10 Occultists Who Were Accused SPIES

Ten Political ‘Intriguers’

See the companion video, above.

Introduction

The occult is a shadowy world.

Historically, it has involved actors in subrosa activities, prompted the adoption of pseudonyms, and – depending upon how unfavorably ruling powers would react to discovery – resulted in the creation of clandestine networks.

All this is made to order for another area that might, at first glance, appear to be totally unrelated to these mystical or sorcerous undercurrents: namely, the world of spy craft.

But, in fact, the two arenas may overlap surprisingly frequently.

In this video, we’ll examine some of the junctures by looking primarily at ten (10) well-known occultists who have been accused of espionage.[1]

However, there is an almost unbelievably dramatic aspect to our entire saga. We will get to this in our final and climactic consideration of that much honored American Founding father who held a key to a kite string, for a Luciferian personal lightning strike.  Of course, we’re referring to the man so well portrayed on the $100 bill, and who needs no further introduction now.

10. Aleister Crowley

We’ll start things off – as we have done before – with the man who styled himself “The Great Beast, 666,” Edward Alexander “Aleister” Crowley.

Perhaps no one has a higher profile in 20th-century occultism than he.

If the usual biographical sketches are credible, at one time or other, Crowley dabbled in nearly every “alternative” form of religion, and joined every esoteric group, that existed. He had connexions to both English and French Freemasonry. He was initiated into the magical system of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. He made a study of Theravāda Buddhism and Tantra. He became the head of the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.).

For more on some of these currents, see “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

When he was dissatisfied with the status quo, he either set about reforming preëxisting institutions in his own image, or simply formed his own associations. For example, he started the A∴A∴ (usually said to abbreviate the Latin phrase Argentium Astrum, or “Silver Star”)[2] – a magical society not to be confused with Alcoholics Anonymous.

Crowley modified the high-grade masonic degrees of John Yarker. He rewrote the rituals for the Gnostic Church and the O.T.O.

Effectively, he established his own quasi-religion called Thelema.

Not to be confused with the London-based hedge fund, …

…Crowley’s Thelema was based on precepts (such as “Do what thou wilt”) that were articulated by the Renaissance writer François Rabelais.

(For more on the particulars of some of this, see our previous “Top 10 Occultists of All Time.”)

But these interests placed Crowley in numerous, out-of-the way places on the earth. And he associated with many strange people.

These facts, together with Crowley’s own (often exaggerated) bravado, led to allegations that Crowley was a spy.[3]

For example, for two years, Crowley worked as a columnist for German-born American political agitator and accused spy George Sylvester Viereck.[4] In the lead up to both world wars, Viereck was outspokenly pro-German. He published two periodicals, The Fatherland and The International, for which Crowley both edited and wrote articles ostensibly championing Germany over against his native Britain.

In his autobiography, Confessions, Crowley maintained that he had been doing “undercover” fact-finding for British Intelligence.[5]

He also associated with Gerald Hamilton,[6] a man who, for a brief interval, was reputedly as notoriously “wicked” as Crowley himself.

Also like Crowley, Hamilton seemed prone to aggrandize himself; so biographical details are a bit sketchy. But Hamilton appears occasionally to have operated as an information broker or a police informant.[7]

According to biographer Tobias Churton, Crowley met with Guy Burgess in 1942.[8]

Burgess was a principal member of the ring of British double agents known as the “Cambridge Five.” Under the direction of Harold “Kim” Philby, and from the era of World War II right through the early stages of the “Cold War,” the five spies secretly assisted the Soviet Union – to which Burgess defected in 1951.

Crowley also had dealings – some of them potentially sexual in nature – with journalist and Parliamentarian Thomas “Tom” Driberg.

Driberg may (or may not) himself have worked with the Soviet KGB or the British MI5.[9]

In any case, he wrote a biography of Burgess.[10]

Finally, Crowley was acquainted with, and influenced, German-born doctor and occultist Arnold Krumm-Heller.

Krumm-Heller was the neo-gnostic founder of the South American-based Fraternitas Rosicruciana Antiqua – a blend of Martinism, Rosicrucianism, Spiritism, Thelema, and Theosophy.

He was a personal physician to Francisco Madero, the 37th president of Mexico (until the latter’s deposition and assassination in 1913).

And, of course, Krumm-Heller was an operative in both the German and Mexican secret services.

Krumm-Heller appears to have reported to German diplomat and intelligence agent Felix Sommerfeld.

The two may have been attempting to engineer a war between Mexico and the United States. To that end, Krumm-Heller and Sommerfeld possibly engineering the bloody attack on Columbus, New Mexico by Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa on March 9, 1916.

9. Michael Sendivogius

During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, it was still uncommon for non-nobility to be widely traveled. Exceptions included certain craftsmen (for example, stone masons) as well as self-styled adventurers and …occultists!

On the other hand, you have noblemen who were also esotericists. An obvious case is that of Michael Sendivogius, …

…whom we covered in “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists.”

Sendivogius shuttled amongst various European courts, including those of Emperors Rudolf II and Ferdinand II …and Polish[11] King Sigismund III, from the House of Vasa –…

…for whom (allegedly) he was “a double agent.”[12]

Among other things, Sendivogius seems somehow to have been mixed up[13] in the Russian affair of the “False Dmitry,” during that country’s so-called “Time of Troubles.”[14]

The gist was that a succession of various imposters – referred to as “Pseudo Dmitries” –…

…claimed to have been the youngest son of Tsar Ivan the Terrible,

…who was apparently assassinated at the age of eight.

The first of these pretenders actually managed for a time to assume rulership of the country.[15]

Espionage-related shenanigans concerning royal succession would later afflict other countries, including England – as we will see further on. And other European nations would give rise to interesting espionage-occultism interrelations.

8. Emanuel Swedenborg

And this brings us to Sweden, and to the late-17th to early 18th-century scientist turned philosopher-theologian, Emanuel Swedenborg.

Initially, Swedenborg studied physical science and became a knowledgeable mineralogist. His mechanical inventions, including one enabling ships to be transported on land, brought him to the attention – and into the favor – of government officials.

Following a series of mystical experiences in the 1740s, Swedenborg devoted himself to spiritual pursuits.

Essentially, he became convinced that he had a divine mission to reinterpret the Bible and Christianity, effectively being the conduit for a new gospel. But, he denied that he was acting on his own hook. Instead, Swedenborg claimed that he was merely delivering information obtained by “visiting” heaven and hell and conversing with angels and with God.

Swedenborg was preoccupied with the hermetic notion of “correspondence” between human beings and the cosmos – an idea we sketch in the video “10 Arcane Words.”

Several of his doctrines arguably had a neo-gnostic complexion. Some of them revolve around marital – and even sexual – concepts, as discussed in “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

For all that, the influence of his Protestant-Lutheran background was still evident.

After his death, a few of his disciples – referred to as “Swedenborgians” – founded the Church of the New Jerusalem, or the “New Church.”

Swedenborgianism, in one form or other, attracted notables such as John Chapman, better known as “Johnny Appleseed”; Swedish entomologist Leonard Gyllenhaal, progenitor of actors Jake and Maggie Gyllenhaal; Henry James, Sr., father of important writers Henry and William James; and popular health commentator Mehmet Cengiz Öz, who is, in 2022, a senatorial candidate in Pennsylvania and who’s known professionally as “Dr. Oz”[16]

But, Swedenborg also inspired a group of French esoterics, called the Illuminés of Avignon. This was an assembly of Freemasons, led by “Dom” Antoine-Joseph Pernety and Count Thaddeus Grabianka, who introduced the so-called “Swedenborg Rite” into their masonic rituals.[17]

As to whether Swedenborg the man had himself been a member of “the Brotherhood,” the matter is hotly disputed.

In her book Emanuel Swedenborg, Secret Agent on Earth and in Heaven,[18] author Marsha Keith Schuchard has argued not only that Swedenborg was a Freemason, but also that he was a Jacobite spy in the employ of the Swedish government, during the rise of parliamentarianism.

According to her, Swedenborg was valued, in part, because of his access to “secret Masonic networks” which functioned as confidential message-relaying systems.

Schuchard places Swedenborg, an inveterate traveler, at the epicenter of prominent British Prime Minister Robert Walpole’s intelligence apparatus in Hanover, Germany.

If true, this would place Swedenborg in a class of adventurers and businessmen, operating during the heyday of mercantilism, that also veered over into spy craft. This would include Swiss-English agent John Coustos and Prussian antiquarian Philipp von Stosch – both of whom were Freemasons.

It also includes the even more mysterious Count of St. Germain,[19] who was suspected of participating in Jacobite machinations during the 1740s.[20] He claimed to have been one of the last surviving members of the Hungarian royal House of Rákóczi.[21] “…[T]here is some evidence that Saint-Germain had worked for …[Frederick the Great] as a secret diplomat (i.e. a spy) in France…”.[22]

The so-called Grand Constitutions of 1786, one of the important documents in the formation of the Scottish Rite, name Frederick as the head of that order. Masonic orders play a recurring part in state intrigues.

7. Robert Moray

Recall that, as part of the far-flung occult connexions he maintained, Aleister Crowley was a high-degree Freemason. This is suggestive – not to say instructive – not least because (as we have seen) several other historically important members of the “Craft” also spent time as spies.

For example, consider the case of Sir Robert Moray. Moray was in on the ground floor of what is termed “speculative” masonry – as opposed to the “operative” variety in which bona fide builders and stone workers would have engaged.[23]

Although the official inception of the Grand of Lodge of England wouldn’t occur until June 24, 1717,[24] Moray is recognized as having been among the men “raised” to masons as part of “[t]he first recorded initiation in England” circa 1641.[25]

Prior to that, Moray was part of a secretive coterie of Scottish military and statesmen who had some connexion to France. In fact, Moray supposedly had close contact with the distinguished Duke Armand Jean du Plessis, better known as Cardinal Richelieu.

Richelieu was a shrewd political operator and managed to attain high offices in both the Catholic Church and in the government of France, where he was King Louis XIII’s chief minister.

Among his accomplishments was that he catapulted France above Spain as the most powerful nation in Continental Europe.

He did this, in part, by negotiating tactical alliances with numerous Protestant countries (including the Dutch Republic, England, and Sweden) to oppose the Hapsburgs, who controlled both the Iberian Peninsula and the Holy Roman Empire.

To advance this master plan, Richelieu maintained a network of spies – among whom was Robert Moray. And among Moray’s tasks seems to have been that of ingratiating himself with a militant group of lowland Presbyterian Scots called the “Covenanters.”

Making short shrift of portions of Scottish history, we may summarize the situation. The Covenanters opposed Kings James VI (i.e., James I of England), and his son Charles I – at least, insofar as these rulers followed the precedent set by Henry VIII – and assumed control of the church in Scotland.

However, even though the Covenanters resented monarchial intrusions into church governance and theology, they recoiled in horror when Charles I was deposed and executed.

So, the Covenanters extended an olive branch to Charles’s son. “Moray helped to persuade the Prince of Wales, the future Charles II, to visit Scotland for his coronation as King of Scots at Scone on 1 January 1651.”[26]

Charles II was reigning when a group of twelve men, including Robert Moray, met at Gresham College in 1660 and founded The Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge. Moray was apparently instrumental in procuring the royal charter from the king.

As discussed in a previous video, the Royal Society’s initial membership included Sir Robert Boyle, the alchemist who helped launch the modern science of chemistry.[27]

In 1688, Boyle’s advocacy helped persuade Parliament to overturn a law forbidding the practice of alchemy. This paved the road for the incorporation of the Bank of England just a few years later, in 1694.

So, it’s tempting to say that part of Sir Robert Moray’s legacy was the London-based money-power apparatus that, to a certain degree, supplanted the British monarchy starting in the 17th century.[28]

But, Sir Moray was not the only “brother mason” to have entered into intelligence work. Another notable was the ponderously named individual (Charles-Geneviève-Louis-Auguste-André-Timothée d’Éon de Beaumont) later known as the Chevalier D’Eon.

We had occasion to name d’Eon in “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults” owing to his alleged affiliation with English poet, and Emanuel-Swedenborg discipline William Blake.[29] In that place, we noted the chevalier’s reputation as a “cross-dresser” – an usual pastime for an 18th-century gentleman.

It turns out, however, that this fact – irrespective of its possible sexual connotations and implications – figures in at least one persistent tale of international intrigue.

According to the story, recounted in the chevalier’s memoirs, the French King Louis XV wished to open a secret channel of communication with Elizabeth Romanov, then the Empress of Russia.  The trouble – according to d’Eon – was that England was using its influence to prevent French emissaries (on pain of death) from entering Russia.

In order to circumvent English security, the Chevalier d’Eon claimed that he impersonated a woman and inveigled himself into “service as a maid of honour to the Empress.”

D’Eon was closely aligned with the House de Broglie, which eventually produced famed quantum physicist Louis de Broglie, who postulated the particle-wave duality of subatomic parts like electrons.

For example, he and Charles-François de Broglie, also known as the Marquis de Ruffec, were both operatives in Louis XV’s clandestine “King’s Secret” group.  Among other things, the marquis worked with playwright and spy Pierre Beaumarchais, composer of The Barber of Seville and The Marriage of Figaro.

Together de Broglie and Beaumarchais lobbied the French government in support of the American Revolution. In fact, the duo was instrumental in convincing Gilbert du Motier, the Marquis de Lafayette, to intervene on behalf of the Americans to the point where he assumed command of his own troops in the Continental Army.

6. Nicholas Roerich

Nicholas Roerich was a late-19th to early 20th-century Russian painter and occultist. He achieved early public acclaim both for his Symbolist oil compositions as well as for stage-costume designs – for example, in Igor Stravinsky’s 1913 The Rite of Spring.

He and his wife, Helena, became students of Buddhism, Hinduism, mythology, and Theosophy – which, of course, owed its formulation in large measure to Russian esoteric H. P. Blavatsky.

Similarly to Blavatsky, the Roerichs claimed to be in contact with Himalayan-based “Ascended Masters.”

These “Mahatmas” prompted them to create their own, mystical system known as “Agni Yoga.”

Eventually, the pair traveled to United States by way of Finland and Great Britain. In America, the Roerichs impressed Freemason and financier Louis L. Horch, who – in 1928 – paid for the construction of the Roerich Museum in New York City.

Among those who frequented the museum, then called the “Master Building,” was masonic philosopher Manly Palmer Hall.

Nicholas Roerich also became a spiritual advisor to politician Henry A. Wallace. At the time, Wallace served as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s secretary of agriculture. But he would become FDR’s third-term vice president. Had he not been edged out by Harry S. Truman during the 1944 election cycle, Wallace might have become president of the United States when F.D.R. died in office in 1945.

Because of his contacts, history, and mobility, Roerich was commissioned by Wallace to search southeast Asia in search of drought-resistant grasses to offset the negative effects of the “Dust Bowl.”

But, what he may really have been doing was attempting to secure local support for an Asian union – possibly around Eastern-messianic expectations.

Roerich is now counted among the ranks of that motley assortment of characters who took up the reigns of what has been called the “Great Game” after the British Empire went into eclipse. The phrase the “Great Game” – a 19th-century coinage – was popularized by Freemason and novelist Rudyard Kipling, especially in his 1901 classic, Kim.

The degree to which masonry interconnected with political intrigue was vividly, if fancifully, showcased in Kipling’s 1888 short story, The Man Who Would Be King, which was adapted for film in 1975 by John Huston and featured actors Michael Caine, Sean Connery, and Christopher Plummer.

Also termed the “Tournament of Shadows,” the overarching power struggle between the British and Russian empires revolved around the geopolitical significance of portions of Asia, including Afghanistan, India, and Tibet.

“…[T]o many theorists [this is the]…heartland of the world, and [it is] riddled with symbolism.”

Pursuant to his mythological interests, Roerich appears to have been on the hunt for legendary locations supposedly imbued with magical powers.

For one thing, beneath the surface of Tibet – quite literally – was said to lie the mythical subterranean city of Agartha, supposed home to the Lord of the World.

Or, again, the “hidden paradise called Shambala” has long been rumored to be in the vicinity. Some claim that it is an “undiscovered city” somewhere in the Himalayas “in northern Tibet.” Others – including Roerich – seem to have searched for it in the Altai Mountains, in an area sometimes referred to as the “Russian Tibet.”

Interestingly, F.D.R. wasn’t the only world leader to fix his attentions on Tibet. Under Soviet “Chairman” Vladimir Lenin,[30] the cryptographer, spy, and Tantric Buddhist Gleb Ivanovich Bokii also attempted to locate Shambala.

Almost incredibly, one of the stated aims was to “merge” the sex-magical oriented “Kalachakra-tantra and ideas of Communism”.[31] For more on Tantra, see “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

Until his summary execution during Joseph Stalin’s “Great Purge,” Bokii was active in the U.S.S.R.’s numerous pre-KGB-era secret-police outfits, including the Cheka, NKVD, and OGPU.

In the next decade, then-German Führer Adolf Hitler sent his own exploratory party to the Tibetan region under zoologist Ernst Schäfer. The expedition was operated under the auspices of SS-Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler’s Ahnenerbe,[32] which basically investigated what might be termed “esoteric genealogy.” The explorers sought to establish that “….Tibet …[was] the cradle of the Aryan race…”.

Also operating in the Indian subcontinent was the eccentric, French-born Greek and occultist Maximiani Julia Portas. Portas later converted to Hinduism and changed her name to Savitri Devi.

Her Hindu sympathies stemmed from an interpretation of the history and etymology of the word “Aryan.” Devi perceived a connexion between the ancient, Indo-Iranian people group of that name and the racial identification embraced by National Socialist Germany, by way of French ethnologist Arthur de Gobineau and British philosopher Houston Stewart Chamberlain.

5. J. G. Bennett

Another interesting figure in the vicinity was John Godolphin Bennett. “J. G.” Bennett was apparently a linguistic savant who was connected, in some fashion, to British intelligence.

After mastering Turkish, he was stationed in Constantinople (Istanbul) toward the tail end of World War One.

Perhaps significantly, later American Central Intelligence chief Allen Dulles was also in the same vicinity.

“In 1916 Dulles joined the U.S. Foreign Service. …He was assigned to Constantinople (later Istanbul) from October 1920 to April 1922, and then went to Washington, D.C., to become the State Department’s specialist on the Near East.”[33]

While in Turkey, Dulles was mixed up in the hoopla surrounding the so-called Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Specifically, he was among the first opinionators to label the document spurious.[34]

The Protocols are a whole other story. One commonly repeated theory holds that they are the creation of one Mathieu Golovinski, a Russian writer in France who acted as an agent for Pyotr Rachkovsky, head of the Tsar’s “secret police,” the Department for Protecting the Public Security and Order (abbreviated “Okhrana”).

Like Dulles’s experience, Bennett’s time in Turkey resulted in his own promotion under General Edmund Allenby. (Allenby had commanded Colonel Thomas Edward “T. E.” Lawrence, who became famous as “Lawrence of Arabia.”) Bennett “…was recruited to be the head of Military Intelligence ‘B’ Division, with responsibility for the entire Middle Eastern region.”[35]

Following the European war and the Bolshevik revolution, Bennett was assigned to surveil Russian émigrés and expatriates. This put him in contact with occultist G. I. Gurdjieff, and Gurdjieff’s principal disciple, P. D. Ouspensky. Apparently, the trio were introduced to one another through Prince Sabahaddin de Neuchâtel. Sabahaddin was simultaneously the scion of the House of Osman, the then-ruling Ottoman dynasty, as well as a supposed anti-dynasty agitator and proponent of democracy.

As an aside, the “Osman” name is intriguing. One recalls the following tidbit related to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. “A member of a prominent Saudi Arabian family with links to the Texas Bush clan, Osama (Usama) bin Laden was known to the CIA in the 1980s as Colonel Tim Osman, a successful leader of the Mujahiddeen.”[36]

Nevertheless, these associations – and an alleged near-death, out-of-body experience – warmed Bennett up to all things esoteric. He ended up delving into Gurdjieff’s Fourth Way, Rudolf Steiner’s Anthroposophy, H. P. Blavatsky’s Theosophy, and even becoming a missionary for Indonesian guru Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo, bringing the “Subud” movement to Britain.[37]

4. Theodor Reuss

Turning to police spies, we ought to mention Theodor Reuss.

Along with Carl Kellner, Reuss was one of the initial founders of the Ordo temple Orientis, or O.T.O.[38] We mentioned this organization in connexion with Aleister Crowley, who ratcheted its sex obsessions into the stratosphere.

For some of the lurid details, see “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

But beyond their common interest in magia sexualis and Tantra, Crowley and Reuss shared another thing in common: supposed ties to intelligence work.

In the case of Reuss, this amounted to alleged involvement with the Prussian secret police.

As writer (and former Blondie drummer) Gary Lachman notes, this put Reuss in the orbit of anarchists and socialists. In fact, Reuss was expelled from “…the English Socialist League for spying on Karl Marx’s daughter Eleanor for the Germans…”.[39]

Bear in mind that the Prussian secret police are identified by contemporary writers as having been the motivating force behind the infamous – and previously mentioned – document known as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Almost universally – and variously – denounced as a “forgery” or a “hoax,” the Protocols are part of a spate of nineteenth-century, socio-politically supercharged manuscripts with questionable provenances.

Interlude 1: William Thetford

We hope to be able to enumerate ten of the most salient of these in a future video. But, for the time being, we observe that the nexus of intelligence with quasi-religious texts isn’t confined to previous centuries.

Consider, as just a single example, the ponderous tome titled A Course in Miracles.

After the works of Alice Bailey and Edgar Cayce, the writings of Marilyn Ferguson[40] and James Redfield,[41] and alongside other supposedly “channeled” treatises,[42] such as those of Judy Zebra “J. Z.” Knight[43] and Dorothy Jane Roberts,[44] A Course in Miracles has been hugely influential for “New Agers.”

The “course” contains material supposedly “channeled” by a psychologist named Helen Shucman[45] from an entity elsewhere identified as “Jesus.”

However, Shucman merely dictated the words of a perceived “inner voice” to at least one other collaborator. According to the story, this person was her colleague, William Newton Thetford.

And this is where things take a strange turn. For, consulting Thetford’s autobiographical sketch, as presented on A Course in Miracles’s website, we find that he was trained by Carl Rogers at the University of Chicago. Rogers – widely regarded was a board member for the Central-Intelligence-Agency-connected Human Ecology Fund, which appears to have been an MK-Ultra cover operation.

In a testimony to the interconnectivity of the tangled web of characters we’ve been surveying, we note – in passing – that the Cornell University-based Human Ecology Fund was also the institutional base for Louis Jolyon West. Dr. West engaged in public shadow boxing with L. Ron Hubbard’s Church of Scientology and was also consulted as a “brain-washing expert” in the trial of Patricia Campbell Hearst. Better known as “Patty Heart,” she is the granddaughter of publishing tycoon William Randolph Hearst, and become notorious when she was arrested for numerous crimes – including bank robberies – committed in connexion with a strange, leftist terror organization called the “Symbionese Liberation Army.” Heart’s defense claimed that she had been mind-controlled through rape and other forms of coercion. Dr. West successfully petitioned then-President Jimmy Carter for commutation of her prison sentence and she was later pardoned by Bill Clinton.

Back to Thetford: the psychologist further disclosed that he himself was recruited into the C.I.A. during the 1950s. According to Thetford’s account, as retold via an interview with “transpersonal” psychotherapist Frances Vaughan, the C.I.A. was expanding a battery of personality assessments that had originally been conceived by Harvard University Professor Henry Murray.

During World War II, Murray worked for William “Wild Bill” Donovan’s Office of Strategic Services, or the O.S.S. Murrary is infamous for conducting a series of barbaric human “experiments” on Harvard students – including the now-infamous so-called “Unabo(b)mer,” Theodore “Ted” Kaczynski.

During Murrary’s “research project,” an untold number of individuals were given mind-altering drugs, including LSD, or lysergic acid diethylamide, as well as psilocybin.[46] Others were – essentially – emotionally traumatized. It is entirely possible that a few hapless “volunteers” were subjected to both pharmacological and psychological abuses.

As journalist Alexander Cockburn wrote in one Los Angeles Times article in 1999: “What did Murray give Kaczynski? Did the experiment’s long-term effects help tilt him into the Unabomber’s homicidal rampages? The CIA’s mind experiment program was vast. How many other human time bombs were thus primed? How many of them have exploded?”[47]

According to an article in Psychology Today, “Murray …supervised psychoactive drug experiments, including …[those of psychedelic-drug advocate Timothy Leary].”[48] Leary once publicly stated that he had long “…been an admirer of Aleister Crowley” and believed that he had “…carried on much of the work that he started over a hundred years ago…”.[49]

In any case, Murray’s legacy was continued (in part) by John Gittinger, best known for developing a “Personality Assessment System” that C.I.A. used for creating and exploiting psychological weaknesses in targets of espionage or in recruitment scenarios.

Thetford states: The P.A.S. “…was so accurate that I began working with …[Gittinger] and others to further develop and refine it.”

As a final point, recall Helen Shucman’s claim to have heard a disembodied voice in her head. It is interesting to consider this alongside a further datum known as the “microwave auditory effect,” whereby “communications are generated directly inside the human head without the need of any receiving electronic device.”

This was described in 1961 by biologist Allan H. Frey. At the time Frey published a paper on the phenomenon – now sometimes called the “Frey Effect – he was employed by General Electric’s Advanced Electronics Center at the MK-Ultra-connected Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.[50]

The power to induce the effect in controllable and predictable ways was supposedly harnessed by Joseph C. Sharp, a neuropsychiatrist working at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

In other words, we have an ostensible C.I.A. operative named William N. Thetford who, by his own testimony, was a participant in MK-Ultra psychological experiments. He’s working closely to “record,” edit, and publicize what would – partially through the promotion of media gurus like Oprah Winfrey – become hugely influential text of New-Age spirituality. And this text was allegedly obtained through a process oddly reminiscent of the “Frey Effect” – a radar-induced sensation of “inner communication” that had just been identified prior to Helen Shucman’s adventures in “inner dictation.”[51]

The case is hardly the only curious interstice between “intelligence” and contemporary culture.

As mentioned before on this channel, consider (in this vein) a man who may have inspired the fictional, Marvel Comics character Howard Stark, father of Tony Stark, billionaire playboy and tech savant …and the real-life identity for the superhero known as Iron Man.

3. Jack Parsons

Of course, I have in mind the American, California Institute of Technology-associated rocket scientist John Whiteside Parsons, better known as “Jack.”

Given his possible inspirational rôle for the movie representation of Howard Stark, I’m sure it’s just an extraordinary coinkydink that his given name, at birth, was “Marvel.”

He was also a principal member, and later head, of the so-called “Agape Lodge,” a United States branch of Aleister Crowley’s Ordo Templi Orientis.

By day, he made numerous discoveries pertinent to the manufacture of both liquid-fueled and solid-state aeronautical engines. Parsons was one of the founders of Caltech’s Jet Propulsion Lab. One important series of test explosions was fired off on Halloween (no less) in 1936. The event, which was photographed for posterity, is known as the “Nativity” and is annually recreated, in memoriam.[52]

Many of Parsons’ engineering projects were conducted under the directorship of Hungarian-born American mathematician and physicist Theodore von Kármán.

According to an article published by Britain’s august Royal Society – which we mentioned throughout “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists” – “…the most famous of [von Kármán’s] ancestors is Yehuda Loew ben Bezalel, the ‘Exalted’ Rabbi of Prague, a famous sixteenth-century scholar… who is …credited by legend with the creation of the Golem of Prague…”.[53]

By night, Parsons accentuated these tantalizing biographical details by performing “sex-magickal” (sic) rituals, some of which were aimed at summoning elemental spirits. The culmination of his efforts was the “Bablon Working,” the stated goal of which was the incarnation of a quasi-demonic being on earth.

For more on this aspect of Parsons’ life, see our video “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

Eventually, and perhaps inevitably, Parsons’ path crossed with the Hughes Aircraft Company, originally founded by eccentric engineer and entrepreneur Howard Hughes. Parsons obtained a Hughes chemical-manufacturing contract. While under Hughes’s employ, he was accused of document theft. This led to charges of corporate espionage and allegations that he was spying for the newly created nation of Israel.

To complicate matters further, Parsons was – for a time – romantically involved with one Sara Northrup. Sara was the sister of Parsons’ first wife, Helen Northrup. Sara eventually broke things off with Jack and eloped with then-fellow thelemite, and later Church of Scientology founder, Lafayette Ronald Hubbard, better known as L. Ron Hubbard.

As if the love triangles weren’t bewildering enough, a tapestry of espionage intrigue was superimposed on the situation. Firstly, Hubbard denounced Sara as a Communist spy. Though, Hubbard’s allegations have largely been dismissed – and appear to have been rejected by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents – as sour grapes.

Secondly, Hubbard himself was connected to U.S. Naval Intelligence. He would later claim that his membership, along with Parsons and Northrup, in the Agape Lodge had merely been part of a covert sting operation geared toward eradicating “black-magic” cults in California.[54]

Although officially exonerated of wrongdoing himself, Parsons’ reputation – and acquaintances – resulted in the permanent revocation of his all-important security clearances. He was compelled into ancillary fields (such as pyrotechnics) to continue exercising his peculiar skill sets.

Ultimately, Parsons lost his life conducting some (obviously perilous) experiment in his home. Explanations ranged from the pedestrian – such as hastiness due to the pressures of meeting shipment demand for an order of fireworks from a Hollywood movie studio – to the exotic – such as the speculation that Parsons was attempting to animate a Frankenstein-like creature called a homunculus.

Of course, there were also those who believed Parsons had been murdered. Hypotheses included that there was some anti-Zionist conspiracy motivated by Parsons’ cooperation with Israel; that various industrial tycoons – including Hughes – might have been looking to rid themselves of their competition; or even that the Los Angeles Police Department may have sought vengeance for Parsons’ rôle in the conviction of Captain Earle E. Kynette, who had been charged with conspiracy in an attempted car bombing directed against a former detective (Harry J. Raymond) who had blown the whistle on law-enforcement corruption.[55]

This subplot “thickens,” as it were, when one discovers that Captain Kynette didn’t simply preside over beat cops. He was the head of the L.A.P.D.’s “intelligence unit.”[56] He and his officers were themselves referred to in press clippings as “police spies.”[57]

2. John Dee

John Dee already had a reputation as a skilled astrologer, cartographer, and mathematician when he acquired a curious book that may have assisted – or even inspired – him in a more covert path.

The book, titled Steganographia,[58] had been written circa 1500 by the mysterious Benedictine monk Johannes Trithemius.[59]

The contents – and significance – of the book are still being debated (some 500 years later). But it’s clear that it uses ostensibly magical emblems and formulæ to convey groundbreaking techniques in cryptography.

In fact, the word “steganography” (albeit uncommon in conversation around the water cooler) has entered English, where it refers to “the practice of concealing messages or information within other nonsecret text or data.”[60]

And this appears to be precisely how John Dee applied the procedure. 17th-century English polymath Robert Hooke,[61] writing at the turn of the 18th century, “suggested, in the chapter Of Dr. Dee’s Book of Spirits, that John Dee made use of Trithemian steganography to conceal his communication with Queen Elizabeth I.”[62]

In this way, Dee – if I may be forgiven the expression – took a page out of the book of yet another Renaissance “magus” who had been influenced by Trithemius, the German polymath Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa. Like Dee, whom he inspired, Agrippa was fascinated by codes and by all things esoteric, on which he wrote the seminal Three Books of Occult Philosophy.

And like his later, English counterpart (Dee), Agrippa also seems to have been connected to the world of espionage, and may have functioned as a “diplomatic spy” for Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I.[63]

Likewise, Dee seems to have at one time operated as an “intelligencer” for the English Crown. Reportedly, when Sir Francis Walsingham was appointed chief spy Queen Elizabeth, the rôle for which he is principally remembered, “he found it necessary to consult with the only man in England who understood encryption ciphers and who (legend has it) had long since served as the queen’s spy: John Dee.”[64]

There is an “idea of Dee as a roving James Bond of Tudor times” which, though it is “far-fetched” in certain respects – for example, Dee was certainly not regarded as a lady’s man – nevertheless has a “basis” in fact and history.[65]

For example, and remarkably, according to author Richard Deacon,[66] “…twentieth-century author” Ian Fleming “unconsciously [borrowed] as a code name for his hero the very signature used by Bond’s Elizabethan counterpart – 007.”[67]

Though Deacon admits that, overall, “despite his signature of 007, …[Dee] can better be compared to Admiral Sir Reginald Hall, Director of Naval Intelligence in World War I, than to James Bond.”[68]

“Unlike Bond, he was not directly involved in the maritime defence (sic) of the nation, but he was able to lend his technical and navigational know-how to sailors at the court of Elizabeth.”[69] To extend the analogy to Fleming-inspired characters, “[m]aybe he was a little more like Q than Bond…”.[70]

Interlude 2: Francis Bacon

We might as well continue this Elizabethan saga by speaking of the courtier to whom, according to Masonic philosopher Manly Palmer Hall, John Dee might have passed his torch of occult knowledge.

Francis Bacon[71] was a late-16th to early 17th-century English lawyer, philosopher, and politician. Intellectually, he was a trailblazing British empiricist. He articulated a method of reasoning that is still referred to a “Baconian induction” and was a forerunner of what evolved into the “scientific method.”

At his high point under King James I, Bacon became Lord High Chancellor. But his career as a member of court ended on a sour note. Bacon’s longtime enemy, the famed jurist Sir Edward Coke, brought numerous “corruption” charges – including accepting brides – against him.

Beyond his duties as a statesman, and seemingly apart from his rôle in the development of experimental science, Bacon may also have been an esoteric adept. As noted, Freemasonic writer Manly Hall, possibly drawing upon a tradition that was transmitted to him via Max Heindel’s[72] Rosicrucian Fellowship, represents Bacon as the inheritor of an occult gnosis that was transmitted to him by John Dee.

This is a story for another time. But, what is interesting from the standpoint of the current topic, is that Lord Bacon’s younger brother, Anthony, was undeniably a member of the Elizabethan-era spy network headed by the previously mentioned Sir Francis Walsingham.[73]

The Bacon family was a powerful force in England at the time. And it raises the question of how much sharing of information – and vision – might have occurred between the brothers.

In this respect, the Bacon family bears some similarity to the Dulles family.

In twentieth-century America, of course, Allen Welsh Dulles – having been instrumental in the wartime Office of Strategic Services and its successor, the Central Intelligence Agency – was indisputably one of the United States’s highest-ranking spies.

At the same time, his older brother, John Foster Dulles, was an attorney and high-level political insider. He was the Secretary of State under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, worked closely with Republican party boss Thomas E. Dewey, and was a key player in the U.S.’s early participation in the United Nations.

The Dulles brothers coordinated in at least two covert actions, both considered by Masonic President Harry S. Truman but ultimately authorized and implemented by President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

The first was Operation Ajax, by which the C.I.A. and Britain’s MI6 – in 1953 – overthrew the democratically elected Iranian leader Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in his place.  The second was Operation PBSuccess which, the following year, ousted democratically elected Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz and installed a military junta.

1. Benjamin Franklin

Speaking of coups and rebellions, and as we teased in our introduction, we would be remiss if we didn’t say something about one of America’s homegrown revolutionaries.

And that brings us (at last) to number one. Benjamin Franklin, of course, was an 18th-century polymath who is most famous for his rôle in securing the United States as its own nation, independent of England.

As one of the country’s preëminent statesmen, he was a cosigner for each of three, über-important, formative documents: the Declaration of Independence, the U.S Constitution, and the Treaty of Paris.

It’s worth mentioning that Franklin arguably displays numerous similarities to Francis Bacon.

For example, along with his Italian contemporary, Galileo, Bacon is regarded as a father of modern experimental science.

Similarly, having made contributions to the studies of electricity and oceanography, Benjamin Franklin was also at the forefront of investigation during his era. Several of his inventions, including bifocal lenses and the lightning rod, are still in use.

Moreover, according to Baconian legend, the man known variously as Lord Verulam and the Viscount St. Alban, figures in Rosicrucianism and the beginning of Freemasonry.

Likewise, Franklin not only became a mason, but he was elevated to the position of master at lodges both in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania as well as in Paris, France.

There, in the “Lodge of the Nine Sisters”[74] – which (coincidentally or not) later became an important center for the bloody French Revolution[75] – he was initiated by Court de Gebelin, fountainhead of Western-occult fascination with the Tarot deck.

Franklin later personally initiated François-Marie Arouet, better known as the satirist Voltaire.

In truth, freemasonry may have just been the tip of the iceberg of Franklin’s occult involvement. Though, a word of caution is in order. The word “occult” has a range of meanings.[76] We discussed some of these in “10 Arcane Words.” For a more detailed survey, see that presentation.

But, somewhere along the “occult spectrum” lies the Bavarian Illuminati, to which Franklin can be connected through pamphleteer Thomas Paine.[77]

Paine was on intimate terms with one Nicolas Bonneville (and, incidentally, with Bonneville’s wife). Prior to the order’s office dissolution in 1787, Bonneville had been converted to Illuminism by Adam Weishaupt’s chief lieutenant, Christian Bode.[78]

At the same time, allegedly, the seeming sober-minded politician and printer was himself a member of a quasi-Satanic group known colloquially as the “Hell-Fire Club.”

Technically, the order to which Franklin is said to have belonged alternately called itself the “Brotherhood” or “Knights of St. Francis of Wycombe” and the “Monks of Medmenham” – both phrases intended as parodies of Christian (especially Catholic) religiosity. But the label “Hell-Fire Club” is the one that has stuck.

It turns out that there was a predecessor club by that exact name. This original incarnation goes back to a curious, 18th-century English duke and playboy named Philip Wharton.

At various times, and somewhat like the later Frenchman who called himself “Léo Taxil” (for the details, see “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists of All Time”), the paradoxical Wharton posed as both friend and enemy of Freemasonry. Supposedly, he once presided over the Premiere Grand Lodge of England as well as the Grande Loge de France.[79] However, after his alleged expulsion, he founded an even more secret society. Wharton ran this supposedly “anti-Masonic” organization – called the Gormogons – along with Andrew Michael Ramsay, a Scotsman known by the French title Chevalier, that is, “Knight.”

In a famous speech delivered in 1736, Ramsay connected Freemasonry to a group of Catholic crusaders. Later typically identified as the Knights Templar, the military order to which Ramsay referred was said to have passed its mysteries on to those men who founded masonry.

This idea, called “Templarism,” is detectable in esoteric degrees of “appendant” societies, such as the York Rite which offers a set of “Knights Templar” degrees. But even within the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite[80] – which, in an apparent nod to our Scottish Chevalier, is sometimes designated by the French word Écossais – one finds shades of Templarism, for example in the so-called Knight Rose Croix.

Politically, Ramsay was also a Jacobite. This group, whose name comes from the Latin Jacobus, lent its support to James II, the Catholic king of England who was deposed by Parliament during the “Glorious Revolution” and replaced by the Protestant William of Orange.

There has long been speculation that certain Jacobites, like the Chevalier Ramsay – with the possible assistance of French Jesuits – attempted to rewrite various Freemasonic rituals. Their presumed intention was to introduce these reformulations back to England to increase public support for the ousted House of Stuart and possibly for Catholicism.

At least, this line – that Freemasonry had been coopted by agents within the Vatican’s militant Society of Jesus – was pushed by the likes of Bode, Bonneville, and Weishaupt. These men billed the Illuminati as the anti-dote. Its anti-authoritarianism was pro-revolution and equally opposed to kings and popes.

Philip Wharton himself had Jacobite sympathies for much of his life. And Wharton was friends with James II’s son, James Francis Edward Stuart, known variously as the “Old Pretender” or as the rightful King James III – depending on the side one favored.

Late in his short life, Wharton seems to have abandoned the Jacobite cause and (like Emanuel Swedenborg) may have been a spy for English Prime Minister Robert Walpole. Walpole was a stalwart advocate for the Georgian Kings of the German House of Hanover, and he employed numerous covert agents, including the ostensible anti-Jacobite George Dodington, 1st Baron Melcombe.

Supposedly, George Dodington also happened to be a member of Francis Dashwood’s circle. When Dashwood rebooted Wharton’s Hell-Fire Club, beginning at London’s George and Vulture tavern, Dodington reportedly signed up, along with other influential persons – including Benjamin Franklin.

This is interesting for many reasons, not least of which is writer Richard Deacon’s contention that the club served as a “cover” for “British Intelligence” and, in effect, became a “…centre of English espionage.”[81]

And Benjamin Franklin was right in the thick of things. In fact, according to one researcher, Franklin came to England in 1758 expressly “…to discuss the future of the American colonies with Dashwood.”[82]

Additionally, Franklin had close dealings in Paris with Edward Bancroft, who was later unmasked as a double agent. It is disputed whether Franklin knew of Bancroft’s intrigues or not.[83]

As if that weren’t enough, Franklin appears to have known and corresponded with the Chevalier d’Eon, who we covered earlier. According to Deacon: “The Philadelphia philosopher and the chevalier became friendly in the 1770s when the French master spy was assigned to London and promptly joined the Hell-Fire Club.”

All this doesn’t necessarily mean that Franklin was a spy himself, that he had treasonous designs, or that he was working for the British. Tho, historian Cecil B. Currey raises this precise possibility in his 1972 study, Code Number 72 / Ben Franklin: Patriot or Spy?[84]

Admittedly, Franklin was cunning. It could be that he was hedging his bets if the Colonists were defeated.

Alternatively, Franklin may have been conspiring with a group of supporters inside George III’s own government. In this regard it’s worth recalling that Freemasonry extended throughout Britain and its colonies. American lodges frequently obtained their “charters,” or their authority to operate, from either the Grand Lodge of England.[85] So, that there existed some transatlantic, supranational confederation is not outside the realm of possibility.

One does wonder, however, just what Franklin was doing cavorting with the “Hell-Fire” group, if not simply using their meeting place as a convenient locale for hatching political schemes.

It should be remembered that Franklin was something of a ladies’ man. He himself, in his Autobiography, admitted his weakness for the opposite sex, writing that he was “…hurried …frequently into intrigues with low women that fell in [his] way.”[86]

And his womanizing ways continued well beyond his youth. As one crude, 18th-century poem put it: “Franklin, tho plagued with fumbling age / Needs nothing to excite him. / But is too ready to engage / When younger arms invite him.”[87]

The received, and sanitized, view of the club is that it was characterized by “ritual comedy, …banqueting and drinking, …and …wenching …”.[88]

Though, to read Daniel Mannix’s account, “…the Black Mass was celebrated and a solemn sacrifice [was] made to the devil of the virginity of the young girls lured into the cave system”[89] – a reference to the chalk caves directly beneath St. Lawrence Church, in West Wycombe, Southeast England, where Dashwood hosted Hell-Fire revels.

This darker complexion to the story might be dismissed as so much scandalmongering against the esteemed author of the Poor Richard’s Almanack were it not for an odd discovery made in 1998 by workmen renovating Franklin’s old digs at #36 Craven Street in London.

“…[O]ver 1200 pieces of [human] bone were retrieved… [f]rom a one metre wide, one metre deep pit…”.[90]

One of the builders who made the grisly discovery exclaimed: “It was like a horror movie”![91]

According to the London Times: “Most of the bones show signs of having been dissected, sawn or cut. One skull has been drilled with several holes.”[92]

At the time, “Paul Knapman, the Westminster coroner,” said in an official statement: “I cannot totally discount the possibility of a crime.”[93]

However, this angle was never investigated. According to the Benjamin Franklin House website: Since it was “determined that the bones were more than 100 years old …an inquest was not required.”[94]

Instead, is casually asserted that the bones are the “remnants of an anatomy school run from the House by William Hewson, son-in-law of Franklin’s landlady, Margaret Stevenson.”[95]

Even if this nonchalant reply is accepted at face value, one might worry that it glosses over several important points. For instance, there’s the issue of just where the bodies were obtained.

The further worry about why the remains of fellow human beings were so callously discarded is usually “answered” with the observation that the basement pit was “probably” used “to hide [the bones] because grave robbing was illegal.”[96] But, this solves nothing – unless, that is, learning about a Founding Father’s complicity in criminal grave robbery and evidence tampering is only worth an insouciant shrug.

That Hewson lived at the house for two years is mentioned in the usual retelling. But why Franklin shared quarters with him is evidently a question that is not interesting enough to answer. Likewise, the obvious follow-up query – namely, why Franklin would permit his home to be converted into a makeshift “anatomy school” – is apparently also of little to no consequence.

While one wrestles with these lacunae, commentators on the “Craven Street Bones” are busying themselves displaying an inexplicable omniscience in virtue of their (typically solemn) assurances that our American hero had nothing to do with the unsanctioned surgeries, themselves. Perish the thought!

Though, how Franklin’s aloofness and innocence could be ascertained without an investigation is anyone’s guess. Doubtless it is an inference from axioms such as that “he that would live in peace & at ease, must not speak all he knows or judge all he sees.”[97]

Nevertheless, on pain of being labeled gadflies, we must press this inquiry a bit further. After all, William Hewson was said to have been trained by anatomist William Hunter. In an article published in 2010 by the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, one may read a “prima facie case” that Hunter, along with accomplice William Smellie, “were responsible for a series of 18th-century …murders of pregnant women, with a death total greater than the combined murders committed by the famous 19th-century murderers, Burke and Hare, and Jack the Ripper.”[98]

Not only this, but – as mentioned in “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists of All Time” – Freemasonic reference materials ritualize the word “autopsy.” This implies that, in a bizarre – and arguably twisted – way, some Masons (perhaps like Franklin) may view this procedure both medically and esoterically. But, surely, there’s nothing to see, here!

Conclusion

Lest viewers conclude that these odd – and frankly alarming – connexions are relics of the past, we have only to ponder the career of New-World-Order booster George Herbert Walker Bush.[99]

Bush had moved in upper-level political orbits since at least the early 1950s, when he worked to support the presidential campaign of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

But he was introduced (in earnest) into federal positions by Richard M. Nixon, who appointed him the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and chair of the Republican National Committee.

Coincidentally or not, Bush’s tenure corresponded to revelations about a sensational (and apparently bungled) burglary attempt – and ensuing coverup – at the RNC’s counterpart Democratic National Committee’s headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. The whole sordid business involved key personnel in Nixon’s Whitehouse and resulted in the president’s unprecedented resignation in 1974.

Reportedly, Bush’s profile was high enough throughout this period that he was considered for the vice presidency by Both Nixon and Gerald R. Ford.[100] It’s well known that Bush eventually did become V.P. under Ronald Reagan. And he nearly became president on March 30, 1981, when a would-be assassin’s bullets crippled White House Press Secretary James Brady and nearly claimed Reagan’s life.

It’s less well known that the Bushes had ties to the family of accused shooter, John Hinckley Jr. According to a New York Times article, dated April Fool’s Day, 1981: “The eldest Hinckley child, Scott, … is …a friend of Neil Bush, the son of Vice President Bush.”[101]

Neil Bush and Scott Hinckley were such close friends that the two had planned to attend a dinner together “…at the young Bushes’ home …but,” we’re told, “the dinner was canceled after the shooting.”

The “elder” Bush, who would in 1989 succeed Ronald Reagan and become the 41st president of the United States, had been tapped in 1976 by then-President Gerald Ford to assume headship of the Central Intelligence Agency.

You’ll recall that Gerald Rudolph Ford – whose birth name had been “Leslie Lynch King Jr.” – had also been a member of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, better known as the “Warren Commission.”

Interestingly, although Bush denied having had any intelligence experience prior to his becoming chief spook, a provocative memo from longtime Federal Bureau of Investigation Director, J. Edgar Hoover, suggests otherwise. “Hoover reported that, on the day after JFK’s murder, the bureau had provided two individuals with briefings. One was ‘Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.’ The other: ‘Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency.’”[102] 

Just a year prior to Bush’s appointment as DCI, Ford was himself the target of two assassination attempts, just a few weeks apart. The first, on September 5, 1975, involved Manson-family member Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme and occurred in Sacramento, California.

We mentioned Charles Manson in “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

The second assassination attempt, September 22, 1975, took place in San Francisco in front of the St. Francis Hotel. This public attention on the name “Saint Francis” reminded synchromystic extraordinaire, James Shelby Downard, of the Hell-Fire Club which – as we discussed – jokingly called its members monks of “Saint Francis.”

One Sara Jane Moore was arrested and served thirty-two years for the crime, until she was paroled in 2007 – during the presidency of George W. Bush. Moore, who was at one point an informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, had peculiar ties to William Randolph Hearst’s organization “People In Need” and to the Patty Hearst case. According to Time Magazine, Moore made national headlines “in the early 1950s by collapsing …in front of the White House …suffering from amnesia”.[103]

That’s probably not worth looking into. Nor, I suppose, is it newsworthy that George Herbert Walker Bush had connexions to so many high-level political killings – or attempts.

As stated, and following the bizarre pair of failed assassinations on Ford, Bush, “Sr.” served as director of central intelligence. His assumption of that title came fast on the heels of previous DCI William Colby’s surprisingly cooperative testimony during Congressional investigations into C.I.A. activities.[104]  

Colby himself was found dead under suspicious circumstances in 1996. Oh! I almost forgot to mention the occult angle.

Along with his son, and 43rd President, George Walker, as well as numerous other policy-making heavy hitters (like “Dubya’s” opponent in the 2004 presidential election, John Forbes Kerry), George Herbert Walker Bush was a member of the ultra-exclusive, and spookily named, secret society “Skull and Bones” operating at Yale University.

They meet in a walled-off building affectionately referred to as the “Tomb.” Supposedly, the Bonesmen have a collection of human skulls – including those previously resting on the shoulders of famous Apache elder Geronimo and of the previously mentioned Mexican revolutionary born José Doroteo Arango, but better known as “Pancho Villa.”

But that establishment-recruitment mechanism, which masquerades as a college fraternity, will have to be the subject of future study.

If you found something of interest in this presentation, please “Like” the video. If you would care to see additional content, don’t forget to “Subscribe” and turn on “Notifications.”

Copyright 2023; all rights reserved.


[1] Some figures appear to have been accused as part of character-assassination campaigns. This is the current line taken, for example, on the late-19th-to-20th-c. Russian monk and mystic Grigori Efimovich Rasputin. He had a strange and multifarious reputation that included accusations of espionage, sexual deviancy, and an almost supernatural (though plainly not inexhaustible) ability resist death. However, these claims are now usually explained as having been defamatory attacks launched by Tsarist enemies during the tumultuous year 1917, which saw two successive revolutions. See, e.g., Albinko Hasic, “5 Myths and Truths About Rasputin,” Time Magazine, Dec. 29, 2016, <https://time.com/4606775/5-myths-rasputin/>. Be that as it may, Rasputin does seem to have been involved in political intrigues. Additionally, there are those who still advocate for there having been some connexion to intelligence. According to press reports, Rasputin may even have been killed by British agent Oswald Rayner. See Karyn Miller, “British spy ‘fired the shot that finished off Rasputin’,” Telegraph (U.K.), Sept. 19, 2004, <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3344528/British-spy-fired-the-shot-that-finished-off-Rasputin.html>.

[2] This is far from uncontroversial. Wikipedia (“A∴A∴,” Apr. 2, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%E2%88%B4A%E2%88%B4>) provides a useful summary of the options. One possibility is that the phrase is actually Greek, rather than Latin. On this view, A∴A∴ stands for Άστρον Αργόν (Astron Argon or Aster Argos), which still translate to “Silver Star.”

This proposal is credited to James Eshelman, who gives an explanation based upon Jewish numerology (the Gematria of Kabbalah).

A variant on this Kabbalistic theme has it that A∴A∴ is a reference to the semitic phrase Arikh Anpin, sometimes referred to as the “Macroprosopus” (as in the Christian Cabalist Christian Knorr von Rosenroth) or the “Long Face.” This is an obscure concept in the emanationist cosmology of Jewish mysticism, and derivative systems. For more insight into the basics of both – emanation and Kabbalah – see my video “10 Arcane Words.”

A further option is that A∴A∴ represents the chimeric notion of a sublime, Acanum Arcanorum, that is, a “secret of secrets.” Indeed, Crowley appeared much taken with this sort of concept. Specifically, O.T.O. founders Carl Kellner and Theodor Reuss both professed to have discovered such an, ahem…  penetrating mystery in the complicated subject of “sex magic,” to which I devoted an entire presentation. (See “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”)

Alternatively, one sees the phrase “Angel and Abyss” crop up periodically. Crowley certainly placed heavy emphasis both on the notion of a “Holy Guardian Angel” as well as of the indispensable significance of “crossing the Abyss” on one’s journey toward gnosis.

The Wiki authors also state that 20th-c. American novelist Lyon Sprague de Camp floated “Atlantean Adepts” as a candidate in his 1980 book, The Ragged Edge of Science (Philadelphia: Owlswick Press).

To round things out, Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea asserted (in their The Illuminatus! Trilogy, New York: Dell, 1975) that A∴A∴ doesn’t represent anything. To hear them tell it, anyone who presumes to decode the name gives himself away as a pretender.

[3] Theosophical Society (co-)foundress, Helena Blavatsky, has also been suspected of being an intelligence agent. She was interviewed by the British-based Society for Psychical Research. At the end of 1885, its highly critical was report was circulated. In it, principal investigator Richard Hodgson (who was an associate of both William James and Henry Sidgwick) denounced her as a fraud and “…accused Blavatsky of being a spy for the Russian government…”, according to “Helena Blavatsky,” Wikipedia, Aug. 31, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena_Blavatsky>; citing Bruce F. Campbell, Ancient Wisdom Revived: A History of the Theosophical Movement, Berkeley, Cal.: Univ. of Cal. Press, 1980, pp. 92–93; Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Helena Blavatsky, Berkeley, Cal.: North Atlantic Books, 2004, p. 13; Gary Lachman, Madame Blavatsky: The Mother of Modern Spirituality, New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher; Penguin, 2012, pp. 228–230 and 236–237; and Peter Washington, Madame Blavatsky’s Baboon: Theosophy and the Emergence of the Western Guru, London: Secker & Warburg, 1993, pp. 82–83. On Hodgson’s associations, see Nevill Drury, “Hodgson, Richard,” The Dictionary of the Esoteric, Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 2004, p. 144. Hodgson’s conclusions were questioned by Vernon Harrison. See Goodrick-Clark, op. cit., p. 14.

[4] E.g., Crowley’s main Wikipedia article – “Aleister Crowley” – refers to Viereck as a “German spy.” At least, in the version available as of Sept. 24, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley>. Though, Viereck’s own article contains no such reference, and merely calls him a “pro-German propagandist.” See “George Sylvester Viereck,” Wikipedia, Aug. 8, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Sylvester_Viereck>.

[5] Gary Lachman, Aleister Crowley: Magick, Rock and Roll, and the Wickedest Man in the World, p. 196.

[6] Supposedly born Gerald Souter.

[7] See Peter Parker, “The Long and Disgraceful Life of Britain’s Pre-Eminent Bounder,” book review, Tom Cullen, The Man Who Was Norris, Spectator (U.K.), Jul. 19, 2014, <https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-long-and-disgraceful-life-of-britain-s-pre-eminent-bounder>.

[8] Tobias Churton, Aleister Crowley in England, Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 2021, p. 207.

[9] “Tom Driberg,” Wikipedia, Oct. 13, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Driberg>.

[10] Tom Driberg, Guy Burgess: A Portrait With Background, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1956.

[11] And later Finnish and Swedish ruler.

[12] “Michał Sedziwoj,” Wikipedia, Aug. 25, 2022, <https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micha%C5%82_S%C4%99dziw%C3%B3j>.

[13] Michał Sedziwoj,” loc. cit.

[14] No fewer than three, and perhaps four. They were: False Dmitry I (fl. 1582-1606), False Dmitry II (fl. 1607-1610), and False Dmitry III (fl. 1611-1612). If there were a fourth (False Dmitry IV), he would have been active circa 1611-1612.

[15] Of course, Ivan the Terrible, was married to Anastasia Romanovna, through whom proceeded the House of Romanov. This dynasty would end with the abdication, and eventual murder, of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia by the Bolsheviks. As an aside, Tsar Nicholas II bore an uncanny resemblance to his cousin, King George V of Britain, as can be seen from a famous 1913 photograph depicting the two side by side. See <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tsar_Nicholas_II_%26_King_George_V.JPG>.

[16] Mehmet Oz supposedly also is an adherent of Sufism.

[17] Elsewhere, it is referred to as the Rite hermétique (“Hermetic Rite”).

[18] Marsha Keith Schuchard, Emanuel Swedenborg, Secret Agent on Earth and in Heaven: Jacobites, Jews and Freemasons in Early Modern Sweden, Leiden: Brill, 2011.

[19] Also written: Comte de Saint Germain. He is also said to have used a panoply of other titles, including: Comte Bellamarre, Marquis de Montferrat, Prince Ragoczy, Chevalier Schoening, Comte Soltikoff, Graf Tzarogy, and Chevalier / Count Weldon. See Isabella Cooper-Oakley, The Comte De Saint Germain, 2nd ed., London: Whitefriars Press, 1912, passim.

[20] See, Horace Walpole, “The Rebel Army Has Retreated From Derby…,” letter to Horace Mann, Dec. 9, 1745, Letters of Horace Walpole, vol. 1, Charles Duke Yonge, ed., London: T. Fisher Unwin; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1890; online by Ted Garvin and Linda Cantoni, eds., Project Gutenberg, <https://www.gutenberg.org/files/12073/12073.txt>.

[21] Or Rákóczy.

[22] Colin Wilson, The Occult: A History, New York: Random House, 1971, p. 360.

[23] There is a rough – and perhaps prototypical – distinction between “practical” and “speculative” aspects of many occult disciplines, chief examples are alchemy and Jewish Kabbalah.

[24] This coincides with “St. John’s Day,” that is, the Nativity of John the Baptist. Whether deliberately or not, it’s celebrated on what was apparently referred to as “Midsummer Day” in certain pagan contexts. “St. John’s Day,” Wikipedia, Mar. 28, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._John%27s_Day>.

[25] See the article by that title: “The First Recorded Initiation in England,” Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, Dec. 1, 2010, <https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/moray_r.html>; a reproduction of, and citing, Dudley Wright, The Builder, 1921.

[26] “Robert Moray,” Wikipedia, May 13, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Moray>. Before his restoration, Charles II was spied upon by agents of Oliver Cromwell. One such spy, Henry Manning (not to be confused with the 19th-c. Anglican-turned-Catholic Cardinal Henry Edward Manning), reported to spymaster John Thurloe before he was discovered and executed. See John P. Kenyon, The Stuarts: A Study in English Kingship, Glasgow: Fontana Collins, 1979 [London: B.T. Batsford, 1958], p. 103; archived on Google Books, <https://books.google.com/books?id=vdA_AAAAYAAJ>. Relatedly, Cromwell was interfacing with Jewish spies – or “intelligencers” – such as Antonio Fernandez Carvajal (who may have been an agent of Manasseh ben Israel). See Joseph Jacobs, “Carvajal, Antonio Fernandez,” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, online, <https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4089-carvajal-antonio-fernandez>.

[27] Moray was also friends with alchemist Thomas Vaughan.

[28] Of course, William of Orange came from the Netherlands (the Dutch Republic). The predecessor of the Bank of England (and, for that matter, the bank of Sweden, est. 1668) was the Bank of Amsterdam (1609).

[29] Portrait artist Richard Cosway also figured in the same Masonic-Swedenborgian circle. Among other subjects, Cosway painted George Augustus Frederick, then the Prince of Wales and the future King George IV. George Augustus Frederick’s father, of course, was King George III, against whom the American Revolutionaries successfully revolted and for whom the Prince of Wales served as regent during George III’s extended periods of mental incapacity. Cosway’s wife, Maria, was also alleged involved with French “Illuminism” and is said to have had a romantic entanglement with American Thomas Jefferson when he was an ambassador to France. See, e.g., “Maria Cosway,” Wikipedia, Sept 22, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Cosway> and “Richard Cosway,” Wikipedia, Jul. 19, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cosway>.

[30] Born Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov.

[31] “Gleb Bokii,” Wikipedia, Sept. 27, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleb_Bokii>.

[32] Literally, “ancestral heritage.”

[33] Kirk H. Beetz, “Dulles, Allen Welsh,” Scribner Encyclopedia of American Lives, Thematic Series: The 1960s; online at Encyclopedia.com, May 17, 2018, <https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/allen-welsh-dulles>.

[34] “Allen Dulles,” Wikipedia, Aug. 29, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Dulles>.

[35] “John G. Bennett,” Wikipedia, Aug. 15, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Bennett>.

[36] Alison Broinowski, “Many Happy Returns of al-Qaeda,” Australian Institute of International Affairs (online), Aug. 11, 2018, <https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/many-happy-returns-of-al-qaeda/>.

[37] See “Bennett,” Wikipedia, loc. cit. and “Subud,” Wikipedia, Mar. 5, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subud>.

[38] Others associated with the group’s earliest period include Franz Hartmann and Heinrich Klein.

[39] Gary Lachman, Aleister Crowley: Magick, Rock and Roll, and the Wickedest Man in the World, p. 175. As Lachman later observed, the comingling of occultism and sex (in a European context) had been prefigured by the curious Moravian Nicolas Zinzendorf and the Swedish mystic Emanuel Swedenborg.

[40] The Aquarian Conspiracy (Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher, 1980).

[41] The Celestine Prophecy: An Adventure (Hoover, Ala.: Satori: 1993).

[42] Some people might include others in this category as well, e.g., Elizabeth Clare Prophet, Neale Donald Walsch, and others.

[43] Born Judith Darlene Hampton, she supposedly channels an entity known as “Ramtha.”

[44] She is responsible for a slew of material communicated to her by a being named “Seth.”

[45] Born Helen Dora Cohn.

[46] Suspiciously, Louis Jolyon West was also active at the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic in San Francisco, California during the height of the 1960s “hippie-countercultural revolution” – at least, as it was depicted by mainstream media outlets like Time-Life. Military psychologist James Sanford Ketchum was also in attendance.

[47] Alexander Cockburn, “We’re Reaping Tragic Legacy From Drugs,” L.A. Times, Jul. 6, 1999, <https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-jul-06-me-53482-story.html>.

[48] Jonathan Moreno, “Harvard’s Experiment on the Unabomber, Class of ’62: An odd footnote to Kaczynski’s class reunion,” Matt Huston, reviewer, Psychology Today, May 25, 2012, <https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/impromptu-man/201205/harvards-experiment-the-unabomber-class-62>.

[49] “Timothy Leary: I carried on Aleister Crowley’s work,” interview excerpt, [PBS,] chellow2, YouTube, uploaded May 1, 2008, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2gY3dSqs68A>.

[50] “The Work of Allan H. Frey,” Cell Phone Task Force, <https://cellphonetaskforce.org/the-work-of-allan-h-frey/>.

[51] Another participant in the creative process was a neo-gnostically inclined psychologist named Kenneth Wapnick.

[52] John Carter, Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons, Port Townsend, Wa.: Feral House, 2005, p. 15; online at <https://books.google.com/books?id=TIWoTlHT4xYC>. Another character in the mix was Brooklyn, N.Y.-native Martin Summerfield (1916-1996). Perhaps apropos of nothing, the German intel chief Felix Sommerfeld – whose surname is merely “summer field,” auf Deutsch – has no recorded date of death on his Wikipedia page. The ultimate paragraph of the article on Sommerfeld reads: “In June 1918, Sommerfeld was interned in Fort Oglethorpe, GA as an enemy alien.[19] He was released in 1919. A few trips back and forth to Mexico have been recorded in the 1920s and 30s. However, the German agent disappeared in the 1930s, though he does show up in 1942 at age 63 residing at 117 West 17th Street in New York City,[20] after which his whereabouts remain unknown. …[19] The Washington Post, June 21, 1918, “Held as Enemy Alien.” [20] Ancestry.com. U.S., World War II Draft Registration Cards, 1942 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.” All online at: “Felix A. Sommerfeld,” Wikipedia, May 7, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_A._Sommerfeld>.

[53] Sydney Goldstein, “Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society: Theodore Von Kármán, 1881-1963,” Nov. 1, 1966, <https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.1966.0016> & <https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbm.1966.0016>.

[54] “Hubbard broke up black magic in America …L. Ron Hubbard was still an officer of the U.S. Navy, because he was well known as a writer and a philosopher and had friends amongst the physicists, he was sent in to handle the situation. He went to live at the house and investigated the black magic rites and the general situation and found them very bad… Hubbard’s mission was successful far beyond anyone’s expectations. The house was torn down. Hubbard rescued a girl they were using. The black magic group was dispersed and destroyed and has never recovered.” Source: “L. Ron Hubbard,” Wikipedia, Oct. 3, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Ron_Hubbard#cite_note-355>; citing “Scientology: New Light on Crowley,” The Sunday Times (U.K.), Dec. 28, 1969, n.p.

[55] See, e.g., “Police Captain Earle E. Kynette sits in court after being charged with conspiracy to commit murder, Los Angeles, 1938,” archived photograph, Los Angeles Daily News, February 1938; Univ. of Cal., Los Angeles, <https://digital.library.ucla.edu/catalog/ark:/21198/zz0027z90w>. Two others implicated were Fred Browne (ultimately acquitted) and Roy J. Allen (eventually convicted along with Kynette). The name “Allen” is an interesting study in its own right. For example, Ethan Allen Hitchcock was a major general during the American Civil War. He was also interested in – and wrote on the topic of – alchemy. His mother, Lucy Caroline Hitchcock (née Allen), was the daughter of famed militiaman, Ethan Allen, founder of the Green Mountain Boys. The name “Ethan Allen” recurs in the lore surrounding the “Zodiac” killer(s), in that it is the name of the father of suspect Arthur Leigh Allen. According to the dossier on ZodiacKiller.com, “Ethan was a retired, highly decorated naval commander.” “The Arthur Leigh Allen File,” Zodiac Killer, <https://www.zodiackiller.com/AllenFile.html>. Leigh Allen himself had enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1957. Though, again according to the posted biographical data, the official record indicates that “…in 1958 he [Leigh] was less-than-honorably discharged from the Navy after two years of service.” Ibid. Investigators in the Zodiac case pursued leads (specifically, the “wing-walker” shoe prints discovered at the Lake Berryessa crime scene where Cecelia Shepard was murdered, Sept. 27, 1969) suggesting that their killer (or killers) might have had a connexion to the military in general, or the navy in particular.

[56] “Police Captain Earle E. Kynette…,” ibid.

[57] Cf. <https://tessa.lapl.org/cdm/ref/collection/photos/id/16045>.

[58] Around 1518, Trithemius wrote a companion volume, Polygraphia, expanding upon themes introduced in the seminal Steganographia.

[59] John Dee copied Trithemius’s manuscript in his own hand circa 1591.

[60] According to the Google definition.

[61] Hooke was an architect, biologist, geometrician, paleontologist, and member of the Royal Society. Some of his scientific apparatuses helped innovate inventions like microscopes and vacuum pumps. And he assisted and collaborated with the great chemist Sir Robert Boyle, about whom we spoke in the presentation “Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists of All Time.” The Frenchman Denis Papin also associated with Boyle.

[62] “Johannes Trithemius,” Wikipedia, Jun. 6, 2022; citing Robert Hooke, The Posthumous Works of Robert Hooke, London: Richard Waller, 1705, p. 203. Hooke was inclined toward naturalistic explanations. For example, Hooke is credited with prefiguring later theories of biological and geological evolution and with opposing Biblical-literalist calculations for the age of the Earth.

[63] Donald Tyson, ed., ann., Three Books of Occult Philosophy Written by Henry Cornelius Agrippa of Nettesheim, James Freake, transl., Llewellyn’s Sourcebook Series, St. Paul, Minn.: Llewellyn Worldwide, 2004 [1993], p. xvi. <https://books.google.com/books?id=5YjXnoAaYowC&pg=PR16>.

[64] Aaron Leitch, The Essential Enochian Grimoire: An Introduction to Angel Magick from Dr. John Dee to the Golden Dawn, Woodbury, Minn.: Llewellyn Publ., 2014, p. 35. Tho, the two would eventually have something of a falling out. Walsingham assigned agents to tail Dee, and his shady companion Edward Kelley, alias Edward Talbot. (The name is sometimes spelled “Kelly.”) For his part, Dee was frequently able to evade his pursuers. Ibid., p. 36.

[65] Richard Deacon, John Dee: Scientist, Geographer, Astrologer, and Secret Agent to Elizabeth I, London: Muller, 1968, p. 5, <https://books.google.com/books?id=N–2AAAAIAAJ>.

[66] Pseud. for Donald McCormick.

[67] Deacon, loc. cit.

[68] Ibid.

[69] “The Original 007?” weblog post, Univ. of Cambridge, n.d., <https://www.cam.ac.uk/news/the-original-007>.

[70] Ibid.; quoting history researcher Jenny Rampling.

[71] In “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults,” I introduced the curious concept of “Nick”-names. On that wavelength, it is interesting that our statesman’s father’s name was Nicholas Bacon. The elder Sir Bacon was Queen Elizabeth I’s Lord Keeper of the Great Seal.

[72] Heindel was born Carl Louis von Grasshoff.

[73] Anthony Bacon was stationed in France until he became embroiled in a scandal stemming from allegations that he was a homosexual.

[74] La Loge des Neuf Sœurs, also referred to as the “Lodge of the Nine Muses.”

[75] The lodge was, at one time or other, associated with people such as Jean Sylvain Bailly, Jean Pierre Brissot, Nicolas Chamfort, Marquis Nicolas de Condorcet, Georges Danton, Camille Desmoulins, and Joseph-Ignace Guillotin. Franklin was also friends with the likes of Count Mirabeau.

[76] Suffice it here to say that we may distinguish forms of “mysticism” from Enlightenment rationalism, the latter being “occultic” at least in virtue of its political and religious subversiveness.

[77] To trace some of the complex currents of this novel political radicalism, former Librarian of Congress James Billington follows the word “Philadelphia,” meaning brotherly love. Manifestly, the city by that name was Ben Franklin’s American base of operations and became the first capital following the Revolutionary War. According to Billington, “Philadelphia” was also a code word. E.g., various orders sprang up with that label. One stream extended from the 16th-17th-c. German mystic Jakob Böhme, to English Hermeticist and minister John Pordage, whose “Behmenists” would create the “Philadelphian Society” under Jane Leade. See “Philadelphians,” McClintock and Strong Biblical Cyclopedia; archived online at: <https://www.biblicalcyclopedia.com/P/philadelphians.html>. The previously named Chevalier Ramsay was influenced by these Philadelphians prior to his conversion to Catholicism. See: Martin I. McGregor, “A Biographical Sketch of Chevalier Andrew Michael Ramsay Including a Full Transcript of his Oration of 1737,” Pietre-Stone’s Review of Freemasonry, Feb. 18, 2008, <http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/ramsay_biography_oration.html>. A second current likewise arose out of Germany, in connexion with (and possible opposition to) Baron Gotthelf von Hund’s “Rite of Strict Observance.” This strand surfaced in Narbonne as the “Primitive Rite of Philadelphians” and led to the formation, in Paris, of the Lodge of the Nine Sisters. See James H. Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 108f.

[78] Johann Joachim Christian Bode.

[79] See  “Philip Wharton, 1st Duke of Wharton,” Wikipedia, Aug. 20, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Wharton,_1st_Duke_of_Wharton> and “Grand Loge de France,” Wikipedia, Sept. 1, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grande_Loge_de_France>.

[80] By the way, the then early Scottish Rite met (ca. 1733) in the City of London at the Devil Tavern. Was this locale the setting for the planning stages of use of the key Kabbalistic number “13” in the curious deployment of England’s otherwise ill-fitting New World “thirteen colonies”? The political activism associated with the Devil Tavern goes back at least to the late 17th-c., when “…some 150 members of the House of Lords, including Sir Thomas Clarges, Heneage Finch …, Sir Robert Sawyer, and Sir Christopher Musgrave, met at the Devil Tavern Club in the City of London… pp. 197, <https://books.google.com/books?id=OWFnAAAAMAAJ>. Among other things, when Parliament passed the “Act of Toleration” in 1688-1689 (which was dutifully signed by William of Orange): “The Devil Tavern Club group was in accord, and William [III] gave his consent on May 24,” ibid., p. 202. There’s this also this tantalizing factoid: “In [the revolutionary year!] 1776 some young lawyers founded there a Pandemonium Club; and after that there is no further record of the ‘Devil’ till it was pulled down and annexed by the neighbouring bankers,” Walter Thornbury, “Fleet Street: General Introduction,” Old and New London: A Narrative of Its History, Its People, and Its Places, vol. 1, London: Cassell, Petter and Galpin, 1878, pp. 32-53; online at British History Online, <http://www.british-history.ac.uk/old-new-london/vol1/pp32-53>. It was evidently the meeting place of choice for numerous, powerful persons – not all whose actions are matters of public record. And there is a literary tie-in as well. “As well as [Ben] Jonson, members of the club are said to have included William Shakespeare, Jonathan Swift, Alexander Pope and Dr. Samuel Johnson. Samuel Pepys is also said to have frequented the tavern,” “Lost London – The Devil Tavern…,” Exploring London, Oct. 17, 2014, <https://exploring-london.com/2014/10/17/lost-london-the-devil-tavern/>.

[81] Deacon, op. cit., pp. 23 & 108.

[82] Christian J. Pinto, Secret Mysteries of America’s Beginnings, Volume 1: The New Atlantis, dvd, N.p.: Antiquities Research Films, 2005; citing Michael Howard, The Occult Conspiracy: Secret Societies, Their Influence and Power in World History, Rochester, Vt.: Destiny Books, 1989.

[83] The Americans did have an acknowledged espionage apparatus as seen, for instance, in the Culper Spy Ring which was organized in reaction to intelligence failures (such as the capture and execution of Nathan Hale). Benjamin Tallmadge ran operations for George Washington. Agents included Robert Townsend and Abraham Woodhull – and, possibly Bancroft, Silas Deane, and James Rivington.

[84] Cecil B. Currey, Code Number 72 / Ben Franklin: Patriot or Spy? Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

[85] Or …from the Grand Lodge of Scotland. Allegedly, several prominent American families – including the Standishes – had descended from Jacobites who decamped for the “New World” after a series of unsuccessful revolts failed to restore the Stuarts to the throne in the Kingdom of Great Britain.

[86] Benjamin Franklin, The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, reprint ed., Bedford, mass.: Applewood Books, n.d. [orig.: Chicago: Lakeside Press; R. R. Donnelley & Sons, Co., 1903], p. 103, <https://books.google.com/books?id=Y32wOLkDz1oC&pg=pa103>.

[87] Quoted by William Ecenbarger, “Ben Franklin’s Dangerous Liaisons,” Chicago Tribune, May 6, 1990, <https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1990-05-06-9002070774-story.html>.

[88] Geoffrey Ashe, The Hell-Fire Clubs: A History of Anti-Morality, Towbridge, Wiltshire [U.K.]: Redwood Books, 2000 [orig.: London: W. H. Allen & Co., 1974], p. 133, <https://archive.org/details/hellfireclubshis0000ashe/page/132/mode/2up>.

[89] Daniel P. Mannix, The Hell-Fire Club, New York: Ballantine, 1959, p. 107.

[90] N.a., “Craven Street Bones,” Benjamin Franklin House, n.d., <https://benjaminfranklinhouse.org/the-house-benjamin-franklin/craven-street-bones/>.

[91] N.a., “Skeletons in the Closet,” The Craven Street Gazette, No. 2, Fall, 1998, p. 1, <http://www.benjaminfranklinhouse.org/site/sections/news/pdf/Issue2.pdf>.

[92] Robin Young, “Remains of Ten Bodies at Ben Franklin’s Home,” The Times (London), Feb. 11, 1998.

[93] Ibid.

[94] “Craven Street Bones,” loc. cit.

[95] Ibid.

[96] Young, loc. cit.

[97] “Benjamin Franklin’s Famous Quotes,” Franklin Inst., n.d., <https://www.fi.edu/benjamin-franklin/famous-quotes>; citing Poor Richard’s Almanack, 1736.

[98] Don C. Shelton, “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 103, No., 2, Feb. 1, 2010, pp. 46-50, <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813782/>.

[99] Joseph S. Nye, Jr., “What New World Order?” Foreign Affairs, Spring 1992; online, <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/what-new-world-order>.

[100] Real name: Leslie Lynch King Jr.

[101] Joseph B. Treaster, “A Life That Started out With Much Promise Took Reclusive and Hostile Path,” New York Times, Apr. 1, 1981, p. A19, <https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/01/us/a-life-that-started-out-with-much-promise-took-reclusive-and-hostile-path.html>.

[102] Russ Baker, “PoppyLeaks, Part 1,” Who What Why, Mov. 16, 2015, <https://whowhatwhy.org/politics/government-integrity/poppyleaks-part-1/>.

[103] “Making of a Misfit,” Time, Oct. 6, 1975, <http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C913511%2C00.html>; archived at <https://web.archive.org/web/20070930060025/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,913511,00.html>.

[104] These were conducted in 1975-1976 by the Church and Pike Committees in the Senate and House, respectively.

Top 10 Gold-Making Alchemists of All Time

Teaser

See our corresponding video!

Is there a magical powder or “stone” with the power of turning lead into gold? Is there a potion capable of prolonging life indefinitely?

In the wake of pandemics and rising prices, these questions are perhaps more pressing now than ever before. Surely the answer to both is… no. Right?!?

But… dotting the timeline of history, like gold ore embedded in gravel, are a minority of dissenters who not only answer a resounding “yes!” – but who also claim to have developed repeatable techniques for accomplishing these (and other) fabulous ends.

Of course, we’re speaking, here, about the diverse cluster of men and women who engaged in a storied discipline known as alchemy.

Working alone and in secret, these alchemists communicated with one another in code, and they took pains to shroud their beliefs – and, more importantly, their methods – under a veil of elaborate and even grotesque symbolism.

The received view is that these practitioners were largely deluded and superstitious failures who misspent their lives on chimeric quests but who managed, with their fledgling efforts, to pave the way for the advent of Science, which has now cleared the field of these ill-educated dilettantes.

And yet… whispers remain about a select group who may have achieved the impossible.

Introduction:

The term “alchemy” is one striking example of a fascinating family of still-current words whose origins – and primary meanings – are shrouded in mystery.

Among the etymological candidates is the root, khemia,[1] which may have been an ancient reference to Egypt.[2]

Sometimes provocatively labeled the “gay science,” alchemy – which is conspicuously preoccupied with quasi-miraculous changes known as “transmutations” – is commonly represented as divine chemistry.[3]

Alchemical formulæ purport to provide something like a “recipe” for elemental transformation.

And these lofty pretensions are not for nothing. You see, the art and science of alchemy was said to have been primordially and supernaturally communicated to humankind by otherworldly beings.

The legendary Hermes Trismegistus is one of the earliest initiates, if not the source, of this tradition.[4]

In the first place, Hermes is a reference to the Greek god of communication.[5] Hermes – and his Roman counterpart, Mercury – are frequently further identified with the Egyptian Thoth.[6] In this sense, Hermes was believed to have been the fountainhead of all the esoterica associated with Egypt.

But, Hermes Trismegistus – via “many mythical and contradictory genealogies”[7] – is also said to have been a contemporary (and possible teacher) of the Biblical patriarch Moses. He therefore leads a kind of double life, here being identified with a (presumably human) initiate who became a proficient sorcerer.

By the way, “Trismegistus,” means “three times great” and celebrates Hermes’ alleged mastery over a trio of disciplines – alchemy, astrology, and magic – that make up a system known as “hermeticism.”

(For an introduction, see “10 Arcane Words.”)

While the last two of these disciplines will have to occupy us another time, we note that the first, alchemy, influenced the development of numerous fields that now function as self-contained sciences.

Among the most important of these is modern physics[8] which, before the era of Albert Einstein, was dominated by the theories of the 17th– to 18th-c. English polymath, Sir Isaac Newton. According to researchers at Cambridge University in Britain where, once upon a time, Newton himself held a prestigious position as head of the mathematics department, of Newton’s surviving writings, no fewer than one million words – or 10% of his voluminous output – were devoted to his study of alchemy.  

Chemistry is another of the so-called “hard sciences” that owes a huge debt to alchemy.[9] Here, we’ll name 17th-c. figures like Belgian physician Jan-Baptiste van Helmont and, again in England, Sir Robert Boyle. Boyle was one of the founders[10] of England’s Royal Society[11] and is sometimes regarded as the father of modern chemistry.[12]

Perhaps most surprisingly, alchemy also informed the investigations of pioneering thinkers operating in sciences that are often considered to be “softer.”[13] For example, the 19th– to 20th-c. Swiss psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung created a strand of depth psychology that notably diverged from that of his teacher, the Austrian-Jewish founder of “psychoanalysis,” Sigmund Freud. Among the elements that differentiated this Jungian, “analytic” approach from its Freudian parent, was its originator’s fascination with, and use of, the symbolism of medieval alchemy. Jung was inspired by the writings of the 3rd– to 4th-c. Greco-Egyptian alchemist Zosimus of Panopolis who employed “chemical symbols and analogies” to describe a process of “psychological transformation”.[14]

What is it about this subject that so captivated these, and other, undisputed geniuses?

In this video, we’ll lay some historical groundwork for an answer by looking at ten people with enduring reputations for having been able to command nature itself by becoming adepts of alchemy.

1.      Nicholas Flamel

Among people who are most famous for their connexions to alchemy, perhaps none has achieved the renown enjoyed by the remarkable, 14th– to 15th– c. Frenchman Nicolas Flamel.

As a sidenote, in the video titled “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults,” we introduced viewers to the possibility that the name “Nicholas” (and its cognates) is a preëminent “name of power.” As a first pass, this means that you may expect it to appear – like in the present context – as a landmark for high strangeness.

Most historians will attest that Nicolas Flamel was indisputably a real person. The burning question, however, is whether the flesh-and-blood man managed to realize two of the main alchemical goals: (1) the creation limitless wealth by means of the fabled “Philosopher’s Stone”; and (2) the attainment of immortality through the so-called “Elixir of Life” – both of which are the result of a glamorous but hazy process termed the Magnum Opus, or “Great Work.”

On the prevailing scholarly view, the historical Flamel was a run-of-the-mill manuscript salesman who had his life story fancifully embellished by 17th-c. chroniclers.

But, legend has it that in 1357 Flamel acquired a copy of an enigmatic spell book, or grimoire, known as the Book of Abramelin the Mage.

Among myriad curious “magical squares,” the book[15] specified rituals which would later become part of the erotically suffused system of notorious 20th-c. British esotericist Aleister Crowley, whom we highlighted both in our “Top 10 Occultists” and “10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults” videos.[16]

Flamel reportedly spent two fruitless decades attempting to decipher the seemingly impenetrable text with his wife, Perenelle, before deciding, circa 1378, to travel in search of a knowledgeable interpreter.

Spain was the logical place to seek such a venerable sage since, until the tail end of the 15th century, it had the distinction of being one of the very few feasible European destinations where adherents of the “Big Three” religions – Christianity, Judaism, and Islam – coexisted.

And, indeed, Flamel supposedly cracked Abramelin’s secrets with the help of a Jewish converso (that is, a Jew who had converted to Catholicism) during a chance encounter while on his Iberian tour.

By 1382, the Flamel was supposedly capable of producing silver and gold using his decrypted formulæ.

20th-c. Masonic philosopher Manly Palmer Hall provides a threefold taxonomy of alchemical enlightenment. The lowest rung on Hall’s “Hermetic ladder”[17] are the Initiates – those people who know of the true secret. Slightly higher are the Illuminates, who have had their propositional knowledge bolstered by witnessing a live transmutation. Finally, the Adepts are the ones who have the know how to create the Philosopher’s Stone. Chief among them is Flamel. (Diagram: Imitates [Knowers]; Illuminated Ones [Seers]; Adepts [Doers])

Beyond his significance for fellow occult practitioners, Nicolas Flamel’s impact has been most noticeable in the arenas of arts, entertainment, and literature, where he has several noteworthy mentions.

For one thing, in his masterful 1831 novel Notre-Dame de Paris, better known as The Hunchback of Notre-Dame, French Romantic novelist Victor Hugo gives his villain, Monseigneur Claude Frollo, an insatiable lust for knowledge. This leads Frollo to pore over various hermetic insignia attributed to Flamel and carved throughout Paris’s Holy Innocents’ Cemetery.

Hugo’s American contemporary, the Confederate general and high-ranking freemason Albert Pike, connected Nicholas Flamel with famed 13th– to 14th-c. Italian poet Dante Alighieri.[18] For more on Pike, who, in his capacity as Sovereign Grand Commander of the order, rewrote the rituals for the Scottish Rite’s so-called Southern Jurisdiction, see our “Top 10 Occultists” presentation.

Finally, on the current scene, Nicholas Flamel is mentioned throughout J. K. Rowling’s first installment in what would later become the wildly successful Harry Potter franchise. In the United States, her debut novel was labeled Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.[19] But, in the United Kingdom, it bore the unmistakably alchemical title Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone.[20]

Flamel is introduced into Rowling’s story as a 665-year-old “French wizard …who was the only known maker of the Philosopher’s Stone.”[21]

2.      Maria the Jewess

Alchemical histories are interlaced with fable to such an extent that it is difficult to disentangle the strands. Be that as it may, some names crop up repeatedly.[22]

One such, and a possible candidate for the founder of the entire enterprise (at least, as we think of it), is the Greco-Egyptian woman remembered as Maria the Jewess.

Her appellation is exceedingly interesting, not least because a principal stream of Western occultism – the Kabbalah – coalesced partially out of Jewish-mystical currents.

In any case, competing accounts place Maria variously in Memphis during the 5th century, B.C.,[23] or in Alexandria in the 3rd century, B.C.

She is credited with the invention of alchemical paraphernalia, for example, the Bain-Marie. The phrase, which translates as “Mary’s Bath,” denotes a double boiler that is still used in industry and cooking.

Her distillation vessel, called a kerotakis, incorporated “copper foil” which, at a point in the alchemical process “…change[d] colors – giving the impression that it was taking on the spirit of gold.”[24]

You should realize that, early on, hermetists such as Zosimus of Panopolis began to syncretize alchemy with other mystical doctrines, such as Gnosticism (for an introduction, see “10 Arcane Words”).

The idea that an overarching entity, called the “world soul,” or anima mundi, pervaded all reality became part of the emerging alchemical gnosis. Consequently, one aim of various “spagyric” operations, was to harness the individual latent pneuma that was trapped both in inorganic and organic matter.

In fact, liquor distillers (among others) retain some of the alchemical lingo, and routinely refer to various alcoholic preparations as… “spirits.” Moreover, cosmeticians, herbalists, and perfumers also must familiarize themselves with a variety of usually plant-based “essential oils.” These “natural oil[s are] typically obtained by” processes of “distillation” that hearken back to those of the ancient alchemists.

Suffice it to say that Maria’s legacy of devices and reputed knowledge resulted in her commemoration as one of the few alchemists who had managed to create the Philosopher’s Stone.

3.      Jabir / Geber (Al-Sufi)

The so-called “Dark Ages” – spanning roughly from the 5th to 11th centuries – began with the fall of the Roman Empire and the cessation of the study of the Greek language. This period is characterized by a marked decline of learning in general.

For example, the two giants of Greek philosophy had been Plato and his pupil, Aristotle. Whereas the former would enjoy continued influence, at least in the spiritualized form of “Neoplatonism,” the latter went into almost total eclipse for over 500 years.[25]

One of the chief contributions of the Islamic civilization to the world is its preservation of Greek philosophy through this Western downturn.[26] Therefore, it is unsurprising to find that alchemy next surfaces in an Arabic context.

A principal figure, here, is sometimes designated Al-Sufi, but whose given name was Jābir ibn Ḥayyān.[27]

Jābir expanded Aristotle’s doctrine, taken up from “pre-Socratic” philosophers like Empedocles, that the cosmos is composed of various arrangements of four basic “elements” – earth, air, water, and fire – along with two pairs of complementary “qualities” – dryness and moistness, along with coldness and hotness.[28]

This basic, Aristotelian theoretical framework served to underwrite the procedures of alchemy – not to mention Galenic medicine which centered on the closely related concept of the four “humors.”[29] The idea was that, if things (such as metals) are what they are in virtue of their peculiar ratios of elements and qualities, then knowledgeable artisans could change one thing into another by manipulating these (sometimes hidden) natures.

Jābir is, however, somewhat critical of these explanations, and began to move toward an alternative theory. On this new view, which would be developed in terms of “Three Principles” (or Tria Prima): salt, sulfur (or sulphur), and mercury.[30] At least part of the material description for reality would have to invoke this triplet.  

The Arabic adept professed that two transmutations into gold were possible: a temporary one, which only modified the superficial, or “accidental properties” of a base metal, and a permanent one, which – to borrow Catholic Eucharistic lingo – managed to transubstantiate, or permanently change, the underlying the essence.

Like many historical characters, Jābir’s identity was later assumed by at least one anonymous author, presumably in the hope that readers would take him more seriously. To this unknown writer, termed “Pseudo-Geber,” is owed an alchemical treatise in Latin, the title of which is variously translated “The Height of Perfect Mastery,” “The Sum of Perfection,” or “The Perfect Magistery.”[31]

Much of the Jabirian corpus is written usually a strategy known as the “dispersion of knowledge”[32] technique, whereby passages are reproduced out of their proper order – like cooking directions that have been scrambled. Thus, possession of an alchemical text – by itself, without the proper key – does little good (even if a reader can decode individual symbols).

In fact, our English word “gibberish,” which means “unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing,” literally comes from the Latinized spelling (“Geber”) of Jābir.

This paranoid secrecy – which resulted in impenetrable texts – was partly due to the fact that alchemical knowledge was frequently considered heterodox – even heretical[33] – by mainstream adherents of the three major, monotheistic religions. 

But, it was also because of the fear that the gold-making and life-extending potential of the Philosopher’s Stone, were it to be too widely known, would undermine the proper order of society. We’ll get back to this in a moment.

4.      George Ripley

Fear of being labeled a heretic may have been off-putting for most would-be alchemists. But… not for everyone. Among those who sought this recondite information was the 15th-c. English Augustinian canon, George Ripley.

Ripley is one of a handful of people that allegedly achieved alchemical adeptness – at least, according to Freemasonic scholar Manly Palmer Hall. According to Hall, Ripley’s wonderworking was confirmed by the fact that he “…contributed one hundred thousand pounds [of gold] to the Knights of Rhodes,” who later became the Knights of Malta, “so that they could continue their war against the Turks.”[34]

In his important poetic volume The Compound of Alchemy, “Ripley adopted an allegorical approach to” his titular subject. He compared an adept’s completion of the Magnum Opus to passage through “Twelve Gates.”[35] This metaphor, which treats the Great Work as “a kind of spiritual obstacle course,”[36] became the basis for a division of the alchemical process into “twelve stages,”[37] usually enumerated:[38] 1. Calcination; 2. Solution (or Dissolution); 3. Separation; 4. Conjunction; 5. Putrefaction; 6. Congelation; 7. Cibation; 8. Sublimation; 9. Fermentation; 10. Exaltation; 11. Multiplication; and 12. Projection.

The fact that Ripley was an Augustinian hints at what you might call a “Catholic connexion” to alchemy that goes back at least to the 12th century.[39] For example, scholastic theologian and Catholic bishop of Lincoln, Robert Grosseteste, is sometimes named on rosters of alchemists – as was his most illustrious student, the 13th-c. Franciscan friar, and “proto-empiricist,” Roger Bacon.[40]

Also from the 13th century, German-born Dominican St. Albert the Great[41] was associated with the city of Cologne, where his system of thought, a blend of Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism[42] (sometimes called “Albertism”)[43] would influence the mystic Meister Eckhart as well as polymath and out-and-out occultist, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, in the 14th and 16th centuries, respectively.[44]

This is especially noteworthy since, according to 20th-c. British historian Frances Amelia Yates, it “is with Cornelius Agrippa” that alchemy “…very decidedly …enter[s]” the Hermetic-Cabalist tradition[45] as it came to expression during the Renaissance.[46]

Albert – or, according to the strictures of contemporary textual criticism, PseudoAlbert[47] – is said to have codified eight preconditions for would-be creators of the Philosopher’s Stone – including the ability to, well… keep your mouth shut![48] (display 9th Gate “silence is golden”)

Additionally, Albert the Great was rumored to have been in possession of the Philosopher’s Stone. He is said to have passed its secrets to his best-known student, the precocious Dominican St. Thomas Aquinas, whose Summa Theologiæ (or “Comprehensive Summary of Theology”) revolutionized Catholic philosophical instruction and became the foundation for later publications including the important Catechism of the Catholic Church. An alchemical treatise called the Aurora Consurgens (“Rising Dawn”) is sometimes attributed to St. Thomas,[49] leading to his occasional classification as a hermetic initiate.

5.      Salomon Trismosin

Not that Catholics corner the market on this sort of endeavor. As we have seen, there was no shortage of Arabic-Muslim influence, and it is arguable (for example, from the case of Maria the Jewess) that the whole enterprise was at least partially informed by Hebraic mystical currents as well.

And this influence continued unabated until – or, was at least renewed during – the Renaissance. One of the principal figures credited with tuning Europe onto a Hermetic wavelength was the legendary Salomon Trismosin.

Trismosin, which name is suspected of being a pseudonym, is said to have had his alchemical curiosities piqued after a chance meeting with an otherwise unknown alchemist named “Flocker.” After witnessing the metamorphosis of lead into gold, but being unable to wrest the secret from Flocker, Trismosin threw himself into a lifelong investigation for the formula for the Philosopher’s Stone.

His travels took him to Venice, Italy, where he apprenticed to an itinerate German master named “Tauler”[50] and finally learned the key to transmutation.

As an aside, Venice, home of the 15th– 16th-c. Franciscan Cabalist Francesco Giorgi, formed the backdrop for some of the action in Dan Brown’s 2013 mystery novel, Inferno,[51] which was adapted into a film in 2016 by director Ron Howard.

According to Franz Hartmann, the 19th– to 20th-c. German occultist and cofounder, with Carl Kellner and Theodor Reuss, of the Ordo Templi Orientis, Trismosin also managed to discover the Elixir of Everlasting Life. At least, Hartmann makes use of this hypothesis to explain allegedly sightings of Trisomosin throughout the 17th century.

One of Trismosin’s lasting contributions was the gorgeous, illuminated manuscript titled Splendor Solis (“The Sun’s Splendor”), which was first printed around 1532. The illustrations are some of the most recognizable representations of alchemy extant.

It’s worth remarking that such works – whether handwritten or typeset – left tremendous impressions, sometimes changing European history for good, …or ill.

Consider the works of the (possibly fictional) alchemist Bernard of Treviso.[52] They were rumored to have exerted a formative influence upon Joan of Arc’s 15th-c. companion and later diabolist, Gilles de Rais. According to the 20th-c. English Catholic scholar and priest Montague Summers,[53] the highly influential 19th-c. French occultist Éliphas Lévi said “…that Gilles de Rais ‘sought the Philosophical Stone in the blood of murdered children…”.[54]

Recall that the elusive Philosopher’s Stone is oftentimes described as a “red powder that transmutes base metal into purest gold.”[55]

Summers then proceeds to quote Lévi’s further assertion that Gilles de Rais “…had doubtless derived his [alchemical] recipe from …old Hebrew Grimoires…”.[56]

As the book collector Victor Fargas puts it in Roman Polansky’s 1999 film, The Ninth Gate, “Some books are dangerous, not to be opened with impunity.”

6.      Paracelsus

One of Salomon Trismosin’s proverbial “claims to fame” was undoubtedly the power he exerted over that man who has been dubbed the “Martin Luther of medicine.”[57] In fact, “the scientific debates of the late sixteenth century were centered more frequently on …[this man’s] innovations …than they were on the heliocentric astronomy of Copernicus.”[58]

I’m speaking now of the pioneering anti-Galenic physician born Theophrastus von Hohenheim, but better known as Paracelsus.[59]

In the ancient world, “Western alchemy [was] based on the Hermetic tradition,” and consisted of “a syncretism of Egyptian metallurgy” and magic, along with Greek Neoplatonism and Jewish-Christian Gnosticism.[60] But, under Paracelsus’s influence, European Renaissance alchemy started to assume the characteristics of (what we’d today think of as) chemistry, homeopathy, pharmacology, and surgery.[61]

Although he rejected medical explanations framed in terms of the “four humors,” he was by no means anti-alchemical. On the contrary, according to Paracelsus, “…chemically prepared medicines …would work only if the physician first understood the relationship between the patient, the cosmos, and God. An essential key to that understanding lay in the study of alchemy…”.[62]

From a Hermetic perspective, alchemy is merely a set of procedures for speeding up natural processes of physical and spiritual evolution whereby “metals evolve toward gold …[j]ust as all life evolves toward Divine Perfection.”[63]

The Hermetic philosopher holds that human beings are miniature versions – or “microcosms” – of the entire universe – or macrocosm. Consequently, there are meaning (albeit hidden) correspondences between lower-level and higher-level realities. This is the significance of the famous alchemical maxim “as above, so below,” which is expressed in the so-called Emerald Tablet.

For his part, “…Paracelsus …claimed to have received the final secrets of the Great Work in Constantinople…”.[64]

A famous drawing of Paracelsus shows him grasping an upside-down sword by its hilt, with the word “Azoth” (/AZ-oth/) engraved on the pommel.

The well-known 19th-c. French occultist Éliphas Lévi likened the Azoth – also called the panacea or the “universal medicine”[65] – to a mysterious, fabled “fifth element” called the quintessence. According to Lévi, the Azoth “is a combination of gold and light.” (onscreen quote: (Ignis et Azoth tibi sufficiunt. [“Fire and Azoth are enough for you.”])

Enthusiasts have considered these dense and obscure claims worthy of reflection, since – according to Paracelsus – therein lies the “key to creating spiritual gold.”[66]

Who can say whether Paracelsus cracked the ultimate code? But upon his alleged death in 1541, “…a few suggested that the alchemist …had found the elixir of life and given himself a dose of immortality.”[67]

Paracelsus had a number of intellectual successors, including Gérard Dorn (who exerted a powerful influence on Carl Jung), Oswald Croll (who had contact with John Dee’s collaborator, Edward Kelley), Jan Baptiste van Helmont, and Valentin Weigel. They all, in one way or other, came to believe that the “Book of Nature” could be just as illuminating as the Holy Bible – and held just as many secrets.

7.      Basil Valentine

Like Maria the Jewess, Salomon Trismosin, and several others on this list, Basil Valentine[68] is the subject of many stories.

Depending upon the report, he is said to have lived anywhere between the 12th and 15th centuries – or even beyond. This either means that his precise origins are unknown, or else that he is suspected – similarly to Counts Cagliostro and St. Germain, as well as to the 16th– to 17th-c. English barrister, philosopher, and one-time Lord High Chancellor of England, Francis Bacon – of having unlocked the secret of eternal life.[69]

As an aside, Cagliostro claimed affiliation with the same Catholic military order – though, under their new name, the Knights of Malta – that had been funded been George Ripley. “The famous and elusive Saint-Germain convinced many European aristocrats he could create gold.”[70] And Francis Bacon included a “section on the making of gold” in his Sylva Sylvarum, or a Naturall Historie in ten Centuries,” published posthumously in London in 1627, and which he had intended to form “part of …[his] unfinished Instauratio Magna.”[71]

According to one persistent legend, Basil Valentine was a Benedictine monk;[72] though, revisionist biographers have begun identifying him with a German salt miner named Johann Thölde.[73] In any event, he cultivated a “reputation for obscure learning.”[74] 

Like Paracelsus, Valentine was an early medical experimenter and critic of the establishment. Also like Paracelsus, he certainly picked up on the “Azoth” current. This is evident from one of the most recognizable alchemical diagrams that is owed to Basil Valentine.

It is a prominent illustration in the work titled “Azoth of the Philosophers.” According to writer Dennis William Hauck, “Azoth” is an alpha-omega symbol, and hints obliquely at “the chaotic First Matter at the beginning of the [alchemical] Work and the perfected Stone at its conclusion.”[75]

“The Azoth is believed to be the animating energy (spiritus animatus) of the body…”[76] – and its crucial in the gold-making endeavor, as occultist Franz Hartmann explains. “This [spirit, the ‘prime mover’[77]] is the great alchemical agent, and in it are contained all productive and generative powers. If this spirit is extracted from gold or silver and united with some other metal it transforms the latter into gold, respectively silver.”[78]

Much of the symbolism of alchemy was subsequently imported into the 17th-c. Rosicrucianism movement. Special mention should be made of the possible authors of the “manifestos” published between 1614 and 1617, namely, Johannes Valentinus Andreæ, Christopher Besoldus, and Tobias Hess.

But, among the Rosicrucian apologists we must also count English Paracelsan doctor Robert Fludd, German Hermeticist Heinrich Khunrath, and Michael Maier[79] whose alchemical epigrams were famously printed in the volume titled “Atalanta Fleeing,” alongside gorgeous illustrations by Matthias Merian.[80]  

Not quite a relic of bygone eras, a handful of quirky personalities have also philaappeared to continue Basil Valentine’s legacy. One of these was the French adept known only as “Fulcanelli.”[81]

The name – ostensibly a mashup of Vulcan, god of the forge in classical Roman mythology, and El, a semitic word for “god” – appeared as the byline of a book titled “The Mystery of the Cathedrals,”[82] arguing that medieval stone masons preserved the formula for the Magnum Opus through decorations in the great churches of Europe.[83]

According to Fulcanelli’s protégé, Eugène Léon Canseliet, Fulcanelli’s (theoretical) teacher – whether through books or via some miraculous attainment of old age – had been none other than… Basil Valentine.

8.      Alexander Seton

Alexander Seton[84] stands near the top of a short list of those “…very few alchemists, reportedly, who succeeded in the great experiment of the transmutation of metals.”[85] It is for this reason that Seton’s story also serves as a cautionary tale for would-be gold makers.

The story begins in 1601 when a Dutch boat shipwrecked off the coast of Scotland. By chance, the ill-fated vessel had crashed near Seton’s home. At personal risk, Seton rescued many of the sailors and  nursed them back to health.

One of the survivors, a pilot named James Haussen, was thankful to the point of offering to host Seton for a vacation in his native Holland.

During the trip, Seton disclosed to Haussen “that he was a master of alchemy …and proved his words by performing several transmutations.”[86]

Apparently, Seton continued to tour continental Europe – and he continued, also, injudiciously displaying his much-coveted talents along the way. Some of these alleged exhibitions – if the stories are true – are among the most remarkable accounts of their kinds.

Unlike scores of seeming charlatans, such as the miserable 18th-c. British chemist James Price who, when challenged to repeat a carefully choreographed lead-into-gold demonstration in front of a scrutinous, scientific audience, opted instead to commit suicide, Alexander Seton invited crowd participation.

Spectators brought their own lead. Chemical equipment was brought by disinterested third parties – such as town apothecaries and smithies. Seton himself purportedly touched nothing – he merely directed the action, as it were. And the results of the process were immediately available to contributors for close inspection.

All this was most impressive to Seton’s audiences. Unfortunately, word of these spectacular feats reached the avaricious Christian II, who held the title “Elector of Saxony” from 1591 to 1611, until he died at the age of 27. But, while he drew breath, he summoned Seton to his court.

After trying to evade the sham “invitation” by sending an emissary[87] in his stead, Seton was at last sufficiently pressured to appear personally. Satisfying that request was Seton’s final and most grievous error – in a long sequence of mistakes.

Ultimately, he ended up in Christian’s prison tower. According to Manly Palmer Hall, Seton: “was pierced with pointed iron, scorched with molten lead, burned with fire, beaten with rods, and racked from head to foot; yet …he refused to betray his God-given knowledge.”[88]

Enter Michael Sendivogius.

9.      Michael Sendivogius (knew John Dee;[89] went to Prague)

Sendivogius was born into a family of means. The official account has it that he was moved by the plight of the hapless Seton and used his influence to gain access to the prisoner.[90]

During their tête-à-tête, Sendivogius supposedly proposed staging a jailbreak in exchange for the Seton’s alchemical secret. This plan was then put into place with the help of strategic bribes and, after plying the guards with food and drink, Seton was freed.

However, Seton refused to divulge his gold-making recipe and soon died from the trauma of abuse sustained during his imprisonment.

Before he expired, Seton entrusted to Sendivogius his stock of the so-called “projection” catalyst, that scarce red powder which is also called the “Philosopher’s Stone.”

It is said that Sendivogius used his magic powder to effect numerous, genuine transmutations.

But, without the all-important formula, he was operating on borrowed time. Desperate to unearth the preparation instructions, he accosted Seton’s widow – on the assumption that she knew something of her husband’s techniques.

Being unsuccessful at that interrogation, Sendivogius absconded with a manuscript in Seton’s hand, bearing the title The New Light of Alchemy. “In its pages, he thought he saw a method for increasing the powder, but he only succeeded in lessening it.”[91]

Doubtless bitter, and perhaps desperate for money, Sendivogius published New Light under his own name, and died among the ranks of pretenders.

At least, such is the tale as “[m]ost biographers have assumed”.[92]

Prague was the “metropolis of alchemy.”[93]

10. George Starkey & Thomas Vaughan

George Starkey has the distinction of being the only American on our list.

Like Paracelsus, Jan van Helmont,[94] and numerous others, he was a physician by training. In fact, Starkey received his medical instruction at Harvard during the 1640s, just a few years after its founding in 1636.

He decamped from Boston to London to find an intellectually stimulating environment more congenial to his esoteric interests.

Starkey associated with the great chemist Robert Boyle,[95] from whom we know of the existence of the so-called “Invisible College.” That institution deserves its own treatment. Suffice it here to say that it was a precursor to the Royal Society.

As a token of good will, and likely to impress his European collaborators, Starkey produced manuscripts bearing the name Eirenæus Philalethes, which is Greek for “Peaceful Lover of Truth.”[96]

“The authorship of the Philalethes manuscripts has never been firmly established, but most scholars are of the opinion that George Starkey wrote the books himself.”

Starkey bankrupted himself and alienated his English colleagues. For a time, he was reduced to performing experiments in the cell of a debtor’s prison.[97]

He managed to secure a release but died shortly after an “outbreak of bubonic plague” in London. In 1665, he and physician George Thomson offered to dissect a corpse to gain insight into the mechanisms behind the affliction. His proposal was scornfully rejected by the medical establishment. When Starkey passed following the attempt, which the pair proceeded with anyway, naysayers told exaggerated stories about how his death had come “within minutes” of the idiotic procedure.

Weirdly, Freemasonry also includes a ritual referred to by the same word – autopsy – which is in common use to designate the very operation Starkey had proposed.[98]

Starkey has a generally poor reputation – even among esoteric writers. Freemasonic scholar Manly Palmer Hall described him as “of unsound character.”[99] Still, he is important for at least two reasons.

Firstly, it was arguably the work of Boyle and Starkey that sparked the alchemical interests of the young Isaac Newton whose Hermetic library eventually grew to one of the largest in the world.[100]

Secondly, he is of interest because of his possible connexion to the shadowy figure of Thomas Vaughan.

According to the usual retelling, Thomas Vaughan[101] was born in Wales in 1621. He studied to become a physician, but “never practiced” that profession – preferring, instead, to devote himself to alchemy.

Vaughan seems to have adopted “the pseudonym Eugenius Philalethes,” under which he published several Hermetic treatises.[102]

Supposedly, Vaughan killed himself (accidentally, one presumes) while engaging in an obviously dangerous chemical experiment.[103]

According to Theosophist H. P. Blavatsky, the aforementioned Count Saint-Germain: “belonged to the Martinist-related Masonic Rite of the Philalethes, ‘whose members made a special study of the Occult Sciences’.”[104]

The Freemasonic connexion crops up repeatedly. For one thing, Masonry has adopted numerous alchemical emblems. For another, some of the earliest English Freemasons had Hermetic interests.  This includes Elias Ashmole who, in 1652 published a compilation of alchemical texts under the title Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum;[105] as well as Sir Robert Moray, who was one of Vaughan’s patrons.

Conclusion:

It makes sense that states would have a mercenary interest in bottomless coffers. Regents like James IV of Scotland and Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II were among the array of monarchs with more than passing interests in funding gold-making. And then there’s the interest of private parties and corporations.

But, would you believe that alchemy also influenced… modern finance?!

Consider, as a first pass, Hungarian-born American financier, George Soros.[106] Provocatively, he titled his 1987 book, The Alchemy of Finance![107]

Soros became world famous in 1992 when he made one billion dollars by using an investment tactic called “short selling” to profit off the Bank of England.[108]

The Bank of England is the British ancestor of the United States’s Federal Reserve, and it “…was formed in 1694 to institutionalize” a money-lending procedure called “fractional-reserve banking.”[109]

Without getting too technical, the “fractional-reserve” system allows money changers to lend out more than they actually have in their vaults. In other words, through the “magic” of fractional reserves, bankers are literally authorized to create money out of thin air.

If this were not a modern form of gold-making alchemy, then why did agents of the Invisible College, including Sir Robert Boyle,[110] agitate for the passage of the Mines Royal Act of 1688?[111]

The answer is: The Mines Royal Act repealed the 1404 Act Against Multipliers in which then-King Henry IV “…had made it a felony to create gold and silver by means of alchemy.”[112]

With the anti-alchemy law off the books and out of the way, private banking interests were free to charter the Bank of England, which they did around five years later.

With this in mind, consider the possible Hermetic interests of economist John Maynard Keynes. You see, Keynes was one of the principal purchasers (through the famed auction house, Sotheby’s) of Sir Isaac Newton’s treatises on alchemy.[113]

Perhaps all this is not so strange. After all, recall that alchemy was said to have descended from Hermes. And among Hermes’ grandiose titles was …the god of commerce.

(Onscreen quote: Thomas Norton: “This art must ever secret be. / The cause whereof is this, as ye may see: / If one evil man had thereof all his will, / All Christian peace he might easily spill, / And with his pride he might pull down / Rightful kings and princes of renown.”[114])

“False alchemists seek only to make gold; true philosophers desire only knowledge.”[115]

Copyright 2023, TheSynchroMystic. All rights reserved.


[1] It is sometimes rendered “land of black earth.” See Douglas Harper, “Alchemy,” Online Etymology Dictionary, Oct. 13, 2021, <https://www.etymonline.com/word/alchemy>.

[2] With only slight variations, the word was subsequently imported into Arabic, Greek, and Latin, from which it has come to us in English. As one source (“Egypt, Chemi, Kham,” Esoteric Philosopher: Study of the Endless Path of Wisdom, <>.) notes: “…‘The Land of Ham’ or chem, Greek (chemi),” is mentioned in “Psalm cv. 23”: “Then Israel entered Egypt; Jacob resided as a foreigner in the land of Ham.” (Psalm 105:23, New Intl. Vers.)

[3] Or a “chemistry of god.” See, e.g., “Gnostic Chemistry or Alchemy,” Gnostic Studies, n.d., <https://gnosticstudies.org/index.php/alchemy/>.

[4] Sometimes, “Tubal-Cain, who lived before the Flood, was considered the father of alchemy since it was said of him that he was ‘the forger of every cutting instrument of brass and iron’ (Gen. 4:22),” J. E. Grennen, “Alchemy,” New Catholic Encyclopedia, Jun. 11, 2018, <https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/other-religious-beliefs-and-general-terms/miscellaneous-religion/alchemy>. “The fire chemist is descended from the mighty smithy, Tubal-cain (sic), the iron worker…”, Hall, op. cit., p. 27.

[5] In fact, the word “hermeneutics” is still current in specialized circles that are engaged in the interpretation of literary works, such as the Holy Bible.

[6] Also sometimes called “Tahuti.”

[7] Antoine Faivre, Western Esotericism, Christine Rhone, transl., New York: SUNY Press, 2010, p. 25.

[8] The “hard sciences” include: astronomy (“father of modern astronomy” was Nicolaus Copernicus, 1473-1543); chemistry (if it’s not Boyle, then the “father” was probably Antoine Lavoisier, 1743-1794); and physics (Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642). If one had to name a single “father” for the entire enterprise of modern science, the honor could also go to Galileo. Though, Francis Bacon, 1561-1626, could be called the “father of modern empiricism.”

[9] Allied disciplines didn’t surface until the 16th c. or later – at least, not in any form resembling what we think of as “modern science.” For example, minerology was comparatively early; the “Father of Mineralogy” was the German humanist Georgius Agricola (born Georg Bauer; 1494-1555). On the other hand, geology proper came about later: the “father” of that area of study usually being credited as the Scottish naturalist James Hutton (1726-1797). Especially up to a certain point in history, it’s almost impossible to draw a sharp line between alchemy and other disciplines. For example, part of the “alchemy” of 13th-c. Spanish thinker Ramon Llull was his project of reimagining Christian apologetics and theology along the lines of a grand synthesis that recognized similarities Christianity had with Islam and Judaism. In this way, he both combined opposing principles along alchemical lines, as well as anticipated the later “Christian Cabala” of people like Pico della Mirandola and Johannes Reuchlin. See Yates, loc. cit.

[10] The fascinating history is complicated and cannot be told without reference to the curious “Invisible College.” But, the proximate founders were notables from a group, operating out of London’s Gresham College, known as the “Oxonian Society.” In the year 1660, some of these met in what is called the “Committee of Twelve,” and formed the Royal College as we know it. They were: William Ball, Robert Boyle, William Brouncker, Alexander Bruce, Jonathan Goddard, Abraham Hill, Sir Robert Moray, Paul Neile, William Petty, Lawrence Rooke, John Wilkins, and Christopher Wren.

[11] Originally known as “The Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge.”

[12] But, see previous footnote on the “hard sciences.” It is conceivable that once chemistry really “got going,” there was a renewed interest in alchemy (in some circles) in virtue of the hope that newly discovered information, or recently developed technology, might equip practitioners to at last realize the fabled, ancient goals.

[13] The “soft sciences” are, for the most part, even later still. They are frequently adumbrated as: anthropology (“father of physical anthropology” was Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, 1752-1840; the “father of cultural anthropology” was Sir Edward Burnett Tylor, 1832-1917; while the “father of American cultural anthropology” was Franz Boas, 1858-1942; the “father of social anthropology” was Bronisław Kasper Malinowski, 1884-1942; but precursors included Sir James George Frazer, 1854-1941, and Sir Edward Evan “E. E.” Evans-Pritchard, 1902-1973), economics (“father of economics” should probably be credited to Scottish philosopher Adam Smith, 1723-1790), psychology (“father of modern experimental psychology” was Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt, 1832-1920); and sociology (“father” was Auguste Comte, 1798-1857; or, sometimes, it is given as David Émile Durkheim, 1858-1917; “father of sociology of religion” could be thought of as Maximilian K. E. “Max” Weber, 1864-1920). Though, some incarnations of these were a bit earlier: economics (some of the earliest modern writers on economic theory were Jesuits – e.g., Luis de Molina, 1535-1600 – from the Spanish School of Salamanca); political science (“father of modern political science” may have been Niccolò Machiavelli, 1469-1527; of course, political philosophy goes back to Aristotle); psychology (“father of modern psychology” was arguably Juan Luis Vives, 1493-1540).

[14] Zosimos of Panopolis, The Book of Pictures, Theodore Abt, ed., transl., Zurich, Switzerland: Living Human Heritage Publ., 2007, p. 33.

[15] Crowley availed himself of a then-recent translation produced by his erstwhile colleague Samuel Liddell “MacGregor” Mathers: The Book of the Sacred Magic of Abra-Melin the Mage, As Delivered by Abraham the Jew Unto His Son Lamech, A.D. 1458, London: J.M. Watkins, 1898.

[16] Reportedly, some of these were conducted in conjunction with George Cecil Jones, Jr., who was a fellow member of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and co-founder, with Crowley, of the magical order designated the “A∴A∴” – which is sometimes said to stand for Argentium Astrum (“Silver Star”), but may have any of a number of alternate interpretations (including Arcanum Arcanorum, or “Secret of Secrets”). See, “A∴A∴,” Wikipedia, Apr. 2, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley>;  “Aleister Crowley,” Wikipedia, Aug. 22, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley>; and “George Cecil Jones,” Wikipedia, Mar. 30, 2021,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Cecil_Jones>.

[17] See Hall, op. cit., p. 36.

[18] As well as with 13th-c. French poet Jean de Meung. See Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma…, reprint ed., Richmond, Va.: 1946, L. H. Jenkins, p. 823.

[19] New York: Scholastic, 1998.

[20] London: Bloomsbury, 1997. (Underlining added.)

[21] “Nicolas Flamel,” Harry Potter Wiki, n.d., <https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Nicolas_Flamel>.

[22] Another early – if not seminal – 3rd-c. (B.C.) figure was Bolos (or Bolus) of Panopolis. The place name is also intriguing. Geopgraphically, Panopolis was an Egyptian city now called Akhmin. The principal deity worshipped at this location was supposed to have been Min, sometimes understood as an alter ego of Horus. In any event, Min is routinely depicted ithyphallically, and (presumably for this reason) was associated with the ever-amorous, rustic Greco-Roman deity Pan. Connexions abound. Fortean anomalist Jim Brandon formulated an entire study – his 1983 volume, The Rebirth of Pan: Hidden Faces of the American Earth Spirit (Firebird Press, Dunlap, Ill.) – around the theme. For my part, I’ve had opportunity to mention Pan in the past (for one example, see “Omicron”). A dedicated presentation may be forthcoming.

[23] According to some legends, she taught the late 5th-c. to early-4th-c. “pre-Socratic” philosopher Democritus, one of the earliest expositors of atomism, the idea that reality is explicable in virtue of the interplay of irreducible, microscopic pieces of matter (“a-toms” – which word literally means “un-cuttable”) and the in-between spaces (the “void”). To confuse matters, there is a secondary character, one Democritus of Alexandria, who enters the picture – though, frequently, he is said to have been a student of another alchemical master named Ostanes.

[24] Janet Cave and Robert A. Doyle, et al., eds., Mysteries of the Unknown: Secrets of the Alchemists, Alexandria, Va.: Time-Life Books, 1990, p. 24.

[25] From St. Augustine onward, Aristotle would only be known indirectly, through his quotation by previous generations of scholars, or through scattered translations, such as Boethius’s version of the Organon.

[26] Streams of ancient Greek tradition were also preserved in the Byzantine Empire. Alchemically speaking, the Neoplatonist Olympiodorus the Younger (or an unknown author that we may call “Pseudo-Olympiodorus”) penned Περί τῆς ἱερᾶς τέχνης τῆς φιλοσοφικῆς λίθου (“On the Divine and Sacred Art of the Philosophical Stone,” in Latin: De arte sacra lapidis philosophorum).

[27] Or “Geber.”

[28] These dovetail in a surprisingly compelling and intuitive way. As rehearsed on the relevant Wikipedia page: “…fire was both hot and dry, earth, cold and dry, water cold and moist, and air, hot and moist.” “Jabir Ibn Hayyan,” Wikipedia, Aug. 24, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabir_ibn_Hayyan>.

[29] The four are: blood (associated with a sanguine temperament), “yellow bile” (resulting in a choleric personality), black bile (melancholic), and phlegm (phlegmatic). This schema was assumed for centuries, but began to be challenged around the 10th century, e.g., by the Arabic physician Al-Rāzī (Rhazes).

[30] On the usual picture, “all things” are inherently “hermaphroditic,” Guiley, op. cit., p. 9. (For more insight, see “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”) This is to say that they are, in some sense, mercurial-sulfurous composites. “Sulfur,” here, is not an anachronistic gesture toward the periodic table of elements (where it has the symbol “S” and an atomic number of 16). Rather, it is an emblem of “soul” (anima), the fiery, masculine energy of thought, symbolized by the sun. “Mercury,” on the other hand, is “spirit” (spiritus), the watery, feminine energy of emotion, represented by the moon. And salt – added later – is an oblique reference to sensations and the “body” (corpus), in which the “fiery water” is incarnated. See, e.g., ibid. and Hauck, loc. cit. “The adept is the child of the sun and the moon,” Hall, op. cit., p. 29. But, on the subject of the periodic table, it’s worth noting that the search for foundational chemical “elements” as the building blocks of matter was arguably given impetus by the hermetic philosophizing of people like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (see his concept of “monads”) and Robert Boyle (via his idea of “corpuscles”).

[31] Summa perfectionis magisterii.

[32] Tabdīd al-ʿilm. See Noah Daedalus Gardiner, Esotericism in a Manuscript Culture: Ahmad al-Buni and His Readers Through the Mamluk Period, dissertation, Univ. of Mich., 2014, pp. 125-127; online at <https://1library.net/article/tabd%C4%ABd-%CA%BFilm-esotericist-reading-communities-b%C5%ABn%C4%AB-tabd%C4%ABd-%CA%BFilm.yn9w3mjq>.

[33] Zandaqa.

[34] Hall, op. cit., p. 22.

[35] Sir George Ripley, Alchemical Works: The compound of Alchemy & al.; online at <https://www.labirintoermetico.com/01Alchimia/Ripley_G_Compound_of_Alchemy_et_al.pdf>.

[36] Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 55.

[37] One thinks, also, of various “twelve-step” programs – such as Alcoholics Anonymous (“AA”) – which fit into a broader tapestry of “Mind Cure,” “Positive Thinking,” and “self-help” literature.

[38] Helpfully summarized in: “Magnum opus (alchemy),” Wikipedia, Apr. 17, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnum_opus_(alchemy)>.

[39] One obscure personality of the period is John Dastin (or John Daustin). He was a 14th-c. alchemist, living in England, who apparently achieved prominence enough to correspond with the Pope (then John XXII). According to his Wikipedia article, Dastin was known to Elias Ashmole, Hermannus Condeesyanus, and Arthur Dee. “John Dastin,” Wikipedia, Aug. 23, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dastin>.

[40] In the midst of his treatment of Bacon, Manly Hall makes a point of criticizing medieval education. Growing frustration with “sterile scholasticism” is a point of commonality amongst Roger Bacon, Paracelsus, Francis Bacon, the Rosicrucians, and other Renaissance figures. The usual summary has it that the apriorism of the Catholic Middle Ages was based on axioms that were uncritically assumed solely in virtue of appeals to authority: whether the Church’s or that of antiquity (e.g., Aristotle was esteemed so highly that he was simply referred to as “The Philosopher”). Nothing was subjected to experiential testing – which became a rallying cry for malcontents and hallmark of later empirical science. Leonardo Da Vinci, another product of the period, referred to himself as “a disciple of experience,” quoted by Bill Gates, “Walter Isaacson’s Terrific New Biography Sheds Light on Every Facet of the Artist’s Life,” GatesNotes (weblog), May 21, 2018, <https://www.gatesnotes.com/books/leonardo-da-vinci>.  Practical disciplines, like medicine, weren’t the only ones affected by the new patterns of thinking. The whole ad fontes (“back to the sources”) movement undergirding humanism, and priming the pump for theological change vis-à-vis the Protestant Reformation, must also be factored in. Moreover, intellectual discontent would engender political discontent, as the 18th century (and later centuries) of revolution would demonstrate. It’s not for nothing that Manly Hall refers to part of the pertinent period (specifically, the years between 1590 and 1630) as the “Universal Reformation,” op. cit., pp. 62-63. See, also, James H. Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publ., 1999. Incidentally, Roger Bacon was called “Doctor Mirabilis,” meaning “Miraculous Doctor,” or one who is “amazing, wondrous, remarkable,” see: “Roger Bacon,” Wikipedia, Aug. 14, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Bacon> and “Mirabilis,” Wikipedia, Aug. 31, 2020, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirabilis>.

[41] A.k.a., “Doctor Universalis,” or “Universal Doctor.”

[42] At the time, Neoplatonism had a respectable veneer among learned Catholics, since one of its key expositors, now referred to as Pseudo-Dionysius (late 5th– to early-6th– c.), was believed to have been the genuine, 1st-c. Dionysius the Areopagite, an Athenian converted by St. Paul as told in the Holy Bible (the Book of the Acts of the Apostles, chapter 17, verse 34).

[43] Albertism differed from competing systems, such as those of St. Thomas Aquinas (“Thomism”), Duns Scotus (“Scotism”), and William of Ockham (“Nominalism”), as well as of the revived Augustinian Neoplatonism of St. Bonaventure and the Franciscans. It arguably faded into oblivion because: (1) Albertism wasn’t as thoroughgoing a philosophical system as, say, Thomism or Augustinianism; (2) unless you count its inspiration of occultists or members of secret societies supposedly founded by Agrippa (see Frances A. Yates, The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age, London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1979), Albertism was never (per se) embraced by any religious order (as Thomism had been by the Dominicans, Augustinianism by the Franciscans, etc.); and (3) Albertism was anti-nominalist (and nominalism became philosophical orthodoxy along with the rise of mechanistic science).

[44] Other “Albertists” included Heymericus de Campo, Johannes Hulshout of Mechelen, Gerardus de Harderwijck, Arnoldus Luyde de Tongeris, and others associated with the “Gymnasium Laurentianum.” See Maarten J. F. M. Hoenen, “Albertism,” Henrik Lagerlund, ed., Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, Jan., 2011, pp. 44-51; online at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302883424_Albertism>. Albert also influenced Dietrich of Freiberg, Berthold of Moosburg, and John of Freiburg, as well as Ulrich of Strasbourg. See: Irene Zavattero, “Ulrich of Strasbourg,” Henrik Lagerlund, ed., Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2020, pp. 1351-1353; online at <https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_509>.

[45] Due primarily to difficulties transliterating Hebrew, the word “Kabbalah” sometimes displays spelling variations. Some of these variations should be treated synonymously, across certain contexts. However, in my lexicon, “Cabala” is reserved the sort of “Christianized,” Neoplatonized variety that flowed from Pico and Reuchlin. On the other hand, “Qabalah” (not employed as such in this text) is the peculiar version that is often blended with Tarot (courtesy of Éliphas Lévi) and was widely adopted by esotericists (such as Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn members) after the Nineteenth-Century “Occult Revival.” Kabbalah is reserved for specifically Jewish varieties; though, even here, we must allow for development. See “10 Arcane Words” for a very basic introduction.

[46] Yates, op. cit., p. 97.

[47] “Among these works [that are now considered ‘Pseudo-Albertine’] are many treatises relating to chemistry. The titles of some of them will serve to show how explicit was Albert in his consideration of various chemical subjects. He has treatises concerning Metals and Minerals; concerning Alchemy; A Treatise on the Secret of Chemistry; A Concordance, that is a Collection of observations from many sources with regard to the Philosopher’s Stone; A brief Compend on the Origin of the Metals; A Treatse on Compounds; most of these are to be found in his works under the general heading ‘Theatrum Chemicum’,” James Joseph Walsh, The Thirteenth: Greatest of Centuries, New York: Catholic Summer School Press, 1907, p. 46; online at <https://books.google.com/books?id=_rofAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA2-PA46> and <https://books.google.com/books?id=kvQRAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA46>. N.B.: The quoted author seems to have thought that the listed works were penned by the historical Albert the Great. It was only later, it seems, that they were relegated to the knockoff.

[48] See, Hall, op. cit., p. 22.

[49] It is now more commonly ascribed to “Pseudo-Aquinas.”

[50] One remembers that a main disciple of Meister Eckhart was Johannes Tauler. Tho, this Tauler likely died in Germany (Strasbourg) over 100 years (1361) before Trismosin’s sojourn to Italy (ca. 1473).

[51] New York: Doubleday.

[52] A.k.a. Bernard Trévisan; see Hall, op. cit., p. 32.

[53] Scholars have begun questioning Montague Summers’ priestly bona fides. As the relevant Wikipedia article states, Summers was apparently never connected to any parish or religious order. One possibility, mentioned (but not developed), would be that Summers was ordained by an irregular, or “Wandering” bishop (or episcopus vagans) named Ulric Vernon Herford – which would be another story and, therefore, cannot be taken up, here.

[54] Montague Summers, Witchcraft and Black Magic, Detroit: Grand River Books, 1971 (orig. London & New York: Rider, 1945/6), p. 151.

[55] Joseph Caezza, “Who Were the Alchemists?” The Alchemy Website, n.d., <http://www.levity.com/alchemy/caezza4.html>.

[56] Ibid.

[57] Lutherus medicorum (“the Luther of physicians”), see Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 63. Other of Paracelsus’s important instructors were Ulrich Poysel and – especially – the Abbot Trithemius, about whom (the latter) I hope to say more in a subsequent video.

[58] According to Allen G. Debus, “Paracelsus and the Medical Revolution of the Renaissance,” Paracelsus, Five Hundred Years: Three American Exhibits, St. Louis, Mo.: Washington Univ. School of Medicine Library, 1994; blurb online at <https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/paracelsus/index.html>. Whereas Copernicus overthrew Ptolemy, Paracelsus displaced Hippocrates, Galen, and Avicenna. Paracelsus’s decision to favor the German language over academic Latin (which was also characteristic of Reformers like Martin Luther) was, at least in part, a declaration of war against received medical opinion.

[59] The name, para-Celsus is meant to signify that von Hohenheim was moving “… ‘beyond Celsus,’ …the celebrated first-century Roman physician…,” Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 63.

[60] See, e.g., Rosemary Guiley, The Encyclopedia of Magic and Alchemy, New York: Facts on File, 2006, p. 8.

[61] “Paracelsus is credited with starting to build the science of chemistry on the footings of alchemy,” simultaneously “…establish[ing the] …basis …of pharmacy,” Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 63. He had received the standard university education for the time but was dissatisfied with state of medical knowledge. So, he took to interviewing “…wives, gypsies, sorcerers, wandering tribes, old robbers, and such outlaws …tak[ing] lessons from them,” Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 63. Again, we see that Paracelsus anticipates the emergence of experimental science by simply going out and asking everyday people with experience one simple question: “What works?” This hearkens back to Roger Bacon who, as Manly Hall reports, “[broke] with the rigid scholastic pattern” not only by conducting his own “experiments” which “contributed much to the profession of medicine,” but also by gleaning “some of his …ideas from lesser-known contemporaries,” op. cit., p. 41. Although alchemical knowledge is a sort of “gnosis,” it is a “…religious gnosis [that] demands direct personal experience rather than pedestrian faith,” Caezza, loc. cit.

[62] Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 64.

[63] Caezza, loc. cit.

[64] Hall, op. cit., p. 33. Perennially, Constantinople has been the setting for various intrigues – both fictional and genuine. Examples of this include Graham Greene’s 1932 novel, Stamboul Train (London: William Heinemann), and Agatha Christie’s 1934 mystery, Murder on the Orient Express (Glasgow, Scotland: William Collins). Or consider Allen Welsh Dulles, who was named director of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1953 by then-President Dwight Eisenhower, and who served in that capacity until being fired in 1961 by John F. Kennedy, after the botched “Bay of Pigs” operation. Before his tenure as CIA chief – before, even, his involvement with William “Wild Bill” Dononvan’s Office of Strategic Services (OSS) – “…Dulles joined the U.S. Foreign Service” in 1916 and “was assigned to Constantinople (later Istanbul) from October 1920 to April 1922.” “Dulles, Allen Welsh,” Encyclopedia.com, May 17, 2018, <https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/allen-welsh-dulles>.

[65] At least, “the universal remedy” is how Paracelsus used the term, “Azoth,” Dictionary.com, 2022, <https://www.dictionary.com/browse/azoth>. For other alchemists, “azoth” designated “quicksilver” or “mercury, …the assumed first principle of all metals,” ibid. About this “Universal Medicine,” Paracelsus remarked that it “consumed all diseases …like an invisible fire,” Guiley, op. cit., p. 245. The aim of the Paracelsian physician, like later practitioners such as Robert Fludd, was to restore a patient’s place in the delicate cosmic balance.

[66] Guiley, op. cit., p. 245.

[67] Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 69.

[68] Manly Hall speculates that his name – Basil Valentine – means (something like) “the strong or mighty king,” op. cit., p. 57. It may have been the nom de plume for “a circle of Hermetic initiates,” ibid., pp. 57-58. This is an intriguing possibility. One thinks, also, of (one version of) the so-called “Baconian hypothesis” for Shakespearean authorship. Somewhat sophisticated Baconians frequently hold that Francis Bacon may have been the “principal” author or editor of a literary society (the “Knights of the Helmet”) in a way analogous to how “a typical Renaissance studio” painter may have had a whole “studio of pupils.” According to Peter Dawkins, interviewed in Christian J. Pinto, Secret Mysteries of America’s Beginnings:  Volume 1, The New Atlantis, DVD, Los Angeles: Antiquities Research Films, 2005. Cf. Peter Dawkins, The Shakespeare Enigma, London: Polair, 2004.

[69] Saint-Germain is sometimes considered a part of H. P. Blavatsky’s “Great White Brotherhood.” Other times, Francis Bacon and Saint-Germain are said to have been one and the same person. To borrow a phrase from Manly Hall (though, he wrote it in a different context): “It is all very difficult…”! Hall, op. cit., p. 94.

[70] Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 98.

[71] Marcus Williamson, trans., “Francis Bacon – The Making of Gold,” The Alchemy Website, n.d., <http://www.levity.com/alchemy/bacongld.html>.

[72] Hall admits: “Substantially, nothing is known of Brother Valentine except such stray and fugitive information as appear on the title page of various editions of his supposed writings or in the introductions affixed thereto by editors and translators equally obscure,” op. cit., p. 59.

[73] John Maxson Stillman, “Basil Valentine, a Seventeenth Century Hoax,” The Popular Science Monthly, Dec., 1912, p. 591; online at <https://books.google.com/books?id=7SQDAAAAMBAJ>.

[74] Hall, op. cit., p. 57.

[75] Dennis William Hauck, “Azoth of the Philosophers,” Alchemy Lab, n.d., <https://www.alchemylab.com/azoth.htm>; excerpted from Dennis William Hauck, The Emerald Tablet: Alchemy for Personal Transformation, New York: Arkana (Penguin), 1999.

[76] “Azoth,” Wikipedia, Jun. 25, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azoth>. This recalls Parcelsus’s claim that the fabled First Matter – or prima materia – out of which all actualized, particular substances were formed, “is the essence of the world soul,” or anima mundi. See Guiley, op. cit., p. 245.

[77] Primum mobile.

[78] Franz Hartmann, In the Pronaos of the Temple of Wisdom, London: Theosophical Publ. Society; Boston: Occult Publ. Co., 1890, p. 38.

[79] There was a tendency in some writers – for example, Michael Maier and the previously mentioned psychoanalyst, Carl Jung – to interpret classical mythology as alchemy allegory. This would also include “Dom Pernety,” Antoine-Joseph Pernèty, an 18th-c. French-born supposed Benedictine monk who, with Polish Count Tadeusz Grabianka, created a Masonic society colloquially termed the “Illuminati of Avignon” (ca. 1760). The Avignon Illuminism entered around the so-called Rite hermétique, which was informed by the (sometimes sexual) mysticism of Emanuel Swedenborg. For all three men, see: Nicholas Goodricke-Clark, The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2008, pp. 121, 146, and 245ff.

[80] Atalanta Fugiens, Oppenheim: Johann Theodor de Bry, 1617. Another, lesser-known figure was the 18th-c., German-born illustrator and physician Sigismund Bacstrom who was a prolific translator of alchemical and Rosicrucian manuscripts. Contemporary alchemical writer Adam McLean relates that Bacstrom claimed to have been initiated into various arcana by one “Comte Louis du Chazal,” on the Island of Mauritius. Chazal supposedly had attained unnaturally long life for the time, having reached ninety-six years. McLean supposes that “Chazal” was none other than the Comte de St. Germain. See: Adam McLean, “Bacstrom’s Rosicrucian Society,” Hermetic Journal, no. 6, 1979; reproduced online at: <https://www.alchemywebsite.com/bacstrm1.html>.

[81] Possible identity was Jules Louis Gabriel Violle. See “Jules Voille,” Wikipedia, Jan. 24, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Violle>.

[82] Le Mystère des Cathédrales, Paris: Jean Schemit, 1926.

[83] This line of thought inspired Jay Weidner and Vincent Bridges’s volume The Mysteries of the Great Cross of Hendaye: Alchemy and the End of Time, Rochester, Vt.: Destiny Books, 2003, as well as Weidner’s subsequent follow-up video, Secrets of Alchemy: The Great Cross and the End of Time, DVD, Seattle: Wash.: Sacred Mysteries Productions, 2004.

[84] Also spelled “Sethon.”

[85] “Seton (Or Sethon) Alexander (D. Ca. 1604),” Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology; online at Encyclopedia.com, <https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/seton-or-sethon-alexander-d-ca-1604>.

[86] Ibid.

[87] History records that Seton’s friend William Hamilton initially went in his place.

[88] Hall, op. cit., p. 82.

[89] Another alchemist of the period, and John Dee’s contemporary, was Thomas Charnock. He is mentioned by Elias Ashmole in the latter’s Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum (“Chemical Theatre of Britain,” Lond: Brooke, 1652).

[90] Accounts that I have read do not seem to countenance that Sendivogius was part of a Mutt-and-Jeff routine where Christian’s sentinels were “bad cops” and Sendivogius played the part of the savior / “good cop” in order to learn Seton knew.

[91] “Seton (or Sethon)…,” loc. cit.

[92] Hall, op. cit., p. 82.

[93] Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 60.

[94] Starkey was an “intellectual heir” to van Helmont, Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 96.

[95] He collaborated with Boyle on several projects – one of which, a medical treatment for some variety of fever, “met with extensive praise,” ibid.

[96] Ibid.

[97] Ibid.

[98] For the story, see Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 97.

[99] Hall, op. cit., p. 94.

[100] Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 98.

[101] Or Vaughn, as in Guiley, op. cit., p. 329.

[102] Ibid.

[103] Ibid.

[104] “Saint-Germain, Comte De,” Theosophy World, Manila: Theosophical Publishing House, n.d., <https://theosophy.world/encyclopedia/saint-germain-comte-de>.

[105] Among the alchemical writers represented are some that we have not had occasion here to mention, such as: D.D.W. Bedman, William Bloomefield, Geoffrey Chaucer, John Dastin, John Gower, John Lydgate, Thomas Norton, and Thomas Robinson.

[106] Born György Schwartz.

[107] Subtitled: Reading the Mind of the Market, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987.

[108] Soros’s nickname is “Soros is known as “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England.”

[109] “History Of Fractional Reserve Banking Which Became Model For The Federal Reserve System, The Unbroken Record Of Fraud, Booms, Busts, Economic Chaos,” Seeking Alpha (weblog), Nov. 16, 2015, <https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/25783813-peter-palms/4549696-history-of-fractional-reserve-banking-which-became-model-for-federal-reserve-system-unbroken>. According to Investopedia: “In 1668, Sweden’s Riksbank introduced the first instance of modern fractional reserve banking,” Julia Kagan, “Fractional Reserve Banking,” Somer Anderson, reviewer, Aug. 10, 2022, <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fractionalreservebanking.asp>.

[110] Boyle was “intellectual heir to Francis Bacon, …the Rosicrucians”, and alchemists like Jan Baptista van Helmont. See Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 95. On the Rosicrucians, see Christopher McIntosh, The Rosicrucians: The History, Mythology, and Rituals of an Esoteric Order, Newburyport, Mass.: Weiser, 1998. Van Helmont made numerous advances – such as articulating a model of digestion and identifying various gases. As Time-Life Books put it: “These contributions now belong to the realm of science, but they were made in the name of alchemy,” Cave and Doyle, eds., op. cit., p. 92.

[111] A.k.a. the Royal Mines Act, it was passed by parliament under the reign of William & Mary. “Mines Royal Act 1688,” Jun. 22, 2022, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mines_Royal_Act_1688>.

[112] Ibid. “The Act Against Multipliers was signed into law by King Henry IV of England on 13th January 1404. It ordered that ‘None from hereafter shall use to multiply gold or silver, or use the craft of multiplication; and if any the same do, they incur the pain of felony’,” John Welford, “The Act Against Multipliers, 1404,” Medium, Apr. 4, 2022, <https://medium.com/@johnwelford15/the-act-against-multipliers-1404-dd01d63ca86f>. This had followed a condemnation of alchemy (in the decree Spondent quas non exhibent; a.k.a. Spondent partier, 1317) by Pope John XXII.

[113] Possibly related is the fact that former Microsoft chieftain, Bill Gates, bid on and won one of the working notebooks (variously called Codex Hammer or Codex Leicester) from Renaissance genius Leonardo Da Vinci. According to Gates: “…it doesn’t contain codes protecting age-old secrets,” Gates, loc. cit. On the other hand, what would you expect him to say if it did?

[114] Qtd. Janet Cave and Robert A. Doyle, et al., eds., op. cit., p. 45. See, also, “10 Arcane Words” and “Top 10 ‘Sex-Magic’ Cults.”

[115] Quoted by Cave and Doyle, op. cit., p. 55.