The Top Card-Carrying NSDAP Esoterics

Intro

It’s the stuff of legend that Adolf Hitler – and, indeed, the entire Third Reich – was somehow empowered by occult forces. 

According to one line of thought, the architect of German National Socialism was a powerful and shadowy occult adept identified as geopolitical strategist Karl Haushofer.

“Introduced by [Rudolf] Hess” – whom we will meet later – “General Karl Haushofer visited Hitler every day …[when the latter] was confined to prison at Landsberg” following the failed Beer Hall Putsch. Haushofer “spent hours with [Hitler,] expounding his theories …”. And it’s beyond question that Haushofer’s vision heavily influenced his pupil’s autobiographical Mein Kampf.

But, what researchers Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier insist upon, in their eye-popping volume The Morning of the Magicians, is that Haushofer exhibited “another personality – as a disciple of Schopenhauer[,] who had taken up Buddhism, [and as] an admirer of [Jesuit founder] Ignatius de Loyola…”. Haushofer is painted as the mystical mastermind behind Hitler.

Pauwels and Bergier suggest “that it was Haushofer who …chose the swastika as an emblem” for the new movement – the symbol being the ensign of an Aryan savior, as explained in Part 1.

Haushofer was “the magician …[and] secret master” pulling the strings of National Socialism.

Nowadays, it’s fashionable to disparage this as a flight of fancy. Tho… much the same judgment was expressed by an establishment insider, attorney Sidney S. Alderman – during the International Military Tribunal, no less. Colloquially known as the “Nuremberg Trials,” the IMT gave Alderman all the backing of United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson. 

On his own, Pauwels would connect Haushofer to the influential Armenian mystic George Ivanovich “G. I.” Gurdjieff.  

We have mentioned Gurdjieff in passing before – such as in our video “10 Occultist Spies.”

We intend to feature him more prominently in our upcoming “Top Ten 20-Century Occultists.”

Those who fell under his sway – whether through books or personal encounters – include the offbeat “New Age guru” Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, at least one of Tibet’s Dalai Lamas, and – if you believe the stories – the erstwhile Führer.

Naysayers are legion. But it’s worth contemplating the reasons such tales have plausibility – among them being the fact that many influential N.S principals had esoterica on their dossiers. So, in this video, we’ll pick up where we left off in Part 1. And we’ll catalog our top ten (10) occultists who operated within Hitler’s Germany.

Caveats and Disclaimers

Technically, starting around 1933, esoterics began receiving pushback from the government. By 1935, the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP) had laws outlawing Masonic-style secret societies. These enactments – advanced by interior ministers such as Hermann Goering and Wilhelm Frick – negatively affected numerous völkisch neopagans, occultists, and organizations beyond Freemasonry. Orders were enforced by the “Security Service,” or SD, under Reinhard Heydrich. A few key groups – like the often-shocking Thule Society – had officially disbanded years before the crackdown.

Nevertheless, at various times, Germany was rife with occult activity. One of the most colorful of the era’s esoterics was the flamboyant hypnotist who comes in at number ten.

10 — Erik Jan Hanussen

In point of fact, Hanussen’s lasting reputation is partially owed to the Central Intelligence Agency’s principal predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services.

According to O.S.S. psychologist Walter Charles Langer, Adolf Hitler had been instructed in crowd manipulation, hypnotic suggestion, and even “mind control” by an expert “mentalist.” What name did Langer supply in his secret report? Erik Jan Hanussen.

Born Herschel Chaim Steinschneider, Hanussen eventually achieved fame enough to open a successful nightclub, which he named the “Palace of Occultism.” In this personal theater, Hanussen showcased a series of performances blending astrology, clairvoyance, mind-reading, telepathy, and other similar, “paranormal” talents.

Hanussen’s Wikipedia article claims that he was the real-life inspiration for the scheming magician Eduard Abramovich – alias “Eisenheim” – in the 2006 movie, The Illusionist, featuring actors Edward Norton and Jessica Biel.  

Money for Hanussen’s extravagant and egocentric “palace” came from the success of his astrology-based newspaper. The publication garnered wide circulation based upon Hanussen’s renown as a “fortune teller.”

Hanussen was reputed to have predicted the infamous Reichstag Fire of February 27, 1933. Occurring one month into Adolf Hitler’s chancellorship, the event is routinely cited as a milestone in the inception of National Socialism. It also appeared to be an unsettling vindication of the National-Socialist claim that a vast Communist conspiracy had taken root in German soil.

One month after the politically convenient fire, sometime between the late evening of March 24 and the early morning of the twenty-fifth (1933), Hanussen was evidently assassinated. His death followed a brief arrest and interrogation by the Sturmabteilung (SA). This entire episode led many observers to suspect that the Reichstag fire had been an “inside job.” On this version of the story, and owing to his compulsion to wow his audiences with semblant prescience, Hanussen spilled the beans on sensitive plot details and became a liability.

It appears highly likely that Hanussen was running an ambitious “confidence-scam” operation. According to biographers, Hanussen had attempted to make a living as “a society reporter” back in his Vienna days. “During this time he [supposedly] blackmailed wealthy citizens with [the threat of publishing] rumors in tabloids and [he did, in fact, publish] the tricks of a fraudulent clairvoyant…”. This is ironic, since “he later adapted [similar techniques] himself.” 

During the rise of National Socialism, Hanussen maintained profitable “contacts with the SA leadership,” and he was attempting to gain leverage over them “by financing their gambling debts and other [activities], especially [the procurement of] sexual services.” 

In other words, he was something of a 1930s-German version of Jeffrey Epstein. And, like Epstein, Hanussen was not ethnically German. 

And that leads us to note that Hanussen was also part of a little-known – or, at least, seldom-acknowledged – group that we’ll call Jewish (or part-Jewish) National Socialists.

Prominent members of this category include Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch and Three-Star General Helmuth Wilberg.  

One of the more remarkable, a proud descendant of the Jewish philosopher Moses Mendelssohn, was high naval officer Franz Viktor Mendelssohn. A master shipbuilder since World War I, he joined the party in 1934, according to Bryan Mark Rigg. 

Of course, we can’t forget Emil Maurice. Not only was Maurice Adolf Hitler’s first personal chauffeur, but he was also a charter member – and some would say a founder – of the dreaded Schutzstaffel (SS). Staggering!

Lastly, we’ll mention Vice Admiral Bernhard Rogge. “Although he had a Jewish grandfather, Rogge received the …German Blood Certificate …from Hitler, declaring him to be an Aryan.”

For some time during World War II, Rogge was in command of an armed, ex-merchant ship named the Atlantis. And that seems as good as any opportunity to segue into our next figure…

9 — Alfred Rosenberg

Rosenberg had been a refugee from the Bolshevik takeover of Tsarist Russia. 

He became a protégé of Dietrich Eckart and was quickly integrated into Völkisch circles in Germany – including into Rudolf von Sebottendorff’s Thule Society that we surveyed in Part 1.

Officially, Rosenberg had a ponderous and nearly untranslatable title. But, he operated something like the “Führer’s overseer” for education and training in matters relating to intellectual development and worldview reckoning. 

In terms of philosophical outlook, his definitive statement was The Myth of the Twentieth Century – “…the most important Nazi text after Mein Kampf.”

The word “myth” here means “guiding idea” rather than “made-up story.” For Rosenberg, this starting premise has to do with “…the death of Materialism and Individualism” and the anticipated rise of a neopagan Volk.

In this, Rosenberg was shaped by Indian thought, the music of Richard Wagner, and the philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. For this background, see Part 1.

Rosenberg’s political thinking was indebted to the British-born theoretician Houston Stewart Chamberlain who, in 1899, published his pæan to Teutonism, The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century.

Within the pages of Rosenberg’s volume, the author detailed an “occult history” of the Aryan race whose “original home” had been the fabled and ill-fated lost civilization of Atlantis.

Far from the sun-kissed islands of Bimini or the conflict-riddled “Holy Land” of Palestine – two oft-favored locations for the vanished continent – Rosenberg situated Atlantis near the North Pole. This hyperborean focus was seamlessly woven into a tapestry that included the legendary Thule and that explained the symbolism of the “Black Sun.” The latter – found, for instance, as a mosaic in the SS-embellished Castle at Wewelsburg – was a stylized recollection of the arctic summer, when daylight was visible at midnight. 

Along with William Scott-Elliot and numerous others, Rosenberg integrated the story of Atlantis into speculative anthropology. 

But the genesis of this Atlantean mythos owes much to Theosophical foundress, H. P. Blavatsky, whom we profiled in our first installment …

…as well as in “Top 10 Occultists of All Time.”

On this roughly Blavatskian view, “…humankind has evolved through different phases of spiritual growth and intellectual development, each of these being known as a root race. The present state of humanity is broadly identified as the fifth root race. It was preceded by the Atlantean (fourth) and Lemurian (third) root races, both of which were engulfed in cataclysms.” In this picture, “…the blonde-haired blue-eyed race …[descended from the] Atlantean.”

Finally, Rosenberg was noteworthy for his opposition to the Roman Catholic Church. His method, in this, “is a staple of occult literature” – namely, playing up the “theme …that the true religion… has been concealed by an establishment conspiracy.”

Rosenberg lauded “the Albigensians, Waldenses, Cathars, Arnoldists, Stedingers, Huguenots, and reformed Lutherans,” as exemplars. Whoever was vilified as a “Heretic” by the Vatican was eulogized by Rosenberg as a “martyr of free research” and a “hero of Nordic philosophy.”

For Rosenberg, pure expression of volk free thinking was epitomized in people like the thirteenth-century Dominican neoplatonist Meister Eckhart. We have referred to him in several past videos including our deep-dive into “Neoplatonism.”

8 — Rudolf John Gorsleben

A one-time proponent of Ariosophy, he was a member of von Liebenfels’ Order of New Templars. Later, in Munich, he had brief dealings with Dietrich Eckart and Julius Streicher and would ultimately join the Thule Society. 

Gorsleben’s lasting impact – if not memorialization of his name – was guaranteed by his groundbreaking modern translation of the Edda which, he believed, contained the vestiges of an ancient Aryan religion.

Building upon a foundation of esoteric genealogy laid by Guido von List, and continuators like Johannes Balzli, Gorsleben advanced an idiosyncratic etymology of the word “race,” which he leveraged to argue that pure-bred Germans (in particular) had peculiar claims to innate divinity.

Consequently, Gorsleben’s project, aborted by his premature death, became a quest to reawaken latent Aryan “occult powers” by employing a combination of hermetic, Kabbalistic, and magical procedures and genetic segregation. Gorsleben “elaborated upon the wisdom of the runes, mantic sciences, the Edda, and Teutonic astrology.”

Much of this was in line with the professed goals of Madame Blavatsky’s society. And when we get to Heinrich Himmler (in just a few minutes), we’ll see one result of this new Theosophical reading of the Edda. Specifically, it inspired a whole crop of esoteric archaeologists that combed the earth looking for evidence of Aryan prehistory – all under the ægis of the SS.

Believe it or not, a lot of this spirit has been carried over into some “Ancient-Astronaut” and “Ley-Line” investigations and movements as far flung as the New Age and Transhumanism.

7 — Gregor Schwartz-Bostunitsch

This Russian-born writer became estranged from his homeland following the Bolshevik Revolution, on which we hope to have more to say in the future.

Along with Gen. Anton Denikin, Cossack Grigory Semyonov, Baron Pyotr Wrangel, and others, Bostunitsch seems to have been highly placed within “White Russian” resistance movements. 

These were so named because they contrasted with the red symbolism of the Communists.

After fleeing Soviet Russia and its murderous apparatchiki, he traveled – ostensibly, in search of mystical as well as political insight.

At first, Bostunitsch decamped for the Caucasus Mountains, where he met an unknown teacher that the late researcher James Webb identified as the pervasive G. I. Gurdjieff.

For more on him, look for our upcoming video “Top Ten 20th-Century Occultists.”

Later, Bostunitsch made his way to Bulgaria. There, he was received by a circle of Theosophists gathered around Peter Deunov, founder of the Universal White Brotherhood.

Intuitively, there is a parallel to the “Great White Brotherhood” of Madame Blavatsky, the Russian co-founder of the Theosophical Society whom we discussed in Part One.

The basic idea is that a group of perfected entities – known as “Ascended Masters” – guide or control the mundane world from behind the scenes.

Bostunitsch then mixed these ideas with Rudolf Steiner’s “Anthroposophy,” which our peripatetic expatriate discovered while shuttling between Yugoslavia and Germany.

Once in Germany, however, he abandoned the Steiner school – which he (like Dietrich Eckart) came to regard as part of a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy – and embraced Ariosophy instead.

Changing his surname to Schwartz-Bostunitsch, he set up shop with Alfred Rosenberg’s news agency and joined the S.S. in 1944.

From then on, he was much in demand as a lecturer. Given the honorific “Doktor Gregor,” Schwartz-Bostunitsch spoke throughout the Reich on Masonic intrigues.

“In May 1946, his name appeared for the last time on a prisoner list of SS officers compiled by the High Command of the American Armed Forces; this list is in a Moscow archive.” “[H]is eventual fate is unknown.”

6 — Karl Ernst Krafft

Born in Basel, Switzerland in 1939, he was regarded as an expert and insightful graphologist. “Graphology” refers to the purported determination of personality and psychological traits by scrutinizing the way a subject writes his or her letters.

This has been alluded to or mentioned in such films as Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, from 2011, and David Fincher’s Zodiac, of 2007. 

In Donnie Darko, the 2001 cult classic by James “Richard” Kelly, police investigators work with school administrators to try to identify a vandal using a clumsy handwriting-analysis technique.

Elements of this were also present in the horrifying, 1888 Jack-the-Ripper serial-murder case, which had been overseen by then-commissioner Sir Charles Warren. 

In a future video, we may turn our attention to some little-considered aspects of that momentous occurrence. It’s of interest for numerous reasons, not least of which was the fact that Warren was a high-ranking Freemason and  later a principal founder of the significant Quatuor Coronati “research lodge” in London. 

Even earlier, starting in 1867, Warren secretly explored the catacombs beneath the Jerusalem Temple Mount – a site that is increasingly portentous in the latest Arab-Israeli “war.”

In any case, Karl Krafft’s primary field was astrology. And, according to his admirers, he “had already proved himself a talented seer” when “[o]n November 2, 1939, he …predicted [imminent] mortal danger for [Adolf] Hitler…”.

Indeed, less than a week later, “[o]n November 8, Hitler spoke at a rally commemorating the anniversary of the Munich Beer Hall Putsch.” Moments after leaving the main podium, a bomb went off, devastating the stage and caving in the building’s superstructure. The explosion maimed over sixty people, and killed eight bystanders.

The first instinct of German police was to suspect Krafft’s involvement in what was obviously a well-planned, but failed, assassination attempt.

By successfully projecting his innocence, Krafft simultaneously testified to his psychic powers. He was straightaway promoted to a psy-op campaign termed “…the Nostradamus Project.”

“Nostradamus,” of course, was the almost “…magical pseudonym…” of the sixteenth-century French-born astrologer and prognosticator, Michel de Nostre Dame… . Nostradamus …published his famous predictive writings, The Centuries, in 1555.” He recorded alleged prophecies in nearly one thousand cryptic, four-line poems known as “Quatrains.” 

According to numerous Western sources: “…Nostradamus at times seems to have had a remarkable foresight into the events of the French Revolution, and some have discerned references in his writings to [Italian leader Benito] Mussolini and [Adolf] Hitler.”

Krafft’s job was to interpret the famous French seer’s prognostications with a “pro-Nazi slant”. To illustrate, Krafft associated Hitler with Nostradamus’s “grand duke of Armenia”.

Krafft was also said to have originated the “notion that Nostradamus …predicted the German blitzkrieg [‘lightning war’] that resulted in the 1940 occupation of Paris…”.

Meanwhile, of course, “Allied” analysts were busy vilifying Hitler with other of Nostradamus’s passages. In Britain, this included MI5 operative and astrologer Louis de Wohl, psych-warfare propagandist Sefton Delmer, and Naval Intelligence agent (and later James-Bond creator) Ian Fleming. A well-known illustration of their efforts is the passage which “predicts” that Hitler was the “Western-European …child …seduce[d] a great many people.” 

Finally, we’ll note that some say Hitler himself displayed signs of clairvoyance. According to Pauwels and Bergier, “Hitler predicted exactly the date of the entry of his troops into Paris… When he decided to reoccupy the Rhineland in 1935, all the experts in Europe, including the Germans, were convinced that France and England would resist. Hitler predicted that they would not. He also [supposedly] announced [in advance] the date of the death of [four-term American President Franklin D.] Roosevelt.”

Perhaps it was more than a coincidence that “one of the most heavily annotated books in Adolf Hitler’s personal library” was Ernst Schertel’s 1923 Magic: History, Theory and Practice. 

Interlude

A number of second-stringers didn’t quite rate a full treatment, here. But, in passing, we’ll mention Count Karl Friedrich Dürckheim-Montmartin. Sometimes referred to in print as Karlfried Graf Dürckheim, he was a strident anti-Communist who, after World War II, converted to an idiosyncratic combination of Jungian “depth psychology” and Zen Buddhism. 

Although largely forgotten today, Eugen Herrigel operated on a similar wavelength. In fact, Herrigel’s posthumously published “The Zen Way,” was supposedly translated into English by Alan Watts, who helped popularize and Westernize versions of Eastern religion.

Of more importance was Wilhelm Theodor H. Wulff, whose 1968 book, published in English as the Zodiac and Swastika, purported to describe How Astrology Guided Hitler’s Germany.

One episode reported by Wulff was the Reich’s alleged attempt to locate ousted Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini in 1943. 

Foreign-intelligence chief Walter Schellenberg was said to have put a number of esoterics on the trail of Il Duce. These included Wilhelm Gutberlet and Ludwig Straniak, …

…who are remembered for their prowess in the far-out field of “dowsing.” This is a form of divination in which the practitioner uses “[a] forked rod, or branch of a tree, which in the hands of certain people is said to indicate, by means of spasmodic movements of varying intensity, the presence of…” some sought-after item. Usually, this would be “…water and minerals underground.” But, in our case (it would seem), the target was Mussolini, who was recovered by the Luftwaffe working with an SS contingent under Otto Skorzeny.

5 — Ignaz Trebitsch-Lincoln

A Hungarian-born intriguer, his uncanny ability to disguise and reinvent himself was matched only by his seemingly endless capacity for charming political heavy hitters. 

Reportedly, at one time or other, he had ingratiated himself with British Prime Minister David Lloyd George; American Federal Bureau of Investigation chieftain, J. Edgar Hoover; and German SS frontman, Heinrich Himmler.

Without question, Trebitsch-Lincoln is one of, if not the strangest characters on our list. Raised Jewish, he converted to Christianity and reportedly became a missionary in Canada.

Through various ecclesiastical channels in Anglicanism, he ended up in Britain where, in 1910, he managed to get elected to Parliament. 

After bouncing amongst Germany, the Netherlands, and Romania, he “set himself up as a double (or rather a triple) agent during World War I,” according to his biographer Bernard Wasserstein.

A tangle of schemes followed, during which he had a run-in with the American Pinkertons – who had apparently been hired by the British Crown to apprehend him.

The Pinkertons, of course, were – and indeed, through a jumble of mergers and acquisitions, remain – a combination detective agency and security-guard force. Named after their founder, Allan J. Pinkerton, they rose to prominence during the fratricidal fray known as the “Civil War” when Pinkerton inveigled himself into upper-level Union circles. During the “Reconstruction Era,” his private army enforced corporate diktats when they were hired as “strikebreakers.”

The Pinkertons succeeded in locating Trebitsch-Lincoln and dragged him back to His Majesty’s Prison in Parkhurst, on the Isle of Wight. The commotion just previewed the coming attractions.

Trebitsch-Lincoln allegedly knew Dietrich Eckart, an early founder of the German Workers Party. 

But, during the 1920s, he was mostly associated with a right-leaning German revolutionary government under Wolfgang Kapp. In fact, Trebitsch-Lincoln became the movement’s press secretary during its brief seizure of power in Berlin.

At this stage, he was agitating in favor of restoring monarchies all over Europe. These pro-royalists – including Waldemar Pabst – formed a loosely knit group referred to as the “White International.” The name was presumably intended to mark a contrast with the Communist International (Comintern) which was sometimes designated the “Red International.”

Trebitsch-Lincoln shuffled over to the island country of Sri Lanka (Ceylon), where he studied Buddhism. Incredibly, he underwent ordination (upasampadā) to become a monk. 

Then, exploiting a network of Chinese warlords, Trebitsch-Lincoln finagled his way into the orbit of Tibetan Buddhists. Upon the death of the Thirteenth Dalai Lama in 1933, he declared himself to be the new Dalai Lama! Unsurprisingly, the outlandish claim received virtually no support in Tibet. However, his profession may have been championed in some Japanese circles – though, this was probably for geopolitical (rather than theological) reasons. 

Incidentally, Russian occultist-painter Nicholas Roerich was also posing as a Dalai Lama. 

Stranger still, the current – and supposedly bona fide – 14th Dalai Lama has been criticized for maintaining too cozy relationships with various National Socialists. For instance, “…he … cultivated friendly contacts with people such as the ex-SS [man] Bruno Beger… Beger …[was] a member of the …SS-Tibet Expedition organized by …in 1938/1939 whose primary goal was to find traces of an ancient, lost Indo-[Aryan] religion in the Himalayas. Some occult leaders in the SS were convinced that Tibetan Lamas are the key holders of these Indo-[Aryan] mysteries.”

The Dalai Lama was also friends with “…Heinrich Harrer, author of Seven Years in Tibet (a chronicle of his experiences with the Dalai Lama over seven years prior to his exile to India).”

In fact, Seven Years in Tibet was tackled by French film director Jean-Jacques Annand, with no less than Hollywood sex symbol Brad Pitt cast as the SS explorer, Harrer, himself. 

For a mention of the erotically infused Tibetan Kalachakra Tantra, see “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

From Tibet, the already convoluted story takes a number of dizzying additional turns – with Trebitsch-Lincoln landing in Shanghai to begin his own monastery. 

Then operating as a British-instituted “International Settlement,” Shanghai was still reeling from the fallout of the Opium Wars. 

As the prospect of a second world war became ever likelier, Trebitsch-Lincoln is said to have been busy playing the Chinese and Japanese against one another. Coincidentally or not, Trebitsch-Lincoln’s time there seems to overlap with the so-called “January 28 Incident,” a Chinese-Japanese skirmish that led, months later, to the assassination of Japan’s premier.

For his final act, Trebitsch-Lincoln allied himself with Josef Meisinger, the Gestapo’s liaison to Tokyo. What he did in this capacity is not altogether clear. However, it’s worth recalling that Trebitsch-Lincoln fell within that subset of occultists who believed in, and advocated a search for, the group of legendary Tibetan adepts known as the “Ascended Masters.”

These enthusiasts included G. I. Gurdjieff and the above-named Roerich, both of whom we mentioned in our video “10 Occultists Who Were Accused Spies.”

Of course, as mentioned above, one of the principal theorists of this Great-White-Brotherhood mythos was H. P. Blavatsky, whom we profiled in Part 1.

The Stoic philosopher Seneca attributed to Aristotle the observation: “There is no great genius without a touch of madness.” One may be forgiven for suspecting that this might have applied to Trebitsch-Lincoln. Indeed, it may also apply to our next entrant.

4 — Karl Maria Wiligut

The details of his life before 1933 are sketchy. He appears to have been born into a fairly well-connected family of career military men – a tradition continued by Karl.

While stationed with the Austro-Hungarian infantry in Moravia around 1900, Wiligut encountered “a curious prehistoric [standing stone] called the Rabenstein… As a result, he began reading the books of Guido von List, …[the] founder of …Ariosophy ….”. [Silent slide follows.]

Wiligut then moved to Vienna, where he connected with Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels’s Order of New Templars, or O.N.T. We profiled both List and von Liebenfels in Part 1.

The O.N.T. became Wiligut’s entrée into Vienna’s wider occult world. That world included the Austrian branch of Madame H. P. Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society, which had been dominated by the little-remembered esoteric Friedrich Eckstein. Once again, we direct viewers back to Part 1, where we profile both Blavatsky and Eckstein. 

At some point in all this, presumably during the 1920s, Wiligut was exposed to British occultist Violet Mary Firth.

Otherwise known as “Dion Fortune,” she will be a fixture in our upcoming “Top Ten 20th-Century Occultists.”

For now, we’ll note that her idiosyncratic esotericism (Anglo-centric though it may have been), was informed by racial theorizing. Fortune combined the legend of lost Atlantis with the voluminous lore associated with Britain’s mythical King Arthur.

All this must have resonated in Vienna as well, not least because Eckstein’s circle was partial to Wagnerian opera. In 1882, Wagner premiered Parsifal at his Bayreuth Festival Theatre. The production was based upon thirteenth-century German poet Wolfram von Eschenbach’s medieval romance Parzival and centered around the Knight Percival’s search for the Holy Grail.

Wiligut was naturally focused upon Germanic mythology. Accordingly, he joined Gorsleben’s Edda Society, which we named above.

Where Wiligut really distinguished himself, however, was as a clairvoyant. He complemented book learning with his own, alleged ancient “ancestral memory.” This amounted to numerous “…tales of prehistoric Aryan glory…”. SS-Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler – whom we will discuss in a moment – is said to have much “enjoyed listening to [Wiligut].” And that endorsement sufficed to launch Wiligut into the stratosphere.  

But his most “‘spectacular contribution’ …to National Socialist Germany was the development of the Wewelsburg as the castle and ceremonial center of the SS order. Acquired by the SS in 1934, …the castle …[was conceptualized by] Wiligut … as the ‘center of the world,’ an Ariosophic ‘Vatican’ and [an] occult academy.”

This legacy was passed to more recent figures such as Temple of Set founder, Michael A. Aquino. The now-retired lieutenant colonel, who had reportedly worked in psychological-warfare operations – or “PsyOps” – for the U.S. Army, inaugurated his “Order of the Trapezoid following a magical working …performed at the Castle of Wewelsburg in 1982.”

Contemporary neopagan and Odinist, Stephen Flowers – known for his studies on runology – joined Aquino’s group in 1984. For some background information, once again see Part 1.

Another “conspicuous [example]” of a person “who sympathize[d] with some aspect of National Socialist imagery or ideology …is Anton [LaVey]…,” whom we ranked in “Top 10 Occultists.”

LaVey introduced the German-language text of his “…ritual …‘The Electrical Preludes’… published in his 1972 work The Satanic Rituals” with an alleged quote from Dietrich Eckart. 

Eckart himself was a mystic in the mold of Jacob Böhme and Angelus Silesius – both of whom owed much to Medieval Neoplatonists Meister Eckhart, Johannes Tauler, and Heinrich Suso.

But, as we tune off the darker, LaVeyan frequency, we’ll note that not all active, World-War-II-era German occultists were National Socialists. One example was runologist Friedrich Bernhard Marby, who was supposedly jailed under the Third Reich.

Another case in point: mystic and renegade Armanist Siegfried Adolf Kummer. His views evidently opposed those of the high-ranking, SS occultist known as “Himmler’s Rapustin,” whom we will meet later. The ensuing antipathy landed Kummer in the clink as well.

Then there’s Eugen Grosche. Better known as “Gregor A. Gregorius,” he founded the “Thelemic” Fraternitatis Saturni, or “Brotherhood of Saturn.”

This Brotherhood was continued by the likes of the now-deceased neo-pagan and runologist Karl Spiesberger.

Possibly, his runology competed with that endorsed by Adolf Schleipfer, who resurrected the Guido von List Society and the Armanic Order.

3 — Rudolf Hess

Adolf Hitler’s longtime deputy had actually been born in the esoterically saturated land of Egypt.

Like Hitler himself, Hess was “[a] vegetarian.” In this, both men were evidently influenced by Pythagoras, who advocated the dietary practice – as mentioned in our dedicated video.

To situate Pythagoras among the greatest esoterics of all time, see “Top 10 Occultists.”

As explained in Part 1 of our study, this orientation toward vegetarianism was funneled to Ariosophists via Richard Wagner and his occult-minded admirer Friedrich Eckstein.

One of the clearest-cut examples of a high-ranking Nationl-Socialist occultist, Hess was partial to astrology, Ariosophy, herbalism, hermeticism, and even magic.

However, unlike many others of similar temperament – including even Thule Society founder Rudolf von Sebottendorff – Hess viewed himself as an implacable enemy of Freemasonry. 

This had partly to do with the fact that, historically, early founders of institutional Masonry associated with various Jewish rabbis (such as Judah Templo) and drew upon Kabbalistic symbols. (See, the similarity between the “Star of David” and the Compass and Square.) 

This means that the occult landscape became, in essence, a spiritual battleground on which you had German neopagans facing off against Kabbalistic “sex magicians.”

And this wasn’t confined to Germany. According to Ordo Templi Orientis occultist and Wiccan founder Gerald Gardner, whom we profiled in “Top 10 Occultists of All Time,” …

… “[T]he [witch] covens of Great Britain [allegedly] met on the coast of England in 1940 …[and] raised …an intense agglomeration of spiritual energy …[called] the ‘burning brand’ – …and supposedly beamed a mental message to the führer: ‘You cannot come. You cannot cross the sea.’” Some sources refer to this as “Operation Cone of Power.”

Another version of what is likely the same story has it that the forest ritual was – in fact – a psy-op, hatched by Ian Fleming and Cecil Williamson and codenamed “Operation Mistletoe.” It’s not for nothing the world of spycraft has been called a wilderness of mirrors.

Of course, there were people who seemed to cross these battle lines. For instance, there’s the curious esoteric writer Karl Hermann Heise (1872-1939). At one time or other, Heise was involved with Guido von List’s Ariosophy and runology, Rudolf Steiner’s Anthroposophy, and Ernst Otto Hænisch’s quirky and eclectic cult known as “Mazdaznan.” 

Although he was a stalwart anti-Mason, Heise nevertheless appears to have been affiliated with Leopold Engel and Theodor Reuss in their reconstituted Illuminati Order. Reuss, of course, went on to head the sex-magically-obsessed Ordo Templi Orientis.

But the ambiguities may cut even deeper. Peter Levenda asserts that the structure of List’s High Armanen Order was partially inspired by the Kabbalistic “Tree of Life.”

Of course, in List’s view, the Kabbalah was “erroneously thought to represent a Jewish mystical tradition.” List held that Armanism had been the wellspring of the relevant beliefs. 

Rudolf Gorsleben’s Edda Society, eventually taken over by occultist and Wiligut-disciple Werner von Bülow (1870–1947), seems likewise to have explored ostensibly Kabbalistic sigils, such as the hexagram known variously as the “Seal of Solomon” or the “Shield of David.”

On the other hand, German mythology itself is replete with “tree” symbolism. For example, there’s Yggdrasil, the “World Tree,” mentioned by Hollywood’s Marvel Cinematic Universe in movies such as Captain America: The First Avenger and Thor, both released in 2011.

Also keep in mind that, to many of these theorists, the events of the Bible (insofar as they were considered factual at all) were construed as having taken place in Germany. For example, to the previously discussed Wiligut, Jesus Christ was really an Irminist deity named Krist.

Mutatis mutandis, all this was not too dissimilar from the views of journalist William Comyns Beaumont who believed that the “…events …of the Bible …actually took place …in Britain”! 

In List’s case, knowledge of the Kabbalah may have been mediated from the British-based Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn via William Wynn Westcott and Franz Hartmann. 

And, remember, in the early twentieth century, the Golden Dawn said it was the English branch of a German Secret Society! Golden Dawn founders Samuel Liddell “MacGregor” Mathers and William Wynn Westcott claimed that their order was chartered by a mysterious – and possibly fictitious – Rosicrucian adept. Allegedly the lovechild of ousted Bavarian King Ludwig I, this adept – supposedly named Anna Sprengel – tied the British magicians to German occultism.

Similar things are said about a certain American college fraternity headquartered at Yale Univ. Some suggest that “…Skull and Bones [just is] the Yale Chapter of a German society.” 

Recall that: “From 1831 to 1832, [Skull-and-Bones founder William Huntington] Russell studied in Germany. It has been suggested [that] while there, he was initiated into a German society that inspired Skull and Bones. …[Of course, t]he [original] German ‘Illuminati’ was outlawed …by an edict of the Bavarian government in 1785 and it is assumed [by those suspect this wasn’t the end of the story] that they then became a truly secretive underground organization” after that. Although it’s anyone’s guess whether Skull and Bones is literally a continuation of the Bavarian Illuminati, this much is clear. The U.S. was periodically on its guard against Freemasonry. 

This was no truer, perhaps, than in the aftermath of the 1826 William Morgan Affair. 

As discussed in “Presidents & Secret Societies,” William Morgan was kidnapped and believed murdered by Freemasons for exposing the secrets of their order. The episode prompted the creation of the Anti-Masonic political party – the first major “third party” of note in U.S. history. 

Similarly, “[i]n 1939, on the eve of World War II,” Rudolf Hess – along with other N.S. functionaries – worried “that the Third Reich was threatened by a sinister Judeo-Masonic conspiracy, which …was fomenting the imminent conflict.”

This was elaborated upon in 1943 by French film director Maurice Remy in his sensational Forces Occultes. The story follows the activities of an intrepid “young Frenchman who infiltrates the brotherhood to expose its role in starting the war.” We’ll have more in a future video. Look for “Ten 20th-Century Mystery Men” in which we’ll name a little-known behind-the-scenes operator who stands at ground level for the contemporary “Traditional-Catholic” movement.

Speculations abound regarding Hess’s possible esoteric connexions. As discussed in our first segment, one suggestion had it that he came out of alchemist R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz’s orbit. 

To hear others tell it, Hess may have covertly followed the precepts of Aleister Crowley. The suspicion was that Theosophist and Ordo Templi Orientis acolyte Martha Küntzel, in the circle of Franz Hartmann, might have introduced Hess to the “Great Beast’s” quasi-religion of Thelema.

Hess was also a known disciple of geopolitician Karl Haushofer, whom we mentioned above. If the more lurid accounts of Haushofer have any truth, they would imply that Hess was one of the high-level operators in the über-secret Thule Society.

Regardless of the truth of these conjectures, “…Hitler’s deputy Rudolf Hess” – along with Heinrich Himmler, whom we will consider momentarily – are both “said to have consulted with …astrologer[s] before making important decisions…”.

Of course, they weren’t the only world leaders who were enamored with esoteric arts. Two-time British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill was initiated into an order of Druids in 1908. [2^nd img]

And four-term United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt had so many secret-society affiliations we dedicated a portion of an entire video sketching some of them.

On the Russian mystic Nicholas Roerich, who was connected to FDR through 33rd U.S. vice president – the Iowan Theosophist Henry Agard Wallace – see “10 Occultist Spies.”

Four decades after WWII, Ronald Reagen famously – or, infamously, as it were – arranged his presidential schedule according to the advice of his astrologers (partly at the behest of his wife). 

For more on this, look for our forthcoming presentation “10 Celebrity Astrologers.”

In Hess’s case, astrological devotion had a particularly dramatic attestation. I’m thinking of his “planned [personal] …secret mission” for which he allegedly depended on occult counselors.

“On May 10, 1941, Hess [allegedly] flew alone to Scotland, [ostensibly] hoping to forge an accord between the Germans and their fellow Aryans in Great Britain.” 

The story goes that “[t]he mission failed miserably…” and, after 1966, Hess ended up in virtual solitary confinement for decades until he supposedly ended his own life in 1987.

Or… did he? 

Among the people to raise doubts about this account is a man described by “Big Five” Publishing giant HarperCollins as a “surgeon and forensic expert of international repute.”

According to W. Hugh Thomas, writing in his book The Murder of Rudolf Hess, the man long incarcerated in Spandau had not been Hess, but a double.

These days, the Google-approved view is that various DNA tests have put paid to this worry.

Whether this is so or not, we’ve no idea. We can’t comment on questions about the chain of evidence or about the reliability and trustworthiness of the testing procedures. But, it’s curious to us that these press releases are seldom (if ever) cross-checked with numerous mainstream admissions about widespread distortions – or outright fabrications – of genetic-test results. In the words of one U.S. attorney and “forensic pathology expert”: “In the United States[,] we take science as gospel. …The public perception is that faking science is rare. The truth is[,] it happens all the time.”

This isn’t even to note, additionally, that if facial characteristics are determined by our genetics, then it follows (fairly trivially) that two people with similar appearance will have genetic overlap – regardless of family relationship. 

One-time Spandau commandant, Col. Eugene K. Bird, advanced a different hypothesis. In Bird’s view, Prisoner #7 had genuinely been Rudolf Hess. But Bird felt that many mysteries had simply been swept aside regarding Hess’s daring flight. 

Why had Hess been attempting to meet with Royal Air Force Commodore Douglas Douglas-Hamilton, 14th Duke of Hamilton? Had Hitler been aware of Hess’s intentions? Had Hess been aware of the Fürher’s Operation Barbarossa, an invasion of the Soviet Union carried out one month after Hess’s arrest? Why was Hess being held by himself, presumably at lavish expense, in a fortress designed to hold hundreds?

Significantly, despite their different emphases, Bird and Thomas concurred in supposing that Spandau Prisoner #7 had been murdered. And, of course, all the lingering genetic questions go no distance toward deciding whether an arthritic 93-year-old man with limited range of arm motion could manage to have hanged himself from a window latch using an electrical cord.

2 — Otto Rahn

He was “a medievalist who had made a study of the lost cultures of Provence and Languedoc. [But, above all,] Rahn, who had lately become an officer in the SS, was fascinated with the Holy Grail. He read great significance into the passages from Parzifal in which Wolfram [von Eschenbach] describes the sources of his work,” especially the mysterious poet “Guyot.”

We may focus upon Grail mythology another time. For now, suffice it to say that there have been two main schools of thought on what the Grail is. According to one, owing to 12th-century French Troubadours Chrétien de Troyes and Robert de Boron, the Grail is a cup. 

This view is commonly taken in popular depictions like John Boorman’s 1981 Excalibur and Steven Spielberg’s 1989 Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. Usually, this sort of Grail is identified as the vessel used by Jesus Christ during the last supper and, perhaps, the one used by Joseph of Arimathea to catch Jesus’s blood when He was crucified. Following Eschenbach… 

“…Rahn believed [instead]… that the grail was not a cup but a set of stone or wooden tablets on which the sum of all esoteric knowledge had been inscribed, probably in runic characters.” 

We briefly touched on related “tablet esoterica” in our videos “10 Gold-Making Alchemists,” …

…“Pythagoras,” and

…“The Stone of Destiny.”

The story seems to begin in the Old Testament Book of Genesis, chapter four. In the genealogy given for Adam and Eve’s son Cain, one “Lamech” appears as the father of four children. 

His offspring are said to have originated various primitive arts and sciences. Several extra-biblical traditions suggest that they may have learned these from various fallen angels and that they recorded the particulars on two tablets. These stories may underlie Eschenbach.

In any case, Heinrich “Himmler and at least a few of his colleagues came to believe that the tablets might prove to be the long-lost Book of the Aryans – a pagan ‘Ten Commandments,’ which would support their notion of an Aryan super-race.”

In Parzifal, the Grail Castle – headquarters of the “Fisher King,” Amfortas (or Anfortas) – is referred to as “Munsalvæsche.” The mysterious word permits no definitive translation. But, scholars specializing in the medieval languages of Occitan and Provençal, speculate that it either meant “Wild Mountain” or “Mount of Salvation.”

Rahn identified Munsalvæsche with the old Cathar stronghold “Montségur, in Languedoc.”

Before the Cathars were slaughtered by Catholic, anti-Albigensian crusaders, “four …[knights] escaped …by lowering themselves down the cliff …on ropes and then made off with the grail.”

In this Cathar spirit, Rahn sought the Grail to restore the supposed original form of Christianity. To Rahn, this was a thoroughly Germanic neopaganism in which the truth – or the “Light” – “was [not] represented by …Jesus or Jehovah …but by …the ‘Light-Bearer’ …Lucifer.”

Twice, Himmler allegedly sent “…Rahn to rummage through the ruins of Montségur” in order to find and retrieve this Grail.

“No one can today say with certainty whether or not the grail was ever captured by Nazis. …Otto Rahn committed suicide after returning from Montségur for the second time, and he took to the grave whatever secrets he knew.” 

Of course, Rahn’s mystique persists… not least in the character – Indiana Jones – he is said to have partially inspired.

1 — Heinrich Himmler

The man who served Adolf Hitler as Reichsführer of the much-dreaded Schutzstaffel (“SS”), or “Protection Squad” was also the confluence for many of the occult currents we have surveyed. 

Like Hess, Himmler covered many of the occult bases that were then au courant. His interests ran to astrology, herbalism, hypnosis, runology, spiritualism, and telepathy.

Essentially, he “combined …occult revival with an illuminated nationalism.” So, Himmler was, in a sense, an Idealistic Nationalist. But, for Himmler, National Socialism had nothing to do with Communism – except for being its mortal enemy!

The sense of “socialism” was instead grounded in a “feeling of unity” – arising from shared Nordic-Teutonic ancestry – and it drove toward a thoroughly spiritual society. A more accurate phrase might well have been (something like) Germanic Tribalism.

Like Alfred Rosenberg, Himmler was keyed-in on the wavelength of Ariosophy which, as discussed in Part 1, aimed to resurrect distinctly German forms of neo-paganism.

To this end, Himmler poured the SS out of the mold of the Catholic crusaders. In fact, the SS even bore a resemblance to the much-later Jesuits. Indeed, Adolf Hitler referred to Himmler as “my Ignatius Loyola.” Ignatius of Loyola, of course, had been the principal founder of that order, whose official name is the Society of Jesus and which had been instituted as the militant right arm of the Counter-Reformation.

“In its command structure, secret oaths, and rituals, the SS was fashioned after the knightly religious brotherhoods of medieval Germany.” The SS had its own secret ceremonials and sanctuaries, including one at the previously mentioned Wewelsburg Castle.

And Wewelsburg was only one of a network of castle-sanctuaries belonging to the order. 

A primary vehicle for systematizing his worldview perspective “was the organization known for short as the Deutsches Ahnenerbe, which Himmler made part of the SS.”

Under the auspices of the SS-Ahnenerbe, Himmler conferenced with various esoterics and “orientalists” with an eye toward “construct[ing] …a new Indo-[Aryan] Nazi Religion.”

The Ahnenerbe made documentary films promoting pagan ritualism.

And it undertook archaeological and exploratory expeditions. Himmler’s anthropologists sought confirmation – for example, in artifacts and runes – of root-race Theosophy. 

According to Pauwels and Bergier, it was the Ahnenerbe that had made contact with the “secret masters” of Shambhala – as described in Kalachakra Tantra.

And it was the Ahnenerbe that sought fabled, and supposedly power-infused, objects like the Holy Grail and the Spear of Destiny – if Trevor Ravenscroft is to be believed.

We mentioned the Spear – or “Lance of Longinus” – in our video “10 Unnamed Bible Figures.”

Himmler’s occultism inspired comics such as the Hellboy franchise. As to the legendary Grail, Himmler himself looked for it at the Benedictine monastery of Montserrat near Barcelona, Spain.

The SS chief had been following up on the same lead we previously noted when we discussed Otto Rahn. In Himmler’s estimation, clues regarding the identity of the Grail castle of Munsalvæsche actually led to Montserrat.

As far as we know, Himmler came up empty handed. But the SS-Ahnenerbe’s fascination with magical totems has inspired numerous Hollywood films – including several installments of the Indiana Jones franchise – not least, the inaugural, 1987 blockbuster Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Then there are the intriguing claims of curious, Austrian-born Anthroposphist and homeopath Walter J. Stein. The one-time physician to British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill predicted that “…the true grail would be made manifest in the world as a global form of finance capital.”

Perhaps this is the sub rosa reason for the close connexion between economic powerhouses like the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve System and the ancient art of alchemy.

For more detail and context, see our video “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists.”

Outro –

It would be tempting to say that the conclusion of the Second World War closed the book on the occult themes canvassed herein. But, several factors suggest that this is mistaken. 

A direct descendant – often credited to Heinrich Himmler – is the current often called “Esoteric Hitlerism,” a seminal articulation of which was owed to Maximiani Julia Portaz. Better known as “Savitri Devi,” she associated Germans with Hindus and considered Adolf Hitler to have been an incarnation (or “Avatar”) of the major Indian god Vishnu.

We mentioned Devi, in conjunction with intelligence work, in “10 Occultist Spies.” 

Another mentionable is the Chilean statesman Miguel Serrano. Serrano, who included Swiss psychologist Carl Jung and novelist Hermann Hesse among his associates, created a stream of Esoteric Hitlerism combining ceremonial magic with Kundalini Yoga. 

A tangent line involves Britain’s “royals.” Shortly after abdicating, the man who was briefly King Edward VIII toured N. S. Germany – which, to quote from his Wikipedia article, “…fed rumours that he was a Nazi sympathiser.” 

How wide-spread these “sympathies” might have been is a still largely unexplored question. But it’s been given renewed impetus owing to frontpage images such as (in Jan. 2005) of Prince Harry sporting a Nazi uniform – complete with a Swastika armband.

The possibly illegitimate prince, who is routinely presented by the media as something of a pariah within King Charles’s family, now says that Prince William and Princess Catherine (known as “Kate Middleton”) put him up to the stunt.

One does wonder – especially given The Sun’s revelations, ten years later, that the late Queen Elizabeth II herself may have been introduced to (well …let’s just say) now-politically incorrect beliefs when she was a girl.

When she grew older, Elizabeth was successfully wooed by a dashing scion of the German House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg. Of course, by the time of their marriage in the numerologically interesting year 1947, he was styling himself Prince Philip Mountbatten.  

In the post-war environment, Philip’s three surviving sisters weren’t invited to the ceremony. Two of them had married royals who became members of the National Socialist Party …

…as had Princess Cecilie who died prematurely – with her husband – in a plane crash in 1937. Brother Philip attended her funeral surrounded by “Nazi” regalia, Swastikas, and Storm-Trooper outfits. (Many of these owed their designs to R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz. And, doubtless, many were manufactured by Hugo Boss, as mentioned in Part 1 of our study.) 

We also note that the Greek angle has interesting elements we may develop in a future video. To get started now, see our presentation “10 Mysterious Mediterranean Islands.”

Tie-ins may be discerned from the fact that Prince Philip was born on the Island of Corfu. He maintained a lifelong relationship with the Greek Orthodox Church. This latter fascination was reportedly passed to his son, Charles III. Obviously, British royalty has to display affection for, and involvement in, Anglican Protestantism – specifically, the Church of England. 

Still, Philip and Charles made numerous, mysterious pilgrimages to Holy Mount Athos on the male-only Halkidiki Peninsula. This would be a digression, presently, were it not that, “[d]uring the German occupation of Greece, the [Holy Administration’ governing peninsular affairs] formally asked Adolf Hitler to place the monastic community under his personal protection. Hitler agreed and received the title ‘High Protector of the Holy Mountain’ …from the monks.” Evidently true to his word, Hitler’s safekeeping preserved “The monastic community … [from] significant damage during the war.”   

We’d be negligent if we didn’t acknowledge “Western” appropriation of German engineers and intelligence agents. We’re thinking, of course, of the U.S. Army Counterintelligence Corps’s “Operation Paperclip,” which brought rocket scientist Wernher von Braun (&c.) into America. …possibly with the help of a Central Intelligence Agency asset named Clay Shaw.

There’s also German General Reinhard Gehlen, whose anti-Soviet “Gehlen Organization” fell under the sway of the likes of William Donovan, Allen Dulles, and Walter Bedell Smith. In other words, Gehlen came in at the ground floor of the creation of U.S. Central Intelligence.

We can’t forget Nikolaus “Klaus” Barbie, the former Gestapo chief and interrogation expert who was shielded by the CIA and the CIC and who – among other things – supposedly trained “Death Squads” in South American countries like Bolivia.

The so-called “School of the Americas” institutionalized training “for dictators, torturers and assassins,” as Noam Chomsky has observed in several places.

Apparently, the Israeli spook shop, Mossad, got in on the action by recruiting former Waffen-SS Obersturmbannführer and special-tactics expert Otto Skorzeny.

Finally, there’s the Bush family that produced the ex-Director of Central Intelligence and, later, 41st U.S. President, George Herbert Walker Bush, whom we discussed in “10 Occultist Spies.”

Family patriarch “…Prescott Bush …worked for …[the private investment-banking house] Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), [which] acted as a U.S. base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s…”.

And what rôle was played in this regard by Sosthenes Behn, founder of International Telephone & Telegraph, now known as ITT Inc.? In August 1933, Behn became one of the first American businessmen to visit “the new Chancellor of Germany, Herr Hitler…” – ostensibly on behalf of National City Bank. 

Further details are suggestive – tho, admittedly, inconclusive. One is the oft-alleged complicity of the Bank for International Settlements in “…transferr[ing] …[National Socialist] money to Argentina (and other Latin American countries) via the Vatican.”

Recall that the current “Vatican Bank” (technically euphemized as the Institute for the Works of Religion), founded in 1942, is run by a Board of Superintendents who report – ultimately – to the Pope. And that office, presently, is occupied by a Novus-Ordo Jesuit going by the name “Francis.” Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, he hails from – and was a bishop in – Argentina. 

We won’t even get into Benedict XVI’s conscription into the Hitler Youth as a lad in 1939.

Antony Sutton, writing in the introduction to his 1976 investigation, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, remarked upon the “obvious” need to seriously consider “…the mystical origins” …and the neo-pagan historical roots of Naziism, the Bavarian Illuminati and the Thule Society…”. 

On that note, which throws us back upon our current – and important – topic, look for the future video “10 Precursors to the Illuminati.” And we’ll expand our investigations. So …stay tuned!

[Note: Some hyperlinks herein resolve to Amazon.com in service our our affiliate status. Your much-appreciated purchases assist our publication and research efforts. Thanks!]

Mysterium Coniunctionis: 10 Secret Adepts

“It is the unvarying rule of secret societies that the real authors never show themselves.” So reported 19^th-20^th-century British historian Nesta Helen Webster, who researched “subversive movements” for over two decades.

Esoteric and occult organizations can be curious and obscure enough on their own. But, when they seem to crystallize – and gain momentum – seemingly out of nowhere, or when they turn out to be world-historic in their impact, mysteries ramify.

In this video, I will sketch profiles of ten (10) people who are, for all intents and purposes, ciphers. Yet, their influence – meditated through heirs that are much better known – is nearly incalculable.

Caveats and Disclaimers

There are serious doubts about the lives – and even the existence – of some (or perhaps most) of the individuals here profiled. The video is intended for educational or entertainment purposes, only, and should not be understood as the final word on any of the events or people it discusses. The aim is to provide viewers with informational background and research leads for their own investigations.

Additionally, given the arcane nature of the topic, trying to find a credible way to rank our entrants proved difficult. Therefore, with only one major exception (to be identified in good time), the list has been arranged in more or less chronological order. But, without further ado…

          The Top Ten

             1. The Man Behind Gnosticism: Dositheos

Gnosticism has been a major current in the Western occult tradition.^[1]

We introduced the constellation of ideas, and tried to distinguish it from other terms with which it is >often confused,^[2] in our video “10 Arcane Words.”

>For a crash course – or a refresher – see, also, “Gnosticism Explained in 5 Minutes.”

Those with more interest, and a little more time, may be interested to note that we also explored the erotic fixations of so-called “Spermo-Gnostics” in “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

Because these other materials provide an adequate foundation for the relevant concepts, I won’t spend much energy reinventing the wheel, here. Suffice it to say that Gnosticism was a religious worldview – flourishing around the second century A.D. – that focused on spiritual advancement through the acquisition of hidden knowledge. It combined Christian, Jewish, and pagan elements.^[3]

Here’s the relevant bit. The reputed founder of Gnosticism was the Biblical figure Simon Magus. (He’s

also called “Simon, the Sorcerer,” since magos is a Greco-Roman word for “magician.”^[4])

Simon appears in the New Testament Book of the Acts of the Apostles, where it says (chapter 8, verse 13) that he became a believer in Jesus Christ. Simon observed the apostles Peter and John effecting the reception of the Holy Spirit. Verse 18 explains that Simon “offered them money” for knowledge of the power they possessed.

This episode that was the seminal instance of Simony, which today is defined by Catholic sources as the sin of buying or selling church favors.

In the Bible, Peter immediately rebukes and dismisses Simon.^[5] Thus, our “prototype …heretic and black magician”^[6] began traveling with a Phoenician prostitute, gathering his own disciples who were impressed with his occult prowess.

But, would you believe that the story doesn’t actually stop there? – even if it’s telling often does.

For, at some point, the enigmatic Simon Magus was reputed to have been taught by an even more secretive adept named Dositheos.^[7]

Although Dositheos was reputed to have been a Samaritan,^[8] some legends speak of an Egyptian sojourn, where he – and his disciple, Simon – allegedly acquired fantastic abilities such “as invisibility, levitation, and shape-shifting into …animal” form.^[9]

At least some of our modern knowledge about the obscure Dositheos – who was acquainted with John the Baptist and may have had connexions to Essenism – comes by way of discoveries made in caves at Qumran, an archaeological site in the Palestinian Occupied Territory known as the “West Bank.”^[10]

The Wikipedia article on Dositheos^[11] quotes from the book The Dead Sea Scrolls and Primitive Christianity by the Jesuit Modernist theologian – and later Catholic Cardinal – Jean Daniélou.^[12] As a crypto-political aside, Daniélou was discovered dead in 1974, under suspicious circumstances, in the house of a known prostitute.

But speaking of Dositheos and Simon Magus, the duo’s impact was remarkable. Not only did Simonian >Gnosticism persist for centuries, but later writers such as 19^th-century French occultist Jules Doinel, 19^th-20^th-century British Theosophist G. R. S. Mead, and even the “Great Beast” himself, British magician Aleister Crowley, would resurrect it for their own esoteric purposes.

We got into greater detail on Crowley in “Top 10 Occultists of All Time,” “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults,” and “10 Occultists Who Were Accused Spies.”

             2. The Man Behind Neoplatonism: Ammonius Saccas

Another hugely influential belief system with an ancient pedigree is Neoplatonism.

We introduced this in “10 Arcane Words.”

Most simply characterized as an expanded and mystified variety of the famous Greek philosopher Plato’s Theory of Forms, Neoplatonism – as a contributor to the “core” of Western esotericism – has few rivals. One thinks only, for instance, of Hermeticism or Pythagoreanism, …

…the latter being our focus in the video “Pythagoras.”

Generally speaking, Neoplatonism presents a picture of a world in which true reality is hidden behind (or above) the mundane realm of appearances. In this way, the worldview underwrites practical magic. For consider that, on Neoplatonic assumptions – several of which are echoed in Eastern thought – “…every event in the visible world is the effect of an ‘image,’ that is, of an idea in the unseen world. …[E]verything that happens on earth is only a reproduction, as it were, of an event in a world beyond our sense perception… [S]ages …have access to these ideas …and are …able to intervene decisively in events in the world.”^[13]

I intend to expound on the history and philosophy of Neoplatonism in a future video. But, for now, I’ll just say that there are four names usually listed as being among “the most visible [ancient] Neoplatonists in later esoteric literature.”^[14]

In reverse chronological order, these are the 5^th-century expositor Proclus, the 3^rd-4^th-century magician Iamblichus, the 3^rd-4^th-century codifier Porphyry, and the man usually regarded as the wellspring for the whole enterprise, the innovative, 3^rd-century theorist Plotinus.

However… Plotinus’s speculations didn’t arise in a vacuum. It turns out that he received instruction from a shadowy autodidact by the name of Ammonius Saccas.^[15]

Vanishingly little is known about his personal views. Yet, he is routinely cited for the profound impact he is alleged to have exerted upon Plotinus and, by extension, on the establishment of Neoplatonism.

Ammonius was later claimed as a fellow traveler by adherents of both Christianity and paganism. This presents a puzzle and leads some scholars to suppose that there may have been two thinkers with the same name who were contemporaries.

Of Ammonius’s origins, no one can say for sure. He taught Plotinus in the important city of Alexandria, Egypt which was then under the control of the Roman Empire.

The city had a large Greek population, suggesting that Ammonius Saccas was ethnically Greek.

But, some analysts have observed that his given name, “Ammonius,” contains a Latinized reference to the Egyptian deity, Amun – the primordial god of air. This raises the possibility that he may have been a Copt. (Similar questions surround Plotinus’s background.)

Stranger still, a few have proposed that Ammonius Saccas may actually have been of Indian extraction.

If true, this would help to explain two curious pieces of data. Firstly, Ammonius Saccas had an affinity for Indian thought that he apparently transmitted to his pupil. According to the biographer and systematizer, Porphyry, Plotinus’s decade-long training by Ammonius Saccas primed him “to make acquaintance with the Persian philosophical discipline and that prevailing among the Indians.”^[16]

Secondly, tenets of Neoplatonism are redolent of Vedanta, the dominant stream of philosophical Hinduism which was derived from a collection of sacred texts called the Upanishads.

A core notion of this viewpoint is often (albeit opaquely) articulated as the slogan “Atman is Brahman.” This is to say that all individual souls (Atman) – yours, mine, and everyone else’s – are identical with the ultimate principle of reality (designated Brahman).

There is a striking similarity between this doctrine and the crucial Neoplatonic notion that all reality is an “emanation” of, and seeks to “return to” unity with, the One. Stay tuned for further explorations of these abstractions.

According to academic Arthur Versluis, the traditions of Indian religion and Neoplatonism coalesced in the 19^th-century American Transcendentalist movement – famously associated with American writers Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. It’s interesting to entertain the possibility that this represented a reunion of divergent strands that previously emerged from the same basic source.

             3. The Man Behind Renaissance Magic: Johannes Trithemius

One of the most epochal textbooks on magic theory ever published was the three-volume De Occulta Philosophia, by the 15^th-16^th-century German Kabbalist and Neoplatonist Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa.

We showcased Agrippa twice already. First, he appeared in our video “Top 10 Occultists of All Time,”

…and then again in “10 Occultists Who Were Accused Spies.”

Agrippa was born and received his early education in the German city of Cologne.

This is significant because Cologne had been a stronghold of Medieval Scholasticism, a composite philosophical-theological system expounding Christianity using the logical apparatus of Aristotle.

Within that context, debates still broke out. At Cologne, the majority of the faculty followed the teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas, known as “Thomism.” But a minority of school men opted instead for “Albertism,” a competing system drawn from Aquinas’s most distinguished teacher, Albert the Great (also known by the Latinized version of his name, Albertus Magnus).^[17]

Although Albertism is little-mentioned today, it was (for a time) preserved in Cologne – where Albert had spent time lecturing – by a coterie of scholars devoted to his outlook. A key point, here, is that Albert was regarded as having been sympathetic to both alchemy and astrology.

We touched upon the former in “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists.”^[18]

As for the latter, in his Speculum Astronomiæ (“The Mirror of Astronomy”), published circa 1260, Albertus Magnus had argued that astrological investigations were compatible with Christianity. Much  later, Agrippa read this work and cited it as instrumental on his thinking.

In the 14^th century, Albertism was combined with Neoplatonism by the largely unknown Dominican Berthold of Moosburg (ca. 1300-1361). Thus, Agrippa would have been trained in what is now referred to as the “Cologne Tradition of Neoplatonism.”

Simultaneously, Agrippa mastered – and would also lecture on – humanist-Catholic thinker Johann Reuchlin’s seminal Kabbalistic treatise, De Verbo Mirifico, printed in 1494.^[19] Incidentally, that title roughly translates to “About the Miraculous Word” and is a sustained explication of the alleged magical power of the name “Jesus.”^[20]

Reuchlin had been introduced to Jewish mysticism by the found of so-called “Christian Cabala,” the Italian Renaissance innovator, Pico della Mirandola, whom we will discuss further in a bit.^[21]

It is difficult to overstate Agrippa’s significance. Occult Philosophy was, in effect, the first attempt at a comprehensive encyclopedia of esotericism and magic.^[22] His thesis? “…[T]hat the hermetic texts …and the Kabbalistic writings… were the gateway to true wisdom” and would restore the control of nature to humanity, who had lost it due to the sin of Adam.^[23]

Early 20^th-century English historian Frances Yates relates the opinions of two specialists who believed that Agrippa “and his associates formed some kind of secret society…”.^[24] Incredibly, “[s]ome historians of the origins of Protestantism in Geneva have regarded Agrippa and his circle … ‘as the seed-bed of the reformed faith’.” Of course, “Reformed Christianity” is merely another name for Calvinism, or the branch of Protestantism owing to 16^th-century French theologian John Calvin.

Not only was Agrippa at ground zero for what developed into Calvinism, but he was also operating in humanist circles in England.^[25] This would have placed him in the orbit of the unfortunately named “Oxford Reformers”:^[26] provocative New-Testament translator Desiderius Erasmus, English statesman and Catholic martyr Sir Thomas More, and – particularly – Renaissance standard bearer, John Colet.

And once again, behind Agrippa – the figure who was apparently so pivotal for preparing the ground for momentous religious changes on the continent and the British Isles^[27] – we find a more obscure intriguer lurking in the shadows.

For, before writing his magnum opus, “[i]n 1509-10, Agrippa was in Germany, visiting the learned [Benedictine] abbot [Johannes] Trithemius,” to whom De Occulta Philosophia would be dedicated.^[28]

             4. The Man Behind Trithemius: Pelagius of Majorca

19^th-century French occultist Éliphas Lévi, on whom see “Top 10 Occultists of All Time,” …

…praised Trithemius as having been the most accomplished magician of his era.

Besides Agrippa, Trithemius had at least one other illustrious student. The revolutionary alchemist and medical reformer Paracelsus (born Theophrastus von Hohenheim) – regarded as the Martin “Luther of the Physicians” – “…identified… the famous Cabalist Johannes Trithemius… [as] among his tutors.”^[29]

Additionally, Dr. John Dee, Queen Elizabeth I’s astrologer royal, whom we also ranked one of the occult practitioners with the most enduring legacies.

Dee’s extensive library, one of the world’s largest of his time, contained several of Trithemius’s books on its shelves. This included Trithemius’s the Steganographia (written ca. 1500),^[30] which “contained many numerological and astrological calculations connected with angels as well as instructions on how to summon them, to gain knowledge, and how to send messages over long distances by means of angelic agency.”^[31]

Because of these alleged angelological dealings, Trithemius garnered a reputation as “a demonic magician,”^[32] necromancer, and “sorcerer.”^[33]

Like the mysterious abbot himself, Dee developed a reputation as a sorcerer.

We touched on these cipher texts in “10 Occultists Who Were Accused Spies.”

and De Septem Secundeis (1508), a treatise on astrology and Kabbalistic magic; 

And, as we noted in “10 Occultists Who Were Accused Spies,” Dee may have exploited Trithemian ciphers to send coded messages for the English crown.

Along with his students, Agrippa and Paracelsus, Johannes Trithemius would be cited by the previously named Lévi in his influential Histoire de la magie (1860).

Confidence in his monumental importance for later streams of occultism is inversely proportional to relative uncertainty about the details of his early life and intellectual formation. In various biographical “snippets” readily available online, one finds unfailingly repeated a fairy-tale-like anecdote about Trithemius’s unlikely – and inexplicably swift – ascent. A twenty-year-old Trithemius was supposedly returning home from university when he was caught in a snowstorm. The ferocity of the storm was such that he sought refuge in a Benedictine Abbey. The story goes that he decided to stay there, and – within a year – he was made “Abbot,” or head monk.

Trithemius himself claimed that he had been schooled in various esoteric arts by one “Libanius Gallus,” an otherwise unknown adept. But the autobiographical questions ramify when we learn that Libanius Gallus himself was said – again, by the precocious abbot himself – to merely have been an intermediary between Trithemius and an even more secretive mage.

Allegedly named “Pelagius of Majorca,” after Mallorca, the Spanish island that is one of the top-ten largest in the Mediterranean Sea.

Stay tuned for more on these sorts of crypto-politically magnetic areas.

Some historians, such as Paola Zambelli, have concluded that “both Pelagius and Libanius were fictions invented by our abbot.”[34]

Another possibility is that they are veiled acknowledgements of real people. One thinks, for instance, of the 13^th-century “proto-Cabalist” Ramon Llull who happened to be from Mallorca.

Still, as Michael Hoffman remarks, due to Trithemius’s preposterous account of his own rise and influence, we must assume that the abbot was assisted by a person (or persons) unknown.[35]

Along a similar line, writer Rosemary Guiley states that, early in his own intellectual formation, Trithemius went to Heidelberg – a center of alchemy and occultism – where he became the student of an unknown teacher.”^[36]

             5. The Man Behind ‘Christian Cabala’: Flavius Mithridates

Speaking of Kabbalists, the short-lived Renaissance syncretist, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, exercised an outsized influence on subsequent esotericism – especially in its Neoplatonic incarnations.

His main contributions were twofold. Firstly, particularly via his captivating Oration on the Dignity of Man,^[37] Pico gave expression to his “…magical view of man as master of the created world.”^[38]

Later interpreters understood Pico to have been asserting “…that man is set apart from the rest of creation, and is completely free to form his own nature.”^[39]

This arguably becomes a major component of later philosophies – such as those of Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche – which place an emphasis upon will.

But, it also forms the part of the foundation for various occult currents, such as those involving figures like Éliphas Lévi – according to whom the Pentagram symbolized “[t]he sovereignty of the will…”[40] – and Aleister Crowley, both of whom we surveyed in “Top 10 Occultists.”

Secondly, Pico is credited with introducing the Jewish mystical Kabbalah into Western occultism. This would have a monumental impact. In the first place, it created – right away – the curious amalgam known as “Christian Cabala.”

Of course, predictably, it seems that Pico wasn’t acting on his own hook. Standing behind him were several figures about whom little else is known – beyond their tutelage of the young Italian.

One of them was the noteworthy Jewish Averroist, Elijah Delmedigo. Among other effects, Delmedigo seems to have primed Pico for his interest in an Aristotelianism that was separate from the usual Catholic framework set in place by the great Dominican theologian St. Thomas Aquinas.

Another was Rabbi Yohanan Alemanno, from whom Pico learned the rudiments of Hebrew. Alemanno was also known for his view “…that natural magic was inferior to the Kabbalah, which provides the keys to a ‘divine’ magic.”^[41]

But, it was from one Samuel ben Nassim Bulfarag, alias Guglielmo Raimondo de Moncada, alias Flavius Mithridates, Pico’s tutor in Aramaic, that Pico would learn the most about Kabbalistic secrets.

British Renaissance historian Frances Yates reports that, “[c]hief among …[the Spanish Jews who instructed Pico] was the mysterious character known as Flavius Mithridates who provided Pico with Cabalist manuscripts.”^[42]

In the words of University of California, Los Angeles Professor Brian Copenhaver, “Flavius Mithridates …[was] his [Pico’s] most prolific Jewish informant, [who] translated (and mistranslated) thousands of pages of Kabbalah into Latin for him.”^[43]

Copenhaver’s aside raises questions about Flavius’s honesty. A commentator (of unknown reliability) introduces a record of one of Flavius’s speeches, delivered on Good Friday in front of the pope no less, by saying that – although he “dazzled the clerics” with his linguistic abilities – he fabricated evidence in the manner of “[a] clever charlatan.”^[44]

As an added layer of intrigue, the Encyclopædia Judaica observes that, in Rome, Flavius had once been “…under the patronage of Giovanni Battista Cibo, bishop of Molfetta, [who] later [became] Pope Innocent VIII.”[45]

Yates draws attention to the high strangeness of the relationship between Pico and Flavius,[46] stating that the latter “…encouraged Pico in the Christian interpretation of Cabala, even to the point of inserting into the texts interpolations of his own pointing in a Christian direction.”^[47]

Yates candidly confesses her own astonishment, asking: “What can have been Flavius’s motive in thus encouraging and directing Pico towards his momentous adoption of Cabala into Christianity…[?]”^[48]

             6. The Man Behind Renaissance Neoplatonism: Elissæus

Similar weirdness also surrounds the earlier, 14^th-15^th-c. Constantinopolitan scholar Gemistos Pletho (circa 1355-1452). He was a well-connected, Byzantine Greek who rejected Eastern Orthodoxy and advocated a return to paganism – ostensibly combined with a Neoplatonic form of Christianity.

Pletho – sometimes alternatively called Plethon – was a major catalyst for Italian Renaissance interest in Plato.^[49] First of all, he was a celebrated participant in the Council of Ferrara-Florence – held over almost a twenty-year period from 1431 to 1449. The council was called to try to undo the Great Schism of 1054. Also called the “East-West Schism,” you’ll recall that this separated Christianity into Eastern Orthodoxy, on the one hand, and Roman Catholicism, on the other.

Secondly, Pletho gave numerous, well-attended lectures “On the Difference Between Aristotle and Plato,” some of which were apparently heard by Florentine banker Cosimo de’Medici.

De’Medici proceeded to establish a Platonic Academy in Florence. Subsequently, he funded the research-and-translation projects of Italian priest-scholar Marsilio Ficino. Ficino, along with the previously mentioned Pico della Mirandola, would basically open wide the doors for mysticism, magic, and revived Neoplatonism in the Catholic Church.

In fact, Pletho arguably paved the way for Pico.

And, wouldn’t you know it? According to Pletho’s dogged ideological adversary, Georgios Scholarios (ca. 1400-1473), a man who would later become Patriarch of Constantinople under the name Gennadios II, some of Pletho’s ideas had been suggested to him by a Kabbalist named Elissæus.^[50]

Of course, the allegations, while provocative, are far from historically certain. Nevertheless, if true, they would mean that two major esoterically oriented streams – Kabbalism and Neoplatonism – were introduced into Western Christianity partially under Rabbinic superintendence.

             7. The Men Behind Cagliostro (I): Altotas

Fast-forwarding to the Enlightenment, Count Alessandro di Cagliostro, allegedly born with the more modest name Giuseppe Balsamo was an 18^th-century Sicilian-Jewish adventurer and Hermeticist.

We covered Cagliostro, who was recently incorporated into the Dr. Strange story line in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, in our video titled “Top 10 Occultists of All Time,” where we noted his institution of a so-called “Egyptian” variety of Freemasonry with Kabbalistic-sorcerous overtones.

“Some accounts suggest that Cagliostro” – who was allegedly trained in sex magic by an adept whose identity will be disclosed in a few minutes – “forced his wife to sell sexual favors in order to augment his income.”[51]

According to his critics, he was a swindler who gallivanted about Europe engaging in confidence scams and evading his creditors. That is… until he ran afoul of the Roman Inquisition – allegedly trying to found a lodge of the “Brotherhood” right in the Vatican’s backyard – and, for his efforts, was imprisoned in the Castel Sant’Angelo.

Viewers of Ron Howard’s 2006 film, Angels and Demons – Dan Brown’s sequel to the wildly successful The Da Vinci Code – will recognize the imposing, cylindrical mausoleum from an exciting scene as the movie builds toward its climax.

In any case, some say that Cagliostro was eventually moved to the Fortress of San Leo, where he died.

But legends suggest that Cagliostro possessed coveted secrets for the attainment of limitless wealth and miraculously long life – if not immortality.

For more information on these fabled goals of alchemy, see “Top 10 GOLD-MAKING Alchemists.”

No prison could hold a man so supernaturally empowered as Cagliostro. Or… so some say. Therefore, rumors of his magical escape and subsequent reappearances gained currency in esoteric circles.

From where – or who – had he acquired his arcane knowledge?

According to one persistent account, young Guiseppe Balsamo had served as famulus to a mysterious Greek adept named Altotas.^[52]

Versions of the story differ slightly. Either the future Count Cagliostro had apprenticed with Altotas on the Island of Malta, or, to advance their learning, the two had journeyed to Malta together.

Malta, of course, was the headquarters for one of the Catholic Church’s oldest military-religious orders. Originally founded as the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, otherwise known as the Hospitallers, a string of defeats prompted their periodic relocation. First they ended up on the island of Cyprus, then Rhodes, and – finally – Malta.

Supposedly, Altotas was so connected that he was able to effect Cagliostro’s introduction to the Grand Master of that august organization, into which our mysterious count claimed to have been initiated.

What happened to Altotas after this, no one seems to have discovered. He simply receded into the background while his pupil proceeded to revolutionize the ritualism of Masonry. Unless, well… hold that thought.

             8. The Men Behind Cagliostro (II): Comte de Saint-Germain

Cagliostro is perhaps the best-known of a number of 18^th-century adventurers who were able – at least for a short time – to capitalize on the venality of European nobles.

Among this group, also, were the prodigious “lover” Giacomo Casanova, and the curious Comte de Saint-Germain.

In fact, Saint-Germain is often said to have initiated Cagliostro into some form of Illuminism. “Illuminism” is a somewhat opaque synonym for Enlightenment. During the heyday of the intellectual movement by that name, which occurred roughly in late-17^th and 18^th centuries, there was an exaltation of the powers of the human mind. This illumination could take the form of a Gnostic-like “awakening” precipitated by contact with some tantalizing bits of “hidden knowledge” – …

…as we have covered in out several videos on Gnosticism.

Or, Illuminism could depend, instead, on an exaggerated confidence in human brain power and ingenuity. This “rationalism” in a broad sense was typical of philosophers of the period, regardless of whether they favored a priori argumentation, as was pioneered by René Descartes and carried on by such thinkers as Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,

…or whether they leaned more heavily on a posteriori, empirical methodology, as did John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume.[53]

The difficulty with a figure like the Comte is situating him along this continuum. In the words of Antoine Faivre, men like Saint-Germain were “expert in exploiting the taste for the marvelous…” that prevailed in their age.^[54] The consensus Ivory-Tower view seems to be something like this: Saint-Germain used early developments in science, to dazzle the mob and pretend spiritual Enlightenment.[55]

Were we previously to have catalogued the top eleven occultists, instead of ten, he would have contended for extra spot.

And, given rumors that he was an agent in the service of Prussian ruler Frederick the Great, we could have featured him in “10 Occultists who Were Accused Spies.”

Saint-Germain’s pedigree is as debated as other aspects of his life. At various times, and by diverse observers, he has been labeled a Hungarian prince or the fabled “Wandering Jew” – and quite a few things in between.

A preposterous array of “past lives” have been assigned to Saint-Germain – whether by popular acclaim or by retelling of his own autobiographical declarations. These include: Joseph, the human father or (depending on the source) step-father of Jesus Christ; the 13^th-century proto-scientist Roger Bacon; and the 16^th-17^th-century English essayist and statesman, Sir Francis Bacon…

…who we have mentioned before.

Saint-Germain was a reputed Rosicrucian and, like Cagliostro, maintained numerous connexions to Freemasonry.

Perhaps more than his contemporaries, Saint-Germain seemed to become larger than life in the years following his alleged death around 1784 or 1785. I say “alleged death” since stories of “sightings” of the miracle-worker pile up in a manner similar to those about Elvis Presley.

A year after his reported demise, Saint-Germain was supposedly elected by Masons – including the groundbreaking hypnotist, Franz Anton Mesmer – to represent their order at an upcoming convention.

Subsequently, he was also supposedly seen retiring to Tibet, which seems to have given rise to – or at least encouraged – the belief that Saint-Germain had joined the ranks of an exalted class of mystics variously designated “Ascended Masters” or Mahatmas.

Indeed, Helena P. Blavatsky, whom we covered in “Top 10 Occultists,” …

…principal founder (in 1875) of the Theosophical Society, which we discussed in “10 Arcane Words,” …

…references Saint-Germain along with other supposed Masters – Morya and Koothoomi – as collectively directing earth’s affairs behind the scenes as the “Great White Brotherhood.”

Madame Blavatsky’s intellectual and spiritual heirs, including Annie Besant and Charles Webster Leadbeater, claimed to have had dealings with the Count.

Saint-Germain’s influence extends even further. Several key “New Agers” professed the Comte’s involvement in their enterprises. For instance, Guy and Edna Ballard established the I AM Movement under the auspices of the Saint Germain Foundation.

Elizabeth Clare Prophet, matron of the Church Universal and Triumphant, articulated a complicated lore surrounding “Saint Germaine,” including the belief that he somehow “inspired” the Constitution of the United States. Throughout her tenure as “Guru Ma,” Prophet claimed continual – or periodic – contact with various Ascended Masters, especially Saint-Germain.

These tales have cemented Saint-Germain’s legacy as one of the most powerful and proficient adepts of all time.

Runner Up: The Man Behind Éliphas Lévi

Let me momentarily interrupt the Cagliostro saga, with all the various behind-the-scenes operators. For there is one aspect of it that is probably best introduced by way of example.

For the illustration, we’ll turn to the man who, for all intents and purposes, kickstarted the so-called “Occult Revival” in the 19^th-century – which we highlighted in the video “10 Arcane Words.”

Born Alphonse Louis Constant, he is far better known under his assumed (and “Hebræcized”[56]) name, Éliphas Lévi.

Of course, Lévi was a major name in “Top 10 Occultists of All Time.”

His chief contribution to occultism was his suggestion that there were “…esoteric correspondences between the twenty-two paths on the Kabbalistic Tree of Life and the twenty-two major trumps in the Tarot pack of cards.”[57]

>Lévi’s synthesized a “transcendental” magic out of material gleaned from a wide variety of sources. These included: idiosyncratic 16^th-17^th-century German mystic Jakob Böhme, 17^th-18^th-century Swedish theosopher[58] Emanuel Swedenborg, 18^th-century Freemason and Tarot enthusiast Antoine Court de Gébelin, 18^th-19^th-century German “animal-magnetism” theorist and hypnotist, Franz Anton Mesmer; 18^th-19^th-century French poet Antoine Fabre d’Olivet; and 18^th-19^th-century French esoteric Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin, founder of Martinism.

These were centered around the Jewish-mystical Kabbalah, which we have repeatedly encountered. What was additionally unique about Lévi, however, was that he seems to have fused two Kabbalistic streams together.

On the one hand, Lévi was acquainted with “Christian Cabala,” as it had originated with Pico and filtered down to the 17^th-century German Hebraist Christian Knorr von Rosenroth. In 1684, Rosenroth had published the influential compendium Kabbala Denudata, or “Kabbalah Uncovered.”[59]

On the other hand, there were several separate strands of Kabbalah originating in Poland. One of these owed to Jacob Frank, a follower of the curious, 17^th-century Messianic pretender, Sabbatai Zevi.[60]

We touched on both Zevi and Frank in “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

Another Polish current came from Hasidism. Fittingly for the present topic, its history is complex and obscure. But it seems to have been introduced into Poland from Prague, during its so-called “Golden Age” in the 17th century. At that time, the community presumably was in custody of the teachings of the 16^th-century Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, known as the Maharal of Prague. He is still remembered for his supposed magical creation of a Frankenstein-like monster called a “Golem.”

Again, for more, see “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

From the Bohemian capital of Prague, Kabbalistic teachings passed to a line of practitioners known as “Baal Shem.” Literally signifying “Lord of the Name,” the specific reference is to the Tetragrammaton, or the four letters making up the name Yahweh – which is regarded as the ultimate magical formula.

Various Baal Shem are reputed to be adept at such things as manufacturing magical amulets and talismans, casting – and averting – the “evil eye,” summoning and controlling demons, and so on.

In any case, the Hasidic movement was founded in the 18^th century Poland by one Israel ben Eliezer, better known as the Baal Shem Tov. In the words of the late historian James Webb, the Baal Shem Tov fashioned “…Hassidism [sic] …[into] a mass movement” by “placing …emphasis on an interpretation of the popular elements in the Cabala…”.[61]

As a consequence, “…the often abstruse doctrines of the Jewish mystical philosophers …[were] rendered …more intelligible to …Gentile[s]. Judæo-Christian sects sprang up throughout Poland and Russia, with rituals based on [these] esoteric doctrines…”.[62]

Our magus – Éliphas Lévi – was initiated into this form of Kabbalism by the 18^th-19^th-century Polish-born French émigré Józef Maria Hoëne-Wroński.

Among other things, Wroński was a mathematician. He therefore brought a dose of Neo-Pythagoreanism into his metaphysician speculations, which he also communicated to Lévi.

Similarly to his star pupil (Lévi), Wroński himself “was well versed in Kabbalah, Boehme, and Gnosticism.”[63]

No word on what would have become of Alphonse Louis Constant without his fateful encounter with his obscure Polish master. But it may well be that just as it was Lévi’s “work [which] formed ‘the narrow channel through which the whole Western tradition of magic flowed to the modern era’,”[64] it was Wroński’s work through which important aspects of that tradition were communicated to Lévi.

             9. The Men Behind Cagliostro (III): Baal Shem of London

With those, later historical developments in place, let’s return to Cagliostro. You see, among the mysterious count’s teachers was yet another rabbinical “Shem Tov.”

In this case, we’re referring to Rabbi Ḥayyim Samuel Jacob Falk,[65] otherwise called the “Baal Shem of London.”

Apparently, Londoners referred to him as “Doctor Falken”[66] – which creates a curious “synch” with the reclusive computer genius by the same name from the 1983 movie War Games.

He “claimed descent from King David.”[67]

Rabbi Falk emerged out of “Shabbateanism,”[68] that is, a modified, messianic form of Judaism.

Shabbateanism sought to preserve the legacy of Sabbatai Zevi, whom we mentioned in passing moments ago, and whom we sketched in “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

Like several entrants on this list, Falk “became known early as a magician…”.[69] And like Cagliostro and Saint-Germain, specifically, Falk had numerous run-ins with civil authorities. Apparently, he was almost executed in Germany for practicing sorcery and witchcraft.

In one dark episode, for example, Falk supposedly “sacrifice[d]… [a] black calf” in the presence of several noblemen,[70] one of whom saw his valet suffer a fatal injury to his spine.[71] According to the report, the unnamed “young man” had his neck so “twisted” that, “had he lived after the accident that [in fact] took his life, could have only seen backward.”[72]

Falk decamped for England where, initially, he was on the “outs” with the Jewish community in London,[73] perhaps because he was laboring under suspicion of “fraud” and heresy – accusations that had been thrown at him by influential German Talmudist Jacob Emden, who had ties to the city.[74]

However, again as with Cagliostro and Saint-Germain – as well as with numerous other occultists, such as Jacob Frank – Falk managed to secure financial assistance from a wealthy family.[75] When he died, Falk was “in relatively affluent circumstances…”.[76]

Falk’s relationship with the broader community improved when he reportedly “saved the Great Synagogue from destruction by fire by means of a magical inscription” – presumably, representation of the Tetragrammaton – “which he [applied] to the doorposts.”[77]

Doctor Falken supposedly had an unnatural-seeming silver candelabrum that illuminated his study without visible use of conventional oil or wax. And – like Saint-Germain – it was said of him that he could subsist for long periods of time without eating or drinking.[78]

By feats such as these, “…he achieved notoriety in both Jewish and non-Jewish circles for his Kabbalistic practices based on the used of the mysterious Name of God, hence becoming known as a Ba’al Shem (‘Master of the [Divine] Name’).”[79]

Among other things, Falk was believed to be able to effect cures by manufacturing and using “Kabbalistic talismans”.[80] By wielding a magic wand constructed from a “rolled-up scroll,”[81] the Baal Shem of London seemed to exert “control over angelic spirits”.[82]

According to the esteemed British Jewish historian Cecil Roth, Falk maintained some sort of “kabbalistic laboratory on” the symbolically charged London Bridge.[83] 

It may have been Saint-Germain who “personally initiated” Cagliostro “into the Lodge of Illuminists at his castle in Holstein,”[84] but it was “[t]he Rabbi Jacob Falk [who] taught [him] sex magic…”.[85]

             10. The Man Behind the ‘Illuminati’: Kolmer

Perhaps no word provokes as many strong reactions – whether out of curiosity, derision, or enthusiasm – as “Illuminati” (and its cognates).

The term has so many colloquial and technical variations that it would be best if I saved its exploration for a dedicated study. Still, I can’t help but to introduce it, here, on account of its relevance for this particular investigation.

Often imagined representing the upper echelon of an all-encompassing, global, economic-and sociopolitical control apparatus, it was established in Bavaria, in what is now Germany – as a bona fide, quasi-Masonic organization.

It was founded in 1776, no less (which, you’ll probably agree, was a pretty important year as far as world-historic events go).

The key player was a twenty-something year old law professor named Adam Weishaupt.

The story of the Illuminati is extraordinarily tangled and it is frequently difficult to separate fact from fiction. The “official record” – if there is such a thing – associates the group with some minor characters such as the German writer Adolph Knigge.

Its goals were said to be furtherance of the sort of anti-clerical and anti-monarchical program that one would expect from an Enlightenment-era movement.

And, according to the surface-level narrative, the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati was outlawed – along with other secret societies – and disbanded sometime between 1784 and 1787.

There is, however, no shortage of dissenting opinions on these – and other – pertinent matters. But, more interesting for us, at present, is the observation that the Order of the Illuminati was linked with more prominent individuals: for example, the 18^th-19^th-century German “animal-magnetism” theorist, Franz Anton Mesmer, and the previously named Count Cagliostro. That, and (of course) the further fact of the claimed influence of yet another “mystery man.”

Nesta Webster wrote of him: “Kolmer remains the most mysterious of all the mystery men of his day…”.^[86]

That such a man may have been behind Weishaupt is extraordinary. For consider that Weishaupt has been linked both to the Jesuits^[87] and to the Rothschild banking powerhouse.^[88]

We intend to probe these topics more fully in upcoming videos. For example, stay tuned for “10 Precursors to the Bavarian Illuminati.”

Copyright 2023, TheSynchroMystic. All rights reserved.

---

^[1]    The term “Gnosticism” was said to have been coined by Cambridge Neoplatonist Henry More. See Michael Williams, “Gnosticism,” Encyclopedia Britannica, <https://www.britannica.com/topic/gnosticism>.

^[2]    Such as “Esotericism,” “Hermeticism,” “Mysticism,” and “Neoplatonism.”

^[3]    It fed into various streams of philosophy as well and, along with other currents (such as Aristotelianism, Cynicism, and Stoicism), resulted in so-called “Middle Platonism.” Middle Platonism, in turn, combined with Neo-Pythagoreanism and issued in Neoplatonism which, confusingly enough, “back fed” into Gnosticism.

^[4]    It derives from even older forms, such as those of Media and Persia. It shows up in references such as to the “Magi” who paid tribute to the Christ child in the New Testament.

^[5]    Acts 8:20; New International Version.

^[6]    Rosemary Ellen Guiley, The Encyclopedia of Magic and Alchemy, New York: Infobase; Checkmark Books, 2006, p. 294.

^[7]    Alternately spelled “Dositheus.” His Wiki article (“Dositheos (Samaritan),” Jun. 25, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dositheos_(Samaritan)>) gives “Nathanael” as an alias, justifying the variant by remarking that both names mean “gift of god.” 

^[8]    Samaritans have an interesting history. You’ll recall that King David had ruled over a united kingdom (ca. 11^th – 10^th centuries, B.C.) – as did David’s son, Solomon (10^th c. B.C.). But when Solomon died (a typical date given is 930 B.C.), the kingdom split into Northern and Southern halves, both of which were eventually conquered. The Southern Kingdom, called Judah, is usually said to have survived until around 587 or 586 B.C., when it was taken over by Neo-Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar II. But the Northern Kingdom of Israel didn’t last as long. It fell to Neo-Assyria; the Northern Kingdom’s capital, Samaria, was overrun circa 722 / 721 B.C. So, the story goes that the “Samaritans” were (and, I suppose, still are) a remnant that claims descent from the original inhabitants of the Northern Kingdom who managed to remain in Samaria after the arrival of the Assyrian invaders. The history is complicated by the “return” of exiled Jews from Babylon after the Neo-Babylonian Empire was displaced by the Persian. A number of factions arose within the religion of Judaism, with the Pharisees and Sadducees being prominent representatives. Main differences lie in the facts that the former maintained bases of operation in small assembly houses (called “synagogues”) and insisted on adherence to a so-called “Oral Law” in addition to the written books of (what we would commonly know as) the Old Testament; Pharisaic Judaism morphed into Rabbinic Judaism. The latter Sadducees – as high priests – were headquartered in the Temple. Both the Sadducees and the Samaritans rejected the “Oral Torah,” but had other differences (including ethnic / racial). These were exacerbated by military conflicts (especially the campaign of John Hyrcanus, circa 128 B.C.). By the time of Jesus of Nazareth, the Samaritans held to their pre-rabbinical form of Judaism and were considered “outsiders” from the viewpoint of mainline Judaism.

^[9]    Guiley, loc. cit.

^[10]  “Dositheos…,” op. cit.

^[11]  Loc. cit.

^[12]  New York: Mentor Omega Books, 1962. Cf. <https://books.google.com/books?id=d6C5DgAAQBAJ>.

^[13]  Richard Wilhelm, “Introduction,” The I Ching, or Book of Changes,” [Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1967, n.p.,] qtd. by Mitch Horowitz, Occult America, New York: Bantam, 2010, p. 8. Wilhelm is writing on the views of Confucius and Lao-tse, but could just as easily be discoursing on Platonism.

^[14]  Antoine Faivre, Western Esotericism: A Concise History, Christine Rhone, transl., Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 2010, p. 26.

^[15]  He may also have once been a student of the Alexandrian Christian theologian, Origen.

^[16]  Elizabeth DePalma Digeser, A Threat to Public Piety: Christians, Platonists, and the Great Persecution, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press,  2012, <https://books.google.com/books?id=K_2tDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74>; citing Porphyry, Plotinus, 3.16.

^[17]  See Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction, New York & Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008, p. 55.

^[18]  Some alchemical – or, at least, pro-chemical – opinions presented in Albert’s De mineralibus (ca. 1248-1262). However, more overtly alchemical-magical texts – preëminently, the grimoire known variously as the Grand Albert or the Secreta Alberti – are now believed to have been falsely attributed to Albertus Magnus (and, thus, belong to what is called the pseudo-Albertine literature).

^[19]  Reuchlin’s mature thought, including Neo-Pythagorean elements, is on full display in De Arte Cabalistica (“On the Art of the Cabala”), published in 1516.

^[20]  “Jesus” is rendered as an expansion of the holy Tetragrammaton, or the “Four Letters” – YHWH or JHVH – which signify Yahweh or Jehovah. In the Christian-Cabalist analysis, the name of Jesus (IESU) is Kabbalistically equivalent to (or may be rendered as) the Pentagrammaton: “Five Letters,” given as YHSWH or IESVE, and yielding (something like) “Yeshua,” which is a Hebrew name translating to “Joshua” …or Jesus.

^[21]  Though, Agrippa also knew the brothers Agostino and Paolo Ricci, the latter responsible for translating (1515) a major Kabbalistic work titled (in Latin) Portæ Lucis, and (in Hebrew) Sha’arei Ora, both meaning “Gates of Light,” written by the 13^th-century Rabbi Joseph Gikatilla. Giktilla had studied under Abraham Abulafia.

^[22]  Book 1 dealt with “natural magic,” such as the use of herbs and stones, as pertained to the terrestrial elements. Book 2 concerned itself with “mathematical magic,” including “magic squares” and numerology, imported from Neo-Pythagoreanism (via Reuchlin), and linked with the “celestial” spheres. Finally, Book 3 focused on “angel magic” – invocations, summonings, and the like – associated with what Agrippa termed the “super-celestial” realm. This book, in particular, earned him a reputation as a black magician who made pacts with demons. A “Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy” – pertaining to ceremonial magic and geomancy – was published several decades after Agrippa’s death. However, Agrippa’s student Johann Weyer maintained that it was falsely attributed to his former master.

^[23]  Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 59.

^[24]  Or, even, that Agrippa “…may have been the centre of [several] secret societies,” all according to Frances Amelia Yates, The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age, London and New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 44.

^[25]  Additionally, of course, Agrippa influenced later occultists such as Éliphas Lévi, Francis Barrett, and the members of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, among others.

^[26]  “It is usual to speak of Colet, Erasmus and More as the ‘Oxford Reformers,’ but the title is misleading. If they advocated reforms, they did not undertake any. Although they had all three been in Oxford, London was the real centre of their influence.” H. Maynard Smith, “The Catholic Reformers,” chapt. 11, Pre-Reformation England, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1963, <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00406-5_12>; <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-00406-5_12>. 

^[27]  Agrippa was convinced that Roman Catholicism has lost the true faith – as, he believed, was evidenced in the inability of Churchmen to perform miracles. See Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 59.

^[28]  Yates, op. cit., p. 45.

^[29]  Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 74.

^[30]  But only officially published in 1606.

^[31]  Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., pp. 51-52.

^[32]  Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 52.

^[33]  Guiley, op. cit., p. 321.

[34] See P. Zambelli, “Chapter Three. Magic, Pseudepigraphy, Prophecies and Forgeries in Trithemius’ Manuscripts. From Cusanus to Bovelles?” in the volume White Magic, Black Magic in the European Renaissance, Leiden: Brill, 2007, pp. 73-100, <https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160989.i-282.11> and <https://brill.com/display/book/9789047421382/Bej.9789004160989.i-282_008.xml>. Trithemius refers to a mysterious, “now lost” text, “attributed to Pelagius of Majorca,” for whom our “only witness is Trithemius”, ibid. Cf.  Michael >Hoffman, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, Coeur d’Alene, Id.: Independent History and Researc, 2017, p. 243, who calls both Labanius and Pelagius “imaginary sages,” as well as “Frater Acher,” who refers to Pelagius as an “invented persona” in “Paracelsus & Trithemius – Musings on a Bewitched Relationship,” Theo Magica [weblog], Feb. 1, 2022, <https://theomagica.com/blog/paracelsus-and-trithemius>.

[35] See Hoffman, op. cit., pp. 238ff, where he repeatedly refers to Trithemius’s unnamed “handlers.”

^[36]  Guiley, op. cit., p. 321.

^[37]  The title was affixed posthumously.

^[38]  Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 59.

^[39]  E. J. Ashworth, “Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni,” p. 619. Significantly, Ashworth demurs on almost all the standard summaries of Pico. Pico “…hoped to write a Concord of Plato and Aristotle”; so, he shouldn’t be considered a “Neoplatonist” in an unqualified sense. Pico “is often described as a syncretist” – as I have done – “but in fact he made it clear that the truth of Christianity has priority over the prisca theologia or ancient wisdom found in the hermetic corpus and the cabala.” Finally, Ashworth thinks that the interpretation of Pico as announcing an almost unrestricted capacity for individual liberty has to be checked by the facts that: firstly, in his Heptaplus (1489), Pico downplays human freedom. Secondly, Ashworth insists that Pico’s anthropology interprets mankind “as a microcosm” of the universe and “thus firmly within the hierarchy of nature…”. (All quotations, ibid.) It seems to me, however, that the stated aim of reconciling Aristotle and Plato belies Ashworth’s rejection of Pico’s syncretism. Furthermore, that Pico gave “Christianity …priority” over Hermeticism must be assessed in light of the Pico’s overall Neoplatonizing tendencies and his “Christian Cabalism.” In other words, it would be a colossal mistake to read Pico’s supposed ranking of “Christianity” over Hermeticism as a preservation of Medieval Scholasticism or Thomism. The caveats about Pico’s endorsement of the notion of alchemical correspondence between humans (as microcosm) and the universe (as macrocosm) are well taken. But, maybe the point is that, divested of his Hermeticism (as occurred during the Enlightenment), Pico’s praise of human freedom takes on larger proportions.

[40] Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 193. In Lévi’s conception, “…the primary function of magic was to enable the magician to focus and direct his will.” Ibid.

^[41]  Colette Sirat, A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages, reprint ed., New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996, p. 410, <https://books.google.com/books?id=XKkSDZNVXX4C&pg=pa410>. Alemanno was also regarded as a Neoplatonist.

^[42]  Frances Amelia Yates, The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age, London and New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 22.

^[43]  Brian Copenhaver, “Giovanni Pico della Mirandola,” Edward N. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2020 ed., <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/pico-della-mirandola/>. Copenhaver elsewhere remarked: “Kabbalah, which Pico saw as the holier Hebrew analog of the gentile ‘ancient theology’ revealed by Marsilio Ficino, is provocatively on display in the 900 Conclusions: 119 of them, including the final and culminating 72, are Kabbalist theses—outlandishly Kabbalist from a Christian point of view. …Because of its Mosaic origin, Kabbalah was holier to Pico than the pagan wisdom that Ficino had traced to Zoroaster and Hermes Trismegistus, in ancient Chaldaea and Egypt, where Ficino found the beginnings of Platonic philosophy.” Ibid. At the same time, Pico wrote subtly. Again, Copenhaver: “Large portions of the Oration, drawing on these texts, are also informed by Kabbalah in ways that no contemporary Christian could have detected—least of all a Christian who lacked the clues provided by the Conclusions.” Ibid.

^[44]  “A Wider World, I,” <http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/vatican.exhibit/exhibit/h-orient_to_rome/Orient_to_rome.html>.

[45]  Menachem E. Arton, updated by Nadia Zeldes, “Mithridates, Flavius,” Fred Skolnik and Michael Berenbaum, eds., Encyclopedia Judaica, 2^nd ed., vol. 14, Detroit: Thomson Gale; Jerusalem: Keter Publ. House, 2007, p. 370.

[46] Arton and Zeldes (ibid.) state that “…in his writings, Mithridates in very explicit about his homosexuality…”. This is suggestive, since Pico is also alleged to have had male lovers. “Quattrocento humanists, based largely in Florence and including such notable figures as Marsilio Ficino and Pico della Mirandola, vigorously explored a Neo-Platonism with …inherent homosexual overtones. … See Leonard Barkin’s Transuming Passion: Ganymede and the Erotics of Humanism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991) and James Saslow’s Ganymede in the Renaissance: Homosexuality in Art and Society (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986). Marsilio Ficino (1443-99), whose influential commentary on Plato’s Symposium, 1469, questioned (in the form of a dialogue) the inclusion of “desire” in [“?]friendship.” Pico della Mirandola (1463-94) and the poet Girolamo Benivieni “wrote passionate sonnets to each other and were buried in the same tomb in San Marco, like husband and wife,” although the poet died 40 years after Pico. Saslow admits that there is “little concrete evidence to suggest that Ficino’s deep love for Giovanni Cavalcanti—whom he enthroned as the hero of his annual symposium commemorating the death of Plato on November 7—was anything other than chaste.” Likewise, there are no explicit accounts of sexual activity between the Pico and Benivieni. (Saslow, Ganymede, 29).” From Robert Diamond, A Gay Neoclassical Movement, thesis, master of arts, Stony Brook, N.Y.: Stony Brook Univ., May 2012, p. 6, footnote 14, <https://ir.stonybrook.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11401/76793/Diamond_grad.sunysb_0771M_10949.pdf>.

^[47]  Yates, op. cit., p. 22.

^[48]  Ibid.

^[49]  “Through Pletho,” also, “ancient doctrines of the Chaldeans and Pythagoreans were transmitted to the West.” According to Deno J. Geanakopols, “Pletho, Giorgius Gemistus (1355-1452),” 1967; updated by Katerina Ierodiakonou, Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2005; archived at Encyclopedia.com, <https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/pletho-giorgius-gemistus-c-1355-1452>.

^[50]  See George Karamanolis, “George Gemistus Plethon,” Henrik Lagerlund, ed., Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, Dordrecht & New York: Springer, 2011, p. 390, <https://books.google.com/books?id=x5FiMR3kd_8C&pg=PA390>. Alternative spellings are: Elisaeus and Eliseus.

[51]  Mysteries of the Unknown: Secrets of the Alchemists, vol. 21, Time-Life, p. 102.

^[52]  Or Athotas.

[53] We would also want to situate many important French thinkers – e.g., Denis Diderot, Montesquieu, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Voltaire – in the vicinity. And, of course, we would need to deal with Immanuel Kant.

^[54]  Op. cit., p. 59.

[55] To put it another way, Saint-Germain, and – perhaps – his students (such as Cagliostro), essentially utilized the results of Illuminism in sense number two (rational-empirical investigation and the primitive – by our lights – technology that it produced) to fake possession of Illuminism in sense number one (i.e., “Gnosis”)!

[56] That is, the alleged attempt to transliterate “Alphonse Louis” into Hebrew letters.

[57] Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 195.

[58] “Theosophy” merely designates the “wisdom of God.” I write “theosopher” in order to distinguish Swedenborg from the disciples (and offshoots) of H. P. Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society (founded 1875), who are generally called theosophists.

[59] Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany.

[60] Or Shabbetai Ẓevi, Shabbeṯāy Ṣeḇī, Shabsai Tzvi, Sabbatai Zvi, etc.

[61] The Occult Underground, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publ. Co.l Library Press, 1974, p. 253.

[62] Ibid.

[63] Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 192.

[64] Goodrick-Clarke, op. cit., p. 195; quoting Ronald Decker, Thierry Depaulis, and Michael Dummett, A Wicked Pack of Cards: The Origins of the Occult Tarot, London: Duckworth, 1996, p. 168.

[65] Alternatively spelled Chaim Schmul Falck.

[66] Or “Doctor Falckon.”

[67] Raphael Patai, The Jewish Alchemists, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1994, p. 456.

[68] Again, alternatively spelled “Sabbatæanism,” “Sabbateanism,” “Sabbatianism,” etc.

[69] Cecil Roth, “Falk, Samuel Jacob Ḥayyim,” Encyclopædia Judaica, vol. 6, Jerusalem: Keter, 1972, p. 1159. Cf. Patai, op. cit., p. 455: “early” in his “career” he was “primarily a magician and conjurer…”.

[70] Patai records the testimony as referring to the “Comte de Westerloh” and the “Duc de Richelieu,” p. 460. The latter appears to have been Louis François Armand de Vignerot du Plessis. I have so far been unable to ascertain the identify of the former personage. “Westerloh” could be Westerloo/Westerlo; if so, Jean Philippe Eugène de Merode might have been a candidate, except he seems to have died too soon. (Patai wrote that Rantzow recorded his impressions between 1736 and 1739; Jean Philippe Eugène de Merode died in 1732. Of course, it is possible that Rantzow’s observations were recorded some years after the events they purport to describe.) Jean Philippe’s son, Philippe-Maximilien, was born in 1729, which suggests that he would have been far too young to have been a perceptive or reliable observer.

[71] Patai, op. cit., p. 460; quoting George Louis Albert de Rantzow.

[72] Patai, op. cit., p. 457; quoting George Louis Albert de Rantzow

[73] Though, Joseph Jacobs and Herman Adler report that Falk was “[r]eceived in London with hospitality” and that “Falk rapidly gained fame as a cabalist and worker of miracles, and many stories of his powers were current.” Joseph Jacobs and Herman Adler, “Falk, Ḥayyim Samuel Jacob (Also Known as De Falk, Dr. Falk, or Falkon),” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, <https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/5992-falk-hayyim-samuel-jacob>.

[74] For example, Jacob Emden’s son, Israel Emden (known as Meshullam Zalman, or Meshullam Solomon) was Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom from about 1765 to 1780. See “Emden, Jacob,” Wikipedia, Nov. 22, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Emden>; citing Jacob Emden, Megilat Sefer: The Autobiography of Rabbi Jacob Emden (1697–1776), PublishYourSefer.com, p. 353, <https://books.google.com/books?id=dOfOc56BFdkC&pg=PA353>.

[75] In Falk’s case, the Goldsmids: “Falk’s principal friends were the London bankers Aaron Goldsmid and his son.” Jacobs and Adler, loc. cit.

[76] Roth, op. cit., p. 1160.

[77] Roth, op. cit., p. 1159.

[78] Jacobs and Adler, loc. cit.

[79] Roth, op. cit., p. 1159. Falk seems to have seen himself as a liberator for his coreligionists. See Patai, op. cit., p. 458.

[80] Patai, op. cit., p. 458.

[81] Patai, op. cit., p. 584, end note #3 (for chapt. 36).

[82] Patai, op. cit., p. 459.

[83] At least, according to Roth! (Op. cit., p. 1159; emphasis supplied.) Falk also operated “a private synagogue in his house in Wellclose Square…,” ibid.

[84] Guiley, op. cit., p. 283.

[85] Gary Lachman, “Why Mrs. Blake Cried by Marsha Keith Schuchard: The Lineaments of Gratified Desire,” book review, Independent (U.K.), Mar. 12, 2006, <https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/why-mrs-blake-cried-by-marsha-keith-schuchard-469652.html>; archived at <https://web.archive.org/web/20100426235430/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/why-mrs-blake-cried-by-marsha-keith-schuchard-469652.html>.

^[86]  Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London: Boswell, 1924, pp. 131 and 139.

^[87]  For instance, the Wikipedia article “Adolph Freiherr Knigge,” states that, upon his falling out with Weishaupt: “He [i.e., Knigge] accused Weishaupt of ‘Jesuitism’, and suspected him of being ‘a Jesuit in disguise’.” In fact, this is simply lifted from the entry “Illuminati,” in the Catholic Encyclopedia. See Hermann Gruber, “Illuminati,” Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 7, New York: Robert Appleton Co., 1910, [p. 661b]; online at <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07661b.htm> and <https://www.studylight.org/encyclopedias/eng/tce/i/illuminati.html>. The encyclopedist’s parenthetical citation (in situ), reads: “Nachtr., I, 129.” Presumably, this stands for “nachtrag” and works out either to Adam Weishaupt, Nachtrag von weiteren Originalschriften [“Addendum of Other Original Writings”], München: Zu haben bey J. Lindauer, 1787 (see <https://www.worldcat.org/title/6760782>) or Nachtrag zur Rechtfertigung meiner Absichten (“Addendum Justifying My Intentions”), Frankfurt und Leipzig,: privately printed, 1787 (see <https://www.worldcat.org/title/919702064>). Cf. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xWl8a9Jl-1kJ:worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n84193453&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>.

^[88]  See the comments from Joseph “Doc” Marquis, in Christian J. Pinto, Eye of the Phoenix, dvd, N.p.: Antiquities Research Films, 2008; <https://www.worldcat.org/title/430836014>.

(And 10 of America’s Elite Brotherhoods)

Preface

In 1961, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy spoke to the American Newspaper Publishers Association, remarking, in part: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.”[1]

That these comments issued from JFK is interesting for several reasons. A main one is that his life would be publicly and violently snuffed out two and a half years later in what the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations concluded was “probably” the “result of a conspiracy.”[2]

For more, see “10 Reasons to Believe JFK Was Killed by Conspiracy.”

That JFK would direct this message to newspaper men is also intriguing, not least because of post-Watergate-scandal revelations, reported by journalist Carl Bernstein, of collusion between the intelligence community and the press. More on these disquieting disclosures in a future video.

I take these – and myriad other – tidbits as indications of just how often the American people are kept in the proverbial “dark” about the inner workings of their own government.

This can be quickly – albeit roughly and even playfully – illustrated by surveying some of the ostensible “public servants” who were devotees of various organizations that, well… let’s just say aren’t entirely forthcoming about the goings on at their meetings. In this presentation we’ll do just that, by looking at the top ten Presidents of the United States alleged to have been card-carrying members of secret societies.

Caveats

This is intended for educational or entertainment purposes only. No allegations of wrongdoing, on the part of any individual or organization, are expressed or implied. The information supplied herein has been gleaned from public records. Its factuality is assumed. Referenced rankings and statistics are for comparison or illustration and have not been calculated with scientific rigor.

Introduction

According to authors Craig Heimbichner and Adam Parfrey, at “…the beginning of the twentieth century, …as many as one-third of all Americans belonged to a secret society…” of some kind.[3]

Without a doubt, the largest and best-known of these groups is Freemasonry.

Freemasonry, or the “Ancient Free and Accepted Masons,” are bundle of traditionally fraternal – that is, male-member-only – associations. The complicated origin story is not without interest and has been the subject of endless debate and speculation. To do it justice, it should probably have its own devoted presentation. But a few brief comments are in order, here.

Some historians trace Freemasonry, sometimes called the “Craft,” back to various societies of artisans, called collegia, that existed in Roman times. These may – or may not – have segued into Medieval trade guilds, specifically ones organized for stonemasons. These are craftsmen who have been trained to build, cut, and otherwise work with stone.

Allowing for technological developments and stylistic innovations, stonemasons have been credited with construction projects ranging from Europe’s great cathedrals, all the way back to the pyramids of Egypt and even the Biblical Tower of Babel.

At some point, approximately during the 17^th century, groups of work-a-day masons began to fellowship with select men who did not have anything to do with stone, professionally. These first “non-operative” inductees were likely nobility or other wealthy patrons and their admission into the “order” launched so-called “speculative freemasonry.”

This is a fitting name since much has been conjectured about possible links between Freemasonry and streams of bona fide esotericism, such as alchemy, Kabbalah, and Rosicrucianism.

And many colorful connexions are asserted – with varying degrees of credibility – with all manner of predecessors from Gnostic-heretical groups like Catharism and Manichæanism, …

…military-religious orders such as the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templar, and other things besides.

The official emergence of institutional Freemasonry, as it’s known today, dates to the founding of what was then called the Grand Lodge of London but is today – after various growth and mergers – the United Grand Lodge of England. Masonic assemblies are termed “lodges.”

For various socio-political reasons, the order experienced explosive growth and even migrated across the ocean to America where many of the United States’s Founding Fathers, including Benjamin Franklin,[4] eagerly joined.

We highlighted Franklin in the video “10 Occultists Who Were Accused SPIES.” In that place we get into the possibility that was decidedly more satanic than the usual portrayals of him let on.

Ignoring, presently, the several U.S. Presidents who were members of multiple secret societies, we may name at least nine who almost certainly belonged to the Freemasons.

These include our first head of state, the Revolutionary War hero, George Washington;[5] …

…James Monroe, whose “Monroe Doctrine” arguably became the foundation of U.S. Imperialism; …

…Andrew Jackson, the hero of the War of 1812…

…whose opposition to the Second Bank of the United States is largely forgotten, but which loosened the grip of private interests over the nation for 80 years (until the creation of the Federal Reserve System); …

…James Polk, who spearheaded the country’s expansion into the south and west; …

…James Buchanan, whose legacy was, in part, the disastrous fratricidal conflict known as the “Civil War”; …

…Andrew Johnson, reportedly so inebriated at his vice-presidential inauguration he was nearly unable to recite his oath of office,[6] who became president after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln; …

…James Garfield, one of four “commanders in chief” to have been assassinated, and the only White-House occupant to have created a unique proof of the Pythagorean Theorem; …

For more information on the esoteric importance of Pythagoras, see our dedicated video.

…Lyndon Baines Johnson, Kennedy’s successor – allegedly implicated in the assassination by former Central Intelligence Agency asset E. Howard Hunt – whose “Great Society” program ushered in the Civil Rights Act and Medicare; …

…and Gerald Ford, birth name “Leslie Lynch King, Jr.,” remembered mainly for his participation in the Warren-Commission whitewash and for “pardoning” Richard Nixon who, you’ll recall, had been charged with abusing presidential power and obstructing justice to cover up the Watergate burglary.[7]

There are also a few others with possible masonic affiliations. Depending on the prejudices of the source, these possibilities may be leveraged into affirmations (as with some anti-Masonic authors) or are vociferously denied (as is the standard line from Masonic apologists).

Prominent, here are Thomas Jefferson, drafter of many of the nation’s important foundational documents (including the Declaration of Independence), and James Madison, who (alongside Alexander Hamilton and John Jay) helped write the Federalist Papers; …

…as well as Ulysses S. Grant and Rutherford B. Hayes, both of whom presided over the so-called “Reconstruction” era.

If we expand our list slightly, we might include William Jefferson “Bill” Clinton, born William Blythe III, to bring our count to fourteen.

You see, “Slick Willie” is touted as perhaps the most famous past member of the Order of DeMolay (now “DeMolay International”).

This group, which is basically Freemasonry for boys, was founded in 1919 and named after Jacques de Molay, a 14^th-century of Knight Templar whose tenure as head (or “Grand Master”) of that military order coincided with its dissolution at the hands of King Philip IV of France and Pope Clement V. High-ranking Templars were accused of assorted crimes – such as desecrating Christian icons and sodomy – and many, including de Molay himself, were burned at the stake.

The junior masonry named in de Molay’s honor claims to instill values such as fierce loyalty, even in the face of death. It seems to have helped form our 42^nd President, perhaps priming him for his instruction, under Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, …

…in the history of the shadowy Round Table Group, a consortium of “think tanks” that were ostensibly the brainchild of 19^th-century British colonialist and diamond magnate, Cecil Rhodes.

So far, we’ve limited ourselves to men who supposedly confined their fraternal horizons to Freemasonry. And we’re already knee deep in cryptopolitical intrigue!

The ‘Top-10’

But there are eleven others who apparently took to oaths and secret handshakes with more enthusiasm. These fellows were connoisseurs of confidential information and the societies that purport to guard it. I’ve loosely arranged the names as a “top-ten” list, where the entrants are ranked in descending order according to the number of societies they belonged to.

Admittedly, though, this list is a bit awkward.

Firstly, there are only five numerical positions represented. This is because there are so many “ties” – that is, occasions where a president has the same number of fraternal affiliations as one or more of his confrères.

Secondly, I’m not pretending to have plumbed the depths of each president’s membership profile. To put it another way, I may have neglected a few connexions.

I wasn’t especially concerned with thoroughness because, thirdly, this list is intended to be on the lighthearted side and doesn’t give any consideration to the possible cryptopolitical “weight” of any of the organizations included.

Finally, for expedience, I have only counted ten (or so) secret societies. While the inclusions are, I think, justifiable and representative of the field of options, they are not exhaustive.

In other words, the entire list is open to question. So, don’t take it too seriously!

Number 8

All that said, coming in at “number eight” (or, #s 8, 9, 10, and 11), we have a four-way tie among William Howard Taft, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Richard Milhouse Nixon, and George W. Bush who each belonged to at least two, publicly identifiable secret societies.

Infamous for his Watergate shenanigans – which we got into in “10 Occultist Spies” – …

…Nixon is routinely found on lists of the most hated or worst U.S. presidents.

One story has it that Nixon – who was supposedly self-conscious of his humble origins – was launched into power by the secretive “Committee of 100.” Not to be confused with the contemporary association of Chinese-American businessmen, the earlier incarnation was allegedly a consortium of rich California Republicans looking to unseat a popular “New Deal” Democrat named “Jerry” Voorhis.

As he rose to prominence, Nixon made his way onto the ticket with Dwight Eisenhower. However, revelations that Texas oil men had established a slush fund for him worth about $18,000 threatened to stop his career in its tracks.

He went on “air,” as it were, and delivered his now famous “Checkers speech.” Among other things, Nixon admitted receiving a cute puppy as a political gift but stated that, due to his family’s newfound affection for it, he resolved to keep it regardless of the consequences. The comments saved him and ultimately paved the way to the presidency over a decade later.

An interesting side note is that ol’ Tricky Dick himself “just happened” to be in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963. Officially, he was there in his capacity as legal counsel for the Pepsi Corporation.

Unofficially, well… there’s a video presentation that gets into the topic, if you’re interested.

Speaking of JFK, his inclusion on this list may seem odd given our opening quotation.

Then again, politicians have a generally poor reputation for consistency. As the 15^th-16^th-century Italian Renaissance philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli argued, political rhetoric is “…power-oriented in the sense that the orator’s mission was to mold his listeners’ responses and work on their wills.”[8]

It has long been rumored that JFK was, well… let’s say… given a “boost” on election day from certain “fixers” in the Chicago mob. Word on the street once was that JFK’s dad, Joseph Kennedy, made a deal with mafioso Sam Giancana to help get “Jack” into the White House. Apparently, someone either forgot to tell JFK, or he and his family decided to double cross La Cosa Nostra.

For, when JFK leveled up, his brother “Bobby” Kennedy continued his longstanding crusade against the “Outfit.” Usually pooh-poohed by academic types, this theory has been advanced to explain the spate of high-profile assassinations that seemed to disproportionately affect the Kennedys in the 1960s.

Perhaps, however, one may be tempted to give JFK a “pass.” For besides his membership in a group (to be discussed in a few minutes) that, by most accounts, was simply a drinking club, his primary affiliation seems to have been with the Fraternal Order of Eagles.

This group, initially formed in 1898 by a half dozen theater proprietors, subsequently became more politically active. It claims to be staunchly anti-Communist and claims credit for the institution of the Mother’s Day holiday as well as for campaigning in support of Franklin Roosevelt’s “New Deal” policies, including Social Security. In other words, the Fraternal Order of Eagles seems to operate fairly transparently – by secret-society standards, anyway.

Things are a bit different, however, the Yale-University-based order called “Skull and Bones,” which was introduced in the aforementioned “10 Occultists Who Were Accused SPIES.”

Founded by Connecticut businessman and politician William Huntington Russell, …

…it conducts its secretive rituals inside a windowless stone building cheerfully named the “Tomb.”

Sometimes referred to as “Chapter 322,” speculation abounds that this Ivy-League frat house functions as an American arm of the legendary New-World-Order architects known as the “Illuminati.”

In fact, according to a recent edition of Heart’s Biography magazine: “It is speculated that the number refers to the year 322 BCE, when Athens transformed from democracy to plutocracy following the death of the Greek orator Demosthenes.”[9]

Be that as it may, it is exceedingly interesting that Skull and Bones, with all its bizarre and – reportedly, sexualized – initiations, “just happened” to spring up in the aftermath of the William Morgan Affair that precipitated organized anti-Masonry in the United States.

The sordid scene unfolded in the town of Batavia, New York in 1826. One William Morgan – either a disgruntled ex-Mason or a lodge crasher, depending on the account you read – was arrested on a flimsy pretext. He was subsequently kidnapped by a posse of Freemasons who apparently gained access to him by posting his bail. Like that of Teamster boss James Riddle “Jimmy” Hoffa, Morgan’s fate is often said to be “unknown.” But the presumption, partially informed from a deathbed confession of one of the alleged perpetrators, was that Morgan was murdered.[10]

The motive was Freemasonic resentment toward Morgan because of a book-length exposé he wrote disclosing the secrets of their order.

In any event, the first “Third” political party in the U.S. was the short-lived Anti-Masonic Party, established in 1828. So it was, in 1832, during the ensuing anti-Freemasonic furor, that Skull and Bones cropped up in New Haven.

Its membership roster is a “Who’s Who” of American finance, industry, and politics. So-called “Bonesmen” have included Central Intelligence Agency “counter-intel” chieftain, James Jesus Angleton, Time-Life publisher Henry Luce, and Stephen Allen Schwarzman, the founder of the private-equity powerhouse Blackstone.

Numerous other names could be added to the list. But, for our purposes, we draw attention back to two. Number one, there’s William H. Taft, the only U.S. President to also have been a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

William Taft’s father, Alphonso Taft, helped get Skull and Bones going.

Number two, we have George W. Bush. Of course, “Dubya” was the son of George Herbert Walker Bush, …

…who we’ll get to shortly.

Both Bushes followed in the footsteps of Bush I’s father, Prescott, who – in 1917[11] or 1918[12] – allegedly used him time as a “Yalie Bonesman” to dig up the skull of the famous Apache Indian Geronimo and whisk it back to New Haven as an ornament.

The 2004 presidential election pitted Bonesman John Kerry against Bonesman George W. Bush.

Number 5

At number five,[13] we have a three-way tie. This triad is distinguished for the trio of secret fraternal organizations that make up its curriculum vitæ. And it is comprised of William McKinley, Ronald Reagan, and the previously named George Herbert Walker Bush. There are a few highlights – or lowlights – from this group.

For one thing, we have yet another president (McKinley) who was outright assassinated; …

…one president (Reagan) who was almost assassinated; …

…and a third (Bush I) who – at one time – was the director of a government agency that specializes in spycraft, covet action, and so-called “black ops,” including assassination.

All three were Republicans.

By way of a little background, we may turn to the History Channel which, in 2012, aired a series titled The Men Who Built America.

Over eight installments,[14] the “docudrama” staged fictionalized reenactments – purportedly based on real events – of portions of the lives of some of America’s “robber barons.”

The individuals spotlighted were 19^th-century shipping and railroad tycoon Cornelius Vanderbilt; …

…19^th-20^th-century oilman John D. Rockefeller; …

…19^th-20^th-century industrialist Andrew Carnegie; …

…financier and Rothschild-banking asset J.P. Morgan; …

…and pioneering automobile manufacturer Henry Ford.

Episode #7, titled “Taking the White House,” centers on the attempt, by “Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, Carnegie and Morgan” to “unite in a bid to buy the White House by striking a lucrative deal with Ohio Governor, William McKinley.”[15]

According to the History Channel, this “bid” consisted at least partially of a “donation” of $30 million to McKinley courtesy of the above-named money trust.[16]

McKinley’s close ties to finance and industry, and his opposition by populist-Democrat and master orator William Jennings Bryan created – or, at least, cemented – the idea that Republicans are the “party of the rich.”

Further reinforcing this notion has been the tendency of Republican presidents – including Nixon,[17] Reagan and Bush I – to belong to yet another cryptic and private group. In this case, it is one that annually meets in Sonoma County, California, in the shady surrounds of imposing redwood trees.

Called the “Bohemian Club,” it hosts a summer retreat at the eponymous “Bohemian Grove” in Monte Rio, some 70-odd miles north of San Francisco.

Originally founded in 1872 by a cadre of newspaper men, it morphed into a clique for economic heavy-hitters and kingmakers. The “Grove” is an interesting symbol in its own right – one which I hope to explore in a future installment.

But as a literal forest hideaway, it appears to date from around 1901.

This was the era of President Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt, among whose claims to fame is launching the “conservationist movement,” which reclassified massive tracts of the country’s land as “National Parks,” making them off limits to developers.

…Unless, that is, you’re among the privileged class. Then you can go ahead and build your magnificent woodland haven in the middle of the John Muir Woods and have the grounds cared for by the National Park Service.[18]

As Mel Brooks’ character repeatedly exclaims in The History of World, Part 1: “It’s good to be the king.”

By some accounts, until Donald Trump took office, “[e]very Republican president since Herbert Hoover [had] belonged to the club.”[19]

A centerpiece of the “Summer High Jinks” spectacle performed at the Grove every year is a psychodrama titled the “Cremation of Care.” It features the supposedly mock-sacrificial immolation of a figure – designated “Dull Care” – below a humongous wooden owl (whose character, at one time, was voiced by a recording of longtime Columbia Broadcasting System anchorman Walter Cronkite).

For more on this conscience-banishing ritual, see “10 Occultists Who Were Accused SPIES.”

Number 3

In third place,[20] we have a two-way tie of those who belonged to no fewer than four secret societies.

Here, we’ll recall “Rough Rider” Teddy Roosevelt, whose corporate “monopoly-busting” is reputed to have struck a blow for the little guy, …

…but which resulted in John D. Rockefeller’s net worth skyrocketing to levels it hadn’t hit previously. I won’t hazard any guesses about whether this outcome was foreseen or unforeseen, intended or not intended. It is routinely asserted that Roosevelt took a turn to the left.

Indeed, he eventually opposed his former protégé, Bonesman William Howard Taft, in the 1912 election.

When the Trust Buster failed to obtain the Republican nomination, in the contest that wound up in the favor of Democratic Woodrow Wilson, he created his own third party.

Officially named the “Progressive Party,” it was popularly nicknamed the “Bull Moose Party,” after a bombastic comment from Roosevelt who defiantly claimed that he remained “strong as a bull moose” after being thrown over for Taft at the Republican Convention.

The bombastic phrase was typical for Roosevelt. But it’s noteworthy that he was a member of the Loyal Order of Moose.

The secret society, now known as Moose International, follows the overarching pattern – for initiations, advancement, and meetings – long established by Freemasonry.

Like numerous other groups, however, it appears to have been primarily catered to men who wished periodically to blow off steam and get loaded. In this vein, it is usually depicted as a rival to another, similar drinking club called the Order of Elks.

In the mold of social organizations with quirky beginnings, the Elks is said to have begun life in 1868 as a get-together of a minstrel troupe that called itself the “Jolly Corks.”

Once upon a time, justifiably or not, the group had a reputation for ribaldry. It was thought that their meetings were occasions – or even pretexts – for drunkenness, indecency, and even orgies.

This description hearkens to tales of the 18^th-century “Hell-Fire Club,” one incarnation of which boasted Benjamin Franklin as a member.

We got into this in a little more detail in “10 Occultists Who Were Accused SPIES” and we mentioned it in passing in “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

After the passage of some time, and a dash of remedial “P.R.,” the modern association “rebranded” itself as benefit society, under the expanded named “Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks.”

Minimally, that means insurance sales.

One of the Elk’s members, at some stage of its evolution, was 33^rd U.S. President, and 33^rd-Degree Freemason, Harry S. Truman – who, …

…some say, had his early governmental ambitions bankrolled by fraudster “political boss” Tom “T. J.” Pendergast.

As Michael Hoffman once noted, “Give ‘Em Hell Harry” – true to his nickname – “did just that” by authorizing the vaporization of several hundred thousand Japanese at Hiroshima and Nagasaki when the United States of America became the first and (so far!) only country in world history to use atomic weapons in war.

Perhaps it’s meaningful that Truman was also a prominent member of Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, colloquially called the “Shriners.”[21] Their presumably once-secret vow, the alleged text of which is now widely available from online and print sources, reads like a blood oath invoking “…Allah, the God of Arab, Muslim and Mohammed…”.[22]

In any case, their characteristic headgear, a tasseled conical red hat called a “fez” is often adorned with Islamic-esque symbols like the curved sword (called a “scimitar”) and the crescent moon. Some anti-Masons, Protestant Fundamentalists, and others of a generally paranoid bent sometimes fret about the deep color of the hat. Occasionally, it is suggested that it is blood red – in commemoration of some past, but difficult to precisely identify, Muslim-instigated slaughter of Christians.

Nowadays, the name “Shriner” is perhaps more frequently conjoined with the word “hospital” than with anything else.

Though, to be fair, this talk sometimes invites “Moolah clowns” – and they can be horrifying enough.

Who said secret societies were only for Republicans? Right, just ask Kennedy or Truman!

Sidelight: Royal Order of Jesters

Some secret organizations contain even more reclusive societies within the larger society. In at least one case, these are nested several layers deep – like “Russian dolls.”

Take, for example, the fact that the Shriners only accept “master masons” in good standing. These are men who have attained the Third Degree within basic, Blue Lodge (or “Craft”) freemasonry.

But – by invitation only – a select few Shriners may be asked to join the more obscure Royal Order of Jesters which, by its own admission, is dedicated to enjoyment and merrymaking.

The Jesters were reportedly founded in 1911, adopting for themselves a vaguely sinister totem called the “Billikin” …

…– among other symbols, some of which evince an apparent fascination with death (one apparently shared by other orders, such as the previously named Skull & Bones).

Weirdly, the Billiken isn’t unique to the Jesters. In fact, earlier claim to it may have been made by the Catholic, Jesuit-controlled Saint Louis University, which refers to the Buddha-looking sigil – and stylized variations, thereof – as its “good-luck charm” and mascot.

Once prosecuted back east on charges of prostitution and human trafficking (with hints of deadlier antics), the Royal Order of Jesters has been investigated for its – shall we say? excessive partying – by now-absentee researcher Sandy Frost.

However, as of this recording, an eye-opening piece is readily available at Medium.com, the “blogging” website started by Twitter cofounder Evan Williams. No fewer than two U.S. Presidents are said to have had connexions with these exclusive fun-seekers.

The first was Missourian Harry S. Truman.

The second? Gerald R. Ford – whose wife, Betty Ford, became something of a byword for alcoholism – not least through her own struggles and via her eponymous “substance-abuse” clinic.

Number 2

Now we’re really “up there,” as it were, on our list. One, two, …even four secret-society affiliations is small potatoes for our next president who, according to the record, maintained at least six such memberships.

We’re speaking of 29^th President, Warren Gamaliel Harding – who popularity at the time of his election quickly eroded in the face of numerous, unflattering posthumous disclosures.

Among minor accomplishments, Harding is remembered for the creation of the Veteran’s Bureau which, through various twists and turns, has become the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.

Though, it is arguable that the most distinctive things about him were the strangeness of his death and the brevity of his presidency that, nonetheless, was riddled with scandal.

In one writer’s bitingly sarcastic appraisal, Harding was “[a] newspaper publisher who became president of the U.S. And gave dirty politics a bad name by surrounding himself with some of the most dishonest and corrupt chiselers of all time.”[23]

He wasn’t even close to having occupied his office for the absolute shortest amount of time – that dubious “award” goes to 9^th President, William Henry Harrison.

Still, he’s one of ten presidents to have served less than a single full term, for one reason or other.

In the case of Warren G. Harding, accounts vary slightly. The cause of death has various been attributed to any, or some combination, of the following: cardiac arrest, cerebral hemorrhage, food poisoning, and pneumonia. I plan to spend just a tad more time with this curious story in a forthcoming video.

But, for now, suffice it to say that Harding’s peculiar demise punctuated a presidency the climax of which was, at least retrospectively, the bribery fiasco known as “Teapot Dome.” The upshot of the affair was that Harding’s Secretary of the Interior, Albert Fall, was convicted of accepting money from oil men – including Harry Ford Sinclair – to secretly transfer land rights from the Navy to private business interests.

Well, to be precise, Harding gave Fall control of Teapot Dome by executive order. Then Fall handed it over to Big Oil. I suppose that provides a veneer of “deniability.”

Maybe that would be giving Harding too much credit. One source alleged that he spent more time playing poker than governing the nation. Harding hosted regular poker games attended by a fair few of his “Ohio Gang,” including “…Fall, Attorney General Harry Daughtery, [gofer] Jesse Smith, and Veterans Bureau head Charles R. Forbes. After the Teapot Dome scandal, Fall and Forbes went to jail, Daugherty got two hung juries, and Smith committed suicide.”[24]

Or…was it murder?

Anyway, Harding loved his secrets. Like McKinley before him, he was a member of the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, a group whose origins are as mythologized as those of Freemasonry – from which it may have emerged.

Ignoring the surely fantastical claims of 11^th-century beginnings, the Odd Fellows can be documented in 18^th-century England, where it attracted such members as dissident journalist and politician, John Wilkes.

Wilkes was also a member of the previously mentioned Hell-Fire Club, which we covered in greater depth in “Top 10 Occult Spies.”

The Odd Fellows was subsequently associated with the rakish British monarch George IV. In turn, King George had dealings with portrait artist Richard Cosway.

Cosway was connected to an erotic-mystical circle via English Romantic artist, poet, and Emanuel-Swedenborg enthusiast William Blake…

…whom we discussed in “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

The Odd Fellows crossed the Atlantic with Thomas Wildey, who founded a lodge in Baltimore.

This North American progenitor initially catered more to the blue-collar set than had its ancestor from London. This explains Harding’s involvement, since he started off as a “working man,”[25] selling insurance and doing other odd jobs in his youth.[26]

Like the exclusive Skull-and-Bones fraternity, the Odd Fellows has – or had – a fascination with death symbolism. According to the Washington Post, human “…skeletons …reside in closets, drawers, attics and crawl spaces in Odd Fellows lodges nationwide.”

Reportedly, these remains are invoked as emblems “of mortality” during initiation ceremonies. According to one member, the skeletons are hidden and only make their appearances when a prospective candidate actually goes through the secret admission ritual.

The Odd Fellows appear to have derived these practices from the Freemasons – at least, those of the higher-degree Scottish Rite. In Masonic ritual materials, one can find innumerable references to coffins, “death’s head” skulls, skeletons, and other ritual paraphernalia.

Commentators as far flung as the 19^th-century Presbyterian preacher Charles Finney and 21^st-century writer John “Ed” Decker have asserted that members of the “Brotherhood” go so far as to drink wine from a human skull during the 30^th-degree ceremony.

Predictably, this is denied by Masonic apologists, like S. Brent Morris.

But, the macabre spectacle was given credence by novelist Dan Brown, whose book The Lost Symbol – which Morris admitted “showed Masons in a pretty good light” – incorporates the scene into its opening pages.

Similarly to the Elks, the Odd Fellows were believed to incline toward the Bacchanalian.

One aspect of this suspicion was the fact that it was the Odd Fellows, rather than the Masons per se, who were accused of incorporating goats into their outrageous ritualism.

This would be an amusing irrelevance were it not for curiously recurring links between goat symbolism and devil worship. Notable mentions include: Aleister Crowley’s rendition of the #15 “Devil” card in the Tarot deck as well as Éliphas Lévi’s drawing of Baphomet, …

We can’t neglect the related, so-called “Goat of Mendes” or “Baphomet sigil” originally published – if not drawn by – occultist Stanislas de Guaita.

Reportedly, there’s also an obscure reference, in Masonry, to a “God of All Things” that later morphed into a “Grand Architect Of The Universe.” Those initials are awfully GOAT-like.[27]

Number 1

But even Warren G. Harding, with his half-dozen affiliations, can’t hold a candle to Theodore Roosevelt’s fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. By my (admittedly rough and unscientific) count, F.D.R. was a veritable aficionado of secret societies, having been actively involved with no fewer than seven of them over his lifetime.

A Democrat – in fact, the ultimate Democrat in the minds of his many admirers – F.D.R. was famously elected for a whopping four presidential terms. Of course, he only served three of them since he died a few months into 1945.

Officially, he is said to have died from an “intracerebral hemorrhage.”

He also suffered from diseases of his arteries and heart, and recent medical revisionists have suggested that, perhaps due to his longtime tobacco smoking, he may have died of cancer.[28] We may have an additional possibility to float in a follow-up presentation. Stay tuned.

In any case, and justifiably or not, F.D.R. is credited with helping to bring the United States out of the Great Depression. His so-called “New Deal” policies enlarged the federal government in the name of economic recovery and future stability.

He instituted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, ostensibly to safeguard bank accounts.[29]

Though… according to financial advisor and writer Fredric Mark “Ric” Edelman, writing in his The Truth About Money (originally published in 1997): Nowadays, “…FDIC …has only $1.25 per $100.”[30]

FDR created the Social Security Administration as a sort of “social-insurance” program, including various old-age benefits.[31]

Not all these achievements were universally acclaimed. Some have proved more lastingly controversial than others.

For example, FDR is remembered for confiscating most privately held gold under the guise of rebooting the economy.

Meanwhile, some wealthy gold bugs – especially (one presumes) those within FDR’s Blue-Blood circle – were at least partially exempted from complying with the Executive Order 6102. You see, some holdings were treated as collector’s (or “numismatic”) pieces, rather than as circulating coin.

The Great Depression itself was a suspiciously selective catastrophe. Noble-Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman was among the more prominent people to call attention to the rôle of the Federal Reserve in crashing the America economy – despite the uncomfortable fact that the “Fed’s” whole reason for existing was ostensibly to prevent such misery.

All this led to the charge, from many of the “right side” of the politic spectrum, that Franklin Roosevelt was either an out-and-out Communist or, at the least, a sympathizer.

In fact, it seems that some American industrialists and money men became so fed up, that they attempted to orchestrate a coup d’état to remove Roosevelt from power.

In the basic narrative, which I hope to expound in a follow-up presentation, a highly decorated marine-corps officer, General Smedley Darlington Butler, was approached to lead the American Legion to facilitate this “regime change.”

[Video clip of Butler]

That F.D.R. came through the event unscathed testifies to the diligence of his attendant angel. The entire story – sometimes referred to as the “Business Plot” or the “Capitol Hill Coup” – is a fascinating chapter of American history. It seems to be a part of the complicated crypto-political backdrop for the so-called “January 6^th Riot,” the symbolism surrounding which we sketched in a dedicated video.

Although we intend to tug on some conspiratorial threads in this tangled yarn in future installments, for now, we return to the fact that FDR maintained numerous secret-society connexions.

One of these was with the Knights of Pythias,[32] which organization Roosevelt is said to have joined during his long presidential tenure.

The Knights of Pythias, instituted during the fratricidal waste that is euphemistically termed the “civil war,” was apparently “chartered” – whatever that comes down to – by the federal government (either Abraham Lincoln or, more likely, Congress).

Its ritualism is based on the so-called Pythagorean ideal of friendship, as exemplified in the myth of Damon and Pythias.[33] This is just a single example of the abiding fascination with Pythagoras one discovers in esotericism. For examples, & for the reasons, see “Top 10 Occultists of All Time” …

…as well as the dedicated “Pythagoras.”

The Knights were founded in 1864 by a U.S. Treasury Department clerk named Justus Henry Rathbone. Rathbone was also a member of the so-called Improved Order of Red Men…

…which F.D.R., some years later, would also join.

The society adopted some of the symbols and vocabulary of Amerindians in a manner similar to the embrace of the trappings of Islam by the Masonic Shriners or – for that matter – like the Knights of Pythias’s own Knights of Khorassan.

The word “Khorassan” is interesting. It supposedly signifies the “east” or “sunrise.”[34] One author has it that “Khorassan signifies, in the old Persian language, Province or Region of the Sun.”[35]

It crops up in the romantic lore of St. Louis’s “Veiled Prophet Parade.”

And, more recently, we’re told there’s an offshoot (or upper echelon) of the dangerous al-Qaeda organization: an “ISIS”-like operation supposedly calling itself the Khorasan Group.

The name is explained as an obscure reference to the same general area that has been the key geo-political node and espionage epicenter for over a hundred years – and which you can discover more about in the video “10 Occultist Spies.” It was of great interest to mason and novelist Rudyard Kipling.

And this leads us back to F.D.R. for whom, arguably, a major preoccupation was Freemasonry.

The most flamboyant attestation of this is the fact that it was during Roosevelt’s presidential incumbency that the all-seeing eye symbol was placed on the U.S. dollar bill.

Well in advance of its implementation in the design of the dollar, eminent 19^th-century Harvard art professor, Charles Eliot Norton, labeled eye-and-pyramid amalgam a “dull emblem of a masonic fraternity.”[36]

There are a few other key players in that drama, including FDR’s third-term vice president and mystic, Henry Agard Wallace; Wallace’s one-time personal, spiritual “guru,” the Russian Theosophist Nicholas Roerich…

…to whom we devoted a segment in the previously named “…Occultist …SPIES…” video…

…and hearkening back to the Knights of Pythias, FDR’s treasury secretary, Henry Morgenthau Jr. (You’ll recall that the Knights get their start in the imagination of a treasury clerk.)

According to Dr. Robert Hieronymus, a specialist on the United States Great Seal, Roerich likely suggested placing the all-seeing-eye symbol on the dollar. And then Wallace brought the idea to FDR, who simply instructed Morgenthau to use it.

The upshot is that presidential secret-society affiliations literally stare us in the face whenever we pay with cash – an occurrence that (admittedly) happens less and less often with each passing day. And, of course, it’s far from the only association between our currency and occultism. See “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists” for the magical origins of the serpentine “dollar sign.”

Conclusion

Did we miss – or miscount – anyone? What order would you have preferred? Feel free to drop us a comment, below.

But if you found something of interest, please be sure to “Like” the video and, if you’re not already subscribed to the channel, consider doing so in order to see more content similar to this.

If you think others might appreciate this content, do us a favor and share the link. And if you have video ideas or suggestions, don’t hesitate to let us know!

Copyright 2023, TheSynchroMystic. All applicable rights reserved.

---

[1]President John F. Kennedy, “The President and the Press: Address Before the American Newspaper Publishers Association,” Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City, April 27, 1961; online at <https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/american-newspaper-publishers-association-19610427>.

[2]House Select Committee on Assassinations, Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: Hearings Before the Select Committee on Assassinations of the U.S. House of Representatives, United States Congress, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Second Session, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1978-1979; online at <https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report>.

[3]Adam Parfrey and Craig Heimbichner, Ritual America: Secret Brotherhoods and Their Influence on America, Port Townsend, Wash.: Feral House, p. xviii.

[4]For his part, Franklin presided over Masonic assemblies both in America and in Europe.

[5] According to the official website of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc., the third U.S. president “is frequently, yet falsely, linked to the Freemasons.” (“Fraternal Organizations,” Monticello.org, n.d., <https://www.monticello.org/research-education/thomas-jefferson-encyclopedia/fraternal-organizations/>.) No initiation records are extant that would be evidence of the contrary, as is usually pointed out by Masonic apologists (such as S. Brent Morris). Despite these protests, Jefferson is sometimes found on rosters of Masonic presidents. (See, e.g., “Masonic Presidents of the United States,” Harry S. Truman Library and Museum, National Archives, <https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/photograph-records/58-11>. Notice that James Madison is also depicted on the image.)

[6] Amy Wallace, David Wallechinsky, and Irving Wallace, The Book of Lists #3, New York: Bantam, 1983, p. 28.

[7] Jimmy Carter is sometimes listed as a Freemason. However, supposedly, this is based upon a misreading of the significance of that fact that he was sworn into office using George Washington’s Inaugural Bible, which was in the custody of a Masonic Lodge (St. Johns No. 1, New York). Carter is best remembered for brokering a peace deal between Egypt and Israel that concluded three decades of hostility – but also served as the catalyst for the creation of Baptist minister Jerry Falwell’s “Moral Majority,” which signaled a new partnership between Protestant Christians and the Republican political party. Fundamentalists were professedly dissatisfied with what they interpreted as a betrayal of the Israeli state.

[8]Virginia Cox, “Rhetoric and Ethics in Machiavelli,” John M. Najemy, The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, chapt. 11, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010, <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-machiavelli/rhetoric-and-ethics-in-machiavelli/9F3D60D530A02EDF192819DB3FC3C40A>.

[9] “Skull and Bones, Yale University,” Biography Presents Secret Societies, New York: Hearst Specials, 2023, p. 43.

[10]The confession is from Henry L. Valance, as published in Charles G. Finney, The Character, Claims, and Practical Workings of Freemasonry, Cincinnati: Western Tract & Book Society, ca. 1869, <https://www.gospeltruth.net/1869Freemasonry/freem_chap2.htm>.

[11]Marcus Baram, “Did Bush’s Grandfather Steal Geronimo’s Skull?” ABC News, Jun. 20, 2007, <https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3299671&page=1>.

[12]“Geronimo’s Kin Sue Skull and Bones,” Associated Press via NBC, Feb. 18, 2009, <https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna29265600>.

[13]Numbers 5, 6, and 7!

[14]Or, four parts over eight hours of broadcast time.

[15]For the quote, available (at time of writing) via a Google search, see: <https://www.google.com/search?q=history+channel+men+who+built+america&rlz=1C1UEAD_enUS946US946&oq=history+channel+men+&aqs=chrome.0.0i355i512j46i512j69i57j0i22i30l7.3870j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#wptab=si:AEcPFx7344W7I-FdyS_HaKiRPRHW9DfKDEEkRfxriy8TgoDRa69ZGfZQIjCsemp_VNl8HxbR9–Jc26PvlJUYJ3419Wj6u34i4-RRRNnqywV-cPZJYZLgeSqX-E0y9v8E3NQbyGstGBps9sXrC-Im-8F8adJLrRmUNvFjArWMbGl3DD1usg-4AA%3D>.

[16]See, e.g., the episode summary available at the Internet Movie Database, “Taking the White House,” History Channel, season 1, episode 7; “Storyline” at IMDB, <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt18298200/>. Cf. The 1913 Pujo Committee Report, details about which can be found at “Money Trust,” Wikipedia, Feb. 3, 2023, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_trust>.

[17] According to Wikipedia’s summary of the “historical drama” Secret Honor, “…Nixon admits that he has been the willing tool of a political network he alternately calls ‘the Bohemian Grove’ and ‘The Committee of 100’.” “Secret Honor,” Wikipedia, Aug. 27, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Honor>; see Donald Freed and Arnold M. Stone, Secret Honor, Robert Altman, dir., New York: Cinecom, 1984, film.

[18]See “Bohemian Grove,” National Park Service, Nov. 7, 2021, <https://www.nps.gov/places/000/bohemian-grove.htm>.

[19]Devon Jackson, “Bohemian Club,” Conspiranoia, New York: Penguin; Plume, 2000, p. 33.

[20]#s 3 & 4.

[21]Cofounding credits are given to surgeon Walter Millard Fleming, allegedly a Masonic-degree collector almost as enthusiastic as John Yarker, and playwright William J. Florence (born William Jermyn Conlin).

[22]Parfrey and Heimbichner, p. 119.

[23]Laurence J. Peters, qtd. in David Wallechinsky, Irving Wallace, and Amy Wallace, The Book of Lists, New York: Bantam Books, 1980, p. 15.

[24]Wallechinsky, Wallace, and Wallace, op. cit., p. 374.

[25]“JFK and the U.S. Presidents Who Died in Office,” History (U.K.), <https://www.history.co.uk/articles/us-presidents-who-died-in-office>.

[26]“Warren G. Harding,” Wikipedia, Mar. 5, 2023, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_G._Harding>.

[27]On the latter, see Parfrey and Heimbichner, op. cit., p. 51.

[28]Barron H. Lerner, “Roosevelt’s Last Days: Did cancer kill FDR?” Slate, Nov. 24, 2009, <https://slate.com/technology/2009/11/did-franklin-d-roosevelt-actually-die-from-cancer.html>.

[29]“History of the FDIC,” Fed. Deposit Insurance Corp., Jun. 6, 2022, <https://www.fdic.gov/about/history/>.

[30] Ric Edelman, The Truth About Money, 3^rd ed., New York: HarperBusiness; Rodale, 2004-2005, p. 63. (Earlier editions read: “…$1.22 per $100,” ibid.) The figure may have been updated for the 4^th edition, published in 2010.

[31]“Social Security History,” Social Security Administration, n.d., <https://www.ssa.gov/history/50ed.html>.

[32]Established in 1864 by a school teacher named Justus Henry Rathbone.

[33]The story goes that Pythias was sentenced by a tyrant to death for treason. Pythias accepts his punishment, but asked only for the latitude to conclude his personal business. The tyrant only agreed on the condition that Pythias’s bosom companion, the innocent Damon, submit to arrest to guarantee Pythias’s return. The tyrant is initially surprised that both men agree to this condition. The tyrant, expecting Pythias to simply disappear, anticipates Damon’s execution. But Pythias does come back. The astounded tyrant frees both men in admiration of their friendship.

[34] “Khorasan,” Wiktionary, Mar. 16, 2023, <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Khorasan>.

[35] Thomas Moore, Lalla Rookh: The Veiled Prophet of Khorassan, London: Hurst, 1817; online at <https://fiftywordsforsnow.com/ebooks/lalla/prophet.html>.

[36]Qtd. by Gaillard Hunt, ed., The History of the Seal of the United States, Washington D.C.: U.S. Dept. of State, Govt. Printing Office, 1909, p. 55; archived online at <https://books.google.com/books?id=jUZmAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA55>.

10 Quick Reasons to Believe There Really WAS a Conspiracy

According to press reports, the majority of Americans believe that thirty-fifth United States President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was murdered as part of some sort of conspiracy.

However, there’s always that one holdout: a colleague, friend, or other acquaintance who insists that accused assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.

In this video, in commemoration of the 59^th anniversary of JFK’s untimely death, I’ll sketch ten (10) reasons to believe that there is more to the tale than one, Communist-sympathizing “lone nut.” The aim, here, is certainly not to break new ground or to favor one particular hypothesis over another. Rather, the points to be surveyed are merely intended as candidate “opening moves,” as it were. They may be used in circumstances – such as over holiday dinners – where partisans of the “official story” ask for justification for the skeptic’s position.

The first point could well be that it’s rational in this case to be in the majority. And although there are important, burden-of-proof-style considerations that probably ought to be raised, let’s begin with the following instead.

10. Oswald was never tried – let alone convicted.

Legend has it that there is a presumption of innocence in the legal system of United States of America. At a minimum, this is supposed to mean that a person is considered to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

According to the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, this is to play out via a “speedy …public trial” in front of “an impartial jury” in the relevant jurisdiction. The accused is to have the opportunity to address the evidence and testimony against him, with the help of a competent lawyer.

Of course, as now-deceased attorney Mark Lane vociferously pointed out, Lee Harvey Oswald received no such trial, was never afforded a robust legal defense, and – since he was essentially summarily executed while under the “protection” of the Dallas Police Department – never had the opportunity to confront or answer any of his accusers.

While these facts, by themselves, may not suffice to show that JFK was assassinated as part of a conspiracy, they persuade me that Oswald’s guilt was never established according to this country’s historical canons of judicial fairness.

9. The Warren Report didn’t satisfy everyone.

What about “The President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy”?

Better known as the Warren Commission, this was the body empowered to “investigate” the assassination.

As JFK’s immediate successor, Lyndon Baines Johnson would – in an impartial and sane world – surely have rated more than a passing glance as an accomplice or suspect himself.

Indeed, he would later be implicated by career CIA man, E. Howard Hunt in what has become known as Hunt’s deathbed confession.

Even setting aside the fact that Kennedy’s death catapulted Johnson into the highest office in the land, the new President’s “commission” initially resisted any attempt to allow Oswald, posthumously, to receive a fair hearing.[1]

That including an actual defense for the recently deceased defendant was (at best) an afterthought must surely cast doubt on the pretense that the Warren Commission approximated anything like a “fair trial.”

Furthermore, the commission was populated by at least one of JFK’s presumed enemies – namely, Allen Dulles.

Recall that Kennedy had fired Dulles from the über-secretive Central Intelligence Agency.

When one reflects on this fact, one can easily sympathize with then-influential columnist and television personality Dorothy Kilgallen who publicly ridiculed the Warren Commission’s Report as “laughable.”

Dorothy decided to bring her considerable investigative talents to bear on the matter. Unfortunately, on November 8, 1965, she turned up dead – in highly suspicious circumstances – before her potentially history-altering conclusions could see the light of day.

Or again, consider JFK’s brother, Robert F. “Bobby” Kennedy. According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., RFK believed that the supposedly exhaustive report was a “shoddy piece of craftsmanship.”

Of course, RFK was short dead in June of 1968, when was – potentially – close to being nominated as the Democratic candidate for the office of the presidency.

The story goes that Bobby’s assassination led the U.S. Secret Service to offer to safeguard high-level political candidates.

A lot of good that does, seeing that JFK ostensibly enjoyed the same “protections” when he became the fourth president to be murdered in office – by official count, anyway – and the first to be assassinated since the Secret Service began shielding the commander in chief.

8. Even Warren Commission members didn’t believe it.

As if it weren’t bad enough to have prominent members of the public rejecting the Warren Commission’s authoritative-sounding pronouncements, the word is some of its own members may not have believed it, either.

For instance, according to various documents belonging to the late Richard B. Russell, a former Democratic senator from Georgia, Russell “was troubled by the Warren Commission’s conclusion that a single bullet killed President John F. Kennedy and wounded former Texas Gov. John Connally, even though he signed the commission’s report…”.[2]

Supposedly, however, Russell had been one of three commission members who at first refused to lend their names to the final report.[3]

The others were Senator John Cooper and Congressman Hale Boggs.

Although Hale Boggs would waffle and make contradictory claims – before his own mysterious disappearance (and presumed death) in an airplane crash in late 1972…

– at one time he disclosed his “strong doubts” about magic-bullet theory.

7. The Commission’s self-doubt engenders skepticism.

When nearly half of commission members had grave misgivings about signing their own “findings,”…

…it’s not surprising that upwards of half of the American public can’t bring themselves to believe it either.

Prominent people who have, in one capacity or other, expressed some measure of disbelief, include numerous celebrities – from Kevin Costner and Tommy Lee Jones to Oliver Stone and Bruce Willis – have made no bones about their incredulity.

In the political sphere, the quirky, left-leaning “independent” former professional wrestler and ex-governor of Minnesota, Jesse Ventura is a professed doubter of the System-approved account,…

…as are occasional presidential hopefuls John Forbes Kerry and Gary Warren Hartpence.

The latter, better known as “Gary Hart,” went so far as point out the (obvious) failure of mainstream “American journalism” to do any real “follow up” on the myriad indicators of widespread treachery.

In fact, this dereliction of press responsibility is so grievous and, on its face, so inexplicable that it deserves its own treatment – which I hope to provide. For now, suffice it to say that, at least since World War II, the relationship between the media and the intelligence services has been a little, well… murky.

6. The media seems long ago to have sacrificed any semblance of objectivity.

Let’s try to make this point more vividly. Case in point, consider a then-youthful CBS news correspondent Dan Rather speaking about his viewing of the film of the assassination captured by Ukrainian-born American clothier Abraham Zapruder.[4] Rather misrepresents the result of the second shot to hit Kennedy[5] – which he calls “the third total shot” – falsely claiming that it caused the president’s “head …to move violently forward”.[6]

[play]

In fact, Kennedy’s head was savagely blown back and to the left, in the memorable phraseology of director Oliver Stone’s film, JFK.[7] [play]

You’ll note that, in 1963, the Zapruder Film was purchased by Time-Life and essentially put on ice.

It’s an interesting story – and it involves a now seldom mentioned former O.S.S. operative, army psychological-warfare mastermind, and Eisenhower speechwriter named Charles Douglas “C. D.” Jackson.

But that will have to wait. For the time being, I’ll simply note that, except for the publication of odd still frames – several of which were reproduced out of their proper sequence – Dan Rather’s claims could not readily be exposed as fabrications.

In 2022, when Zapruder’s footage is easily discovered by anyone with a web browser, widely available references such as Wikipedia casually admit that there were “inaccuracies in his [Dan Rather’s] description” of the content of the film.[8] That’s an understatement.

5. Despite the disinformation, scattered admissions are intriguing.

Rather was far from unique. And the relentless Oswald-alone agitprop continues to be pushed by soulless apparatchiks like Peter Jennings well into the 21^st century. But, occasional interesting tidbits can be found.

For example, consider comments made by Lyndon Johnson to Walter Cronkite in 1969. LBJ stated that he couldn’t rule out the assassination involving “international connexions.”[9]

For some reason, Cronkite – billed as “the most trusted man in America” – was inexplicably standing by a news wire machine at around noon (Dallas time) when the JFK-assassination dispatch came thru.

4. Newsman admits the obvious: ‘there had to be a conspiracy.’

As we hope to excavate in a future video, even a partial accounting of the worrying interrelationships between major newspapers and television networks on the one hand, and the Central Intelligence Agency on the other, shows that among the worst offenders were some of the biggest names in the business: for example, CBS and the New York Times.

So, perhaps it isn’t all that surprising that this particular comment owes to a man who was a fixture of public broadcasting instead.[10]

In an interview with Diane Rehm, Jim Lehrer remarked:

“I went at my reporting or the idea that there had to be a conspiracy. The only issue was, what kind of conspiracy?”[11]

I would say that this is extraordinary. But, on the contrary, it seems to me that nothing could be more ordinary. Perhaps we should take it as an attestation of the adage (apparently falsely attributed to George Orwell) that “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”[12]

3. Even a pathological liar occasionally lets the truth slip.

Former President Richard M. Nixon isn’t exactly remembered for his honestly. The only president ever forced to resign his office, he – or someone in his administration – ran an espionage and sabotage campaign against his political enemies.

This culminated in the Watergate debacle, in which a group of burglars – including several central intelligence agents such as E. Howard Hunt – were arrested trying to bug the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee.

“Coincidentally” (quote, unquote), Hunt was also likely front and center in the JFK assassination – at least according to his own alleged deathbed confession, as told to his son Saint John Hunt.

Even some possible (and famous) photographic evidence exists.

It has long been suspected that E. Howard Hunt was one of the three so-called “hobos” or “tramps” present at ground zero on November 22, 1963.

In his secret audio tapes, Nixon made repeated references to his fear that the Watergate investigations would uncover the “whole Bay of Pigs thing.” To hear Nixon’s former White House chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman, tell it, this was a code phrase for Kennedy’s assassination.

At one point, Nixon appeals for cover-up help to then-Director of Central Intelligence, Richard Helms. In his usual halted, rambling style, Nixon is heard to bring up: “The ‘who shot John?’ angle,” asking: “Is Eisenhower to blame? Is Kennedy to blame? Is Johnson to blame? Is Nixon to blame? Etc., etc. It may become, not by me, a very vigorous issue. But if it does, I need to know what is necessary to protect – frankly – the intelligence-gathering and the dirty-tricks department. And I will protect it. I have done more than my fair share of lying to protect you. And I believe it’s totally right to do it.”

So, here is the sitting U.S. President – Tricky Dick, himself – asking the head of the CIA for information on “who shot John” Kennedy. And of course, quite interestingly, Helms did not say: of course, it was Lee Harvey Oswald.

2. Some of the files are still sealed.

Which brings up another curiosity: After 59 years, some of the JFK-associated records are still off limits. This naturally brings a few questions to mind, such as: what are they still hiding?

At this point, establishment pundits typically scoff – as if the only reason to fret about secret archival information is the chimerical quest for a “smoking-gun” document. But such thoughts are wrongheaded – in two equal and opposite directions.

For one thing, the fact that some records remain hidden – even at this historical distance – displays the bad faith of certain government archivists. It’s already beyond question that there has been a cover up. That the same players still resist – or outright refuse – oversight is, frankly, insulting.

This leads to a second, and perhaps more important, point – one which moves in a diametrically different direction. Namely, it’s reasonable to think that the sealed files are an emblem of a pathological lack of volition on the part of the American people. We don’t need to wait for some smoking gun. The evidence already available is more than sufficient to show that President John F. Kennedy was murdered by conspirators – some of whom (or some of whose heirs) are yet in power. The problem isn’t sealed files; the problem is collective paralysis.

1. The government’s own most recent investigation concluded conspiracy!

As a final attestation to the fact that overwhelming evidence for conspiracy is widely available, we need look no further than the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Established in 1976, it looked into the JFK murder, among other things. It’s conclusions?

One was this: “The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.”

A second was that there is a “high probability” of a second gunman. – meaning… whatever conspiracy you favor, Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone.

A second was that there was a “high probability” of a second gunmen – meaning, of course, that (regardless of what conspiracy you favor) Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone.

Copyright 2023. All applicable rights reserved.

---

[1]    It only reluctantly appointed Walter E. Craig, then head of the American Bar Association, to the task when called out on the “oversight” by the previously named Mark Lane.

[2]    “Senator Russell’s Papers Show He Disagreed With Warren Report,” Rome News-Tribune, Oct. 17, 1993, p. 7A; online at <https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bhMwAAAAIBAJ&pg=3085%2C4917493>.

[3]    Charles J. Sanders and Mark S. Zaid, “Disclosure Law at Last May Help to Clarify the Facts of the Kennedy Assassination,” South Texas Law Review, vol. 34, p. 412; reproduced in Hearing Before the Legislation and National Security Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, The Effectiveness of Public Law 102-526, The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records, U.S. House of Representatives, 103^rd Congress, 1^st Session, Nov. 17, 1993, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994, p. 141; archived online at <https://books.google.com/books?id=j6Z_LOsTRi8C&pg=PA141>.

[4]    “Dan Rather’s account from November 25, 1963,” HelmerReenberg (channel), YouTube, posted Jan. 28, 2010, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiSoxFHyjGY>.

[5] Between 2:01 and 2:17.

[6]    Ibid.

[7]    See “JFK Zapruder Footage: Slowed Down & Enhanced,” Wayne Robson (channel), YouTube, posted Sept. 28, 2011, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwy6Q9_cUwc>.

[8]    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapruder_film>.

[9]    “Lyndon Johnson interview with Walter Cronkite, September 1969,” Michael Courtenay (channel), YouTube, posted Nov 23, 2013, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5psrZmT0tY>. The interview excerpt, though recorded in September 1969, was originally part of a CBS Nightly News broadcast dated April 24, 1975.

[10]  Tho, PBS had its share of odd characters. For instance, former White House Press Secretary – and ex-Council on Foreign Relations member – Bill Moyers deserves a careful look.

[11]  Jim Lehrer, interviewed by Diane Rehm, “Jim Lehrer: ‘Top Down: A Novel Of The Kennedy Assassination’,” Diane Rehm Show, Oct. 7 2013, <https://dianerehm.org/shows/2013-10-07/jim-lehrer-top-down-novel-kennedy-assassination>. Continuing, he said: “So I checked out every one of them, as did everybody else. And it was all said and done, I came away with a conclusion after several years, after a few years that there may have been a conspiracy,” ibid.

[12]  Cf. Brad Sylvester, “FACT CHECK: Did George Orwell Say, ‘Telling The Truth Is A Revolutionary Act’? We take a look,” National Interest, Jul. 29, 2019, <https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/fact-check-did-george-orwell-say-%E2%80%98telling-truth-revolutionary-act%E2%80%99-69896>.

(And the People Associated With Them)

Introduction

Sex magic?[1] Yes, really! So what is one to make of this salacious, risqué and frankly vulgar phrase that has attained currency among contemporary cognoscente?

…Even as STDs (sexually transmitted diseases) supposedly spiral out of sight in Euro-American public health.

One gathers that this is, to some extent, from the baleful renown of a certain Edward Alexander “Aleister” Crowley. Being featured on the cover of the Beatles’ 1967 Sgt Pepper’s record album – and even possibly as the real identity of the eponymous Sgt. –seems to have clinched (or validated) the idea of psychoneurotic sexuality for credulous millions.

The self-styled “Great Beast 666” Crowley – the “wickedest man in the world” – was the personification of demented eros, even though he himself, for all his supposed powers, ended his days an impoverished terminal heroin addict in December 1947. We will meet “Mr. Crowley” again, shortly.

All right: down to particulars. “Sex” I suppose needs no special explication, except that – more precisely – it is the adjectival form, sexual, that is implied here. Magic (or magick, Crowley style) is much more historically reverberating, as we will see throughout this presentation. A definition supposedly popularized by Crowley and repeated by an admiring Wikipedia is: “a technique for bringing about change in the physical world through the force of one’s will.”[2]

But with this basic groundwork in place, in this video, we will look at ten groups (and some of the often-notorious people associated with them) for whom sacred rituals have revolved around sexual intercourse, or what is sometimes given the lofty sounding title magia sexualis – that is, “sex magic.”

Caveats and Disclaimers

Just a few words of caution: As usual, no claim is being made for completeness. In other words, this presentation will merely be a survey, rather than an exhaustive exploration. Additionally, nothing herein should be construed as an allegation of wrongdoing on the part of any individual or organization. This isn’t a legal brief; it’s a video! And it’s for entertainment purposes, only! We will be looking at some of the racier characterizations that have been made of various institutions. But we leave it to viewers to decide whether these accounts are exaggerations, fabrications, or reliable histories.

20^th & 21^st Centuries

The phrase “sex cult” may immediately recall images from the ritual-orgy sequence in the blockbuster erotic tour de force, Eyes Wide Shut.[3] In the film, the late, inimitable Hollywood director Stanley Kubrick has main character Dr. Bill Harford, played by Tom Cruise, unwittingly infiltrate a group of wealthy debauchees. Harford observes masked participants in flagrante delicto. Ultimately, he himself is unmasked and threatened for his deception.

It is standard to hear movie analysts and critics (whether System-approved or self-proclaimed) issue blanket denials that Kubrick intended to lend his considerable weight to the opinion that such secret societies actually exist.[4]

It would be presumptuous of me to suppose that I could settle the question of what was on the famed movie-maker’s mind. However, recent developments must surely call into question dismissals that are pronounced in the usual, all-too cavalier manner.[5] 

After all, in 2018, major media outlets disclosed the arrest of one Keith Raniere. Raniere was ostensibly the head of a successful marketing company called NXIVM (“nexium”) that provided “personal-development” seminars to white-collar, executive types.

But, according to stories, underneath this sleek veneer, Raniere billed himself “Master of Slave Women”[6] and operated a sex-trafficking network with the help of a coterie of female accomplices, including actress Allison Mack and Seagram’s-liquor heiress Clare Bronfman.

This was followed, one year later, by the re-arrest of sex-offender and former financier, Jeffrey Epstein.  Epstein also appears to have had some kind of interaction or relationship with high-profile persons such as former U.S. presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Microsoft mogul Bill Gates, Britain’s Prince Andrew, and numerous others. And he also supposedly utilized the “fairer sex” to entice fresh meat into his predatory (and sex-obsessed) orbit.[7]

Or, consider the earlier Children of God group, also sometimes referred to as the Family International. Once upon a time, the group enticed the parents of notables such as actress Rose McGowan as well as of the “Phoenix” siblings – Joaquin, Liberty, Rain, River, and Summer.

River Phoenix, you may remember, reportedly overdosed on drugs inside of Johnny Depp’s Viper Room nightclub, along the Sunset Strip in West Hollywood in 1993. He was transported to the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, but died on Halloween night at the age of 23. According to an article that appeared in Esquire Magazine two years before his death, River supposedly called the Children of God “disgusting” and claimed that it was “ruining people’s lives.”[8]

Apparently, the Children of God’s sex-obsessed “…leader, David Brant Berg” recruited new members through seduction – “proudly refer[ring]” to his sexual missionaries “…as hookers for Jesus.”[9]

Of course, this smacks of Charles Manson’s notorious – and, ultimately, murderous – collection of hippie youths, who also referred to themselves as a “family.”[10] It’s not uncommon to see the Manson Family referred to as a sex cult. And it’s worth point out that Manson himself seemed inexplicably well-connected with California movie-and-music-scene personalities like actress Doris Day’s son Terrence “Terry” Melcher,[11] actress Angela Lansbury’s teenage daughter Didi,[12] Rat-Pack member Dean Martin’s daughter Deana,[13] and – most famously – Beach Boys’ co-founder Dennis Wilson.[14]

For his part, Manson may have been (partially) influenced by the London-based, and oddly named, Process Church of the Final Judgment. The brainchild of a pair of British occultists named Robert and Mary Anne De Grimston, the “Process” was described in media reports as “an offshoot of” Lafayette Ronald Hubbard’s Church of Scientology – the outfit that has attracted Hollywood “A-listers” like Tom Cruise and John Travolta, as well as other big names like Kirstie Alley, Stanley Kubrick’s daughter Vivian, Giovanni Ribisi, and others.

But, as an offshoot, the Process was a more sinister variant – one “…which practice[d] black magic and glorif[ied] sexual excess.”[15]

According to Ed Sanders, some Process members were decidedly Luciferian,[16] and – to help ourselves to Sanders’ euphemism – “celebrated… sensuality”[17] by participating in what the pornographic-movie industry routinely calls “gangbangs.”[18]

Given all these cultish and sexual shenanigans, it seems fair to ask: What might some of these groups have been up to? Borrowing a phrase from Baroness Kessler (in Roman Polanski’s 1999 film, The Ninth Gate), we may ask: are these just “social club[s] for bored” degenerates “…who use …meetings as …excuse[s] to indulge their jaded sexual appetites”? Or is there a deep secret, or arcanum arcanorum, lurking in the background?

‘Spermo-Gnosticism’: Salvation Thru Sex?

In the West, no study of sex magic would be complete without some mention of ancient Gnosticism. So, we may as well start with that.

I dealt with what you might call the “main lines” of Gnosticism in a video titled “10 Arcane Words.”[19] So, for a sober-minded account of foundational philosophical-religious terms such as “dualism” and “gnosis,” with no hanky-panky, see that presentation.

Here, we’ll only be concerned with the more sensational possibility that some rivulets of Gnosticism involved members in risqué ritualism. Many of these offshoots would (sometime later) be described as “spermo-gnostics,” in order to differentiate them from their milder-mannered cousins.[20]

Cainism, Ophism, Sethianism: Revolt Against Jehovah?

But, to kick things off slowly, in a three-way tie at number ten, we’ll look at some sects that have one conspicuous thing in common: their heroes come off as villains in the Bible.

For instance, consider the Cainites. In the Old Testament Book of Genesis, chapter 4, Cain is the firstborn son of Adam and Eve. When God favors the sacrifice of his younger brother, Abel, Cain also becomes the first murderer. 

And then there’s the Ophites. The Greek root word – ophis – means “snake.” The reference, of course, is to the serpent that tempted Eve in the Garden of Eden, just two chapters before Cain and Abel.

The significance of serpentine references was perhaps uncovered by Thomas Inman. As George Ryley Scott summarizes: “The power of erection possessed by certain snakes” – and, here, he names “[t]he Egyptian asp and the Indian cobra” – “was likened to the same power exhibited by the male organ of generation.”[21]

The case of the Sethians is more complex.[22] But we can zero-in on a highly relevant detail by noting that they are widely believed to have been the composers of the Gospel of Judas, the first English translation of which was published to great media acclaim by the National Geographic Society in 2006.

In the canonical Gospels (according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), Judas is portrayed as the wretched betrayer of Jesus; whereas, in the Gospel of Judas, he is the beau idéal of the enlightened Gnostic and the sole Apostolic custodian of the “true teaching” that the crucifixion was necessary to liberate the Christ from his bodily prison.[23]

Why did the Gnostics have this predilection for inverting the Biblical narratives? Firstly, they sought to learn and possess, hidden doctrines, or “Gnosis,” lying beneath the literal storylines.

But, secondly, they also viewed the Old Testament God, variously transliterated Yahweh or Jehovah, as a fool or as an evil entity.[24] And they associated him with Plato’s Demiurge[25] – the being responsible for the physical world of privation and suffering.[26]

This led to the Gnostic conviction that the only appropriate reaction was to “[revolt] against” the Hebrew and Christian God.[27]

In the words of agnostic New Testament critic Bart Ehrman: “Anything that [the Old Testament] God commanded, [Gnostics] opposed, and anything that God opposed, they supported.”[28]

The 19^th-c. French occultist Éliphas Lévi would later connect this mentality of revolt – which included “profanation of Christian mysteries” – with “black magic” that would arise “in the Middle Ages.”[29]

With this backdrop, we’re positioned to appreciate why many occult commentators have stated the “true God,” represented by the subversive serpent and Judas Iscariot, was in fact Lucifer.

Something of this is echoed by 19^th-century Freemasonic majordomo Albert Pike, who put it starkly in his monumental, if largely unreadable, tome Morals and Dogma. “LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light…? Doubt it not!”[30]

Likewise, 20^th-century Masonic philosopher Manly Palmer Hall states: “When the Mason …has learned the mystery of his Craft… [t]he seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands…”.[31]

How does one carry out this revolutionary and Luciferian project against Yahweh? In the words of the 18^th-century French essayist Jean-Pierre-Louis de Luchet: You “destroy the works of God and …commit every kind of infamy.”[32]

This shows up in Elizabethan playwright Christopher Marlowe’s The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus, where Lucifer’s servant-angel, Mephistophilis, tells the titular character:

“Therefore the shortest cut for conjuring
“Is stoutly to abjure all godliness,
“And pray devoutly to the prince of hell.”[33]

If this magical connexion seems farfetched, recall that the founder of Gnosticism was reputed to be the sorcerer Simon Magus, who appears in the Acts of the Apostles attempting to bribe Jesus’s apostles for the knowledge of how to “receive the Holy Spirit.”[34]

Apparently, Simon traveled with a Phoenician prostitute and encouraged his disciples to “…[follow] their own pleasure as though free…”.[35] It seems that, in these conditions, any Jehovian revolt would spill over into sexual deviancy.

Pretty salacious. But, you say: the case is merely inferential. 

Okay, but what may be merely implicit for the Cainites, Ophites, and Sethians, becomes more obvious later, starting with a system called Valentinianism, which comes in at number nine.[36]

Valentinianism Introduces the ‘Hieros Gamos’

For instance, the Valentinian-Gnostic Gospel of Philip uses “sexual imagery” to describe a “sacral rite” provocatively called the “bridal chamber.”[37] “[S]ome scholars [understand] the text as promoting sacred intercourse among group members…”.[38]

This same Gnostic “gospel” is mentioned both by author Dan Brown, in his 2003 novel The Da Vinci Code,[39] as well as in director Ron Howard’s 2006 movie adaption featuring famed American actor Tom Hanks and French actress Audrey Tautou.

The frenetic plot centers around the adventures of Harvard symbologist named Robert Langdon (Hanks), and French police cryptographer, Sophie Neveu (Tautou). In an attempt to solve the murder of Sophie’s grandfather, and lift suspicion from Langdon, the pair are pulled into the shadowy world of secret societies, and the search for the fabled Holy Grail.

In the course of the narrative, it is revealed that Brown’s heroine[40] “witnessed a sex rite” in her youth.[41]

The character Langdon explains that this ritual – which he refers to as a Hieros Gamos, or “Sacred Marriage”[42] – was meant to “achieve gnosis”.[43]

Proponents of this sex-for-knowledge idea frequently attribute it to Jesus himself who, in the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, allegedly endorsed it with cryptic remarks about “[making] the two one”.[44]

Viewers will also remember that Dan Brown has the character Sir Leigh Teabing assert that Jesus was “married” to Mary Magdalene, as implied in the Gospel of Philip. If you’re catching the drift, it’s implied that Mary Magdalene would have been Jesus’s sex-magic partner.

Of course, in context of The Da Vinci Code story, the Hieros-Gamos participants – including Sophie’s murdered grandfather, former Louvre museum curator Jacques Saunière – were members of a mysterious, and possibly fictitious, 20^th-c. order called the Priory of Sion.

Priory of Sion Legend: Jesus’s Sacred Marriage Begat Royalty

The received view of the Prieuré de Sion is that it is a product of the fevered imagination of Frenchman Pierre Plantard de Saint-Clair. Plantard claimed descent from an apparently long-extinguished line of kings known as the Merovingians.

Prevailing opinion has it that later writers, such as Anglo-Americans Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln,[45] notably in their bestselling 1982 volume, Holy Blood, Holy Grail,[46] provided Plantard’s delusions of grandeur with a backstory. So it goes that, in the expanded legend, the Priory – via its enforcement arm, the Knights Templar – were the protectors of a supposedly royal bloodline going back to Jesus of Nazareth and Mary Magdalene.

Brown’s fiction has a similar spirit. Or, at least, so it seemed to Baigent and Leigh, who brought an ultimately fruitless legal action against the Da-Vinci-Code creator for copyright infringement.[47]

Be that as it may, in his book, Brown has his lead male protagonist declare: “Sophie Neveu had unwittingly witnessed a two-thousand-year-old sacred ceremony.”[48] And that claimed pedigree, of course, situates Brown’s imaginary Hieros Gamos in the context of the birth of ancient Gnosticism.

Carpocratianism Taught ‘Deconditioning’ Thru Sex Rites

Another early variant of Gnosticism, Carpocratianism, takes us to number eight.[49]

The Carpocratians took up Plato’s idea that human beings have preexisting souls that reincarnate after death.[50] But…with a twist.

Essentially, they maintained that, in order to facilitate the purification (and ultimate release) of the soul over its many cycles of reincarnation: “One must try everything, experience everything, unveil everything…”.[51] In order to grasp this, you must lay a lot of stress upon the word everything.

“Thus bad deeds as well and good deeds were …wrought in pursuance of this idea.”[52] Get the picture?

The late 20th-c. French classicist Jacques Lacarrière calls this “deconditioning.” It is something similar to “sensitizing,” and it involved breaking down, through repeated exposure, a subject’s resistance to something viewed as objectionable.

An allied concept surfaces in alchemy, where the Latin maxim solve et coagula refers (roughly) to a process whereby something – for example, the consciousness of the alchemist – is first “dissolved” and the resultant residue is “rejoined” in a novel way.

In later traditions, this would come to be expressed as the thought that, in order to advance spiritually, a person needs to destroy or otherwise “transcend” his or her “ego.”

And one way to do this, or so it is sometimes held, is to engage in activities that, although they may be morally or physically repugnant, facilitate “[t]he terror, agony and despair” that tamp down the ego.[53]

A kind of neo-Carpocratianism recurs in European movements beginning around the 14^th century.[54] One core notion held in common by these groups could be expressed, in English, as the thought that “[t]here is nothing evil in nature except as men think it.”[55]

William Shakespeare appears to echo this sentiment when he has his Danish prince, Hamlet, exclaim: “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”[56]

In France, where many of the medieval revivals originated, it might have been phrased: “Honi soit qui mal y pense,” or (roughly) “Evil to him who evil thinks.”[57]

The French phrase is all the more curious since it is the motto of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, a chivalric association to which numerous members of the British Royal Family belong.[58] (There’s that royal connexion, again!)

The concept of “subjectivizing” evil – or reducing morality to a matter of human convention – is, in this context, often related to something called “antinomianism.” And this, it turns out, is an overt part of another variety of ancient Gnosticism.[59]

Nicolaism: ‘Antinomianism’

Tradition holds that this system, Nicolaism, our number seven, also had a checkered past.

It may have originated with Nicholas, one of the first seven deacons in the Christian faith.

Interestingly, Fortean thinker Jim Brandon, in his 1983 study, The Rebirth of Pan: Hidden Faces of the American Earth Spirit,[60] touches upon the relationship of particular “names of power” with anomalism.[61]

“Nick”-names are among these dynamic words.[62]

Nicolaism was condemned outright in the New Testament Book of Revelation, where Jesus states to the church at Ephesus: “You hate the practices of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.”[63]

The antipathy of the mainstream ancient church for Nicolaism stemmed, partially, from the suspicion that Nicholas had taught the aforementioned antinomian heresy. The word, coined in the 1530s by seminal Protestant Reformer Martin Luther, literally means being “opposed to the law.”

Luther had argued with fellow reformer Johannes Agricola, because the guy taught not only that Christians could disregard the Mosaic Law, but also that they could set aside all moral constraints.

Agricola’s basic idea was that if, as even Luther maintained, doing good works isn’t going to help your chances of getting to heaven, then it’s hard to see why doing evil would hurt your chances!

But Agricola’s view was arguably a restatement of a belief that went back to the early days of Christendom. Specifically, it arose within various branches of Gnosticism.[64]

The basic rationale was this: your soul is “fallen” just because you’re trapped in a dirty, physical body. It doesn’t matter what you do with your body. You can’t make things worse than they are already!

This, or something like it, may help to explain why the Nicolaites were known for leaning toward libertinism and “…lead[ing] lives of unrestrained indulgence”[65]^,[66]

The Nicolaites were notorious for defiling an early Christian ceremony tantalizingly known as an Agape, which – in the present context – roughly translates into “love feast.”[67]

Apparently, the Nicolaites may have drawn too close a parallel between erotic “human love,” on the one hand, and “heavenly love…,” on the other.[68] And this is where the story takes a decidedly darker turn, with the inception of a group of Gnostics with an even more sordid reputation for sexual immorality during these “love feasts.”

Borborite’s Secret Technique for Absorption of Magical Energies

This deeply shadowy sect is perhaps best known by the disparaging term “Borborites,” which means – provocatively – “filthy ones,”[69] and brings us to number six.

Similarly to the Sethians, the Borborites may have venerated an obscure entity known as “Barbelo.” A religious text called the Secret Book of John calls “Barbelo”: “…the Mother-Father, the first man, …the thrice-named androgynous one…”.[70]

“Androgyny,” of course, refers to the property of being sexually ambiguous in virtue of possessing both feminine and masculine properties. One of the prime symbols of alchemy has long been the androgyne – or “man-woman,” depicted here as the so-called Rebis, Latin for “dual thing.”

Dan Brown mentioned “androgyny” numerous times in The Da Vinci Code. For example, he claimed that the sex of Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa is ambiguous. He had participants in his fictional hieros-gamos sport “androgynous masks.” And, drawing from a Kabbalistic tradition that we will expound in a few minutes, he relates the belief that “[t]he Jewish tetragrammaton YHWH – the sacred name of God – in fact derived from Jehovah, an androgynous physical union between the masculine Jah and the pre-Hebraic name for Eve, Havah.”[71] The theme of androgyny will come up again.

For the moment turning aside from esoteric bisexuality, and toward claims of the 4^th-c. Catholic heresiologist St. Epiphanius, the Borborites treated the previously mentioned Agape meals as occasions for orgies and wife swapping.[72]

Not only this, but – if Epiphanius’s lurid retelling is credible – they also took semen,[73] as well as “the unclean menstrual blood” of the woman, when it was available, and consumed these as …get ready for it: the “body” and “blood of Christ.”[74]

Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey’s daughter, Zeena Schreck, comments on “[t]he practice of ritualized copulation” and the “consumption of the sexual fluids,” saying: “…the celebrants …swallow the sexual elixir …to devour magical energies…”.[75]

Though Zeena herself reportedly renounced her father’s beliefs in favor of Tantric Buddhism, her heritafe is interesting since the Borborites are routinely cited as precursors to the establishment, in ostensibly Satanic circles, of the so-called “Black Mass.”[76] This dark ritual, it is alleged, is essentially an “inversion,” or mockery, of certain elements of the Catholic Mass.[77]

When Satanism or other forms of supposed “devil worship” recurred in France, beginning in the 17^th century, certain features of those tales – such as abortion, child sacrifice, and cannibalism – hearken back to early accounts of the Borborites.

Of course, the socio-religious context is important. During the heyday of Christendom, it was believed that “…magic …[was] taught by the Devil …and the practices were …more effective the more obscenely they were performed.”[78]

Unsurprisingly, this seems to have raised some hackles. Epiphanius, who was regarded as a defender of Christian orthodoxy, was especially incensed, since he understood these activities simultaneously as affronts to natural law as well as parodies and perversions of the Catholic Eucharist, also known as the “Lord’s Supper” or “Holy Communion.”[79]

Manichæans Reserve Secrets for the ‘Elect’

A similar charge (of defiling the Catholic Eucharistic host) was leveled against the next group that we’ll consider – number five – the Manichæans, a group that exerted a powerful influence over various Church-proclaimed “heretics” for at least one thousand years of European history.

Manichæanism has been described as a blend of Persian Zoroastrianism and Gnostic Christianity.[80]^,[81]

A chief Manichæan innovation was its two-tiered initiation system. At the entry level were the “auditors” (or “hearers”) and, at the top, was a group of élites known as the “Elect” or “Perfect.”

St. Augustine, the towering 4^th-5^th-c. “doctor” of the Catholic Church, accused this upper echelon of engaging in “secret vices,”[82] including ritual nudism and – like the Borborites – consumption of “…a kind of eucharist including human sperm.”[83]

Presumably, Augustine would’ve known; he was a member of the group for several years![84]

In typical Gnostic fashion, Manichæans viewed the ingestion of human sexual fluids as means of freeing the latent “divine substances” that had been trapped inside.[85]

In fact, some Manichæans called themselves “…Catharists,” meaning “purifiers”. And they believed that they were redeeming or “purify[ing]…part of God” by eating sexual discharges.[86]

Interestingly, a kind of neo-Manichæanism surfaced in Europe during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Its name? Catharism![87]

Cathars / Albigensians

These Cathari,[88] more commonly termed “Albigensians,” flourished in the south of France.

At the time, the region was geopolitically removed from the orbit of the French king, who was headquartered in Paris. And it was also free from direct control of the Roman Church, which operated out of Italy. Consequently, a form of anti-Catholic, Manichæan religion appealed to the people in this area.

Albigensianism included the Manichæan system of initiation: an upper level of “…a ‘pure’ élite …(perfecti, parfaits, bonshommes or hérétiques)…” and a “…mass of simple believers (credentes).”[89]

Like the Borborites: “They were said to consume the ashes of dead babies and indulge in incestuous orgies.”[90]

Troubadours

According to Freemasonic scholar Manly Palmer Hall, Albigensianism “descended from the same source” as the tradition communicated by traveling minstrels called troubadours.[91]

According to Hall, these medieval singers (and, later, the celebrated Italian writer Dante) transmitted features of the Manichæan gnosis through poems dealing with chivalry and “courtly love.”

Writer Donald McCormick adds that “…the Troubadours …had [a tremendous] influence in creating the [modern] idea of love…”.[92] Tho, Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet must surely also be mentioned in this regard.

These balladist and lyrists created a repository of folklore that would furnish the materials for the stories of Excalibur, the Holy Grail, and the Knights of the Round Table.

Recall that a principal plot point in the Arthurian Cycle revolves around the adulterous romance between King Arthur’s bravest and most illustrious knight, Lancelot, and Queen Guinevere, retold – in a lighthearted fashion – to modern audiences in various performances (and revisions) of Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe’s 1960 musical, Camelot.

Suffice it to say, one or more of these Gnostic streams feed into later sex-magical currents. So much for one of the primary western roots of magia sexualis. Now, let’s shift our attention to a different tradition with roots that stretch further East.

Kabbalah: The Tree of Life

A second root comes from Jewish mysticism.[93] Scholar Hugh Urban puts it this way: “[O]ne of the most influential forces in the rise of modern sexual magic was the complex body of texts and traditions that make up Jewish Kabbalah. …Erotic symbolism is pervasive throughout Kabbalistic literature…”.[94]

Rabbi Moses de Léon, probable author of the major Kabbalistic text known as the Sefer Zohar (or, “Book of Splendor”) was “…a disciple of …‘Gnostic’ kabbalists…” who were preoccupied “…the world of the demonic …[and] with the sexual mysteries… [the alchemical] mysterium coniunctionis …[that] lies at the very heart of the Zoharic teaching.”[95]

A kabbalistic variation on the sacred-marriage theme was further developed in the anonymous, but highly influential, treatise titled Iggeret Ha-Kodesh (or, the “Holy Epistle”).[96]

The word Kabbalah itself signifies “tradition.” Specifically, we’re talking about a mystical tradition in which “[s]exual relations between a husband and wife were seen to replicate the union between [the] Shekinah and God.”[97] In Kabbalistic sex, “…the woman represents and to some extent becomes Shekhinah [sic],” while her male partner identifies with masculine aspects of divinity.[98]

The dictionary definition of “Shekinah” is the “glory of the divine presence.”[99] In Kabbalistic circles, it is linked with another concept, Malkhut, and it is construed as the “feminine aspect of God” – something like the Jewish version of the “goddess.”[100]

Of course, this recalls the “sacred marriage” – or hieros gamos – that we encountered with Valentinian Gnosticism.[101] Though, in this case, it has a Jewish complexion.

The topic of Kabbalah (and its origins) is, predictably, huge and multifarious. Once again, for its most basic – and non-sexual – contours, see “10 Arcane Words.”

However, since knowledge of the Bible and history is instructive, for now, I’ll simply lay it down that the Kabbalah appears to be an amalgamation of Hebrew and other traditions,[102] some of which – like Gnosticism and Neoplatonism – we’ve touched on both here and in our other videos.[103]

But, it’s arguable that some influence came by way of the ancient Akkadian empire of Babylonia, which enforced a system of “sacred prostitution.” In the words of the ancient historian Herodotus: “The foulest Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land to sit in the temple of Aphrodite and have intercourse with some stranger at least once in her life.”[104]

The influence that the Babylon sojourn exerted upon later Jewish religion is a complex and oft-debated matter. “Some Biblical scholars… have interpreted the story of Judah and Tamar [in the Book of Genesis, chapter 38] as a case of sacred prostitution.”[105]

Hargrave Jennings puts it directly when he asserts that ancient “Hebrew grove worship was …Phallic worship.”[106]

The case is hotly disputed, but we can get an intuitive “fix” on the overall, complicated situation another way. Subsequent Jewish religion would be importantly centered around a library of texts known as the Talmud. Although there are two versions of this encyclopedia-length corpus, arguably the most important of them is called the Babylonian Talmud.[107]

Whatever the extent of the comingling – and occultists sometimes go so far as to maintain that Moses encoded secret, ancient-pagan teachings into the Pentateuch, that is, the first five books of the Old Testament in the Bible – the fact is, Jewish interpretive tradition displays signs of syncretism.[108]

On a lighthearted note, the phrase mazel tov – commonly used to express congratulations and for joyous occasions – literally means “good star,” and invokes concepts of pagan astrology.

More centrally and seriously, the 5^th-c. commentary[109] known as Bereshith Rabba explains that when the Book of Genesis says that “God created man in His image …male and female He created them,” the text doesn’t refer to Adam and Eve, as readers may assume. Instead, according to the commentator, Genesis is saying that the “first man” was androgynous.[110]

In the occult imagination, this original human (sometimes called “Adam Kadmon”) was supposed to have been a composite entity – similar to the previously mentioned Barbēlo. In other words, the male Adam and the female Eve were formed from the preexisting, and hermaphroditic, “Adam Kadmon.”[111]

Some analysts connect this legendary Jewish character to “Baphomet,” the diabolical idol of the Knights Templar (according to some accounts), also known as “the Sabbatic Goat.” Baphomet was drawn in its now widely recognized form – and embellished with the alchemical maxim solve et coagula – by Éliphas Lévi as an illustration in his 1856 book, Dogma and Ritual of High Magic.

The correct recombination of “sacred” male and female energies is believed by some occultists to issue in the creation of the “divine child.” This conjunction of opposites[112] is sometimes said to be the mystical significance of symbols such as the right triangle in Freemasonry as well as the so-called “Star of David” hexagram in Judaism. Whether in Jewish-Masonic or Eastern lore, “[t]he downward-pointing and upward-pointing triangles …symbolize the sexual union of the female and male principles…”.[113]

Far from having been specifically a symbol of Jewishness from time immemorial, the Magen David (or “Shield of David”) hexagram appears to have come from medieval grimoires, of spell books. This magical use was then funneled through the work of idiosyncratic and highly influential Kabbalist Isaac Luria. Ultimately, the so-called “Star of David” was adopted as a Jewish flag, first in 14^th-century Prague. Prague was a hotbed for alchemy, astrology, and other occult arts.

Either way, and “…ever since” this primordial sex-change operation, human beings have sought their “soul mates” to restore the complete perfection of this supposedly original androgyny.[114]

Notice that these musings hearken back to the Gnostic-Kabbalistic interpretation of the Tetragrammaton: namely, that it is a symbol of a quasi-sexual combination of male and female divine energies.

This principle also motivates some sexual magic since, as Kabbalists put it: “humanity left Eden as a couple, …as a couple they must return.”[115] Therefore, practitioners operating on this wavelength view hieros–gamos-type rituals as part of an elaborate program of “repairing the world,”[116] resulting either in the creation of souls for ourselves or the restoration of our latent divinity (or perhaps both).[117]

This necessitates gaining self-knowledge; or, as the Delphic Oracle put it: “Know[ing] Thyself.”[118]

For example, in esoteric anatomy, the Kabbalistic “Tree of Life” is identified with the human spinal column. Said to contain the Freemasonically significant number of thirty-three vertebræ, the spinal column, also associated with the rod of Moses, is rooted in the sexual organs. The knowledgeable sexual Kabbalist will understand that the fiery, creative energy of Moses’ brazen serpent (see Numbers 21:8) is generated during sex.

Incidentally, in Eastern traditions this business is sometimes called “raising the Kundalini” and it connects back, in the minds of some authors (such as the 19^th-c. British Freemason and Rosicrucian Hargrave Jennings) with Gnostic snake worship – which, we mentioned before.[119]

Kabbalists view themselves as custodians of hidden knowledge such as this. As we saw previously, in Greek, these secrets would be termed “Gnosis.” In Hebrew, the word is Da’ath.[120]

Both in the Bible and in other spiritual literature, the word Da’ath is sometimes used as a euphemism for sexual intercourse.[121]

For example, in The Book of Genesis, chapter four, verse 1, when it says that “Adam knew his wife,” the plausible interpretation is that he and Eve had sex.[122]

Craft Freemasonry is said to be fascinated with some of these Gnostic-Kabbalistic concepts, as are depicted in what is perhaps the most recognizable masonic emblem. As it is typically presented, the compass and square – which, if completed, would represent the interlaced triangles of the Star of David[123] – surrounds the letter “G,” often supposed to be shorthand for “Gnosticism.”

Also remember that another major set of Kabbalistic-Masonic symbols revolve around the fabled Temple of Solomon. In occult lore, Solomon was a powerful sorcerer who could summon and control demonic entities and other aethereal forces. But, he also had “700 wives and 300 concubines” – who, collectively, led him into apostasy.[124] This fact prompts some observers – like the previously named Rosicrucian Hargrave Jennings – to imagine that Solomon was a prodigious sex magician.

Apart from Freemasonry, another mysterious sect emerged from the syncretistic backdrop just sketched. These people, called “Frankists,” carry us to number 4 on our list of sex-captivated cultists.

‘Frankists’ Invert Judaism

First, we need a little historical context. In the inauspicious-sounding 1666, the same year as the Great Fire of London, Jewish theologian Nathan of Gaza proclaimed that the Messiah had come.[125] Nathan was the principal follower and promoter of the offbeat, 17^th-c. Sephardic Kabbalist Sabbatai Zevi.[126]

Sabbatai Zevi had long garnered a reputation for having a “‘Luciferan’ [sic] side” that issued in “strange acts.”[127] For instance, he once busted in on a synagogue service and, wielding an axe, “forced [worshippers] to pronounce the sacred, always unspoken, four-letter Name of God”[128] – the previously mentioned Tetragrammaton. Or, another time, he “publicly [married] himself to a Torah scroll.”[129] One wonders whether that “marriage” was ever consummated.

Nevertheless, for a host of socio-political and other reasons, the pair initially won over a considerable number of followers, who became known as Sabbateans.[130]

Many of these disciples became disillusioned, however, when Sabbatai Zevi converted to Islam after being apprehended in Turkey.

Curiously, some of the Sabbateans remained faithful to their founder – and even converted with him, in solidarity. For example, to this day, in Turkey, one may still find a group called the Dönmeh, who endorse what, as a first pass, could be glossed as a blend of Islam and Judaism.

According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, and like the varieties of Gnosticism that we previously surveyed: “The mystical cult of the [Sabbateans]”[131] was a mixed bag. Some genuinely embraced asceticism, while others “gave themselves over to licentiousness.”[132]

“The Polish rabbis attempted the extermination of the ‘Shabbethaian heresy’…, but” – as is evidenced by the existence of the Dönmeh – “could not fully succeed, as it was kept alive mostly in secret circles which had something akin to a Masonic organization.”[133]

Enter Jacob Frank. In 1726, he was born into a family of Sabbateans in what we would today know as Ukraine.[134] Frank was raised to be a merchant, and he supposedly traveled back and forth between Podolia and Turkey, where the Sabbatean Dönmeh were headquartered.

By 1755, Frank had somehow managed to attract his own congregation, which he turned on to his idiosyncratic version of Sabbateanism. His activities – and popularity – provoked the wrath of the local Rabbis, and the Frankists (as they began to be known) were dragged in front of rabbinical courts.

As the Jewish Encyclopedia puts it: “…[M]any of the sectarians confessed to having broken the fundamental laws of morality; and women confessed to having violated their marriage vows, and told of the sexual looseness which reigned in the sect under the guise of mystical symbolism.”[135]

For example, the “…bet din (Jewish court) …found [the Frankists] guilty of breaking numerous halakhic prohibitions …[including] adultery, …wife swapping, stud[ying] banned Sabbatian books, and profess[ing] the faith of Shabetai Tsevi.”[136]

Eventually, Frank claimed to be Sabbatai Zevi’s successor. The form of religion that he evidently preached called for his followers to invert (or ritually break) the Jewish law.

And similarly to Sabbatai Zevi, who apparently converted to Islam, Frank and his Frankists converted en masse to Christianity and were collectively baptized in what is now Lviv, Ukraine[137] in 1759.

Rabbi Marvin Antelman would link the Frankists with all manner of subversive movements, including the Illuminati.[138]

Frank himself went on the lam, as it were. He ended up in Germany and lived the remainder of his life in apparent luxury, assuming the title “Baron of Offenbach.”[139]

The Moravian Connexion

Allegedly, he had contact with – and may have been partially funded by – a group of Protestants known as Moravians. The original Moravian Brethren go back at least to the 15^th century.

In the 18^th century, a Lutheran-Pietist[140] named Nicolaus Zinzendorf – and known more commonly as “Count Zinzendorf” – resurrected the label “Moravian,” though “there is no real historical association between the two” movements.[141]

Dusting off a teaching reminiscent of Nicolaism, Zinzendorf made “…sex into such an important act that Moravians referred to it as a ‘sacrament.’”[142]

Zinzendorf also borrowed from the language of some “[m]edieval mystics …[and] held that sex …both symbolized and reenacted the unification of Christ and his bride, the church…”.[143]

Married Moravians were – somewhat unbelievably – supposed to have sex “…while focusing on their union with Christ.”[144]

But, if this imaginative effort alone made the difference between base and sacred sex, then it was hard to see why unmarried people couldn’t, well… get in on the action, too – provided only that they achieved the proper mental state.

Zinzendorf appears also to have believed and taught that, since males are part of the church, and the church is the “Bride of Christ,” males must somehow eventually become female. This queer notion initially issued in “homoerotic …liturgical language.”[145]

Ultimately, Zinzendorf’s son, Christian Renatus, and a group of likeminded brethren got the idea that they could effect this end state in the here and now. They did this by “[performing] a gender-changing ceremony,” after which they began calling themselves a “choir of sisters.”[146]  

Predictably, nowadays, enthusiasts insist that “[t]he practice of sex magic does not require sex organs, male-female polarity, or a partner”![147]

The ‘Swedenborgian Church’

Speaking of redefining marital relations, 18^th-c. Swedish mystic Emanuel Swedenborg came to believe that Conjugal Love (the title of his 1768 book) bordered on the liturgical. It seems relevant that, while he lived in London, Swedenborg associated with a group of English Moravians.[148]

However, to bring things around full circle, we note that it has long been assumed that Swedenborg was influenced by erotic Kabbalism. Though, this hypothesis has seen scholarly challenges, lately.

But Marsha Keith Schuchard has argued forcefully that that Swedenborg was trained in Hebrew by one Johan Kemper, formerly known as Rabbi Moses Aaron of Krakow. Additionally, Swedenborg was almost certainly acquainted with Rabbi Hayyim Samuel Jacob Falk, better known as the “Baal Shem of London.” In the first place, for a while, the Baal Shem – which is Hebrew for “lord of the (divine) name” – was practically Swedenborg’s next-door neighbor while he lived in England. But, also importantly for our purposes, both Kemper and Rabbi Falk were suspected of Sabbateanism!

Count Cagliostro figures in this broader picture. For an introduction, see “Top 10 Occultists.”

In any case, Swedenborg exerted an influence on numerous, subsequent celebrities – for example, 18^th-19^th-c. English Romantic artist and poet William Blake.

By some accounts, Blake, and a circle of associates – including engraver John Flaxman, portrait painter Richard Cosway, and the curious, androgynous, cross-dressing Freemason and spy known as the Chevalier d’Eon – may have participated in nudism and orgies.[149] Both of which were uncharacteristic for respectable Englishmen of the period.

Some of Swedenborg’s followers would proceed to start congregations based upon his teachings, loosely designated “Swedenborgianism.” This “New Church,” as it came to be called, has arms in Europe and North America where, according to Wikipedia, “[i]t is …liberal on social issues and sexual ethics, such as the ordination of women, homosexuality, and abortion.”[150]

In this, it is faithful to Swedenborg, who advanced a “view of sexual relationships outside marriage” that was “startling at the time”. “Unlike modern Christian fundamentalists, he did not condemn all sexual activity outside marriage, but saw that there were degrees of behaviour. …Just as subversive, …was his teaching that truly conjugial love is enjoyed in heaven.”[151]

Erotic Rosicrucianism

Still on the subject of revolutionary marriage-modifying movements, let’s move to number three, and call it “erotic Rosicrucianism.”

Circa 1856, an American spiritualist named Paschal Beverly Randolph founded the Fraternitas Rosæ Crucis, first in San Francisco, and then in Boston and Philadelphia. This is the order for which he is primarily remembered – though, his heirs disclaim any connexion to sex magic.

Though, according to Manly Palmer Hall, phallic and sexual symbolism was the original significance of the rose and cross, Rosicrucian emblems going back at least to the 17^th century.[152]

Bear in mind that Randolph conducted paid lectures and published numerous handbooks and novels[153] in which he advertised a mysterious set of privately printed manuscripts[154] that – he claimed – taught secret techniques of sex magic.

Randolph thus initiated select groups of customers during sub rosa meetings of his Brotherhood of Eulis – presumably introducing attendees our old notion of hieros gamos. His innovation was to place special attention on the idea that mutual climax – especially simultaneous orgasm of male and female partners – was especially powerful and can “[open] a momentary pathway to the cosmos” which, in turn, activates latent clairvoyant and psychic abilities.[155]

Randolph was interesting for several reasons, not least that he was of blended African-Caucasian extraction – which may have warmed him up to the alchemical-Rosicrucian notion known as coniunctio oppositorum, or the “union of opposites.”[156]

According to an apologetic offered in Hugh Urban’s volume Magia Sexualis,[157] Randolph would supposedly been horrified by any notion that a “sacred” sexual union could occur anywhere other than on a marriage bed.

However, according to Lara Langer Cohen, Randolph endorsed something close to Swedenborg’s view that “celestial marriage” is not to be confused with anything as base as an exchange of legal formalities in front of a justice of the peace. Professor Cohen contends that, in Randolph’s view, if mutual orgasm between two people is good, then the “best sex” involves “more than two participants.”[158]

In a CliffsNotes version, Randolph held that “true Sex-power is God-power.”[159]

Randolph’s influence extended far beyond his initial, possibly restricted circle. Numerous later practitioners, for example, the Russian-born artist, mystic, and (according to some commentators) Satanist Madame Maria de Naglowska, would take his insights in a variety of directions – such as in the rituals of Naglowska’s Parisian Brotherhood of the Golden Arrow. It is noteworthy that Naglowska claims to have translated – but may, in fact, have written – the volume Magia Sexualis that was published in Paris in 1931 with Paschal Beverley Randolph’s name on it.[160]

In their book, Demons of the Flesh, Nikolas and Zeena Schreck conclude that Randolph’s system has much in common with one final stream of sex-magical tradition,[161] which we will now take up.

Tantra

In fact, we’ll cheat a little and count this third important strand (in toto) as our top-two “sex-magical” cult. Of course, it’s the one that derives from the far-eastern mystical tradition known as “Tantra.”

Let me give a few prefatory words of caution, however.

At least since famed British explorer Sir Richard Francis Burton published the first English translation of the Kama Sutra,[162] there has been a tendency to sexualize wide swaths of Eastern philosophy. Although the Kama Sutra does contain portions that deal with sexual positions, which is the content it’s famous for, it is overall a treatise on how to live well – and not generally classified as “Tantra.”

Additionally, there are Eastern-religious practices that, for all their sexual appearance, are also distinguishable from Tantra, properly so-called. For instance, there is a maxim that, “[t]o prove one’s aloofness[,] one should lie with beautiful naked women in order to show self-control. Gandhi is said to have done this in the belief that it increased spiritual powers.”[163]

According to Donald McCormick: “The Tertiaries of the Catholic Order of St. Francis …[also] slept by the side of naked women” – and for similar reasons: supposedly “to test their powers of resisting temptation.”[164] Our attention will be focused elsewhere.[165]

Tantra, or Tantrism, is something of a blend of its parent traditions of Hinduism and Buddhism.

Preëminently, it is concerned with ritualized sex that purports to approximate – or identify with – the union of the god and goddess, in this case, Hindu deities such as Shiva and Shakti.

Some resources suggest that Tantrics, or practitioners of Tantra, may follow either of two “paths,” designated the “right hand”[166] and the “left hand.”[167] As a first pass, and although practitioners would bristle at the notion, you could think of this distinction as something like that between “white” and “black” magic in western occultism.[168]

So, the next set of sex-magic enthusiasts we’ll consider are those who adhere to this sinister track. (The word “sinister,” of course, comes from Latin, where it originally meant “left.”)

Left-Hand Tantrics: Taboo-Breaking

Left-hand Tantra,[169] or Vāmamārga,[170] ties back in with the concept of “deconditioning” that we mentioned, earlier. In Left-Hand Tantra, this deconditioning – or “destruction of the ego” – is frequently associated with the “breaking of ethical or social taboos” for the power that is believed to issue therefrom.

An entire procedure is prescribed, called (in English) the “Five Ms,” or Panchatattva.[171]

On the surface, the first four of the “M”-words uncontroversially represent substances that are generally taboo in Indian culture: madya (liquor), māṃsa (animal meat), matsya (fish), and mudrā (roasted grain).

However, the fifth word, maithuna, is of primary interest to us, here. Often translated “sexual intercourse,” maithuna provides us with an opportunity to take a peek under the surface, as it were.

Exoterically, it might appear that maithuna, the culminating taboo, is an action. On this superficial interpretation, which is also a common assumption for Western observers, sexual intercourse itself is seen as “taboo.” Therefore, having sex – at all; or, at least outside carefully circumscribed societal rôles – is tantamount to “taboo breaking.”[172]

But, seemingly more knowledgeable students of Tantra, such as Indologist David Gordon White,[173] disclose the explanation held by insiders: namely, that maithuna actually involves the ritual consumption of some combination of male and female sexual discharges or fluids.[174]

Ritual “consumption” or “reabsorption” may either be through oral ingestion (e.g., via cunnilingus) or through “…the drawing of the mixed essence …back into [the] still erect penis,”[175] in an alleged “flow reversal” that is bound up with various semen- and urine-retention techniques collectively known as amaroli, or the vajroli seal.[176]

We have seen ritual fluid ingestion before, with some forms of Gnosticism. Whether Tantra is, in some way now lost to history, the source of the Gnostic belief, or whether it is merely an allied system of thought, the fact is that later Western sex-magic practitioners recognized the similarities and began to look for ways to combine or syncretize the two.

This is sometimes put aphoristically to the effect that the way up is down or the adept must first descend in order to ascend.

So, for instance, some commentators reinterpret the Christian doctrine of “Original Sin” through this sort of lens, yielding the conviction that, with Gnostic-Tantric practices, “…the Fall into the body is reversed and human consciousness is able to escape its entrapment in matter.”[177]

On this view, Tantric sex is not simply an emblem for so-called “social liberation” – but it is literally a vehicle for spiritual liberation. In some streams of Tantra, for example, where “loss of semen is loss of soul,” having sex the “wrong way” may be spiritually deadly. Therefore, would-be yogis are either told to abstain totally, or else they are compelled to learn complicated breathing and meditative practices aimed at mastering the “correct” way to have sexual intercourse. There are competing theories, here.

‘Samael Aun Weor’

One suggestion comes from the South American apostate Catholic and neo-Gnostic Víctor Manuel Gómez Rodríguez, better known under the Hebraic-sounding appellation “Samael Aun Weor.” According to him, the aim is to have sex without achieving climax.[178] The rationale is that the orgasm is a wasteful expulsion of life energy and seed.[179]

In his 1961 book, The Perfect Marriage,[180] Aun Weor describes “Sexual Yoga” as divisible into three subsorts: white, gray, and black. In “white Tantra,” ejaculation is forbidden;[181] in “gray” and “black” varieties, on the other hand, it is allowed – to one degree or other.[182]

The movement of Tantra into the Anglo-American world is probably best understood against the backdrop of the so-called “19^th-c. Occult Revival,” part of which included the creation of the Theosophical Society – which was partially characterized by a syncretism that sought to fuse Eastern and Western forms of esotericism. For the basics, see (again!) my video titled “10 Arcane Words.”

Ida C. Craddock

One illustration of the Theosophical Society’s influence can be seen in the curious figure of Ida C. Craddock. Craddock was born into a Quaker household in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1857. After a brief stint as a Unitarian, and ostensibly following some sort of contact with the Theosophical Society, Craddock founded a “Church of Yoga,” and declared herself its head. She devoted her life to teaching and promoting eroticism and mystical sexuality, before committing suicide at the age of 45, due (according to some commentators) to despair over the constant barrage of obscenity charges that were leveled against her.

Craddock’s case might be thought an insignificant footnote – even for a study as specialized as this one – were it not that her posthumously published volume, Heavenly Bridegrooms,[183] caught the attention of no less an occultist than Aleister Crowley who reportedly wrote: “No Magick [sic] library is complete without it.”[184]

Crowley himself was influenced by both Buddhism and Tantra. He was an inveterate connoisseur of erotic occultism. At one time or other, he became a member of Freemasonry as well as the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.[185] And this brings us to our final sex-associated organization.

Honorable Mentions

But… before that, let me name a few “runners up” for this list. Mainly, these systems (or associations) were – for one reason or other – simply too complicated to tackle, here. Each of them deserves fuller treatments – which I hope to provide in forthcoming videos.

The first notable – which we have mentioned in passing – is the esoteric discipline of alchemy, one ancient name for which was the “Gay Science.”

Alternatively called the “science of god,”[186] its central theme is transformation. Many of the vivid images associated with alchemy contain sexual symbolism. Indeed, the mysterious process of alchemical transmutation itself is frequently likened to sexual intercourse.

Secondly, we have the Knights Templar. This Catholic military order, founded in the 12^th century – partly due to the fervent support of mystic and saint Bernard of Clairvaux, attained then-undreamed-of heights of power and wealth following the Crusades. However, as many people know, the order was disbanded in the 14^th century by French King Philip IV and Pope Clement V, and many – though possibly not all – of its knights were jailed and executed. The pretext? The Templars were first of all accused of blasphemy and idolatry – specifically, the worship of the previously named goat-headed entity “Baphomet.” They were also charged with sexual immorality – especially homosexuality – in conjunction with their infernal rites.

As writer Donald Michael Kraig helpfully summarizes: “The accepted history is that the Templars learned sex magic from the Sufis of the Middle East, who had learned it from the Tantrics of India. The Medieval alchemists received this information from the Templars and encoded it into some of their works.”[187]

Sufism, in brief, is a mystical tradition within Islam that has “many features of Gnostic doctrine”. In fact, “…at various times, Sufis were …called Gnostics,” that is, “knowers.”[188]

Thirdly, I wish I had time to dive into the divining cards known as the Tarot deck. Several of the face or “Trump” cards allegedly have sexual interpretations. And, in any case, no study of the 19^th-c. “Occult Revival” – which gave birth to modern sex magic – would be complete without considering the Tarot.

Fourthly, of course, there’s Satanism – and its many offshoots. In the modern period, one of the more sexual of these was the notorious, 18^th-century “Hell-Fire Club.” It was revived – if not created – by British politician Sir Francis Dashwood, and it attracted prominent American inventor and statesman Benjamin Franklin.

But if the Hell-Fire Club’s Luciferianism is sometimes dismissed as irreverent mischief, it is worth noting that there were allegations – arising in late-19^th-c. France, to the effect that serious devil-worshipping cults and even rogue Freemasons were engaging in sex magic. I have in mind the circle of the defrocked Abbé Boullan, Henri Antoine Jules-Bois, and the so-called “Order of the Palladium.” Whereas the former were accused of out-and-out black magic, the latter participants – called “Palladists” in some chronicles – were supposed to have been involved in a kinky variation on “co-masonry” (that is, a form of masonry that allowed the admission and initiation of women as well as men). However, since much of this is derided as a fraud perpetrated by a habitual double-dealer, operating under an assumed name, the affair is often dismissed as the “Léo Taxil Hoax.” Probably, given all attendant difficulties, a more responsible treatment of it would be in line. At any rate, it would take up more space than I could afford, presently. So…call it a runner-up.

Finally, a major – if not seminal – branch of contemporary neopaganism and witchcraft is Wicca. There are several varieties to consider – not least is “Gardnerian Wicca,” principally established by Gerald Gardner, whom we mentioned in our “Top 10 Occultists” presentation. But, a few acknowledge a ritual, frequently termed the “Great Rite,” which is a take-off from the hieros-gamos ceremonies that we have already examined.

But, without further ado… my pick for the number one “sex-magic” cult, is a mashup of the Ordo Templi Orientis (“O.T.O.”), and an associated sex-suffused, Thelemic brand of “Gnostic Catholicism.” Lemme try to explain.

Ordo Templi Orientis

Crowley joined the O.T.O. in 1912. But, it had reportedly been founded more than a decade earlier (circa 1897) by a professed German Rosicrucian named Carl Kellner, and his associate Theodor Reuss.

At a high level of generality, the O.T.O. may be describable as a composite of magic and Masonic Templarism – both of which were largely focused through a lens of mystical sexuality.

Specifically, “Kellner and Reuss had in mind that they would form a new esoteric order that would fuse craft Masonry, Rosicrucianism, and Hindu Tantra.”[189]

Kellner’s organization was downstream, and partially derived, from the 19^th-c. American occultist and spiritualist Paschal Beverly Randolph, whose sex-magical system we mentioned, above.

But Randolph’s admirers in the O.T.O. were also instructed and motivated by other currents.[190] One of the most important was the sex-infused teachings of the Kabbalistic Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor.[191]

Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor

Allegedly founded by Louis-Maximilian Bimstein, who operated under the pseudonym “Max Théon,” The Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor may – or may not – have exercised a formative influence on theosophist H. P. Blavatsky. But, in any case, its teachings were transmitted to the United States by the Scottish astrologer and psychic, Thomas Henry Burgoyne.[192]

According to Joscelyn Godwin, “…the primary result of the Order was to introduce occultists to the practical methods of P. B. Randolph.”[193] This was especially important, since “…[Randolph’s] detailed instructions in self-training were not easy to come by.”[194]

It’s not clear whether Kellner’s sex magic came from Randolph. For his part, Kellner claimed that he had been initiated into erotic mysticism directly by Sufi and Tantric masters.[195]

You’ll recall that, rightly or wrongly, widespread popular Western interest in Tantra was – ahem! – aroused (mistakenly, as we have said) in part by the aforementioned British scholar Sir Richard F. Burton, through his privately published (in 1883) early English version of the Kama Sutra. The Indian text is, of course, best-known for it’s explicit, illustrated representations of myriad sexual positions. 

The ‘Magnificent Oom’

But another, lesser-known, belt of transmission came by way of the mysterious American Pierre Arnold Bernard,[196] who was known by the colorful – if nonsensical – nickname “The Great Oom.”[197]

Bernard’s family includes individuals with connexions both to Buddhism and Sufism.

He founded “the Tantrik Order of America in 1905” and “[promoted] self-hypnosis and yoga.”[198]

In press reports, Bernard was depicted as a sex-obsessed philanderer who may have utilized hypnotism to debauch numerous women – and even young girls.

Enter Mr. Crowley

Enter “Mr. Crowley.” There’s no question but that the main sex-magical practitioner of the 20^th century – and possibly of all time – was British occultist Aleister Crowley.

You may view an introduction to Crowley in “Top 10 Occultists.”

Presently, we’ll start in 1909, with Crowley and his Jewish-English acolyte, Victor Neuberg, a poetry student who, incidentally, is credited as an early publisher of 20^th-c. Welsh poet Dylan Thomas.

Venturing into the desert of Algiers, Crowley suddenly had the urge to have homosexual sex.[199] As author Rosemary Guiley puts it: “The ritual marked a turning point …in [Crowley’s] view of the importance of sex in magic.”[200]

This rite, which Crowley claimed put him in contact with a demon – “Choronzon” – that had been known to Elizabethan sorcerer John Dee, led him to seek out other sex-magic adherents.

Crowley, who was by all accounts fairly sex-obsessed in any case (having had numerous partners of both sexes), would go on to found the Abbey of Thelema in Cefalu, Italy, on the Island of Sicily. The name was taken from a bawdy work of fiction titled The Life of Gargantua and of Pantagruel, written in the 16th century by the Renaissance humanist and supposed Catholic monk, François Rabelais.

In 1923, Crowley’s “Thelemic” commune – with its sex-and-drugs experimentation[201] – was closed, and he himself was expelled from the country, by order of Benito Mussolini no less.

The proverbial “last straw” had been the death of a young Oxford literature student, Frederick “Raoul” Loveday, allegedly following a depraved black-magical ritual involving the ingestion of cat blood.[202]

Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica

Crowley drew upon these – and myriad other[203] – ceremonies to rewrite the O.T.O.’s ceremonials to include “the ritual consumption of semen and vaginal fluids,” masturbation, as well as heterosexual and homosexual intercourse.

Crowley also influenced the Gnostic Catholic Church.[204] In fact, Crowley’s “Gnostic Mass” would become its principal rite.

One of the mainstays of this Mass is the consumption of a “Cake of Light.” A useful summary of the ingredients is easily discovered by a visit to the pertinent Wikipedia page: flour, honey, oils, and …sexual fluids.[205]

Crowley used the phrase “Elixir of Life,” or the word Amrita, as euphemisms for these sexual secretions. Thus, he resuscitated themes found in ancient Gnosticism and Tantra.[206]

Not only these, but Kabbalism, too, is a huge part of Crowley’s magical system.[207]

One legendary – and widely fictionalized[208] – facet of Kabbalistic lore, generally, is the so-called Golem.[209]

Not unlike Frankenstein’s Monster, the creature of 19^th-century gothic novelist Mary Shelley,[210] the Golem is a subhuman entity that is animated by rabbinic magic – specifically, various, math-like manipulations of the Hebrew alphabet.[211]

On this wavelength, would you believe that various Crowleyan sex rituals may have been geared toward the magical generation of a similarly soulless entity known as an homunculus?[212] And with this, we arrive at what is (if true) perhaps the darkest of the secrets of this current of magia sexualis.

The Homunculus

To start with, following particular strands of occult speculation, a fetus is held to be soulless until “…the third month of gestation.”[213]

In fact, Strong’s Condordance, a widely consulted Bible-reference book, defines “golem” as “embryo.”[214]

In Crowley’s imagination, this opens the door for the possibility that a rite of conception, properly performed according to formulæ derived from the Gnostic-Kabbalistic-Tantric tradition earlier rehearsed, will issue in the creation of an apparently living humanoid that is actually some incarnated “elemental or planetary spirit.”[215] The purpose of this operation is to create a minion – one variety of which Crowley termed a “Moonchild”[216] – that will carry out the magician’s bidding.[217]

Crowley intimates that this rarely succeeds.[218] Though, it’s a bit unclear just what “success” is supposed to look like. Consider the case of American occultist and “Thelemite” rocket scientist John “Jack” Parsons,[219] possible inspiration for Marvel Comic character Howard Stark – father of the Iron Man superhero, Tony Stark.[220]

Parsons was initiated into a California-based branch of the O.T.O. The outfit’s name – the Agape Lodge – recalls the ancient Christian “love feast” mentioned in conjunction with Gnosticism. Originally founded in Hollywood by one of Aleister Crowley’s acolytes, an esotericist named Wilfred Talbot Smith, the Agape Lodge came under Parsons’ control when it moved to Pasadena.

Parsons was said to have attempted (on several occasions, and failed in) the creation of homunculi with his then-wife Marjorie Cameron.[221]

At least one of their sex-magical ceremonies, the “Babalon Working,” supposedly had this aim.

There has also been speculation that Parsons was attempting some dangerous version of the homunculus rite when he died in a fiery explosion in his Pasadena home.

According to author John Carter, “…Cameron later claimed to have been impregnated by Parsons during their first two weeks together… She said she had an …abortion[222] with Parsons’ consent (and another abortion later on), then just a few days later they were performing another working.”[223]

Was the human fetus supposed to have been the “clay” out of which a flesh-and-blood homunculus was produced? Or was the sexual act merely intended to generate (or summon) some sort of “astral” or ethereal entity? At the end of the day, we’re left to guess whether the physiological pregnancies were the unintended byproducts of the rite, or whether the abortions were, so to speak, magical sacrifices.[224]

In any event, in Aleister Crowley, we have something of the Mount Everest of sex magic – a long and perilous climb to a mythical peak from which some, in attempted ascent have plunged headlong into inhospitable depths. Perhaps this is a fitting metaphor since Crowley was, in his youth, a mountaineer.

Concluding Thoughts

As a coda, Crowley’s O.T.O. brings us back, full circle, to some of the groups touched on in the introduction.

For the “Solar Lodge of the Ordo Templ[i] Orientis” has been characterized as a “magical cult specializing in blood-drinking [and] sado-sodo sex magic” – and that has ties to none other than Charles Manson.[225]

The upshot is that, even with Aleister Crowley’s death in 1947, Thelemic “magick” – including, one presumes, its sexual varieties – apparently lives on, probably in one or more of the myriad groups that dovetail (or identify themselves) with it.

Scattered reports even suggest that heirs of Crowleyite sex magic may even have wormed their ways into unlikely places – such as the Roman Catholic Church. But, that will have to be a study for another time!

In summary, though, magia sexualis preexisted Crowley, and it will certainly survive him.

If you have found something of interest in this presentation, please “Like” the video, subscribe to the channel, and turn on “notifications” for immediate access to forthcoming content. If you would like to assist with future production efforts, please consider sponsoring us via Patreon. Your one-time or ongoing gifts are much appreciated and make possible programs like this.

End Notes:

---

[1] I first became aware of “sex magic” through various presentations, such as: James Shelby Downard’s King Kill 33 (1998), Michael Hoffman’s Judaism’s Strange Gods (2000) and Hoffman’s Judaism Discovered: From Its Own Texts (2008) – all publications of Independent History and Research (operating out of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho) – as well as Jim Brandon’s audio recording Sirius Rising (privately circulated; ca. 1970s). Subsequently, I discovered that the topic had been taken up, to one degree or other (or, at the very least, touched upon), by numerous others, including (without limitation): Bob Dobbs, Phatic Communion With (Toronto: Perfect Pitch Eds., 1992); Francis King, Sexuality, Magic and Perversion (Port Townsend, Wash.: Feral House, 2002); Nikolas Schreck and Zeena Schreck, Demons of the Flesh: The Complete Guide to Left-Hand Path Sex Magic (London: Creation, 2002); John Carter, Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons (Los Angeles, Cal.: Feral House, 2005); Peter Levenda, in his trilogy titled Sinister Forces: A Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft: Book One: The Nine (Walterville, Ore.: Trine Day, 2005), Book Two: A Warm Gun (Walterville, Ore.: Trine Day, 2005), and Book Three: The Manson Secret (Springfield, Ore.: Trine Day, 2006); former “Blondie” bassist, Gary Lachman, e.g., in his Swedenborg: An Introduction to His Life and Ideas (New York: Penguin, 2012); S. K. Bain, The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual (Walterville, Ore.: Trine Day, 2012); Sherwood Kent, Most Dangerous: A True Story (Walterville, Ore.: Trine Day, 2015); and Allen H. Greenfield, Dr. Randolph’s Magical Elixir: The Story of the 19th Century Genius Who Created WESTERN Sexual Magic (Martinez, Cal.: Paranoia Publ., 2020). Recently, the topic has been undertaken by academics as well, for example, in: Joscelyn Godwin, Christian Chanel, and John Patrick Deveney, The Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor: Initiatic and Historical Documents of an Order of Practical Occultism (York Beach, Me.: Samuel Weiser, 1995); John P. Deveney, Paschal Beverly Randolph: A Nineteenth-Century Black American Spiritualist, Rosicrucian, and Sex Magician (Albany, N.Y.: State Univ. of New York Press, 1997); and Hugh B. Urban, Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism (Berkeley, Cal.: Univ. of Cal. Press, 2006).

[2]  “Magic,” Wikipedia, May 14, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic>.

[3] Warner Bros., 1999.

[4] For one example, see Rob Ager, “Are satanic societies really depicted in EYES WIDE SHUT?” Collative Learning (channel), YouTube, Apr. 27, 2018, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22UjKH-yrQw>.

[5] Not that I am accusing Ager, specifically, of being “cavalier,” necessarily. Though, in his brief (publicly available) analysis, he states that he has consulted the Kubrick Archives, and he evidences familiarity with Peter Brookesmith’s Cult and Occult (London: Guild Publ., 1985) – some claims of which he dismisses as “downright wacky.” It’s not obvious to me that this is a cogent counterargument. However, confessedly, I do not currently possess a copy of the book. Ager also references Francis King’s The Secret Rituals of the O.T.O. (originally published: London: Daniel, 1973), which – in a scanned copy of the American edition – I will have occasion to quote later, myself.

[6]The pseudo-Latin phrase that crops up repeatedly, here, is Dominus Obsequious Sororium (or “D.O.S.”).

[7] This included Epstein’s private island – Little St. James – which contained one odd, temple-looking structure (said to have been “a music pavilion” and which seems to have been the scene of innumerable crimes of molestation and rape in the synchromystically significant “U.S. Virgin Island” chain. See Mary K. Jacob, “Jeffrey Epstein ‘pedophile island’ gets price cut after two months for sale,” N.Y. Post, Jun. 9, 2022, <https://nypost.com/2022/06/09/jeffrey-epsteins-virgin-islands-properties-undergo-price-cut/>.

[8]Tad Friend, “River, With Love and Anger,” Esquire, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. Mar. 1994, 108ff; reproduced at <http://www.aleka.org/phoenix/zines/phoenix7.html>.

[9]Ibid. Berg allegedly called the “tactic …‘flirty fishing’,” ibid. Continuing, the article took a darker tone: “Berg also advocated incest and sex with toddlers, and mailed circulars with graphic pictures of molestation,” ibid. The cult was in the news as recently as 2020, when a former Family International “missionary,” Derek Lincoln, was apprehended after a five-year manhunt, charged, and convicted of sex crimes going back several decades. (Lincoln is also a curious name, synchromystically speaking.) See, e.g., Paul O’Hare, “Children of God cult rapist jailed for ‘horrific’ offences,” BBC Scotland, Aug. 7, 2020, <https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-53448774>.

[10] A forerunner, at least in name, seems to have been “Familism,” associated with the Familia Caritatis, or the “Family of Love.” This sect had been founded in 1539 by Henry Nicholis (see further on for a few remarks about “Nick” names), a native of Germany who was alleged to have had taken part in a political uprising known as the “Münster Rebellion.” Following this, he seems to have moved about – from various cities in Germany (including Cologne and Emden) to England and the Netherlands. Nicholis was inexplicably well-connected. His compatriots included humanist printer Christophe Plantin, artist Pieter Brueghel the Elder, and the cartographer Abraham Ortelius, who was in John Dee’s circle. John Dee, whom we highlighted in our video “Top 10 Occultists,” was best remembered as Queen Elizabeth I’s “astrologer royal.” Presumably exploiting some political connexions, the Familists requested religious toleration around 1604, during the reign of Scottish King James I. But the petition was rejected. Subsequently, they were lampooned in the anonymous play “The Family of Love,” possibly written by Thomas Middleton and Thomas Dekker and published in 1608. As Wikipedia’s summary puts it: “The play satirises the sect’s reputation for sexual lasciviousness…”. See “The Family of Love (Play),” Wikipedia, Jan. 22, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Family_of_Love_(play)>. As a coda, Jakob Böhme’s foremost English apologist, John Pordage (who established “Behmenism” on the British Isles), might have been operating on the periphery of the Familist movement. “Possibly, Pordage’s opinions owed something to furtive influence of the Familia Caritatis, followers of the sectarian prophet Henry Nicholis (alias H. N.). In 1637, Pordage’s brother-in-law, Henry Faldo, was accused of Familism.” According to “John Pordage,” Wikipedia, Aug. 28, 2020, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pordage>; citing David Como, “The Family of Love and the Making of English Revolutionary Religion: The Confession and ‘Conversions’ of Giles Creech,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, vol. 48, 2018, pp. 562-65.

[11]This connexion is well-known. But, for a sample, see: Tommy Udo, Charles Manson: Music Mayhem Murder, London: Bobcat Books, 2012, passim.

[12]See, e.g., Jeff Guinn, Manson: The Life and Times of Charles Manson, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2013, p. 134. Supposedly, Manson may also have been in contact with actress Candice Bergen, via Terry Melcher. See: James Buddy Day, Hippie Cult Leader: The Last Words of Charles Manson, Toronto: Optimum Publ., 2019, back matter, <https://books.google.com/books/about/Hippie_Cult_Leader.html?id=IdtAxQEACAAJ>.

[13] H. Allegra Lansing, “The Children of the Stars,” Medium, Sept. 28, 2020, <https://themansonfamily-mtts.medium.com/the-children-of-the-stars-b231f52ad59c>.

[14]Again, this has been widely commented upon and reported. But, see: William McKeen, Everybody Had an Ocean: Music and Mayhem in 1960s Los Angeles, Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 2017, esp. pp. 317f.

[15] Jerry Cohen, “Possible Links Between Tate, Scientology Murders Studied,” Los Angeles Times via Greeley Daily Tribune, Dec. 10, 1969, p. 13; archived at <https://access-newspaperarchive-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/us/colorado/greeley/greeley-daily-tribune/1969/12-10/page-12/>.

[16]Ed Sanders, The Family, New York: E. P. Dutton, 1971, p. 79. The other two were supposedly “the Satanists and the Jehovans,” ibid.

[17]Ibid.

[18]To be sure, Sanders admits, “…in the early phases of …[Process] initiation sexual celibacy is practiced. Further on, however, in the trek toward higher ranks, all sorts of bunch-punchings take place,” Ibid., p. 84. Sanders’ prose can be nearly equal parts colorful and opaque. For those unfamiliar with the lingo, “bunch punch” is slang term for: “A sexual encounter between one woman and multiple men.”^[18] See “Bunch Punch,” The Free Dictionary, citing Farlex Dictionary of Idioms, <https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/bunch+punches>. On the porno-flick term, see “Gangbang,” UrbanDictionary, Sept. 21, 2004, <https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gangbang>.

[19] For the companion text, see “10 Arcane Words,” TheSynchroMystic.com, May 23, 2022, <https://thesynchromystic.com/index.php/2022/05/23/10-arcane-words-that-are-easily-confused/>.

[20] See, e.g., Peter-Robert Koenig, “Ordo Templi Orientis: Spermo-Gnosis, Carl Kellner, Theodor Reuss, Aleister Crowley,” lecture, ParaReligion, 1994 / Mar. 2000 [these are the dates that appear at the following URL], <https://www.parareligion.ch/spermo.htm>.

[21] George Ryley Scott, Phallic Worship, reprint ed., London: Random House, 1996 [London: Luxor Press, 1966], pp. 68-69; citing Thomas Inman, Ancient Faiths Embodied in Ancient Names, Liverpool: privately printed, 1868, n.p.

[22] The name “Seth” seems to have been a reference to Adam and Eve’s third son by that name. The Gnostics appear to have read the Book of Genesis as if it were presenting a mythological cosmogony in disguise. In other words, as in certain pagan world-formation narratives, where one reads that Marduk slew Taimat or Cronus castrated Uranus, and it is perhaps not taken to have been literal, so too when Cain killed Abel, this was presumably understood as allegorical.

[23] See: Géza Vermes, The Real Jesus: Then and Now, Minneapolis, Minn.: Augsburg Fortress; Fortress Press, 2010, p. 168; online at <https://books.google.com/books?id=M1RsWXhXXogC&pg=pa168>.

[24] “In general, Gnostics held that the …demiurge …was a fool (‘saklas’)… [and they identified this entity with the] god of the Old Testament,” according to Bart D. Ehrman, “Christianity Turned on Its Head: The Alternative Vision of the Gospel of Judas,” Rodophe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, eds., The Gospel of Judas, Washington, D.C.: National Geographic, 2006, p. 90.

[25] For the cosmos is “…the product of rational, purposive, and beneficent agency,” ibid.

[26] “In the [dialog titled] Timæus Plato …proposes …[that the universe] …is …the handiwork of a divine Craftsman ([also known as the] “Demiurge,” [or the] dêmiourgos… [citing Plato, Timæus, 28a6.])…,” Donald Zeyl and Barbara Sattler, “Plato’s Timaeus,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2022 Ed., Edward N. Zalta, ed., <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/plato-timaeus/>. Continuing: The Demiurge “imitate[es] an unchanging and eternal model, [and] imposes mathematical order on a preexistent chaos to generate the ordered universe (kosmos). The governing explanatory principle of the account is teleological: the universe as a whole as well as its various parts are so arranged as to produce a vast array of good effects. For Plato this arrangement is not fortuitous, but the outcome of the deliberate intent of Intellect (nous), anthropomorphically represented by the figure of the Craftsman who plans and constructs a world that is as excellent as its nature permits it to be,” ibid.

[27] Nesta Helen Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London: Boswell Printing & Publ. Co., 1924. According to Webster: “…to whom they referred under the Cabalistic term of the ‘demiurgus’,” Nesta Helen Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, reprint ed., Escondido, Cal.: The Book Tree, 2000, p. 30.

[28] Ehrman, loc. cit. “…all the figures in Jewish and Christian history who stood against [the Old Testament] God” – like the Serpent in Eden and the fallen angel, Lucifer, as well as “Cain, the men of Sodom and Gomorrah, and eventually Judas Iscariot – were the ones who had seen the truth and understood the secrets necessary for salvation,” ibid.

[29] According to Webster’s summary of Lévi in Secret Societies…, 2000, p. 30.

[30] Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Richmond, Va.: L. H. Jenkins, 1947, p. 321; capitalization in original. Besides Pike’s Scottish Rite, this Gnostic-Luciferianism arguably surfaces in other esoteric such as Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society. Further evidence for this will have to be the preoccupation of a forthcoming video. But, for now, see, “Are the Pyramid and All-Seeing Eye Symbols ‘Masonic’?” Bell Curve [weblog], Jun. 6, 2015, <http://curveofbell.blogspot.com/2015/06/are-pyramid-and-all-seeing-eye-symbols.html>.

[31] Manly P. Hall, The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publ., 2009, p. 48.

[32] Again, Webster quoting, op. cit., p. 30; citing De Luchet, Essai sur la Secte des Illuminés, Paris & Londres [London]: 1789, p. 6. Webster: “…The glorification of evil …[also] constituted the creed of the Ophites, who worshipped the Serpent because he had revolted against Jehovah… and …of the Cainites,” ibid.

[33] Christopher Marlowe, The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus, ca. 1588 / 1592; archived online at <http://www.lem.seed.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/livrosliteraturaingles/faustus.pdf>. Marlowe’s work is understood as an adaptation of a preexisting folk legend regarding the life of the (ostensibly) real, 15^th-16^th-c. German Renaissance alchemist and sorcerer, Johann Georg Faust (sometimes called John Faustus). Later, famed German Romantic writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe would also pen his own version (Faust, ca. 1780 / 1806). In 1947, Nobel Prize-winning author Thomas Mann published Doktor Faustus: Das Leben des deutschen Tonsetzers Adrian Leverkühn (Berlin: Surkamp), which was a retelling of the basic “Doctor Faustus” story as it pertained to the imaginary “…Life of the German Composer Adrian Leverkühn…”. Additionally, there are innumerable film and stage performances – based on one of the underlying traditions – including Richard Burton and Nevill Coghill’s Doctor Faustus (Columbia Pictures, 1967).

[34] The Books of Acts, chapt. 8, verses 18-19, New International Version.

[35] Irenæus, Against Heresies, book I, chapter 23, paragraphs 2 & 3; as quoted by the 19^th-20^th-c. Gnostic and Theosophist G. R. S. Mead, in Simon Magus: An Essay on the Founder of Simonianism Based on the Ancient Sources With a Re-Evaluation of His Philosophy and Teachings, London: The Theosophical Society, 1892, electronic version, online at <http://gnosis.org/library/grs-mead/grsm_simon_magus.htm>. Mead’s citation reads: “Irenæus (Contra Hæreses, I. xxiii. 1-4). Text: Opera (edidit Adolphus Stieren); Lipsiæ, 1848,” ibid.

[36] For some Gnostics, such as the Valentinians, even cosmic emanation was reinterpreted sexually. The various syzygies were construed as “sexually complementary pairs,” “Valentinus,” New World Encyclopedia, <https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Valentinus>.

[37]Paul Foster, The Apocryphal Gospels: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009, p. 41.

[38]“…with the voyeuristic participation of the ‘sons of the bridal chamber’ as a type of ‘sacramental practice’ in the group.” Ibid.; emphasis added. Foster himself demurs.

[39]See Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, New York: Anchor; Random House, 2006, p. 266; <https://books.google.com/books?id=hbZ0Yfz-NG8C&pg=pa266>. (The original U.S. Edition, was New York: Doubleday, 2003, [where the reference is on p. 246].)

[40] Her given name (Sophie) means “wisdom.”

[41] Ibid., pp. 333f, <https://books.google.com/books?id=hbZ0Yfz-NG8C&pg=pa333>.

[42] Ibid., p. 334, <https://books.google.com/books?id=hbZ0Yfz-NG8C&pg=pa334>.

[43] “…by means of “[p]hysical union with the female,” ibid. (Brown’s italics.)

[44] Gospel of Thomas, Thomas O. Lambdin, transl., Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette Univ., n.d., <https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/Gospel%20of%20Thomas%20Lambdin.pdf>.

[45] “Lincoln’s” real name was Henry Soskin.

[46] Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, & Henry Lincoln, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, London: Jonathan Cape; New York: Delacorte Press, 1982.

[47] “Dan Brown Wins Da Vinci Code Case,” Guardian (U.K.), Apr. 7, 2006, <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/apr/07/pressandpublishing.danbrown>.

[48] Op. cit., p. 334.

[49]It was started by Carpocrates in the important Mediterranean port city of Alexandria, in Egypt. Alexandria had been founded by Alexander the Great in the 4th century B.C. Not only was it crucial militarily and politically, Alexandria also became a hub of learning and was the location of a library that was the most famous in antiquity. Additionally, Alexandria had long preserved the intellectual legacy of the great ancient Greek philosopher Plato. It was ground zero for a modified version of that school of thinking, now called “Neoplatonism,” that was heavily influenced by neo-Pythagoreanism. Neoplatonism was sparked by the mysterious Ammonius Saccas and given its seminal formulation by Plotinus. (I touched on Neoplatonism in the previously named video “10 Arcane Words.”) Of course, I’m skipping some intermediate steps. To remedy the deficit, see Maren Niehoff, who summarizes some of the relevant history and notes: “Alexandria occupies a special place in the history of Platonism. The first edition of Plato’s works with text-critical signs was produced here in the second century BCE by Aristophanes of Byzantium. The same scholar also introduced the trilogical division of the corpus, based on literary criteria, which was subsequently replaced by the tetralogical division of Tiberius’ court philosopher Thrasyllus. Other Alexandrians significantly contributed to the interpretation of Plato’s works. Eratosthenes, the famous scientist and literary critic of the mid-third century BCE, was known as a Platonist interested in the mathematical aspects of philosophy. More importantly, Eudorus in the first century BCE played a decisive role in the revival of Platonism. He may also have authored the anonymous commentary on the Theaetetus, our earliest extant, running commentary on any of Plato’s works. Another anonymous Platonic treatise most likely stems from Alexandria, namely On the Nature of the World and the Soul. Finally, the city hosted important harbingers of Neo-Platonism. Ammonius Saccas, the “Socrates” of the new movement, taught here influential thinkers, such as Plotinus, who spent eleven years in Alexandria before establishing himself in Rome.” Maren R. Niehoff, “Dossier Philon d’Alexandrie: Philo’s Role as a Platonist in Alexandria,” Etudes Platoniciennes, no. 623, Jul., 2010, pp. 35-62; online at <https://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/623>.

[50] For instance, Plato had maintained that human beings are – at least partially – immaterial “souls” that had somehow “preexisted” our current, earthly lives. Additionally, Plato advanced a doctrine known as “metempsychosis,” whereby the soul also survives the death of the body, only to be physically “reincarnated” again in the future. The peculiarly Neoplatonic take on this had been to extend the metaphysical speculations by claiming that these preexistent souls had come out of, or “emanated from,” an absolute divine entity known only as the “One.” The One’s involvement was said to have been mediated via the Logos and the “World Soul.” Neoplatonists frequently framed the precise chain with material gleaned from Aristotle’s “four causes.”

[51]Jacques Lacarrière, The Gnostics, Nina Rootes, transl., London: Owen, 1977; orig. Jacques Lacarrière, Les gnostiques, Paris: Gallimard, 1973; reproduced online at: The Anarchist Library, <https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/jacques-lacarriere-the-gnostics>.

[52]Blunt, op. cit., p. 102.

[53] “In these experiences the ego will be totally altered or completely destroyed in the death that must precede a rebirth into life. The terror, agony and despair that accompany this process cannot be minimized,” John Whiteside “Jack” Parsons, ‘Freedom Is a Two-Edged Sword’ and Other Essays, Marjorie Cameron and “Hymenaeus Beta,” eds., New York: Ordo Templi Orientis; Las Vegas: Falcon Press, 1989, p. 56; quoted by John Carter, Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons, Port Townsend, Wash.: Feral House, 2004, p. xvi.

[54] Some of these include the Beghards, Beguines, and Brethren of the Free Spirit – and (possibly) such notables as Marguerite Porete and Meister Eckhart, though these associations are contentious.

[55] Ibid.

[56] William Shakespeare, Hamlet, act II, scene 2, <http://shakespeare.mit.edu/hamlet/hamlet.2.2.html>.

[57] See Oxford Reference online, <https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199539536.001.0001/acref-9780199539536-e-703>.

[58] Seemingly for popular-level, public consumption, the French is alternately translated “Shame on him who thinks evil of it.” However, we believe that the rendering given by Oxford Reference (and quoted in the main text)is more faithful to the original sense.

[59] I may as well address (even if only briefly) what, for at least some viewers, will be a lingering concern. Specifically, many questions exist about whether Gnostic ritual was actually sexual in nature, or whether some opponents – or possibly some injudicious and unrestrained Gnostic rhetoric itself – simply made sensational use of sensual metaphor. As evidence for this, some writers, seemingly keen to offer a defense of Gnosticism, point out that there are parallel reports describing many sects as abstaining from marriage and sex and encouraging their followers to live chastely – even in an austere and (if I may be forgiven the anachronism) “Puritanical” manner. Probably, the truth of the matter is that there was what one writer calls a “Gnostic spectrum”, with  “ascetic or libertine morality” on either extreme. Kenneth Cyril Carveley, Ecclesiological Docetism in Early and Medieval Dissent and Heresy in Eastern and Western Christianity, PhD. dissertation, Dept. of Theol. & Rel. Studies, Leeds, U.K.: Univ. of Leeds, Sept., 1990, p. 431, <https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/624/1/uk_bl_ethos_278360.pdf>. If this is so, then Gnostic groups – and individual Gnostics themselves – may have been variously situated at either pole of such a continuum, depending upon personal or psychological factors. Indeed, it is conceivable that certain people may even have swung back and forth from one extreme to the either.

[60]Dunlap, Ill.: Firebird Press.

[61]See, esp., pp. 180ff.

[62] That includes “Nicholas” and other cognate forms, such as “Nichole” and “Nicholai” – whether feminine or masculine. For an introduction to this theme, take a look at the article titled “Alias Saint Nick” posted at the Bell Curve weblog. 

[63]Revelation chapt. 2, verse 6b, New International Version (NIV).

[64] One reason Gnosticism was friendly to antinomianism was that, according to the Gnostic worldview, we live “…in a precarious world”; Carveley, op. cit., pp. 30-31; humans have been “…thrown into an alien environment from which gnosis is the only release for the self… This frees [the Gnostic believer] from the constraints of morality… This [freedom] could display itself in extremes of libertinism or austere asceticism…,” Ibid. In the middle, “…[m]any Gnostic groups were indifferent to moral issues,” ibid.

[65] At least, if the Catholic Church Father St. Irenaeus is to be believed! Patrick Healy, “Nicolaites,” Catholic Encyclopedia; vol. 11, New York: Robert Appleton Co., 1911, [p. 67a], <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11067a.htm>; citing Irenaeus, Adversus Hæreses, I, xxvi, 3; III, xi, 1.

[66] Some investigators, such as John Henry Blunt, thought that these references pertained to “fornication connected with religious rites.” John Henry Blunt, Dictionary of Sects, Heresies, Ecclesiastical Parties and Schools of Religious Thought, London: Rivintons, 1874, p. 371. Irenaeus’s (previously cited) charge appears to be a restatement of a claim found in the aforementioned Book of Revelation, also called the Apocalypse, where we read the somewhat mysterious comment that “some [people] …[held] to the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to entice the Israelites to sin so that they …committed sexual immorality,” Revelation, chapt. 2, verse 14, NIV. Balaam, by the way, was a magician some of whose exploits were discussed in the Old Testament Book of Numbers (e.g., chapt. 22.) Blunt connected this sex magic with the common pagan practice of “ritual” or “temple prostitution” that had periodically crept into the Hebrew religion and perverted it from a pure worship of Yahweh (Blunt cites, inter alia, Genesis 38:21, Deuteronomy 23:18; 2 Kings 23:7; and Hosea 4:14.) – as, indeed, some of the Old Testament prophets testified. E.g., Ezekiel; in the Book of Ezekiel, chapt. 23.

[67] According to the analysis of the 19^th-c. Anglican scholar John Henry Blunt, gesturing toward the New Testament Book of Jude, Blunt, op. cit., p. 372; cf. “follow[ing] …evil desires” (Jude [1]:16, NIV), resulting in unspecified “ungodly acts” (Jude [1]:15, NIV). Cf. Jude [1]:12, NIV; cf. 2 Peter 2:13. (As the Bible is conventionally divided, the Book of Jude has only one chapter.)

[68] Blunt, op. cit., p. 372.

[69]See “Borborites,” Wikipedia, Apr. 13, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borborites>. The word is a play on the Greek word Bórboros, meaning “mire, filth” or “mud.” For the former definition, see: “Borboros,” Wiktionary, Mar. 8, 2022, <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%B2%CF%8C%CF%81%CE%B2%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%82#Ancient_Greek>; for the latter, see “Borborite,” Wiktionary, Oct. 10, 2017, <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Borborite#English>. Though, they are referred to by an array of alternate names including the Borbeliotes, Borborians, and Barbelites or Barbeliotes. They appear to have been named after Barbēlōs, an entity held to have been a part of a complicated Gnostic-mythologic scheme of emanation. I sketch the rudiments of “emanationism” – in both Gnostic and Neoplatonic varieties – in “10 Arcane Words.” See, also, the succeeding paragraph in the main text (and the next footnote) of the present work for the reference to “Barbelo.”

[70] The Apocryphon of John (The Secret Book of John – The Secret Revelation of John), Frederik Wisse, transl., The Nag Hammadi Library, online at <http://gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn.html>. (The Apocryphon of John and The Secret Book of John are the same book.) It also says: “The first power, the glory of Barbelo, the perfect glory in the aeons, the glory of the revelation, she glorified the virginal Spirit and it was she who praised him, because thanks to him she had come forth. This is the first thought, his image; she became the womb of everything, …the holy Spirit, the thrice-male, the thrice-powerful, …and the eternal aeon among the invisible ones, and the first to come forth,” ibid. The Æons were supposed to have been “good” emanations and stood opposed to the “bad” Archons. Contrast this notion with the Kabbalistic notions of the “Tree of Life” that has a Side of Holiness (Sitra Kedusha), producing divine emanations called the Sefirot, and the Other Side (of Evil; Sitra Achra) that emanates the impure Qliphoth (also spelled Kelipot), on which, see: Nissan Dovid Dubov, “Kelipot and Sitra Achra,” Chabad.org, n.d., <https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/361900/jewish/Kelipot-and-Sitra-Achra.htm>. And compare it with the Tantric Right-hand Path (Daksini Marga or Dakshinachara) and Left-hand Path (Vama Marga / Vamachara).

[71] Brown, op. cit., pp. 130, 334, and 336.

[72]Epiphanius, Panarion, ca. A.D. 375, book 1, part 26, section 4, par. 1-4; reproduced at <http://www.masseiana.org/panarion_bk1.htm>; archived at <https://web.archive.org/web/20160304002946/http://www.masseiana.org/panarion_bk1.htm>.

[73] I.E., “the man’s emission,” ibid.

[74]Ibid., book 1, chapt. 4, par. 5-8.

[75] Nikolas Schreck and Zeena Schreck, Demons of the Flesh: The Complete Guide to Left Hand Path Sex Magic, London: Creation, 2002, p. 189. Gnostics, being preoccupied with escaping materiality, “…believed that drinking the sperm or menstrual blood would prevent souls from being born, delivering the unborn beings …to …a spiritual realm above …the sphere of matter,” ibid. The “safe,” spiritual realm – termed the Plēroma – is the province of the Æons; while the “unsafe,” material realm is controlled by the Archons.

[76] E.g., see “Black Mass,” Wikipedia, Jan. 19, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Mass>.

[77] Anton LaVey himself at times downplayed the rôle of the Black Mass in Church of Satan ritual, once writing: “The usual assumption is that the Satanic ceremony or service is always called a Black Mass. A Black Mass is not the magical ceremony practiced by Satanists. The Satanist would only employ the use of a Black Mass as a form of psychodrama. Furthermore, a Black Mass does not necessarily imply that the performers of such are Satanists. A Black Mass is essentially a parody on the religious service of the Roman Catholic Church, but can be loosely applied to a satire on any religious ceremony,” Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Bible, electronic ed. [orig. New York: Avon Publ., 1969], online at <https://ia802809.us.archive.org/23/items/the-satanic-bible/the-satanic-bible.pdf>. Though, in another place, LaVey speaks more admiringly, for example stating: “Historically, there is no ritual more closely linked with Satanism than the Black Mass,” Anton Szandor LaVey, Satanic Rituals, New York: Harper Collins, 1976, p. 31.

[78] Charles Poncé, Kabbalah, Wheaton, Ill.: Quest Books, 1997, p. 17.

[79] See, e.g., N.a., “What is the Eucharist? The Tradition of Communion from the Lord’s Supper,” Christianity.com, May 24, 2010, <https://www.christianity.com/jesus/following-jesus/communion/communion-lords-supper-eucharist.html>.

[80] Blunt, op. cit., p. 286.

[81] “Manichaeism: Manichaeism In Iran,” Encyclopedia.com, <https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/manichaeism-manichaeism-iran>; citing Manfred Hutter, Encyclopedia of Religion, 2005.

[82]Malcolm Lambert, Medieval Heresy: Popular Movements From the Gregorian Reform to the Reformation, Oxford (U.K.); Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publ., 2003, p. 6.

[83]Ibid. Specifically, he alleged, they developed a sex rite called the ischas. The word ischas “…means…wild fig.” In Christianity, the fig serves as a “…symbol of lewdness” and nudism, because Adam and Eve were said to have covered themselves with fig leaves once they realized they were naked in the Garden of Eden. St. Augustine, De Hæresibus, XLVI; reproduced in Roland Teske, transl., Arianism and Other Heresies, John Rotelle, ed., The Works of Saint Augustine, a Translation for the 2lst Century, Hyde Park, N.Y.: New City Press, 1995, p. 43, <https://wesleyscholar.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Augustine-Arian-Other-Heresies-1995.pdf>; Blunt, op. cit., p. 289. Cf. The Book of Genesis chapter 3, verse 7: “Then the eyes of both of them [i.e., Adam and Eve] were opened, and they realized they were naked; so, they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves,” New International Version.

[84] However, the Manichaeans are one of the sects that are also – and quite oppositely – said to have lived celibate lives of purity and self-denial. For example, see the doctrine of the so-called “three seals.” According to this, the Elect vowed abstinence as related to their mouths (e.g., they didn’t eat meat or drink alcohol), hands (they didn’t perform physical labor or go to war), and hearts (they renounced marriage and sex). “Three Seals (Manichaeism),” Wikipedia, Apr. 4, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Seals_(Manichaeism)>.Besides simply dismissing one of these contradictory reports as spurious, there are three possible resolutions to this apparent difficulty. Or, perhaps, there are three facets to a possible resolution. The first may lie in the already observed dual-membership structure of the cult. The idea is that one of the divisions (e.g., the Elect) had licentious sexual practices, while the other (the Auditors) did not. There is room for dispute even here, though. Others, like John Henry Blunt, suggest that it may have been the low-level “auditor[s] or catechumen[s],” instead, loc. cit. To add to the confusion, it’s sometimes unclear if commentators are referencing what might be called “human weakness” – and associating sex rites with that; or ruling on the issue of whether Manichaean theology countenanced a form of “holy sex.” In Blunt’s phraseology: The auditor’s “…enjoyed the license of the weaker nature and was not bound to the ascetic life,” ibid. Interestingly, he adds: “Even the elect …were permitted to retire, if strength failed them, into the humbler condition of the catechumen,” ibid. This brings us to the second possibility, that Manichaeans distinguished various types of sexual encounter. As one writer puts it, it may be wise to “…[differentiate] between sex during religious ceremonies and sex during the perfects’ day-to-day living,” James Edward Myers, “Morality Among Cathar Perfects and Believers in France and Italy, 1100-1300,” master’s thesis, Kalamazoo, Mich.: Western Mich. Univ., Dec., 1976, p. 58, <https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3378&context=masters_theses>.To round things out, a third possible resolution turns on the related question of the meaning of the word “purity.” Many viewers may assume that the word “purity” is a synonym for sexual abstinence. But, one of the innovations of Manichaeanism seems to have been its move away from the notion that “enlightenment” necessarily involved violating the commandments. The alternative view was that sex was a divine sacrament. And, again according to Augustine, the Manichaeans viewed themselves as God-ordained to the task of purifying the world. In their system of beliefs, this included “divine substances” – including human souls – imprisoned inside of physical bodies. Whereas we think in terms of digestion, the Manichaeans, in their pre-scientific era, apparently associated “purification” process with eating.

[85]See Teske, op. cit., pp. 42ff.

[86]Augustine, De Hæresibus, XLVI; in Roland Teske, op. cit., p. 44; emphasis added.

[87]In one place, Blunt defines “Cathari” as “Puritans,” op. cit., p. 16. Though, he is of course not insinuating that the 16^th-17^th c. English Protestants whose ambition was to reform the Church of England (which they viewed as too Catholic) were thereby implicated in this debauchery.

[88] Author Stephen O’Shea relates: “Their name, once thought to mean ‘the pure,’ is not their own invention; Cathar is now taken as a twelfth-century German play on words implying a cat worshiper. It was long bruited about that Cathars performed the so-called obscene kiss on the rear end of a cat,” Stephen O’Shea, The Perfect Heresy: The Revolutionary Life and Death of the Medieval Cathars, New York: Walker, 2000, p. 13. They were ostensibly related to the Bogomils, about which connexion O’Shea comments: “Also common [in application to the Cathars] was the epithet bougre, a corruption of Bulgar – a reference to a sister church of heretical dualists in eastern Europe. Bougre eventually gave English [the word] bugger, which is yet another proclivity once ascribed to Cathar enthusiasts,” ibid. 

[89] Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou: The Promised Land of Error, Barbara Bray, transl., New York: Vintage Books; Random House, 1979, p. viii. The pathway for turning Believers into Perfecti, and supposedly the only sacrament professed by Albigensians, was a ritual called the Consolamentum. Cathar expert Malcolm Lambert described it this way: “…[T]he consolamentum, of the act of consoling, …was …the rite …whereby entry was made into the small, dedicated elite of the perfect… It was described as the baptism of the Spirit, or the baptism by fire, in contrast to the conventional baptism by water, despised as the work not of Jesus but of John the Baptist, which made use of evil matter and, so far from incorporating the baptized into the Church of Christ, put him or her into the power of Satan,” Lambert, op. cit., p. 21. This passage is interesting because it suggests that there is a connexion between Catharism and what would later become Pentecostalism. Indeed, this appears to be an acknowledged link in some circles. See, e.g., “The Pentecostal Tradition,” Christian History Inst., 2022, <https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/magazine/article/pentecostal-tradition>. Although the Perfecti were supposedly chaste and renounced both marriage and sexual relations, one writer plausibly comments that “[a]s long as the Believers had not received the full initiation, if need be[,] they could live with a woman, but outside the bonds of marriage. Any sexual intercourse was undoubtedly bad, but cohabitation could be tolerated, but not marriage because, in the event of complete initiation, it seemed easier to sever an illegal bond,” “The Albigensian Crusade (3),” FSSPX.news (communication agency of the Priestly Society of St. Pius X; Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Pii X), Aug. 10, 2021, <https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/albigensian-crusade-3-67996>. In his book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Michael Hoffman attributes the licentiousness ritualism to the Perfecti.

[90] O’Shea, op. cit., p. 13.

[91] Manly Palmer Hall, The Adepts in the Western Tradition: Orders of the Quest, reprint ed., Los Angeles: Philosophical Research Society, 2013 [orig. 1949], p. 45.

[92] McCormick, Temple of Love, New York: Citadel Press, 1965, p. 172.

[93] Bear in mind, these strands overlap. E.g., Daniel Matt describes a “Gnostic Kabbalism,” loc. cit.

[94] Hugh Urban, Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism, Berkeley, Cal.: Univ. of Cal. Press, 2006, p. 42. Though, as Michael Hoffman has summarized, sexualization of religious concepts is not exclusive to Kabbalah. For instance, Talmudic interpreters compare Aggadah (or, non-legal, narrative texts) to the male penis, which membrum virile – incidentally – Rabbis sometimes identify with the “image of god.” In the comparison, Rabbinical Pardes hermeneutics is thought of as the manipulation or massaging of texts in order to “pull them” from a limp state (in which deep meanings are hidden under the surface, Peshat), to a fully erect state (in which deeper meanings, such as Remez, Derash, and – especially – Sod, become visible). For an introduction, see Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, op. cit., p. 237.

[95] Daniel Matt, The Zohar (Sefer ha Zohar), Stanford, Cal.: Stanford Univ. Press, 2004, p. xliii; also quoted in Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, op. cit., p. 282.

[96] See Joseph Dan, “Iggeret Ha-Kodesh,” Encyclopedia.com, <http://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/iggeret-ha-kodesh>.

[97] “Kabbalah, Tantra, and Sexual Gnosis,” Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia, <http://tibetanbuddhistencyclopedia.com/en/index.php?title=KABBALAH,_TANTRA,_AND_SEXUAL_GNOSIS>. In the video presentation, I display the following: “This …is the Zoharic recipe for sex magic… In his Prayer of Moses, [Moshe] Cordovero develops the Zoharic model into a complete ritual script… [T]he text adds to this an imaginative preparation for role play, which determines the later placement of the participants’ bodies… “‘Here is its mystery and the meditation required with regard to it: firstly one will wash one’s hands at midnight or during the hours that follow and will purify one’s consciousness and void the spirit of all evil thought… The [the man] will gladden his wife with speech relating to the commandment [of sexual union], at the same time he will bring his awareness closer to the sacred… Then he will undertake to meditate on the secret of the embrace: he is at the level of Tiferet, she is at the level of Malkhut…’,” Brian Ogren, Kabbalah in America: Ancient Lore in the New World, Leiden, Netherlands & Boston, Mass.: Brill, 2020, p. 362; quoting Charles Mopsik, Sex of the Soul: The Vicissitudes of Sexual Difference in Kabbalah, Los Angeles: Cherub Press, 2005, p. 140. Cf. Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: From Its Own Texts, Coeur d’Alene, Id.: Independent History and Research, 2008 and Marla Segol, Kabbalah and Sex Magic: A Mythical-Ritual Genealogy, University Park, Penn.: Penn State Univ. Press, 2021. Mopsik draws, in part, from the work of a student of 13th-c. Kabbalist Abraham Abulafia, one Joseph ben Abraham Gikatilla – specifically, Le secret du mariage de David et Bethsabée [“The Secret of the Marriage of David and Bathsheba”]. Although the title is in French, the text is (presumably) in Hebrew.

[98] Elliot Kiba Ginsburg, The Sabbath in the Classical Kabbalah, Albany, N.Y.: State Univ. of N.Y. Press, 1989, p. 292. Continuing: The Shekinah is the woman’s “…archetype. At the same time she enters into relation with (and in some sense is completed by) Tif’eret, the divine Other,” ibid. As the book’s title indicates, Ginsburg is principally concerned with the Jewish Sabbath. In this context, he writes: “As in virtually all rituals, timing is of the essence here: the mystic and his wife must engage in marital intercourse at the appropriate moment. Although ordinary Jews may engage in marital intercourse during the week, the adept is bidden to wait until Shabbat, Edenic time par excellence, the hour when the divine hieros gamos occurs,” ibid. Jewish scholars Daniel Matt and Arthur Green amplify this, writing: “For the mystic, sex is not merely a personal act; it is an occasion for communion with God… See [Rabbi Moses] Cordovero’s comment on this passage…: ‘Their desire, both his and hers, was to unite Shekhinha. He focused on Tif’eret, and his wife on Malkhut (Shekhinah). His union was to join Shekhinah; she focused correspondingly on being Shekhinah and uniting with Her Husband, Tif’eret.’ This corresponds to the Tantric ritual of maithuna, in which the human couple focuses on identification with their divine models…,” Daniel Chanan Matt and Arthur Green, eds., “Their desire focused on joining Shekhinah…,” Zohar, the Book of Enlightenment, Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press, 1983, pp. 236-237; citing Rabbi Abraham ben Mordecai Azulai, Or ha-Hammah (“The Light of the Sun”), “ad loc;” Mircea Eliade, Yoga: Immortality and Freedom, New York: Pantheon Books, 1958, pp. 200-73; and Agehananda Bharati, The Tantric Tradition, London: Rider, 1965, n.p. Or ha-Hammah is a commentary on the Zohar that is an expansion of, and extensively quotes form, Rabbi Moses Cordovero’s treatise Pardes Rimmonim (“Garden / Orchard of Pomegranates”). Matt and Green also (ibid., p. 236) bid the reader “…cf. Zohar 1:49b-50a; 2:89a-b; 3:81a-b; 168a,” and (ibid., p. 237) “cf. above [in their own volume], ‘Male and Female’,” which is a major section beginning on page 55 (and following).

[99] “Shekinah,” Lexico, 2022, <https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/shekinah>.

[100] The proliferation of innumerable goddess cults is viewed by some as remediation for the supposed, earlier, “patriarchal Christian” view that “[t]he Devil worked through women & [sic] women worked their evil through sex,” Poncé, op. cit., p. 19.

[101] According to the Talmud (see BT Yoma 54a-b), the cherubim on the Ark of the Covenant were depicted as being locked “in intimate embrace.”

[102] Jewish Studies Professor Nathaniel Deutsch further claims that the Kabbalah was cross-fertilized with the near-Eastern religious tradition of the Mandaeans – not to be confused with the Manichaeans discussed a moment ago. “…[I]nteractions [between Mandaeans and Jewish mystics in Babylonia from Late Antiquity to the medieval period] resulted in shared magical and angelological traditions,” Nathaniel Deutsch, “The Date Palm and the Wellspring: Mandaeism and Jewish Mysticism,” ARAM (Journal of the Aramaic Society for Syro-Mesopotamian Studies), vol. 11, no. 2, 1999-2000, p. 222. Deutsch continues: “During this phase the parallels which exist between Mandaeism and Hekhalot mysticism would have developed. At some point, both Mandaeans and Jews living in Babylonia began to develop similar cosmogonic and theosophic traditions involving an analogous set of terms, concepts, and images. At present it is impossible to say whether these parallels resulted primarily from Jewish influence on Mandaeans, Mandaean influence on Jews, or from cross fertilization. Whatever their original source, these traditions eventually made their way into the priestly – that is, esoteric – Mandaean texts … and into the Kabbalah,” ibid. “Sex to the pious Mandaean is the holiest mystery of life and it is enjoined upon him to regard it as such and to pronounce the most sacred name, ‘the great Life,’ before performing a sexual act. …[S]exual metaphors and images employed by initiates are protected by special oaths of silence…,” E. S. Drower, The Secret Adam: A Study of Nasoraean Gnosis, London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1960, p. 10; archived at <http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/books/mandaean/adam.pdf>.

[103] In the first place, it proceeds from Merkabah mysticism, which recalls a vision of God beheld by the Old Testament prophet Ezekiel. But, Kabbalah was also informed by the time the Israelites spent exiled in Babylon. You should also keep in mind the twists and turns of Jewish history, as the Bible records it. After the period of the “judges,” the people clamored for, and instituted, a monarchy. This created what later became known as the United Kingdom of Israel and what was ruled first by Saul, then by David and finally by David’s son, Solomon. After Solomon died, circa 930 B.C., his son Rehoboam inherited the throne. Owing to Rehoboam’s heavy-handed and poor leading, a revolt was led by an apparently influential nobleman named Jeroboam. The resulting civil war split the nation into the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah. Around 720 B.C., the Northern Kingdom fell to Assyria. Assyria itself eventually fell to neo-Babylonia which, in short order, ransacked the Southern Kingdom around 586 B.C., destroyed Solomon’s Temple, and spirited many of the inhabitants of Judah to captivity in Babylon. Once Babylonia was conquered by Persia, some of these Judahites would be permitted to return to their homeland where, approximately 516 B.C., they constructed a smaller “second temple” that stood until A.D. 70 when it was leveled by the Roman Empire. But, before this return, the Judahites were interacting – and sometimes marrying – with Babylonians.

[104] Herodotus, The Histories, 199; A. D. Godley, ed. & transl., London: Heinemann; Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1922; archived at the Perseus Project, Tufts Univ., <https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hdt.+1.199>.

[105] Staff writers, “Sacred Prostitution in the Story of Judah and Tamar? Edward Lipiński on the influence of Canaanite Ashtoreth worship in ancient Israel,” Biblical Archaeology Society, Mar. 6, 2022, <https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/sacred-prostitution-in-the-story-of-judah-and-tamar/>.

[106] For the details, see Hargrave Jennings, Phallism, London: privately publ., 1889, p. 98.

[107] Also called the Bavli.

[108] Esotericists frequently hold that Judaism was partially informed by the traditions of Sumeria and Babylonia. See, e.g., Sex: The Secret Gate to Eden, dvd, Brooklyn, N.Y.: Thelema Press, 2006.

[109] For the dating, see “Genesis Rabbah,” Britannica, <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Genesis-Rabbah>.

[110] Genesis Rabbah (a.k.a. Bereshith Rabba), 8:1, <https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/115214.1?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en>; quoting one Rabbi Yirmiyah ben Elazar.

[111] According to Craig Heimbichner: “In the sub-rosa mythos of Judaism, God is the ‘Jewish male’ as personified by ‘Adam Kadmon’…Adam Kadmon …[is the] Kabbalistic concept of the archetypal man, the primordial being who is simultaneously the Judaic male and the ‘body of God.’ Adam Kadmon is the androgynous and balanced, completed male Jew who manifests his own deity in this world through emanations of sefirot, which include evil in the left-hand pillar of severity or judgment – one half of which must be balanced with the opposite right-side pillar of mercy …[on the] Tree of Life…,” Blood on the Altar: The Secret History of the World’s Most Dangerous Secret Society, Coeur d’Alene, Id.: Independent History and Research, 2005, pp. 124 and 136. According to Robert Graves and Raphael Patai: “Primeval man was held by the Babylonians to have been androgynous. …[T]he Gilgamesh Epic gives Enkidu androgynous features: ‘the hair of his head like a woman’s…’ The Hebrew tradition evidently derives from Greek sources, because both terms used in Tannaitic midrash to describe the bisexual Adam are Greek: androgynos, ‘man-woman’, and diprosopon, ‘two-faced’,” Robert Graves and Raphael Patai, Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis, Manchester, England: Carcanet, 2005, p. 67, n. 2. Graves and Patai continue: “Philo of Alexandria, the Hellenistic philosopher and commentator on the Bible, contemporary with Jesus, held that man was at first bisexual; so did the gnostics. This belief is clearly borrowed from Plato. Yet the myth of two bodies placed back to back [sic] may well have been founded on observation of Siamese twins, which are sometimes joined in this awkward manner. The two-faced Adam appears to be a fancy derived from coins or statues of Janus, the Roman New Year god,” ibid. “…Graves’ embedded, passing mention of Plato refers to the dialogue entitled the Symposium – or ‘Drinking Party’ – in which the notion of ‘love’ is the main topic of discussion and reflection. …The basic idea of the androgyne, or man-woman, was that this combined state was part of the original order,” according to “Now Playing at the Century 16 Ampitheater of Eternal Wisdom: Aurora Consurgens, Part 2,” Bell Curve (weblog), Sept. 1, 2012, <http://curveofbell.blogspot.com/2012/09/now-playing-at-century-16-ampitheater.html>. Of course, in Greek mythology, it was “Zeus [who] divided the androgyne as punishment for hubris…,” Ibid. In Judaism, on the other hand, this division was attributed to the Hebrew God.

[112] Or, in alchemy, coniunctio oppositorum.

[113] Gudrun Bühnemann, Maònòdalas and Yantras in the Hindu Traditions, Leiden: Brill, 2003, pp. 43-44.

[114] “Now Playing…,” loc. cit. Continuing: ““And Aristophanes’ speech presents [erotic or romantic] love as a sort of searching for, discovering, and restoring this division of halves. On Aristophanes’ conception, the pair need not be male-female, but could be female-female or male-male,” ibid. Cf. Graves and Patai, loc. cit. Cf., also, Manly Palmer Hall, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, reprint ed., Garden City, N.Y.: Dover, 2010, p. 351.

[115] Sex: The Secret Gate to Eden, loc. cit.

[116] In the Kabbalist’s lexicon, this is known as Tikkun Olam.

[117] Whether “the Divine” is an external deity or an “inner god” is debated among occultists.

[118] Greek: gnōthi seauton.

[119] See, e.g., Hargrave Jennings, Ophiolatreia: An Account of the Rites and Mysteries Connected with the Origin, Rise, and Development of Serpent Worship, N.p.: privately publ., 1889.

[120] A key notion is that soon after this separation of the sexes, humanity was expelled from Paradise. Rabbi and Zohar translator Daniel Matt, commenting upon what he views as a possible, alternative interpretation for Genesis 3:24 – which is conventionally and straightforwardly read as God’s expulsion of Adam from the Garden of Eden – says, instead: “Adam drove out, divorced, Shekhinah (the divine feminine), splitting Her from Her divine partner and from himself. Once, as Adam, humanity was wedded to God. The original sin lies in losing intimacy with the divine, thereby constricting our unbounded awareness.” “Zohar Questions – Daniel Matt,” <https://www.sup.org/zohar/QADM.pdf>. Matt continues: “This loss is inevitable—a consequence of tasting the fruit of knowledge, the price we pay for maturity and culture. But the spiritual challenge is to search for that lost treasure—without renouncing the self or the world.”

[121] Biti Roi, “Iggeret Ha-Kodesh,” The Shalvi / Hyman Encyclopedia of Jewish Women, updated Jul. 12, 2021, <https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/iggeret-ha-kodesh>.

[122] K. J. Aaron, “Biblical Euphemisms for Sexual Activity,”, posted by Brian Worley, Ex-Minister.org, Jan. 21, 2010, <https://www.exminister.org/Aaron-one-biblical-euphemisms.html>. I’m quoting from “Ex-Minister.org” for the sake of convenience. Though, any number of Bible expositors, theologians, and current ministers readily admit the point.

[123] Cf. Michael A. Hoffman II, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Coeur d’Alene, Id.: Independent History and Research, 2001.

[124] See the Holy Bible, First Kings, chapter 1.

[125] These messianic pretensions had begun to be voiced almost two decades earlier: “In 1648 a scholar declared himself as a Messiah, fracturing the Jewish World,” Marsel Russo, “Sabbatai Zevi – The Messiah That Converted to Islam,” TheJ.ca, Apr. 22, 2021, <https://www.thej.ca/2021/04/22/sabbatai-zevi-the-messiah-that-converted-to-islam/>.

[126] Alternately, Shabbetai Tzvi, 1626-1676.

[127] David J. Halperin, Sabbatai Zevi: Testimonies to a Fallen Messiah, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012, p. 8, <https://books.google.com/books?id=bHJvEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA8>.

[128] Ibid.

[129] Ibid.

[130] Also spelled Sabbatians.

[131] Here, the Jewish Encyclopedia uses the slang abbreviation “Shebs.”

[132] Thus, the sect “…included the elements of both asceticism and sensuality: some did penance for their sins, subjected themselves to self-inflicted torture, and ‘mourned for Zion’; others disregarded the strict rules of chastity characteristic of Judaism,” and turned to the sexual shenanigans that have been our preoccupation, herein. All this, according to Herman Rosenthal and S. M. Dubnow, “Frank, Jacob, and the Frankists,” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, online at <https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9736-lejbowicz>.

[133] Ibid.

[134] Specifically, Podolia.

[135] Ibid.

[136] Pawel Maciejko, “Frankism,” The YIVO Encyclopedia of the Jews in Eastern Europe, New York: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, 2010, <https://yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/frankism>.

[137] The Jewish Encyclopedia gives the location as “Lemberg.”

[138] See Marvin S. Antelman’s (possibly born Mosheh Shelomoh Anṭelman) twin volumes: To Eliminate the Opiate (volume 1), New York; Tel Aviv: Zahava, 1974 and To Eliminate the Opiate: Volume 2, Jerusalem: The Zionist Book Club, 2007.

[139] “Frank, Jacob…,” loc. cit.

[140] The 17^th-c. German Lutheran theologian Philipp Jakob Spener is known as the “Father of Pietism.”

[141] Blunt, op. cit., p. 342.

[142] Paul Peucker, “‘Inspired by Flames of Love’: Homosexuality, Mysticism, and Moravian Brothers around 1750,” Journal of the History of Sexuality, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 30-64, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236722092_Inspired_by_Flames_of_Love_Homosexuality_Mysticism_and_Moravian_Brothers_around_1750>. One could also factor in Donald McCormick’s comment that “the troubadours… tried to raise love to the dignity of a spiritual exercise,” Temple of Love, New York: Citadel Press, 1965, p. 170.

[143] Ibid.

[144] According to history Professor Jared S. Burkholder, in “Sects & Sex,” PietistSchoolman.com [weblog], Jan. 17, 2014, <https://pietistschoolman.com/2014/01/17/sects-and-sex/.>

[145] Peucker, loc. cit.

[146] Ibid. Cf. “Christian Renatus von Zinzendorf,” Wikipedia, Jun. 26, 2021, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Renatus_von_Zinzendorf>.

[147] According to Donald Michael Kraig, Modern Sex Magick, Woodbury, Minn.: Llewellyn Publ., 2006, p. 220. Continuing: “…ask any transexual sex magician!” Ibid. Note that “transexual” is an alternate spelling for “transsexual.”

[148] Richard Lines, “The Erotic Dreams of Emanuel Swedenborg,” Public Domain Review, Jan. 24, 2013, <https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/the-erotic-dreams-of-emanuel-swedenborg/>.

[149] At least, so says Rosemary Guiley in her The Encyclopedia of Magic and Alchemy, New York: Checkmark Books, 2006, p. 40.

[150] “Swedenborgian Church of North America,” Wikipedia, Jul 3, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedenborgian_Church_of_North_America>.

[151] Richard Lines, “Eros, Sexuality & The Spirit,” SwedenborgStudy.com, n.d., <http://www.swedenborgstudy.com/articles/marriage/rl02.htm>.

[152] Manley Palmer Hall, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, reprint ed., Garden City, N.Y.: Dover, 2010, p. 410.

[153] For a list, see “Paschal Beverly Randolph,” Wikipedia, Jun 22, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschal_Beverly_Randolph#Published_works>.

[154] Including, the Anseiretic Mystery, the Golden Letter, the Golden Secret, and the Mysteries of Eulis. See Lara Langer Cohen, “Paschal Beverly Randolph’s Occult Undergrounds,” Zoom lecture, Univ. of Penn., Nov. 2, 2020; recorded and posted to Penn’s Workshop in the History of Material Texts (channel), YouTube, Nov. 3, 2020, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoIeQTbW7cE>.

[155] Ibid. Author Donald Michael Kraig speculates that Franz Anton Mesmer, whose “animal-magnetism” techniques – which were called “mesmerism” and prefigured contemporary hypnosis – also used his powers (including the stimulation of supposedly healing “sexual arousal”) “to induce psychic abilities”, Kraig, op. cit., pp. 21 & 23.

[156] Randolph was also a “Pre-Adamite”; that is, he believed that humans existed on the earth prior to the Biblical Adam and Eve. This is too large a topic to cover, presently. But, the relevant Wikipedia article associates Pre-Adamism with – what it calls – various “racist” anthropological speculations. See “Pre-Adamite,” Wikipedia, Jul 2, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Adamite#Racist_pre-Adamism>. Again, Randolph’s “mixed” heritage may have motivated his interest in this doctrine.

[157] Urban, loc. cit.

[158] Cohen, loc. cit.

[159] P. B. Randolph, The Anseiretic Mystery; reproduced in John Patrick Deveney, Paschal Beverly Randolph: A Nineteenth-Century Black American Spiritualist, Rosicrucian, and Sex Magician, Albany, N.Y.: State Univ. of N.Y. Press, 1996, p. 317. According to Randolph, “the list of powers attainable by the human being …number hundreds of distinct energies,” ibid.; quoted by Arthur Versluis, The Secret History of Western Sexual Mysticism: Sacred Practices and Spiritual Marriage, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008, pp. 125-126 (of electronic edition), <https://books.google.com/books?id=Q14oDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT125>.

[160] Paschal Beverly Randolph, Magia Sexualis, Maria de Naglowska, transl., Paris: Robert Gélin, 1931. On the angle that Naglowska may have written it herself – and on the description of her as a “Satanist” – see Schreck and Schreck, op. cit., passim, but esp. p. 183.               

[161] Op. cit., pp. 178ff.

[162] Vātsyāyana (attributed), The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana, Richard Francis Burton and Forster Fitzgerald Arbuthnot, transl., eds., “Cosmopoli” [probably London]: Kama Shastra Society of London and Benares, 1883 (privately circulated).

[163] Richard Osborne, Introducing Eastern Philosophy, Borin Van Loon, illus., Cambridge, U.K.: Icon Books, 2001, p. 47.

[164] Donald McCormick, loc. cit.

[165] Though, in fairness, a Gnostic sect called the Adamites was said to have adopted practices for “…extirpating carnal desire by familiarizing the senses to strict self-control under the extremest [sic] form of temptation,” Blunt, op. cit., p. 5.

[166] Called Dakṣiṇimārga or Dakṣiṇācāra.

[167] Referred to as Vāmamārga or Vāmācāra.

[168] In Kabbalah, similarly, there is a “left side” or “other side” (sitra achra) of the Tree of Life.

[169]E.g., in Kaula (or Kula) Hinduism.

[170]Or, for Kaula practitioners, Kulamārga.

[171]A.k.a., pancha makara.

[172]For instance, an online version of the Encyclopedia of Hinduism states: “Sexuality outside marriage is looked upon as a negative thing.” Constance Jones and James Daniel Ryan,“Pancha Makara,” Encyclopedia of Hinduism, New York: Facts on File, 2007, n.p., <https://hinduism.en-academic.com/576/pancha_makara>.

[173]See, e.g., David Gordon White, Kiss of the Yogini: ‘Tantric Sex’ in its South Asian Contexts, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2003, pp. 77ff. Cf. The reference to the sacredness of “seminal fluid” by George Small, A Handbook of Sanskrit Literature: With Appendices Descriptive of the Mythology, Castes, and Religious Sects of the Hindus, London: Williams & Norgate, 1866, p. 182, <https://books.google.com/books?id=k9A9AAAAIAAJ&pg=pa182>.

[174]And, for some Tantrics, perhaps other “polluting substances,” such as excrement, menses (menstrual expulsion), urine, etc. White compares similar practices among the “Bāuls of Bengal” and the “Nizarpanthis, ‘Hinduized’ Isma’ilis of Western India” (op. cit., p. 77; where the “Nizarpanthis” are, presumably, followers of Nizari Isma’ilism and the Aga Khan [currently, number IV], and may be related to the Khojas.)

[175] Schreck and Schreck, Demons of the Flesh, op. cit., p. 96.

[176] See, e.g., “Urine Therapy,” Wikipedia, Jun 21, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urine_therapy>; and “Vajroli Mudra,” Wikipedia, Dec. 15, 2021, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajroli_mudra>.

[177] “Bob Dobbs,” Phatic Communion With [Bob Dobbs], Toronto: Perfect Pitch Ed., 1992, p. 51. The name “Bob Dobbs” is frequently associated with a loose-knit organization known as the “Church of the SubGenius.” Wikipedia calls the so-called “Church” a “parody religion,” and claims that it was established in the 1970s by individuals such as “Ivan Stang” (born Douglas St. Clair Smith), “Philo Drummond” (born Steve Wilcox), and “Dr. X” (born Monte Dhooge). See “Church of the SubGenius,” Wikipedia, May 30, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_SubGenius>. To confuse matters further, my copy of Phatic Communion… has a sticker on the publication-information page stating that the copyright holder is one “Robert Dean” – who may (or may not) be one and the same person as the now-deceased career-military man who became a fairly prominent “ufologist” during the 1990s. See “Robert Dean (ufologist),” Wikipedia, Nov. 18, 2021, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Dean_(ufologist)>.

[178] For an illustration, see the Home Box Office (HBO) network’s “The Master of Non-Ejaculation,” Real Sex, episode 7, 1993; at one point, archived at <http://www.tv.com/shows/real-sex/>.

[179] See, e.g., Sex: The Secret Gate to Eden, loc. cit.

[180] New York: Amer. Inst. of Universal Charities, 1961.

[181] Donald Michael Kraig (Modern Sex Magick, op. cit., p. 25) suggests that others advocating similarly include Alice Bunker Stockham (via her Karezza techniques) and John Humphrey Noyes (through his idea of “male continence”). Noyes, remembered for Utopian-Socialist Oneida Community in New York, also encouraged “communal” or group marriage, ibid.

[182] “Three types of Tantras exist in India; first White Tantra, second, black Tantra, third, grey Tantra. In White Tantra, Sexual Magic is practiced without the spilling of semen. In black Tantra there is spilling of semen. In grey Tantra, the semen is and is not spilled. [That is, s]ometimes the semen is spilled, and sometimes it is not spilled. This type of Tantra leads the devotee to black Tantra.”Samael Aun Weor, The Perfect Matrimony, reprint ed., Brooklyn, N.Y.: Thelema Press, 2001, p. 253.

[183]Ida C. Craddock, Heavenly bridegrooms; An Unintentional Contribution to the Erotogenetic Interpretation of Religion, Theodore Schroeder, ed., New York: n.p., 1918 (reprinted: Whitefish, Mt.: Kessinger, ca. 1990).

[184]Cited by “Ida Craddock,” Wikipedia, Jun. 11, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Craddock>; citing “Baphomet” [Aleister Crowley], The Blue Equinox, vol. III, Detroit: Universal, 1919. No link was provided by way of primary documentation. However, Googling yielded the following URL, especially following the words “Heavenly Bridegrooms.” <http://www.the-equinox.org/vol3/eqv3n1/eq0301275.htm>.

[185] Ordinarily, the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn isn’t thought of as preëminent in this subject. But, Kraig (Modern Sex Magick, loc. cit.) summarizes recent scholarly work suggesting that various Dawn members – including Edward Berridge (following Thomas Lake Harris), Dion Fortune (born Violet Mary Firth), and most prominently Samuel Liddell “MacGregor” Mathers and his wife Moina Mathers (née Mina Bergson) – were at least aware of (or obliquely wrote about) sex magic. Possibly, the Mathers exhibited these “mysteries” of magia sexualis in Paris while performing their Rites of Isis. (For the claim, see Kraig, ibid.)

[186] E.g., see Carl Gustav Jung, Collected Works of C.G. Jung: Alchemical Studies, vol. XIII, London: Routledge; Taylor & Francis, 2014, p. 96.

[187] Kraig, op. cit., p, 4.

[188] Andrew Phillip Smith, The Gnostics, London: Watkins Publ., 2008, pp. 152 & 150.

[189] Nevill Drury, Stealing Fire from Heaven: The Rise of Modern Western Magic, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011, p. 93.

[190] This includes the speculative “Phallicism” of Hargrave Jennings, the oriental pornography of Edward Sellon, the compilations of Hindu mythology produced by W. J. Wilkins, and the Sanskrit translations of “Arthur Avalon” (Sir John George Woodroffe).

[191] Nevill Drury: “The bridging link between Randolph and the O.T.O. is provided by two American esoteric orders, the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor and Randolph’s Brotherhood of Eulis,” ibid., p. 100. Donald Michael Kraig, op. cit., p. 4, says that Randolph “was initiated into the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor.” Who knows?

[192] There are also sporadic mentions of the “Hermetic Brotherhood of Light.” See, “Hermetic Brotherhood of Light,” Wikipedia, Mar. 17, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Brotherhood_of_Light>.

[193] Joscelyn Godwin, The Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor: Initiatic and Historical Documents of an Order of Practical Occultism, New York: Weiser Books, 1995, p. 61.

[194] Ibid.

[195]Kellner supposedly named these as Soliman ben Aifa (Sufi), Bhima Sena Pratapa (Hindu), and Sri Mahatma Agamya Paramahamsa (Hindu).

[196]Tho, Bernard was reportedly born either Perry Arnold Baker or Peter Coon. And he may also have sometimes employed the alias “Homer Stansbury Leeds.”

[197]Or “Oom, the Magnificent.”

[198] Isabel Stirling, Zen Pioneer: The Life and Works of Ruth Fuller Sasaki, Emeryville, Cal.: Shoemaker & Hoard; Avalon Publ., 2006, p. 7.

[199] Crowley refers to his spells as “calls,” and says that they were spoken in “Enochian,” an alleged ancient angelic language that owes its initial compilation and “discovery” to the Elizabethan sorcerer John Dee and his companion, Edward Kelley. This early linguistic material, which included an alphabet, was an important part of the communication, conducted over a period of years, that Dee and Kelley supposedly had with an assortment of preternatural entities during various sessions of crystal-ball gazing (or “scrying,” to use the technical term for it). Enochian largely faded into obscurity until it was rediscovered, as it were, by the British-based, 19^th-c. Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The Golden Dawn assigned it great importance, along with the grimoires (or spell books) known as the Key of Solomon and the Book of Abramelin. For a time, Crowley was a member of the Golden Dawn. But its emphasis on magic and Crowley’s differed precisely over the question of sex magic. For example, after resignation of William Wynn Westcott from his headship of the Golden Dawn, the position of leading “magus” (or Chief Adept) was assumed by Florence Beatrice Farr. Farr expressly objected to Aleister Crowley’s advancement on the grounds of his “sex intemperance,” Guiley, op. cit., p. 101.

[200] Guiley, op. cit., p. 57.

[201] P. B. Randolph experimented with hashish and other drugs as well. The Schrecks (loc. cit.) perceive that Crowley may have derived many principles from Randolph without crediting him. They mention the similarity of Crowley’s maxim “Love is the Law; Love under Will” to Randolph’s Will reigns omnipotent; Love lieth at the foundation,” p. 181. One wonders whether Randolph’s “Eulis” may have put Crowley onto the “Rites of Eleusis,” which Crowley (and others) “performed” in London. See “Rites of Eleusis,” Wikipedia, Jan. 16, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rites_of_Eleusis>.

[202] Recall that one possible derivation of “Cathar” had to do with cat worship.

[203] There were other instances of sex magic, as well. E.g., on another such occasion, in 1918, Crowley and a female ritualist, one Roddie Minor (a.k.a., Roddie Warwick) reportedly engaged in a sexual “working” called the Almalantrah. There was also Crowley’s seminal “Cairo Working” in 1904 where his first wife, Rose Edith Kelly, allegedly made spiritual contact with a supernatural being referred to as “Aiwass.” Subsequently, Rose “channeled” a text that would become foundational for “Crowleyanity” and the religion of Thelema: namely, “The Book of the Law” (Liber Al vel Legis). Although the Cairo rituals are not generally considered sex-magical, per se, they occurred during Aleister and Rose’s honeymoon. Later Thelemites are careful to explain that the “honeymoon” has its origins in pagan fertility religions in which newly married couples essentially took religious pilgrimages to be taught sacred sexual techniques. (E.g., see Sex: The Secret Gate to Eden, dvd, Brooklyn, N.Y.: Thelema Press, 2006.) So, I guess, you do the math.

[204] For more on this, see “10 Arcane Words.”

[205] “The Cake of Light is the eucharistic host found within Thelema, the religion founded by British author and occultist Aleister Crowley in 1904 and some neo-Gnostic religions. A common ‘cake of light’ contains kamut flour, honey, a few drops of Abramelin oil, olive oil, beeswing, ash, and sometimes particular bodily fluids such as semen, vaginal fluids, or a mix of both…,” “Cake of Light,” Wikipedia, May 28, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cake_of_Light>.

[206] Explicitly and literally in a form that many modern scholars deny had ever been actualized (until the 20th century). Moreover, Crowley definitely had Buddhist or Eastern-mystical influences, not least from his friend and teacher Allan Bennett, as well as from his experiences living in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka). A major Buddhist revival had been launched in Ceylon in the 1880s by (among others) Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, one of the main co-founders, with H. P. Blavatsky, of the Theosophical Society.

[207] As, indeed, it had been to precursor organizations like the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor, the Hermetic Brotherhood of Light, and the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.

[208] See e.g., numerous retellings of the most infamous of these, the “Prague Golem,” allegedly created by the “Maharal,” Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel. But the stories go back at least to the Talmudic rabbi known as “Rava.” In Talmud Tractate Sanhedrin (section 65b), Rava generates a mute “manikin” that is destroyed by Rabbi Zeira. Gustav Meyrink wrote about the creature in his novel Der Golem (“The Golem,” Leipzig: Kurt Wolff, 1915). More recently, Golem folklore was taken up by writer Howard Gordon and director Kim Manners in an episode (“Kaddish,” season 4, no. 15, Feb. 16, 1997) of the Fox Network’s X-Files television show. For an accessible overview of all this, see “Golem,” Wikipedia, Jun. 29, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem>. For a scholarly study, see Moshe Idel, Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid, Albany, N.Y.: State Univ. of New York Press, 1990.

[209] See, also, Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: From Its Own Texts, Coeur d’Alene, Id.: Independent History and Research, 2008.

[210] Mary Shelley, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones, 1818.

[211] These manipulations are cryptically communicated in a (circa) 3^rd-century Jewish text known as the Sefer Yetzirah (the Book of Formation”). Although the Sefer Yetzirah is by no means a Golem-how-to manual, numerous rabbinic commentators, such as Eleazar of Worms (e.g., in his Perush ‘al Sefer Yeẓirah), have understood the text to contain all the necessary ingredients.

[212] On this, see: Michael Hoffman, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Coeur d’Alene, Id.: Independent History & Research, 2001, especially material deriving from Hoffman’s contact with synchromystic James Shelby Downard. As first reported by Jim Brandon in his Sirius Rising audio interviews, Shelby Downard had long speculated the U.S. government’s creation of an atomic bomb (spearheaded by General Leslie Groves and nuclear physicist Robert Oppenheimer), at Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico (the “Land of Enchantment”), under the name the “Manhattan Project,” may have involved – whether centrally or tangentially – an attempt to create a homunculus.  

[213] According to Francis King, The Secret Rituals of the O.T.O., scanned version [orig. New York: Samuel Weiser, 1973], p. 184; <https://archive.org/details/FrancisKing-TheSecretRitualsOfTheO.t.o.-1973/page/n183/mode/2up?q=gestation>.

[214] James Strong, “1564. Golem,” The Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (“Strong’s Concordance”), Cincinnati: Jennings & Graham, 1890; Nashville, Tenn. & N.Y.: Methodist Press, 1890; reproduced on Bible Hub, <https://biblehub.com/hebrew/1564.htm>. The word golem is, from a biblical standpoint, a hapax legomenon – it is used only once, in the Book of Psalms, chapter 139, verse 16.

[215] Ibid., p. 185.

[216] Crowley wrote a novel in which this procedure is aimed at producing a homunculus imbued with a “lunar spirit.” See Aleister Crowley, Moonchild, N.p.: Mandrake Press, 1929.

[217] Not unlike Rabbi Judah Loew’s Golem of Prague.

[218] See remark: “…to have corn of so subtle a seed is a great thing once; to achieve it twice were the mark of a primal energy so marvellous, that We doubt whether there be one man born in ten times ten thousand years that hath such wonder-power,” King, op. cit., p. 188.

[219] Birth name “Marvel Whiteside Parsons.”

[220] Either him, or Howard Hughes. See Loren Coleman, “Synchromystic Howard Hughes,” Copy-Cat Effect [weblog], Nov. 28, 2016, <http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2016/11/Howard-Hughes.html>.

[221] Born Marjorie Kimmel.

[222] Which was illegal at that time.

[223] John Carter, Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons, Port Townsend, Wash.: Feral House, 2004, p. 151. Carter comments that “[t]his abortion story …casts doubt upon the literal application of the term Moonchild” and “…actually serves as good evidence that Parsons was looking for an adult female to arrive,” (ibid.) were the ritual to have accomplished its intended objective.

[224] To put it slightly differently, there appear to be two primary possibilities. On the one hand, it could be that a physiological pregnancy is interpreted as a failure of the sex magic to create the desired homunculus – which, on this view, could be seen as some sort of “spiritual pregnancy.” On the other hand, it could be that the termination of a physical pregnancy – as a kind of magical sacrifice – is understood to be a sine qua non of the rite.

[225]Ed Sanders, The Family, New York: E. P. Dutton, 1971, p. 64.